User talk:Неполканов: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:15, 19 March 2016

Welcome!

Hello, Неполканов, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Toddy1 (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Crimean_Karaites

Talk:Crimean Karaites# :Lithuanian Wikipedia as a base ? I hope that you do not mind, but I moved the section you added today. The reason for moving it is that there is already a section discussing the faults in the article, and I thought that your recent addition is naturally part of that discussion.--Toddy1 (talk) 20:56, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.109.203.252 (talk) 15:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation and citation style

On Russian Wikipedia it is common to put citations before the punctuation mark.

On English Wikipedia, the approved style is to put citations after the punctuation mark. See WP:CITEFOOT.--Toddy1 (talk) 06:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crimean Karaites

I am quite delighted with most of your most recent edits to the page, please do continue to bring in the references from the Russian article. There are a few questions which I have about some of your sources, e.g. the Sokhnut have told me unequivically that Karaimi-Karaylar are absolutely excluded from the Law of return unless they go through a full conversion to either Rabbinical or Karaite Judaism. I would be extremely interested in seeing the evidence for the statement you inserted into the article which is to the contrary. I do believe that you have granted too much credit the theories of Jewish academics on our origins and not enough credit to the opinions of native Karaimi-Karaylar authors, but nevertheless I am quite delighted to see your efforts. I look forward to your completed work which I will correct in syntax and spelling etc.. Alla razi bolsun. Kaz 15:17, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According my personal sources many Karaim Karaylar are leaving in Israel, The most famous are Olga Prik, Avraham Kefeli(Alexey Golovachev) and some relatives of Shapshal family. No body asked to pass any conversion for immigration permission. I suppose that they may have some discrimination in Rabbinate(for marriage or funeral) like mixed families members or Ethiopian Jews. But the Law of Return is secular law that is not affected by Rabbinate and consider Karaylar as Jews. The only restriction is for persons that actively professing Chistianity(non-atheists). This restriction valid even for 100% born Jews considered by Rabbinate as Jews without relations of their current confession. So the misleading information is coming from Sokhnut or from native Karaimi-Karaylar author. Неполканов (talk) 22:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that there are Karaimi-Karaylar who managed to get into Israel before Universal Karaite Judaism was established, and I met one there, but the law is not the same now. If you have a written source it would be extremely helpful to insert it into the article. But since Moshe Firrouz came to power, Karaimi-Karaylar are excluded. I have emails to confirm this is coming from him and Sokhnut at least. Kaz 23:04, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not accept the statement that POV criticizing the Shapshal's heritage by inspection of earlier sources is Jewish. I do not see any reasons for Jewish Academics to distort Karaylar History, Such reasons may have Crimean Tatars but not Jews.

Неполканов (talk) 22:09, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you allow me to email you with some evidence you will certainly be interested to see why there is an interest among (only some) "Jewish" groups to distort Karaylar History. I am interested to know what the Crimean Tatar agenda may be if you can also share that with me. Alla razi bolsun. Kaz 23:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC) Crimean Tatar in contradiction to Crimean Karayim were expelled by Stalin after WWII. Now after they permitted to go back there some conflicts regarding real statement and budgets for autohont nations.It is strange for me that you did not hear nothing about that. From the other side Jews have no any concern in Karaims property,and according to your interesting update even Sochnut cannot get any budgets for emigration propaganda between Karaylar, I will be glad to get also some source regarding Moshe Firrouz.that can be published also at russian page.Неполканов (talk) 23:21, 29 September 2012 (UTC) Email me and I will send you what I have. But it will be original research which is why I can not mention it in the English wiki. Nothing can be put into the article about it either way without a public press release. If you find anything in writing please do let me know. Kaz 00:11, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked your information regarding the change in the Law of Return with Karaylar in Israel. The answer was strongly negative. He hear nothing about any change in this law. If you can approve that you really Karaim(but not only father of your grandfather) you are permitted to immigrate as every Jew. My source belongs to very known family from Crimea,so he sure belongs to "Karaylar"

So the conclusion is one of the following: 1) This is secret directive. 2) Sochnut make difference between Crimean Karaim and Lithuanian ones 3) Sochnut, doubts if you have Karaim grandfather 4) Gershon Kisprichi does have Karaim blood Неполканов (talk) 20:45, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaz regarding Budo/Kaz.--Toddy1 (talk) 08:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Toddy1 has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

You seem to have missed a comment http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Crimean_Karaites&diff=658153256&oldid=658151984 79.109.203.252 (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chufut-Kale

Неполканов please could you post the comment you made at Talk:Crimean Karaites#Chufut-Kale in the move discussion is at Talk:Juft Qale#Proposal to rename this article Chufut-Kale.--Toddy1 (talk) 05:35, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you take a look at edits made by a new editor at Chufut-Kale‎ and Talk:Chufut-Kale‎.--Toddy1 (talk) 21:52, 21 November 2013 (UTC)--Toddy1 (talk) 21:52, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Crimean Karaites (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Turkic, Altai, Kagan and Khan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crimean Karaites, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Templates containing the Gerae-tamga of the Crimean Tatars

I checked on other pages containing File:Gerae-tamga.png and found the following templates that, as far as I can see, have nothing to do with the Crimean Tatars. What should be done with them?

--Toddy1 (talk) 22:18, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is Crimean Khanate Khans Giray dynasty symbol. Crimean Tatars that are descedents of Crimean Khanate use it as their national symbol . Modern Crimean Karaites have an other symbol (see Russian page). There is theory about Girays Kerait origin. But no one of pages about Qaraei, Keraits or Kabar use this symbol. So at least *Template:User Qaraei looks like Kaz's very original POV , obsessively connecting Karaim with Keraits that can be seen also due to "Wikipedian Karaylar" title below the image. Неполканов (talk) 23:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According the Templates history -it is definitely Kaz's work. So both of them can be removed. Неполканов (talk) 23:04, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken your advice and proposed them for deletion.--Toddy1 (talk) 23:54, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abraham Firkovich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Khazars, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Orientalist, Kipchak and Bulgar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Khazars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cyrus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.109.203.252 (talk) 09:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keraites

There is a discussion at Talk:Keraites about your redirect. Please could you contribute.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand I am required to post this here to invite you to join in a dispute resolution discussion Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Karait. Best regards. YuHuw (talk) 08:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YuHuw (talk • contribs) 18:00, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to your "complaint"

Hi Nepolkanov, You wrote this on my wall User_talk:YuHuw#Nepolkanov.27s_complaint:

"To my opinion Karaims translation in English is really misleading. I would prefer Karaims.It was decided this word after long discussion an search by google. Other Wikipedia pages direct to the Crimean Karaites page, including Russian page were this issue is discussed but this user is not only asks sources .It removes all Concensus translations from this page."

Could you explain what it is you mean you want please? YuHuw (talk) 11:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to the text quoted above it still remains unclear. What is it that you prefer? YuHuw (talk) 11:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You know in contradiction of you I am not native British speaker, and in Contradiction of you I am considering the opinion otf the others.Karaims -it is disambig of Ethnicity and Religion.While Crimeam Karaites is Ethnicity only but misleads some novices and some authists because Karaims(Crimean Karaites in English) are leaving not are leaving not In Crimea.So Lithuanian Karaim is sounds like Lithuanian Crimean Karaite -really misleading,English speakers have decided that Ethnicity in Ennglidh is Crimean Karaites and I accept this while you never will be able todo that,Неполканов (talk) 20:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

what are "authists" ? YuHuw (talk) 21:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sock puppet investigation

When you wrote on my talk page in January, you expressed the concern that Kaz was using "multiply anonimious clones vandalizing the Karait page". (See User talk:Toddy1#New round.) I have started a sock-puppet investigation report on YuHuw at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaz. Please could you add to that report explaining why you thought that it was Kaz who was Kaz was using "multiply anonimious clones".-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by YuHuw (talk • contribs) 22:48, 16 March 2016

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Karaimism. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Saltedcake. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Qaraimits without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Saltedcake (talk) 15:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 157: / Line 157: @@
 [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Saltedcake|Saltedcake]]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from [[:Qaraimits]]&nbsp;without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[WP:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Saltedcake|my talk page]]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> [[User:Saltedcake|Saltedcake]] ([[User talk:Saltedcake|talk]]) 15:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
-[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Qaraimits]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]].  In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].
-'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period.  Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.  Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->
-[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.  <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.