Jump to content

Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Design: Tighten wording for readability
m Cleaned up using AutoEd
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- This article is a part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft]]. Please see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content]] for recommended layout, & guidelines. -->
<!-- This article is a part of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft]]. Please see [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/page content]] for recommended layout, & guidelines. -->
{|{{Infobox aircraft begin
{|{{Infobox aircraft begin
|name=RQ-170 Sentinel
|name = RQ-170 Sentinel
|image=File:RQ-170_Wiki_contributor_3Dartist.png
|image = File:RQ-170_Wiki_contributor_3Dartist.png
|caption=Artist's rendering
|caption = Artist's rendering
}}
}}
{{Infobox aircraft type
{{Infobox aircraft type
|type= Unmanned aerial vehicle
|type = Unmanned aerial vehicle
|manufacturer= [[Lockheed Martin]]
|manufacturer = [[Lockheed Martin]]
|designer =
|designer =
|first =
|first =
|introduction = 2007
|introduction = 2007
|retired =
|retired =
|status = In service
|status = In service
|primary user = [[United States Air Force]]
|primary user = [[United States Air Force]]
|more users =
|more users =
|produced =
|produced =
|number built = ~20<ref name="7 Secret Ways" />
|number built = ≈20<ref name="7 Secret Ways" />
|program cost=
|program cost=
|unit cost =
|unit cost =
|developed from =
|developed from =
|variants with their own articles =
|variants with their own articles =
}}
}}
|}
|}
Line 26: Line 26:
The '''Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel''' is an [[unmanned aerial vehicle]] (UAV) developed by [[Lockheed Martin]] and operated by the [[United States Air Force]] (USAF) for the [[Central Intelligence Agency]] (CIA). While the USAF has released few details on the UAV's design or capabilities, defense analysts believe that it is a [[stealth aircraft]] fitted with [[aerial reconnaissance]] equipment.
The '''Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel''' is an [[unmanned aerial vehicle]] (UAV) developed by [[Lockheed Martin]] and operated by the [[United States Air Force]] (USAF) for the [[Central Intelligence Agency]] (CIA). While the USAF has released few details on the UAV's design or capabilities, defense analysts believe that it is a [[stealth aircraft]] fitted with [[aerial reconnaissance]] equipment.


RQ-170s have been reported to have operated in [[Afghanistan]] as part of [[Operation Enduring Freedom]]. It has been confirmed that the UAVs have operated over [[Pakistan]] and [[Iran]]; operations over Pakistan included sorties that collected intelligence before and during the operation which led to the [[death of Osama bin Laden]] in May 2011.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/05/the-little-known-agency-that-helped-kill-bin-laden/238454/ |title=The Little-Known Agency That Helped Kill Bin Laden |work=The Atlantic |date= 8 May 2011 |accessdate=8 May 2011}}</ref>
RQ-170s have been reported to have operated in [[Afghanistan]] as part of [[Operation Enduring Freedom]]. It has been confirmed that the UAVs have operated over [[Pakistan]] and [[Iran]]; operations over Pakistan included sorties that collected intelligence before and during the operation which led to the [[death of Osama bin Laden]] in May 2011.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/05/the-little-known-agency-that-helped-kill-bin-laden/238454/ |title=The Little-Known Agency That Helped Kill Bin Laden |work=The Atlantic |date=8 May 2011 |accessdate=8 May 2011}}</ref>


In December 2011, the Iranian armed forces claimed to have [[Iran–U.S. RQ-170 incident|captured an RQ-170 flying over Iran]]. The U.S. military has acknowledged losing an RQ-170 in the region. United States administration asked Iran to return the UAV. Iran denied the request and lodged a complaint to the UN Security Council over airspace violation by US.<ref>[http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/266481/20111213/iran-united-states-drone-apology-return-refuse.htm Iran Denies U.S. Request for Drone Return, Demands Apology]</ref><ref>[http://www.reuters.com/video/2012/01/29/iran-sends-toy-drone-to-obama?videoId=229298368 Iran sends toy drone to Obama]</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=General: Iran won't return U.S. drone it claims to have |url=http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/12/world/meast/iran-us-drone/ |accessdate=28 November 2013 |publisher=CNN |date=11 December 2011}}</ref>
In December 2011, the Iranian armed forces claimed to have [[Iran–U.S. RQ-170 incident|captured an RQ-170 flying over Iran]]. The U.S. military has acknowledged losing an RQ-170 in the region. United States administration asked Iran to return the UAV. Iran denied the request and lodged a complaint to the UN Security Council over airspace violation by US.<ref>Elisha Maldonado, [http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/266481/20111213/iran-united-states-drone-apology-return-refuse.htm "Iran Denies U.S. Request for Drone Return, Demands Apology"], ''International Business Times'', December 13, 2011.</ref><ref>[http://www.reuters.com/video/2012/01/29/iran-sends-toy-drone-to-obama?videoId=229298368 Iran sends toy drone to Obama]</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=General: Iran won't return U.S. drone it claims to have |url=http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/12/world/meast/iran-us-drone/ |accessdate=28 November 2013 |publisher=CNN |date=11 December 2011}}</ref>


==Development==
==Development==
The RQ-170 Sentinel was developed by Lockheed Martin's [[Skunk Works]] as a [[Stealth aircraft|stealth]] Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Journalists have noted design similarities between the RQ-170 and previous stealth and UAV programs such as the [[RQ-3 DarkStar]] and [[Lockheed Martin Polecat|Polecat]].<ref>{{cite news |first=David A. |last=Fulghum |title=RQ-170 Has Links to Intelligence Loss to China |url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a7544751e-3bdc-4e52-9be7-07000988da92&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest |work=Ares |publisher=[[Aviation Week & Space Technology]] |date=8 December 2009 |accessdate=9 December 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Mystery UAV operation in Afghanistan |url=http://www.shephard.co.uk/news/2393/mystery-uav-operating-in-afghanistan/ |publisher=UV Online |date=10 April 2009 |accessdate=9 December 2009}}</ref> It is a tailless [[flying wing]] aircraft with pods, presumably for sensors or [[Communications satellite|SATCOMs]], built into the upper surface of each wing. Few details of the UAV's characteristics have been released, but estimates of its wingspan range from approximately {{convert|65|ft|m}}<ref name="Fulghum_Ares">{{cite web|url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post:649e3cf4-8c07-4739-82cf-322c6c56ccd5&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest|title=U.S. Air Force Reveals Operational Stealth UAV|last=Fulghum|first=David A.|date=4 December 2009|work=Ares|publisher=Aviation Week|accessdate=4 December 2009}}</ref> to {{convert|90|ft|m}}.<ref name="Another_beast_picture">{{cite web|url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post:e87edbbf-7a62-44e6-94d4-e067d137ec2b&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest|title=Another Beast Picture|last=Sweetman|first=Bill|date=11 November 2009|work=Ares|publisher=Aviation Week|accessdate=13 December 2009}}
The RQ-170 Sentinel was developed by Lockheed Martin's [[Skunk Works]] as a [[Stealth aircraft|stealth]] Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Journalists have noted design similarities between the RQ-170 and previous stealth and UAV programs such as the [[RQ-3 DarkStar]] and [[Lockheed Martin Polecat|Polecat]].<ref>{{cite news |first=David A. |last=Fulghum |title=RQ-170 Has Links to Intelligence Loss to China |url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a7544751e-3bdc-4e52-9be7-07000988da92&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest |work=[[Aviation Week & Space Technology]] |date=8 December 2009 |accessdate=9 December 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Mystery UAV operation in Afghanistan |url=http://www.shephard.co.uk/news/2393/mystery-uav-operating-in-afghanistan/ |publisher=UV Online |date=10 April 2009 |accessdate=9 December 2009}}</ref> It is a tailless [[flying wing]] aircraft with pods, presumably for sensors or [[Communications satellite|SATCOMs]], built into the upper surface of each wing. Few details of the UAV's characteristics have been released, but estimates of its wingspan range from approximately {{convert|65|ft|m}}<ref name="Fulghum_Ares">{{cite web|url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post:649e3cf4-8c07-4739-82cf-322c6c56ccd5&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest|title=U.S. Air Force Reveals Operational Stealth UAV|last=Fulghum|first=David A.|date=4 December 2009|work=Aviation Week|accessdate=4 December 2009}}</ref> to {{convert|90|ft|m}}.<ref name="Another_beast_picture">{{cite web|url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post:e87edbbf-7a62-44e6-94d4-e067d137ec2b&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest|title=Another Beast Picture|last=Sweetman|first=Bill|date=11 November 2009|work=Aviation Week|accessdate=13 December 2009}}</ref> In a December 2012 report, journalist [[David Axe]] stated that "20 or so" RQ-170s had been built.<ref name="7 Secret Ways">{{cite news|last=Axe|first=David|title=7 Secret Ways America's Stealth Armada Stays Off the Radar|url=http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/12/steath-secrets/?pid=1688|accessdate=14 December 2012|newspaper=Wired|date=13 December 2012}}</ref>
</ref> In a December 2012 report, journalist [[David Axe]] stated that "20 or so" RQ-170s had been built.<ref name="7 Secret Ways">{{cite news|last=Axe|first=David|title=7 Secret Ways America’s Stealth Armada Stays Off the Radar|url=http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/12/steath-secrets/?pid=1688|accessdate=14 December 2012|newspaper=Danger Room|date=13 December 2012}}</ref>


The "RQ" designation indicates that the RQ-170 Sentinel does not carry weapons.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.defenceaviation.com/2009/12/rq-170-sentinel-beast-of-kandahar-confirmed-by-us-airforce.html |title=RQ-170 Sentinel "Beast of Kandahar" |accessdate=2 December 2010 |date=26 December 2009 |work=Defence Aviation }}</ref> ''[[Aviation Week]]'s'' David A. Fulghum believes that the UAV is probably a "tactical, operations-oriented platform and not a strategic intelligence-gathering design".<ref name="Fulghum_Ares" />
The "RQ" designation indicates that the RQ-170 Sentinel does not carry weapons.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.defenceaviation.com/2009/12/rq-170-sentinel-beast-of-kandahar-confirmed-by-us-airforce.html |title=RQ-170 Sentinel 'Beast of Kandahar' |accessdate=2 December 2010 |date=26 December 2009 |work=Defence Aviation}}</ref> ''[[Aviation Week]]''{{'}}s David A. Fulghum believes that the UAV is probably a "tactical, operations-oriented platform and not a strategic intelligence-gathering design".<ref name="Fulghum_Ares" />


The USAF confirmed the "grainy photos of a gray, flying-wing-typed unmanned airplane near Kandahar Airfield."<ref name="USAFafaFeb2010">{{cite journal| last = Tirpak| first = John A.| title=Washington Watch: Stealth skywriting; Watched by Gorgons; Stopping START? ....| journal=Air Force Magazine| volume = 93| issue = 2| page =6| date = February 2010| publisher=Air Force Association| url = http://www.airforce-magazine.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/2010/February%202010/0210watch.aspx| accessdate =12 December 2011| issn = 0730-6784 }}</ref> Since then, this aircraft has been known as "The Beast of Kandahar" in relation to the discussion of the RQ-170 Sentinel on 4 December 2009.<ref name="Fulghum_Ares" /><ref name="Fulghum_Sweetman_AvWeek">{{cite web|url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?id=news/BEAST120409.xml&headline=USAF%20Confirms%20Stealthy%20UAV%20Operations&channel=defense|title=USAF Confirms Stealthy UAV Operations|last=Fulghum|first=David A.|date=4 December 2009|work=Aviationweek.com|publisher=Aviation Week|accessdate=8 December 2009}}</ref> A USAF colonel subsequently commented that RQ-170 is separate from the [[MQ-X program]], which has yet to determine stealth or [[Aircraft engine|powerplant]] requirements, and thus the Sentinel will not replace the [[MQ-1 Predator]] and [[General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper|MQ-9 Reaper]] drones.<ref>{{cite news |first=Stephen |last=Trimble |title=RQ-170 not intended to replace Predators and Reapers |work=The DEW Line |work= International |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2009/12/rq-170-not-intended-to-replace.html |date=10 December 2009 |accessdate=11 December 2009}}</ref> {{As of|2011|5}}, the U.S. military had not released any statements concerning the Sentinel since December 2009.<ref name="Attack on Bin Laden NYT 5 May 11">{{cite news|last=Drew|first=Christopher|title=Attack on Bin Laden Used Stealthy Helicopter That Had Been a Secret|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/06/world/asia/06helicopter.html?_r=1&hp|accessdate=6 May 2011|newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |date=5 May 2011}}</ref>
The USAF confirmed the "grainy photos of a gray, flying-wing-typed unmanned airplane near Kandahar Airfield."<ref name="USAFafaFeb2010">{{cite journal|last=Tirpak|first=John A.|title=Washington Watch: Stealth skywriting; Watched by Gorgons; Stopping START? ....|journal=Air Force Magazine|volume=93|issue=2|page=6|date=February 2010|publisher=Air Force Association|url=http://www.airforce-magazine.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/2010/February%202010/0210watch.aspx|accessdate=12 December 2011|issn=0730-6784}}</ref> Since then, this aircraft has been known as "The Beast of Kandahar" in relation to the discussion of the RQ-170 Sentinel on 4 December 2009.<ref name="Fulghum_Ares" /><ref name="Fulghum_Sweetman_AvWeek">{{cite web|url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?id=news/BEAST120409.xml&headline=USAF%20Confirms%20Stealthy%20UAV%20Operations&channel=defense|title=USAF Confirms Stealthy UAV Operations|last=Fulghum|first=David A.|date=4 December 2009|work=Aviation Week|accessdate=8 December 2009}}</ref> A USAF colonel subsequently commented that RQ-170 is separate from the [[MQ-X program]], which has yet to determine stealth or [[Aircraft engine|powerplant]] requirements, and thus the Sentinel will not replace the [[MQ-1 Predator]] and [[General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper|MQ-9 Reaper]] drones.<ref>{{cite news |first=Stephen |last=Trimble |title=RQ-170 not intended to replace Predators and Reapers |work=The DEW Line |work=FlightGlobal |url=http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2009/12/rq-170-not-intended-to-replace.html |date=10 December 2009 |accessdate=11 December 2009}}</ref> {{As of|2011|5}}, the U.S. military had not released any statements concerning the Sentinel since December 2009.<ref name="Attack on Bin Laden NYT 5 May 11">{{cite news|last=Drew|first=Christopher|title=Attack on Bin Laden Used Stealthy Helicopter That Had Been a Secret|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/06/world/asia/06helicopter.html?_r=1&hp|accessdate=6 May 2011|newspaper=[[The New York Times]] |date=5 May 2011}}</ref>


==Design==
==Design==
The RQ-170 is a [[flying wing]] design containing a single (as yet classified) engine and is estimated by ''Aviation Week'' as having a wingspan of approximately {{convert|66|ft|m|}}.<ref name="AW">{{cite journal|last=Fulghum|first=David A.|author2=Bill Sweetman |date=14 December 2009|title=Stealth over Afghanistan|journal=Aviation Week|publisher=McGraw-Hill|pages=26–27}}</ref> Its takeoff weight is estimated as being greater than the RQ-3 DarkStar's, which was {{convert|8,500|lb|kg|sigfig=2}}. The design lacks several elements common to stealth engineering such as zig-zag edged landing gear doors and sharp leading edges, and the exhaust is not shielded by the wing.<ref name="AW" /> ''Aviation Week'' postulates that these elements suggest the designers have avoided 'highly sensitive technologies' due to the near certainty of eventual operational loss inherent with a single engine design and a desire to avoid the risk of compromising leading edge technology.<ref name="AW" /> The publication also suggests that the medium-grey color implies a mid-altitude ceiling, unlikely to exceed {{convert|50,000|ft|m|}} since a higher ceiling would normally be painted darker for best concealment.<ref name="AW" /> The postulated weight and ceiling parameters suggests the possible use of a [[General Electric TF34]] engine, or a variant, in the airframe.<ref name="AW" />
The RQ-170 is a [[flying wing]] design containing a single (as yet classified) engine and is estimated by ''Aviation Week'' as having a wingspan of approximately {{convert|66|ft|m|}}.<ref name="AW">{{cite journal|last=Fulghum|first=David A.|author2=Bill Sweetman |date=14 December 2009|title=Stealth over Afghanistan|journal=Aviation Week|publisher=McGraw-Hill|pages=26–27}}</ref> Its takeoff weight is estimated as being greater than the RQ-3 DarkStar's, which was {{convert|8,500|lb|kg|sigfig=2}}. The design lacks several elements common to stealth engineering such as zig-zag edged landing gear doors and sharp leading edges, and the exhaust is not shielded by the wing.<ref name="AW" /> ''Aviation Week'' postulates that these elements suggest the designers have avoided 'highly sensitive technologies' due to the near certainty of eventual operational loss inherent with a single engine design and a desire to avoid the risk of compromising leading edge technology.<ref name="AW" /> The publication also suggests that the medium-grey color implies a mid-altitude ceiling, unlikely to exceed {{convert|50,000|ft|m|}} since a higher ceiling would normally be painted darker for best concealment.<ref name="AW" /> The postulated weight and ceiling parameters suggests the possible use of a [[General Electric TF34]] engine, or a variant, in the airframe.<ref name="AW" />


On the basis of the few publicly available photographs of the RQ-170, aviation expert [[Bill Sweetman]] has assessed that the UAV is equipped with an electro-optical/infrared sensor and possibly an [[active electronically scanned array]] (AESA) radar mounted in its belly fairing. He has also speculated that the two undercarriage fairings over the UAV's wings may house datalinks and that the belly fairing could be designed for modular payloads, allowing the UAV to be used for strike missions and/or [[electronic warfare]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Sweetman|first=Bill|title=The Beast is Back|url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post:5b32f70f-3054-4261-947e-dc8fe095d08b&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest|work=Ares|accessdate=26 January 2011|publisher=Aviation Week|date=25 January 2011}}</ref> The ''[[New York Times]]'' has reported that the RQ-170 is "almost certainly" equipped with [[Signals intelligence#COMINT|communications intercept]] equipment as well as highly sensitive sensors capable of detecting very small amounts of radioactive isotopes and chemicals which may indicate the existence of nuclear weapons facilities.<ref name="NYT Drone Crash in Iran">{{cite news|last=Shane|first=Scott|author2=Sanger, David E. |title=Drone Crash in Iran Reveals Secret U.S. Surveillance Effort|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/08/world/middleeast/drone-crash-in-iran-reveals-secret-us-surveillance-bid.html|accessdate=9 December 2011|newspaper=The New York Times|date=7 December 2011}}</ref>
On the basis of the few publicly available photographs of the RQ-170, aviation expert [[Bill Sweetman]] has assessed that the UAV is equipped with an electro-optical/infrared sensor and possibly an [[active electronically scanned array]] (AESA) radar mounted in its belly fairing. He has also speculated that the two undercarriage fairings over the UAV's wings may house datalinks and that the belly fairing could be designed for modular payloads, allowing the UAV to be used for strike missions and/or [[electronic warfare]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Sweetman|first=Bill|title=The Beast is Back|url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post:5b32f70f-3054-4261-947e-dc8fe095d08b&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest|accessdate=26 January 2011|work=Aviation Week|date=25 January 2011}}</ref> The ''[[New York Times]]'' has reported that the RQ-170 is "almost certainly" equipped with [[Signals intelligence#COMINT|communications intercept]] equipment as well as highly sensitive sensors capable of detecting very small amounts of radioactive isotopes and chemicals which may indicate the existence of nuclear weapons facilities.<ref name="NYT Drone Crash in Iran">{{cite news|last=Shane|first=Scott|author2=Sanger, David E. |title=Drone Crash in Iran Reveals Secret U.S. Surveillance Effort|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/08/world/middleeast/drone-crash-in-iran-reveals-secret-us-surveillance-bid.html|accessdate=9 December 2011|newspaper=The New York Times|date=7 December 2011}}</ref>


Following Iranian claims of downing an RQ-170 near the Afghan border in December 2011, Iranian TV showed video footage of what appears to be an advanced unmanned U.S. aircraft that most closely resembles the RQ-170 UAV. In the footage, a member of the [[Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution|Iranian revolutionary guard]] released dimensions of the aircraft, including a wingspan of about {{convert|26|m|ft}}, a height of {{convert|1.84|m|ft}}, and a length of {{convert|4.5|m|ft}}.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-16098562 |work=BBC News | title=Iran shows film of captured US drone | date=8 December 2011}}</ref>
Following Iranian claims of downing an RQ-170 near the Afghan border in December 2011, Iranian TV showed video footage of what appears to be an advanced unmanned U.S. aircraft that most closely resembles the RQ-170 UAV. In the footage, a member of the [[Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution|Iranian revolutionary guard]] released dimensions of the aircraft, including a wingspan of about {{convert|26|m|ft}}, a height of {{convert|1.84|m|ft}}, and a length of {{convert|4.5|m|ft}}.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-16098562 |publisher=BBC News |title=Iran shows film of captured US drone |date=8 December 2011}}</ref>


==Operational history==
==Operational history==
The [[30th Reconnaissance Squadron]] operates RQ-170 Sentinels. This squadron, which is based at [[Tonopah Test Range Airport]] in Nevada, was activated on 1 September 2005. RQ-170 Sentinels have been deployed to Afghanistan, where one was sighted at [[Kandahar International Airport]] in late 2007.<ref name="Fulghum_Ares" /> This sighting, and the Sentinel's secret status at the time, led Bill Sweetman to dub it the "Beast of Kandahar".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/12/mysteries-surround-afghanistans-stealth-drone/|title=Mysteries Surround Afghanistan's Stealth Drone|last=Hambling|first=David|date=8 December 2009|work=Danger Room|work=Wired |accessdate=8 December 2009}}</ref> The UAV being deployed to Afghanistan, despite the [[Taliban]] having no radar, led to speculation that the aircraft was used to spy on Pakistan or Iran: "Phil Finnegan, a UAV analyst at the Teal Group, an aerospace consulting firm, suggests the stealth capabilities are being used to fly in nearby countries. Neighboring Iran has an air force and air defense system that would require stealth technology to penetrate."<ref>{{cite news |title=US Air Force confirms 'Beast of Kandahar' drone |url=http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/World/Story/A1Story20091209-184783.html |agency=Agence France-Presse |publisher=Asiaone |date=9 December 2009 |accessdate=9 December 2009}}</ref><ref>Hoffman, Michael, "[http://militarytimes.com/news/2009/12/airforce_beast_122009/ Unveiling the ‘Beast of Kandahar’]", ''[[Military Times]]'', 23 December 2009.</ref>
The [[30th Reconnaissance Squadron]] operates RQ-170 Sentinels. This squadron, which is based at [[Tonopah Test Range Airport]] in Nevada, was activated on 1 September 2005. RQ-170 Sentinels have been deployed to Afghanistan, where one was sighted at [[Kandahar International Airport]] in late 2007.<ref name="Fulghum_Ares" /> This sighting, and the Sentinel's secret status at the time, led Bill Sweetman to dub it the "Beast of Kandahar".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/12/mysteries-surround-afghanistans-stealth-drone/|title=Mysteries Surround Afghanistan's Stealth Drone|last=Hambling|first=David|date=8 December 2009|work=Wired |accessdate=8 December 2009}}</ref> The UAV being deployed to Afghanistan, despite the [[Taliban]] having no radar, led to speculation that the aircraft was used to spy on Pakistan or Iran: "Phil Finnegan, a UAV analyst at the Teal Group, an aerospace consulting firm, suggests the stealth capabilities are being used to fly in nearby countries. Neighboring Iran has an air force and air defense system that would require stealth technology to penetrate."<ref>{{cite news |title=US Air Force confirms 'Beast of Kandahar' drone |url=http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/World/Story/A1Story20091209-184783.html |agency=Agence France-Presse |publisher=Asiaone |date=9 December 2009 |accessdate=9 December 2009}}</ref><ref>Hoffman, Michael, "[http://militarytimes.com/news/2009/12/airforce_beast_122009/ Unveiling the 'Beast of Kandahar']", ''[[Military Times]]'', 23 December 2009.</ref>


In December 2009, [[South Korea]]'s ''[[JoongAng Daily]]'' newspaper reported that the RQ-170 Sentinel had been test-flown in South Korea for the past few months and that it was expected that they would be permanently deployed in 2010 to replace [[Lockheed U-2]] reconnaissance aircraft operating from [[Osan Air Base]].<ref>{{cite news |title=U.S. to base new unmanned spy plane in Korea |url=http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2914210 |publisher=JoongAng Daily|date=19 December 2009}}</ref> In response to this report, Bill Sweetman argued that the Sentinel's deployments to Afghanistan and South Korea were probably undertaken to monitor Pakistan and North Korea's ballistic missile programs.<ref name="Sweetman_Korea">{{cite web|url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post:088e4448-9e53-492f-8a14-7671361e1743&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest|title=Beast Sighted In Korea|last=Sweetman|first=Bill|date=16 February 2010|work=Ares|publisher=Aviation Week|accessdate=18 February 2010}}</ref>
In December 2009, [[South Korea]]'s ''[[JoongAng Daily]]'' newspaper reported that the RQ-170 Sentinel had been test-flown in South Korea for the past few months and that it was expected that they would be permanently deployed in 2010 to replace [[Lockheed U-2]] reconnaissance aircraft operating from [[Osan Air Base]].<ref>{{cite news |title=U.S. to base new unmanned spy plane in Korea |url=http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2914210 |publisher=JoongAng Daily|date=19 December 2009}}</ref> In response to this report, Bill Sweetman argued that the Sentinel's deployments to Afghanistan and South Korea were probably undertaken to monitor Pakistan and North Korea's ballistic missile programs.<ref name="Sweetman_Korea">{{cite web|url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post:088e4448-9e53-492f-8a14-7671361e1743&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest|title=Beast Sighted In Korea|last=Sweetman|first=Bill|date=16 February 2010|work=Aviation Week|accessdate=18 February 2010}}</ref>


In August 2010, Aviation Week reported that RQ-170s either had been or were about to be redeployed to Afghanistan and that the UAVs had been fitted with a full motion video capability.<ref name="Back_in_action">{{cite web|last=Fulghum|first=David A.|title=Beast of Kandahar Is Back in Action|url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post:162bbb57-2de3-4ec1-9044-a462348f534a&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest|work=Ares |publisher=Aviation Week |date=8 December 2009 |accessdate=11 August 2010}}</ref> The missions performed by these aircraft included flying dozens of high-altitude sorties over Pakistan to monitor a compound in the town of [[Abbottabad, Pakistan|Abbottabad]] where [[Osama bin Laden]] was believed to be living. On the night of 1/2 May 2011, at least one RQ-170 monitored the area while elements of the [[United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group]] [[Death of Osama bin Laden|launched an assault]] on the compound which resulted in bin Laden's death. The aircraft provided footage of the attack which was watched live by President [[Barack Obama]] and his senior national security advisors. The RQ-170 also monitored Pakistani military radio transmissions in the area to provide warning of the response to the attack.<ref name="CIA flew stealth drones">{{cite news|last=Miller|first=Greg|title=CIA flew stealth drones into Pakistan to monitor bin Laden house|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/cia-flew-stealth-drones-into-pakistan-to-monitor-bin-laden-house/2011/05/13/AF5dW55G_story.html|accessdate=19 May 2011|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=18 May 2011}}</ref> On 27 May the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' reported that Pakistani officials were "alarmed" by the use of the RQ-170 over their country as the drones are "designed to evade radar and other surveillance systems, and can be used as a spy plane".<ref>{{cite news|last=Paul Richter, David S. Cloud and Alex Rodriguez|title=Angry Pakistan rejects U.S. appeal, plans to review drone campaign|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-pakistan-clinton-20110528,0,6909030.story|accessdate=28 May 2011|newspaper=Los Angeles Times|date=27 May 2011}}</ref>
In August 2010, Aviation Week reported that RQ-170s either had been or were about to be redeployed to Afghanistan and that the UAVs had been fitted with a full motion video capability.<ref name="Back_in_action">{{cite web|last=Fulghum|first=David A.|title=Beast of Kandahar Is Back in Action|url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&newspaperUserId=27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckPostId=Blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post:162bbb57-2de3-4ec1-9044-a462348f534a&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest|work=Aviation Week |date=8 December 2009 |accessdate=11 August 2010}}</ref> The missions performed by these aircraft included flying dozens of high-altitude sorties over Pakistan to monitor a compound in the town of [[Abbottabad, Pakistan|Abbottabad]] where [[Osama bin Laden]] was believed to be living. On the night of 1/2 May 2011, at least one RQ-170 monitored the area while elements of the [[United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group]] [[Death of Osama bin Laden|launched an assault]] on the compound which resulted in bin Laden's death. The aircraft provided footage of the attack which was watched live by President [[Barack Obama]] and his senior national security advisors. The RQ-170 also monitored Pakistani military radio transmissions in the area to provide warning of the response to the attack.<ref name="CIA flew stealth drones">{{cite news|last=Miller|first=Greg|title=CIA flew stealth drones into Pakistan to monitor bin Laden house|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/cia-flew-stealth-drones-into-pakistan-to-monitor-bin-laden-house/2011/05/13/AF5dW55G_story.html|accessdate=19 May 2011|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=18 May 2011}}</ref> On 27 May the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'' reported that Pakistani officials were "alarmed" by the use of the RQ-170 over their country as the drones are "designed to evade radar and other surveillance systems, and can be used as a spy plane".<ref>{{cite news|last=Paul Richter, David S. Cloud and Alex Rodriguez|title=Angry Pakistan rejects U.S. appeal, plans to review drone campaign|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-pakistan-clinton-20110528,0,6909030.story|accessdate=28 May 2011|newspaper=Los Angeles Times|date=27 May 2011}}</ref>


In October 2012 a RQ-170 was used to conduct [[bomb damage assessment]] for a test drop of a [[Massive Ordnance Penetrator]] bomb from a [[Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit]] stealth bomber.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Trevithick|first1=Joseph|title=U.S. Stealth Drone Helped Test Huge Bomb|url=https://medium.com/war-is-boring/u-s-stealth-drone-helped-test-huge-bomb-a2bfd0cd6a89|website=War is Boring|accessdate=8 November 2014|date=7 November 2014}}</ref>
In October 2012 a RQ-170 was used to conduct [[bomb damage assessment]] for a test drop of a [[Massive Ordnance Penetrator]] bomb from a [[Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit]] stealth bomber.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Trevithick|first1=Joseph|title=U.S. Stealth Drone Helped Test Huge Bomb|url=https://medium.com/war-is-boring/u-s-stealth-drone-helped-test-huge-bomb-a2bfd0cd6a89|website=War is Boring|accessdate=8 November 2014|date=7 November 2014}}</ref>
Line 56: Line 55:
===Iranian capture and reverse engineering claims===
===Iranian capture and reverse engineering claims===
{{main|Iran–U.S. RQ-170 incident}}
{{main|Iran–U.S. RQ-170 incident}}
Four months prior to December 2011, there were reports that RQ-170s had been flying missions over [[Iran]] during 2011.<ref name="NYT Drone Crash in Iran" /><ref name="Explosion Seen as Big Setback">{{cite news|last=Sanger|first=David E.|author2=Broad, William J. |title=Explosion Seen as Big Setback to Iran’s Missile Program|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/05/world/middleeast/blast-leveling-base-seen-as-big-setback-to-iran-missiles.html?scp=1&sq=RQ-170&st=cse|accessdate=5 December 2011|newspaper=The New York Times|date=4 December 2011}}</ref> On 4 December, media reports stated that the Iranian Army's electronic warfare unit<ref>{{cite news |title=Iran airs footage of downed US drone |url=http://www.presstv.ir/detail/214542.html |agency=[[Press TV]] |date=8 December 2011 |accessdate=11 December 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title='Iran military landed US spy drone' |url=http://www.presstv.ir/detail/214683.html |agency=[[Press TV]] |date=9 December 2011 |accessdate=11 December 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=US maintains silence on downed drone |url=http://www.presstv.ir/detail/214765.html |agency=[[Press TV]] |date=10 December 2011 |accessdate=11 December 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Iran military downs US spy drone |url=http://www.presstv.ir/detail/213765.html |agency=[[Press TV]] |date=4 December 2011 |accessdate=11 December 2011}}</ref> had downed an RQ-170 that violated Iranian airspace along its eastern border through overriding its controls, and had captured the lightly damaged UAV.<ref name="BBC_film">{{cite news |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-16098562 |date=8 December 2011 |publisher=BBC News |title=Iran shows film of captured US drone}}</ref> The [[United States Department of Defense]] released a statement acknowledging that it had lost control of a UAV during the previous week, claiming that it was "flying a mission over western Afghanistan" when control was lost. The statement did not specify the model of the aircraft. The U.S. government also stated that it was still investigating the cause of the loss.<ref name="WashPost_downing">{{cite news|last=Jaffe|first=Greg|author2=Erdbrink, Thomas |title=Iran says it downed U.S. stealth drone; Pentagon acknowledges aircraft downing|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/iran-says-it-downed-us-stealth-drone-pentagon-acknowledges-aircraft-downing/2011/12/04/gIQAyxa8TO_story.html?wprss=rss_national-security|accessdate=5 December 2011|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=5 December 2011}}</ref> On 6 December, U.S. officials acknowledged that a drone crashed in or near Iranian airspace and that it belonged to the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]] and not to [[International Security Assistance Force|ISAF]] as was earlier stated.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/checkpoint-washington/post/after-drone-was-lost-cia-tried-a-head-fake/2011/12/06/gIQAJNrnZO_blog.html|title=After drone was lost, CIA tried a head fake|date=6 December 2011|accessdate=8 December 2011|work=The Washington Post|first=Greg|last=Miller}}</ref>


The Iranian government released footage of a captured RQ-170 on 8 December.<ref>{{cite web|title=Iran Captures a U.S. Stealth Drone Intact|url=http://media.farsnews.com/media/Uploaded/Files/Video/1390/09/17/13900917192923.flv|accessdate=8 December 2011|date=8 December 2011}}</ref> The captured drone appeared to be largely intact, except for minor damage on its left wing. Dan Goure, an analyst at the Lexington Institute, stated the largely intact airframe ruled out the possibility of an engine or navigational malfunction: "Either this was a cyber/electronic warfare attack system that brought the system down or it was a glitch in the command-and-control system".<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2011/12/defense-iran-captured-rq-170-how-bad-120911/ |title=Iran's captured RQ-170: How bad is the damage? |author=Dave Majumdar |date=9 December 2011 |newspaper=Air Force Times}}</ref> On 8 December, a senior U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told the ''Washington Post'' that the U.S. cannot be certain the drone shown was real because the U.S. does not have access to it, but also stated that "We have no indication that it was brought down by hostile fire."<ref name="WashPost_downing" /> A second senior U.S. military official said that a major question is how the drone could have remained "virtually intact," given the high altitude from which it is thought to have crashed. After examining the video on 8 Dec, US officials confirmed that the drone was genuine,<ref name="CNN_doubts">{{cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/08/world/meast/iran-drone/index.html |title=U.S. officials, analysts differ on whether drone in Iran TV video is real |date=8 December 2011 |publisher=CNN}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=U.S. official: Iran does have our drone |first=Bob |last=Orr |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57339834/u.s-official-iran-does-have-our-drone/ |publisherer=[[CBS News]] |date=8 December 2011 |accessdate=11 December 2011}}</ref> even though some civilians had initially expressed doubt.<ref name="CNN_doubts"/> [[Bill Sweetman]], an author with an interest in military planes, speculated that the Iranians did not shoot down the plane (citing the lack of burn marks, holes, or outward damage) or hack into the system, postulating that a system failure downed the plane, and that the plane could be intact from what is known as a "flat spin" or "falling leaf departure".<ref name="CNN_doubts" />
Four months prior to December 2011, there were reports that RQ-170s had been flying missions over [[Iran]] during 2011.<ref name="NYT Drone Crash in Iran" /><ref name="Explosion Seen as Big Setback">{{cite news|last=Sanger|first=David E.|author2=Broad, William J. |title=Explosion Seen as Big Setback to Iran’s Missile Program|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/05/world/middleeast/blast-leveling-base-seen-as-big-setback-to-iran-missiles.html?scp=1&sq=RQ-170&st=cse|accessdate=5 December 2011|newspaper=The New York Times|date=4 December 2011}}</ref> On 4 December, media reports stated that the Iranian Army's electronic warfare unit<ref>{{cite news |title=Iran airs footage of downed US drone |url=http://www.presstv.ir/detail/214542.html |work=[[Press TV]] |date=8 December 2011 |accessdate=11 December 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title='Iran military landed US spy drone' |url=http://www.presstv.ir/detail/214683.html |work=[[Press TV]] |date=9 December 2011 |accessdate=11 December 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=US maintains silence on downed drone |url=http://www.presstv.ir/detail/214765.html |work=[[Press TV]] |date=10 December 2011 |accessdate=11 December 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Iran military downs US spy drone |url=http://www.presstv.ir/detail/213765.html |work=[[Press TV]] |date=4 December 2011 |accessdate=11 December 2011}}</ref> had downed an RQ-170 that violated Iranian airspace along its eastern border through overriding its controls, and had captured the lightly damaged UAV.<ref name="BBC_film">{{cite news |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-16098562 |date=8 December 2011 |work=BBC News |title=Iran shows film of captured US drone}}</ref> The [[United States Department of Defense]] released a statement acknowledging that it had lost control of a UAV during the previous week, claiming that it was "flying a mission over western Afghanistan" when control was lost. The statement did not specify the model of the aircraft. The U.S. government also stated that it was still investigating the cause of the loss.<ref name="WashPost_downing">{{cite news|last=Jaffe|first=Greg|author2=Erdbrink, Thomas |title=Iran says it downed U.S. stealth drone; Pentagon acknowledges aircraft downing|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/iran-says-it-downed-us-stealth-drone-pentagon-acknowledges-aircraft-downing/2011/12/04/gIQAyxa8TO_story.html?wprss=rss_national-security|accessdate=5 December 2011|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=5 December 2011}}</ref> On 6 December, U.S. officials acknowledged that a drone crashed in or near Iranian airspace and that it belonged to the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]] and not to [[International Security Assistance Force|ISAF]] as was earlier stated.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/checkpoint-washington/post/after-drone-was-lost-cia-tried-a-head-fake/2011/12/06/gIQAJNrnZO_blog.html|title=After drone was lost, CIA tried a head fake|date=6 December 2011|accessdate=8 December 2011|work=The Washington Post|first=Greg|last=Miller}}</ref>

The Iranian government released footage of a captured RQ-170 on 8 December.<ref>{{cite web|title=Iran Captures a U.S. Stealth Drone Intact|url=http://media.farsnews.com/media/Uploaded/Files/Video/1390/09/17/13900917192923.flv|accessdate=8 December 2011|date=8 December 2011}}</ref> The captured drone appeared to be largely intact, except for minor damage on its left wing. Dan Goure, an analyst at the Lexington Institute, stated the largely intact airframe ruled out the possibility of an engine or navigational malfunction: "Either this was a cyber/electronic warfare attack system that brought the system down or it was a glitch in the command-and-control system".<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2011/12/defense-iran-captured-rq-170-how-bad-120911/ |title=Iran’s captured RQ-170: How bad is the damage? |author=Dave Majumdar |date=9 December 2011 |newspaper=Air Force Times}}</ref> On 8 December, a senior U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told the ''Washington Post'' that the U.S. cannot be certain the drone shown was real because the U.S. does not have access to it, but also stated that "We have no indication that it was brought down by hostile fire."<ref name="WashPost_downing"/> A second senior U.S. military official said that a major question is how the drone could have remained "virtually intact," given the high altitude from which it is thought to have crashed. After examining the video on 8 Dec, US officials confirmed that the drone was genuine,<ref name="CNN_doubts">{{Cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/08/world/meast/iran-drone/index.html |title=U.S. officials, analysts differ on whether drone in Iran TV video is real |date=8 December 2011 |work=CNN}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=U.S. official: Iran does have our drone |first=Bob |last=Orr |url=http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57339834/u.s-official-iran-does-have-our-drone/ |newspaper=[[CBS News]] |date=8 December 2011 |accessdate=11 December 2011}}</ref> even though some civilians had initially expressed doubt.<ref name="CNN_doubts"/> [[Bill Sweetman]], an author with an interest in military planes, speculated that the Iranians did not shoot down the plane (citing the lack of burn marks, holes, or outward damage) or hack into the system, postulating that a system failure downed the plane, and that the plane could be intact from what is known as a "flat spin" or "falling leaf departure".<ref name="CNN_doubts"/>


In April 2012, General [[Amir Ali Hajizadeh]], the commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards aerospace division, claimed that Iran had reversed-engineered the RQ-170, and was building a copy of the UAV. He also stated that data was being recovered from the captured RQ-170.<ref>{{cite news |agency=Associated Press |title=Iran Says It Is Building Copy of Captured US Drone |url=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2012/04/22/world/middleeast/ap-iran-us-drone.html?_r=1&hp |newspaper=The New York Times |date=22 April 2012 |accessdate=22 April 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/23/world/middleeast/iranians-say-they-took-secret-data-from-drone.html |title=Iranians Say They Took Secret Data From Drone |work=The New York Times |date=22 April 2012}}</ref><ref>[http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13920631000264 ]. FarsNews, 22 September 2013.</ref> On 6 February 2013, Iranian State Television released footage purported to have been downloaded from the RQ-170.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://rt.com/news/iran-us-drone-decoded-609 |title=Iran releases video 'proof' US drone decoded |work=RT |date=7 February 2013}}</ref> U.S. Officials say that there is no evidence that these claims are true.{{citation needed|date=September 2013}} In September 2013, Iran claimed that it had completed a copy of the drone and that all of its surveillance data and software had been decoded.<ref>[http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13920631000264 ]. FarsNews, 22 September 2013</ref>
In April 2012, General [[Amir Ali Hajizadeh]], the commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards aerospace division, claimed that Iran had reversed-engineered the RQ-170, and was building a copy of the UAV. He also stated that data was being recovered from the captured RQ-170.<ref>{{cite news |agency=Associated Press |title=Iran Says It Is Building Copy of Captured US Drone |url=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2012/04/22/world/middleeast/ap-iran-us-drone.html?_r=1&hp |newspaper=The New York Times |date=22 April 2012 |accessdate=22 April 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/23/world/middleeast/iranians-say-they-took-secret-data-from-drone.html |title=Iranians Say They Took Secret Data From Drone |work=The New York Times |date=22 April 2012}}</ref><ref>[http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13920631000264 ]. FarsNews, 22 September 2013.</ref> On 6 February 2013, Iranian State Television released footage purported to have been downloaded from the RQ-170.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://rt.com/news/iran-us-drone-decoded-609 |title=Iran releases video 'proof' US drone decoded |work=RT |date=7 February 2013}}</ref> U.S. Officials say that there is no evidence that these claims are true.{{citation needed|date=September 2013}} In September 2013, Iran claimed that it had completed a copy of the drone and that all of its surveillance data and software had been decoded.<ref>[http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13920631000264 ]. FarsNews, 22 September 2013</ref>


On 12 May 2014, the Iranian government showed on national television an aircraft that it claimed was reverse-engineered from the captured RQ-170.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.yahoo.com/iran-says-copied-us-drone-181934723.html|title=Iran says it has copied US drone|date=12 May 2014|work=Yahoo! News|accessdate=2014-05-12}}</ref> They claimed their version could be armed to attack U.S. warships. Sources familiar with the RQ-170's design say that the Iranian RQ-170 is merely a static mockup rather than a flyable aircraft.<ref>[http://news.usni.org/2014/05/12/iranian-copy-u-s-unamnned-stealth-aircraft-fake Iranian Copy of U.S. Unmanned Stealth Aircraft is a Fake] - News.USNI.org, 12 May 2014</ref> In November 2014 Iran claimed to have carried out a successful test flight of reverse engineered RQ-170.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://defenceradar.com/2014/11/10/iran-carries-successful-test-flight-of-reverse-engineered-rq-170/|title=Iran carries successful test flight of reverse engineered RQ-170 |date=10 November 2014}}</ref>
On 12 May 2014, the Iranian government showed on national television an aircraft that it claimed was reverse-engineered from the captured RQ-170.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.yahoo.com/iran-says-copied-us-drone-181934723.html|title=Iran says it has copied US drone|date=12 May 2014|publisher=Yahoo! News|accessdate=2014-05-12}}</ref> They claimed their version could be armed to attack U.S. warships. Sources familiar with the RQ-170's design say that the Iranian RQ-170 is merely a static mockup rather than a flyable aircraft.<ref>[http://news.usni.org/2014/05/12/iranian-copy-u-s-unamnned-stealth-aircraft-fake Iranian Copy of U.S. Unmanned Stealth Aircraft is a Fake] U.S. Naval Institute, 12 May 2014</ref> In November 2014 Iran claimed to have carried out a successful test flight of reverse engineered RQ-170.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://defenceradar.com/2014/11/10/iran-carries-successful-test-flight-of-reverse-engineered-rq-170/|title=Iran carries successful test flight of reverse engineered RQ-170 |date=10 November 2014}}</ref>


==Operators==
==Operators==
Line 81: Line 79:
-->
-->
|genhide=
|genhide=
|crew= 0
|crew=0
|capacity=
|capacity=
|length m= 4.5
|length m=4.5
|length ft=
|length ft=
|length in=
|length in=
|length note=
|length note=
|span m= 20
|span m=20
|span ft=65
|span ft=65
|span in=7
|span in=7
|span note=
|span note=
|upper span m=
|upper span m=
|upper span ft=
|upper span ft=
Line 154: Line 152:
|eng1 kn=<!-- jet/rocket engines -->
|eng1 kn=<!-- jet/rocket engines -->
|eng1 lbf=<!-- jet/rocket engines -->
|eng1 lbf=<!-- jet/rocket engines -->
|eng1 note=
|eng1 note=
|power original=
|power original=
|thrust original=
|thrust original=
Line 233: Line 231:
|ceiling m=
|ceiling m=
|ceiling ft=50,000
|ceiling ft=50,000
|ceiling note= (estimated)<ref>Daily Telegraph{{cite news|title=Iran shows off captured US drone|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/8944248/Iran-shows-off-captured-US-drone.html|publisher=The Telegraph UK|accessdate=8 December 2011|location=London|date=8 December 2011}}</ref>
|ceiling note=(estimated)<ref>Daily Telegraph{{cite news|title=Iran shows off captured US drone|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/8944248/Iran-shows-off-captured-US-drone.html|work=The Telegraph|accessdate=8 December 2011|location=London|date=8 December 2011}}</ref>
|g limits=<!-- aerobatic -->
|g limits=<!-- aerobatic -->
|roll rate=<!-- aerobatic -->
|roll rate=<!-- aerobatic -->
Line 258: Line 256:
-->
-->
|armament=<!-- add (bulleted list) here or if you want to use the following specific parameters, remove this parameter-->
|armament=<!-- add (bulleted list) here or if you want to use the following specific parameters, remove this parameter-->
|guns=
|guns=
|bombs=
|bombs=
|rockets=
|rockets=
|missiles=
|missiles=
|hardpoints=
|hardpoints=
|hardpoint capacity=
|hardpoint capacity=
Line 268: Line 266:
|hardpoint bombs=
|hardpoint bombs=
|hardpoint other=
|hardpoint other=
|other armament=
|other armament=
|avionics=
|avionics=
}}
}}
Line 278: Line 276:
==External links==
==External links==
{{Commons category|RQ-170 Sentinel}}
{{Commons category|RQ-170 Sentinel}}
*[http://www.af.mil/information/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=16001 RQ-170 Sentinel Fact Sheet] from the [[U.S. Air Force]]
* [http://www.af.mil/information/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=16001 RQ-170 Sentinel Fact Sheet] from the [[U.S. Air Force]]
*{{cite news |title=Black UAV Performs In Afghanistan |work=Aviation Week |url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?id=news/BEAST121409.xml&headline=Black%20UAV%20Performs%20In%20Afghanistan&channel=awst |date=11 December 2009}}
* {{cite news |title=Black UAV Performs In Afghanistan |work=Aviation Week |url=http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?id=news/BEAST121409.xml&headline=Black%20UAV%20Performs%20In%20Afghanistan&channel=awst |date=11 December 2009}}
*[http://www.defencetalk.com/pictures/g5112-rq-170-sentinel.html RQ-170 Sentinel Pictures] from DefenceTalk.com
* [http://www.defencetalk.com/pictures/g5112-rq-170-sentinel.html RQ-170 Sentinel Pictures] from DefenceTalk.com


{{Lockheed aircraft}}
{{Lockheed aircraft}}

Revision as of 02:52, 17 November 2015

RQ-170 Sentinel
Artist's rendering
Role Unmanned aerial vehicle
Manufacturer Lockheed Martin
Introduction 2007
Status In service
Primary user United States Air Force
Number built ≈20[1]

The Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel is an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) developed by Lockheed Martin and operated by the United States Air Force (USAF) for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). While the USAF has released few details on the UAV's design or capabilities, defense analysts believe that it is a stealth aircraft fitted with aerial reconnaissance equipment.

RQ-170s have been reported to have operated in Afghanistan as part of Operation Enduring Freedom. It has been confirmed that the UAVs have operated over Pakistan and Iran; operations over Pakistan included sorties that collected intelligence before and during the operation which led to the death of Osama bin Laden in May 2011.[2]

In December 2011, the Iranian armed forces claimed to have captured an RQ-170 flying over Iran. The U.S. military has acknowledged losing an RQ-170 in the region. United States administration asked Iran to return the UAV. Iran denied the request and lodged a complaint to the UN Security Council over airspace violation by US.[3][4][5]

Development

The RQ-170 Sentinel was developed by Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works as a stealth Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Journalists have noted design similarities between the RQ-170 and previous stealth and UAV programs such as the RQ-3 DarkStar and Polecat.[6][7] It is a tailless flying wing aircraft with pods, presumably for sensors or SATCOMs, built into the upper surface of each wing. Few details of the UAV's characteristics have been released, but estimates of its wingspan range from approximately 65 feet (20 m)[8] to 90 feet (27 m).[9] In a December 2012 report, journalist David Axe stated that "20 or so" RQ-170s had been built.[1]

The "RQ" designation indicates that the RQ-170 Sentinel does not carry weapons.[10] Aviation Week's David A. Fulghum believes that the UAV is probably a "tactical, operations-oriented platform and not a strategic intelligence-gathering design".[8]

The USAF confirmed the "grainy photos of a gray, flying-wing-typed unmanned airplane near Kandahar Airfield."[11] Since then, this aircraft has been known as "The Beast of Kandahar" in relation to the discussion of the RQ-170 Sentinel on 4 December 2009.[8][12] A USAF colonel subsequently commented that RQ-170 is separate from the MQ-X program, which has yet to determine stealth or powerplant requirements, and thus the Sentinel will not replace the MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper drones.[13] As of May 2011, the U.S. military had not released any statements concerning the Sentinel since December 2009.[14]

Design

The RQ-170 is a flying wing design containing a single (as yet classified) engine and is estimated by Aviation Week as having a wingspan of approximately 66 feet (20 m).[15] Its takeoff weight is estimated as being greater than the RQ-3 DarkStar's, which was 8,500 pounds (3,900 kg). The design lacks several elements common to stealth engineering such as zig-zag edged landing gear doors and sharp leading edges, and the exhaust is not shielded by the wing.[15] Aviation Week postulates that these elements suggest the designers have avoided 'highly sensitive technologies' due to the near certainty of eventual operational loss inherent with a single engine design and a desire to avoid the risk of compromising leading edge technology.[15] The publication also suggests that the medium-grey color implies a mid-altitude ceiling, unlikely to exceed 50,000 feet (15,000 m) since a higher ceiling would normally be painted darker for best concealment.[15] The postulated weight and ceiling parameters suggests the possible use of a General Electric TF34 engine, or a variant, in the airframe.[15]

On the basis of the few publicly available photographs of the RQ-170, aviation expert Bill Sweetman has assessed that the UAV is equipped with an electro-optical/infrared sensor and possibly an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar mounted in its belly fairing. He has also speculated that the two undercarriage fairings over the UAV's wings may house datalinks and that the belly fairing could be designed for modular payloads, allowing the UAV to be used for strike missions and/or electronic warfare.[16] The New York Times has reported that the RQ-170 is "almost certainly" equipped with communications intercept equipment as well as highly sensitive sensors capable of detecting very small amounts of radioactive isotopes and chemicals which may indicate the existence of nuclear weapons facilities.[17]

Following Iranian claims of downing an RQ-170 near the Afghan border in December 2011, Iranian TV showed video footage of what appears to be an advanced unmanned U.S. aircraft that most closely resembles the RQ-170 UAV. In the footage, a member of the Iranian revolutionary guard released dimensions of the aircraft, including a wingspan of about 26 metres (85 ft), a height of 1.84 metres (6.0 ft), and a length of 4.5 metres (15 ft).[18]

Operational history

The 30th Reconnaissance Squadron operates RQ-170 Sentinels. This squadron, which is based at Tonopah Test Range Airport in Nevada, was activated on 1 September 2005. RQ-170 Sentinels have been deployed to Afghanistan, where one was sighted at Kandahar International Airport in late 2007.[8] This sighting, and the Sentinel's secret status at the time, led Bill Sweetman to dub it the "Beast of Kandahar".[19] The UAV being deployed to Afghanistan, despite the Taliban having no radar, led to speculation that the aircraft was used to spy on Pakistan or Iran: "Phil Finnegan, a UAV analyst at the Teal Group, an aerospace consulting firm, suggests the stealth capabilities are being used to fly in nearby countries. Neighboring Iran has an air force and air defense system that would require stealth technology to penetrate."[20][21]

In December 2009, South Korea's JoongAng Daily newspaper reported that the RQ-170 Sentinel had been test-flown in South Korea for the past few months and that it was expected that they would be permanently deployed in 2010 to replace Lockheed U-2 reconnaissance aircraft operating from Osan Air Base.[22] In response to this report, Bill Sweetman argued that the Sentinel's deployments to Afghanistan and South Korea were probably undertaken to monitor Pakistan and North Korea's ballistic missile programs.[23]

In August 2010, Aviation Week reported that RQ-170s either had been or were about to be redeployed to Afghanistan and that the UAVs had been fitted with a full motion video capability.[24] The missions performed by these aircraft included flying dozens of high-altitude sorties over Pakistan to monitor a compound in the town of Abbottabad where Osama bin Laden was believed to be living. On the night of 1/2 May 2011, at least one RQ-170 monitored the area while elements of the United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group launched an assault on the compound which resulted in bin Laden's death. The aircraft provided footage of the attack which was watched live by President Barack Obama and his senior national security advisors. The RQ-170 also monitored Pakistani military radio transmissions in the area to provide warning of the response to the attack.[25] On 27 May the Los Angeles Times reported that Pakistani officials were "alarmed" by the use of the RQ-170 over their country as the drones are "designed to evade radar and other surveillance systems, and can be used as a spy plane".[26]

In October 2012 a RQ-170 was used to conduct bomb damage assessment for a test drop of a Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb from a Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit stealth bomber.[27]

Iranian capture and reverse engineering claims

Four months prior to December 2011, there were reports that RQ-170s had been flying missions over Iran during 2011.[17][28] On 4 December, media reports stated that the Iranian Army's electronic warfare unit[29][30][31][32] had downed an RQ-170 that violated Iranian airspace along its eastern border through overriding its controls, and had captured the lightly damaged UAV.[33] The United States Department of Defense released a statement acknowledging that it had lost control of a UAV during the previous week, claiming that it was "flying a mission over western Afghanistan" when control was lost. The statement did not specify the model of the aircraft. The U.S. government also stated that it was still investigating the cause of the loss.[34] On 6 December, U.S. officials acknowledged that a drone crashed in or near Iranian airspace and that it belonged to the CIA and not to ISAF as was earlier stated.[35]

The Iranian government released footage of a captured RQ-170 on 8 December.[36] The captured drone appeared to be largely intact, except for minor damage on its left wing. Dan Goure, an analyst at the Lexington Institute, stated the largely intact airframe ruled out the possibility of an engine or navigational malfunction: "Either this was a cyber/electronic warfare attack system that brought the system down or it was a glitch in the command-and-control system".[37] On 8 December, a senior U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told the Washington Post that the U.S. cannot be certain the drone shown was real because the U.S. does not have access to it, but also stated that "We have no indication that it was brought down by hostile fire."[34] A second senior U.S. military official said that a major question is how the drone could have remained "virtually intact," given the high altitude from which it is thought to have crashed. After examining the video on 8 Dec, US officials confirmed that the drone was genuine,[38][39] even though some civilians had initially expressed doubt.[38] Bill Sweetman, an author with an interest in military planes, speculated that the Iranians did not shoot down the plane (citing the lack of burn marks, holes, or outward damage) or hack into the system, postulating that a system failure downed the plane, and that the plane could be intact from what is known as a "flat spin" or "falling leaf departure".[38]

In April 2012, General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards aerospace division, claimed that Iran had reversed-engineered the RQ-170, and was building a copy of the UAV. He also stated that data was being recovered from the captured RQ-170.[40][41][42] On 6 February 2013, Iranian State Television released footage purported to have been downloaded from the RQ-170.[43] U.S. Officials say that there is no evidence that these claims are true.[citation needed] In September 2013, Iran claimed that it had completed a copy of the drone and that all of its surveillance data and software had been decoded.[44]

On 12 May 2014, the Iranian government showed on national television an aircraft that it claimed was reverse-engineered from the captured RQ-170.[45] They claimed their version could be armed to attack U.S. warships. Sources familiar with the RQ-170's design say that the Iranian RQ-170 is merely a static mockup rather than a flyable aircraft.[46] In November 2014 Iran claimed to have carried out a successful test flight of reverse engineered RQ-170.[47]

Operators

United States

Specifications (RQ-170)

Data from [citation needed]

General characteristics

Performance

  • Service ceiling: 50,000 ft (15,000 m) (estimated)[48]

References

Notes
  1. ^ a b Axe, David (13 December 2012). "7 Secret Ways America's Stealth Armada Stays Off the Radar". Wired. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
  2. ^ "The Little-Known Agency That Helped Kill Bin Laden". The Atlantic. 8 May 2011. Retrieved 8 May 2011.
  3. ^ Elisha Maldonado, "Iran Denies U.S. Request for Drone Return, Demands Apology", International Business Times, December 13, 2011.
  4. ^ Iran sends toy drone to Obama
  5. ^ "General: Iran won't return U.S. drone it claims to have". CNN. 11 December 2011. Retrieved 28 November 2013.
  6. ^ Fulghum, David A. (8 December 2009). "RQ-170 Has Links to Intelligence Loss to China". Aviation Week & Space Technology. Retrieved 9 December 2009.
  7. ^ "Mystery UAV operation in Afghanistan". UV Online. 10 April 2009. Retrieved 9 December 2009.
  8. ^ a b c d Fulghum, David A. (4 December 2009). "U.S. Air Force Reveals Operational Stealth UAV". Aviation Week. Retrieved 4 December 2009.
  9. ^ Sweetman, Bill (11 November 2009). "Another Beast Picture". Aviation Week. Retrieved 13 December 2009.
  10. ^ "RQ-170 Sentinel 'Beast of Kandahar'". Defence Aviation. 26 December 2009. Retrieved 2 December 2010.
  11. ^ Tirpak, John A. (February 2010). "Washington Watch: Stealth skywriting; Watched by Gorgons; Stopping START? ..." Air Force Magazine. 93 (2). Air Force Association: 6. ISSN 0730-6784. Retrieved 12 December 2011.
  12. ^ Fulghum, David A. (4 December 2009). "USAF Confirms Stealthy UAV Operations". Aviation Week. Retrieved 8 December 2009.
  13. ^ Trimble, Stephen (10 December 2009). "RQ-170 not intended to replace Predators and Reapers". FlightGlobal. Retrieved 11 December 2009.
  14. ^ Drew, Christopher (5 May 2011). "Attack on Bin Laden Used Stealthy Helicopter That Had Been a Secret". The New York Times. Retrieved 6 May 2011.
  15. ^ a b c d e f Fulghum, David A.; Bill Sweetman (14 December 2009). "Stealth over Afghanistan". Aviation Week. McGraw-Hill: 26–27.
  16. ^ Sweetman, Bill (25 January 2011). "The Beast is Back". Aviation Week. Retrieved 26 January 2011.
  17. ^ a b Shane, Scott; Sanger, David E. (7 December 2011). "Drone Crash in Iran Reveals Secret U.S. Surveillance Effort". The New York Times. Retrieved 9 December 2011.
  18. ^ "Iran shows film of captured US drone". BBC News. 8 December 2011.
  19. ^ Hambling, David (8 December 2009). "Mysteries Surround Afghanistan's Stealth Drone". Wired. Retrieved 8 December 2009.
  20. ^ "US Air Force confirms 'Beast of Kandahar' drone". Asiaone. Agence France-Presse. 9 December 2009. Retrieved 9 December 2009.
  21. ^ Hoffman, Michael, "Unveiling the 'Beast of Kandahar'", Military Times, 23 December 2009.
  22. ^ "U.S. to base new unmanned spy plane in Korea". JoongAng Daily. 19 December 2009.
  23. ^ Sweetman, Bill (16 February 2010). "Beast Sighted In Korea". Aviation Week. Retrieved 18 February 2010.
  24. ^ Fulghum, David A. (8 December 2009). "Beast of Kandahar Is Back in Action". Aviation Week. Retrieved 11 August 2010.
  25. ^ Miller, Greg (18 May 2011). "CIA flew stealth drones into Pakistan to monitor bin Laden house". The Washington Post. Retrieved 19 May 2011.
  26. ^ Paul Richter, David S. Cloud and Alex Rodriguez (27 May 2011). "Angry Pakistan rejects U.S. appeal, plans to review drone campaign". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 28 May 2011.
  27. ^ Trevithick, Joseph (7 November 2014). "U.S. Stealth Drone Helped Test Huge Bomb". War is Boring. Retrieved 8 November 2014.
  28. ^ Sanger, David E.; Broad, William J. (4 December 2011). "Explosion Seen as Big Setback to Iran's Missile Program". The New York Times. Retrieved 5 December 2011.
  29. ^ "Iran airs footage of downed US drone". Press TV. 8 December 2011. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
  30. ^ "'Iran military landed US spy drone'". Press TV. 9 December 2011. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
  31. ^ "US maintains silence on downed drone". Press TV. 10 December 2011. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
  32. ^ "Iran military downs US spy drone". Press TV. 4 December 2011. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
  33. ^ "Iran shows film of captured US drone". BBC News. 8 December 2011.
  34. ^ a b Jaffe, Greg; Erdbrink, Thomas (5 December 2011). "Iran says it downed U.S. stealth drone; Pentagon acknowledges aircraft downing". The Washington Post. Retrieved 5 December 2011.
  35. ^ Miller, Greg (6 December 2011). "After drone was lost, CIA tried a head fake". The Washington Post. Retrieved 8 December 2011.
  36. ^ "Iran Captures a U.S. Stealth Drone Intact". 8 December 2011. Retrieved 8 December 2011.
  37. ^ Dave Majumdar (9 December 2011). "Iran's captured RQ-170: How bad is the damage?". Air Force Times.
  38. ^ a b c "U.S. officials, analysts differ on whether drone in Iran TV video is real". CNN. 8 December 2011.
  39. ^ Orr, Bob (8 December 2011). "U.S. official: Iran does have our drone". Retrieved 11 December 2011. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |publisherer= ignored (help)
  40. ^ "Iran Says It Is Building Copy of Captured US Drone". The New York Times. Associated Press. 22 April 2012. Retrieved 22 April 2012.
  41. ^ "Iranians Say They Took Secret Data From Drone". The New York Times. 22 April 2012.
  42. ^ [1]. FarsNews, 22 September 2013.
  43. ^ "Iran releases video 'proof' US drone decoded". RT. 7 February 2013.
  44. ^ [2]. FarsNews, 22 September 2013
  45. ^ "Iran says it has copied US drone". Yahoo! News. 12 May 2014. Retrieved 12 May 2014.
  46. ^ Iranian Copy of U.S. Unmanned Stealth Aircraft is a Fake – U.S. Naval Institute, 12 May 2014
  47. ^ "Iran carries successful test flight of reverse engineered RQ-170". 10 November 2014.
  48. ^ Daily Telegraph"Iran shows off captured US drone". The Telegraph. London. 8 December 2011. Retrieved 8 December 2011.