User talk:Coffee

This user is more awesome than you.

Wikiclaus' cheer !

		Wikiclaus greetings
		Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you the happiest of Wikiclaus' Wikipedian good cheer. This message is intended to celebrate the holiday season, promote WikiCheer, and to hopefully make your day just a little bit better, for Wikiclaus encourages us all to spread smiles, fellowship, and seasonal good cheer by wishing others a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings and the happiest of holiday spirits from Wikiclaus !

Hello, Coffee. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Buck Satan and the 666 Shooters

Take a a more careful look at what you blocked as "vandalism" on the Buck Satan and the 666 shooters article. What you blocked was actually adequately sourced and accurate, and I was trying to add addiional cites when your people kept undoing my edits and creating a conflict (causing me to lose my work). The problem stemmed from your colleagues not liking the new content and removing it under false pretenses, not from a problem with what was added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.17.167.42 (talk) 15:57, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

@178.17.167.42: Even if we were to take your claim here as accurate, the actions taken by yourself to edit war are completely against our accepted policies here. The page will remain protected, and if you want to have any changes made to the article you will have to actually discuss your requested changes on the article's talk page (with "[my] people"). - No one is allowed to make unilateral changes to this site, we are a community; and if you wish to be a part of it, you will have to abide by our guidelines as laid out on WP:EQ. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:07, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeanette Dousdebes Rubio

• I'm asking you to rethink this one. reasons: The page is well-sourced. All spouses of the major candidates have pages. This is the only one being questioned, and Marco Rubio is the only candidate with a template at the top of his page (relating to the merge discussion that was rolled over into the AFD. Ordinarily, it would be reasonable to allow a discussion to continue for another week. However, with the Iowa caucuses on Feb. 1 and the New Hampshire primary the next week, it seems a bit WP:POINTY to have a template questioning the notability of Rubio's wife, and no similar tags on Melania Trump, Columba Bush, or Katie O'Malley . I have no idea what the motivation of the editor who started the Merge discussion on Rubio's wife's page was. Only that it seems inappropriate for Wikipedia to appear to be allowing ourselves to be gamed at a crucial moment in a heated election campaign.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
  • E.M.Gregory: After taking your thoughts into consideration I have decided to close the Article for Deletion discussion, instead of pushing the conversation into another week. I closed the AFD as keep, per WP:GNG as noted in my closing statement there... thank you for the heads up. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 03:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

• Thank you.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Havacuppa

Hi there Coffee. You might like to add this template near the top of your Talk page: {{User:Yworo/havacuppa}}

It will float a cup at the bottom of your page. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 12:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Hey!

Welcome back, Coffee! It's been a while. I hope you continue to find this place interesting. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:47, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Liz, indeed it has! I'm glad to see you're still here. :) — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Things here got pretty dicey for me during my RfA last August but I'm plugging away, helping out as I can. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:52, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Holy shit, I didn't realize you got the promotion! Welcome to the admin community Liz; I'm very happy such a well deserved editor got the bit. Only wish I could have been around to co-nominate. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:54, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Well, it wasn't a smooth ride, by any means and I was surprised by some of the strong opposes (diff). It was decided by a Crat chat and that Crat chat talk page is 286,278 bytes long. To be viewed as controversial was unexpected but I ended up having sufficient support. I do feel a little envious of candidates who sailed through the process but at least, regarding me, people have made their opinions known and they are public. Better to know individuals' true thoughts about you than assume the best (or the worst) and then discover you're wrong. I have more sympathy for anyone going through the arbitration process than I did before. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Addy Miller

Hello,can you please send me a copy of this recently deleted article Addy Miller as I did a lot of work on it and would like to update it if Miller becomes more notableAtlantic306 (talk) 18:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Atlantic306: I've emailed you the data. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

ThanksAtlantic306 (talk) 19:57, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

A cup of you for you!

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bananasoldier (talk) 18:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Abdur Rahman Madani

Hello Coffee, I made a request to redirect Abdur Rahman Madani to Peace_TV_Bangla#Staffs_and_presenters, here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Redirects/2015-12#Redirect_request:_Abdur_Rahman_Madani, but because it is SALTed this can't be done, is it possible to unsalt it so it can be done, thank you. 81.129.156.118 (talk) 11:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

RHYS HATFIELD From Hawes

Hi Coffee. Thanks for your intervention with User:RHYS HATFIELD From Hawes. I must confess to some bafflement as to whether they were actively/deliberately vandalising, or incompetent, or very young, or somewhat old, or what. A couple of us had attempted to offer help/advice but it was unclear whether we were going to get anywhere. What happens now? If they come up with a coherent unblock request might you look at it again please? I know it might well be a lost cause but ... anyway, thanks very much and all good wishes DBaK (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

DBaK: Most certainly, if they can actually interact with the editors on their talk page and make a coherent and proper unblock request, I will definitely take another look. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! I am not sure that this one will have a happy ending but you never know... cheers DBaK (talk) 21:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AusGamers

I don't think the keep rationale in this AfD was strong enough to make it a "no consensus" close (unless it's with no prejudice against speedy renomination). As an alternative, would you consider relisting it for a third tour? czar 04:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)