User talk:SSgt.Vensky

January 2016

Hello, I'm Mscuthbert. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nick Holonyak has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 16:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pavlo Skoropadskyi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pavlo Skoropadskyi was changed by Андрей Погадаев (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87102 on 2016-04-22T10:05:13+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maltese people. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to Trương Tấn Sang. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:38, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Alexander Lukashenko. Jim1138 (talk) 07:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Jenna Talackova

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Jenna Talackova), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:11, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Unsourced material, using no edit summary, reinstating it every few weeks/days/months despite getting reverted on every single ocassion. - LouisAragon (talk) 17:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

September 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at State Anthem of the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania and Common Turkic Alphabet. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Take some time to familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia rules and also see WP:SOURCE. Edit warring with another user is against the rules as well. Please refer to the three-revert rule. - Ninjoust (talk) 22:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

You don't seem to be listening. You were warned about adding unreferenced/unsourced material before and you don't seem to be complying. Please adhere to all the rules on Wikipedia. —Ninjoust (talk) 23:18, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on State Anthem of the Komi Republic. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Your edit summary, ‘Want report? Why do Turkic transliteration of the Finno-Ugric language of Komi language. Must be the Finno-Ugric transliteration under the Finno-Estonian style. Are you autist?’ does not help the situation. I suggest you work on your English instead of trying to form pointless arguments. You don't seem to be WP:LISTENing. Keep this up and you will be blocked. - Ninjoust (talk) 16:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

You were the one who imposed a Turkic-style transliteration for a non-Turkic language, Kalmyk, in Khalmg Tanghchin Chastr, yet you are telling others not to use Turkic transliterations for non-Turkic languages. This is an act of hypocrisy, which is not civility. In one of your contributions, your edit summary said “I know, but Kalmyk Cyrillic alphabet is very close to the Turkic Latin alphabet.” and you imposed a Turkic-style transliteration for the Kalmyk lyrics. So by that logic I should change the transliterations for Buryat and Mongolian (both of which are Mongolic and not Turkic) because I think their orthographies look very similar to Turkic. (And I am aware that Ossetian is Indo-European and Komi is Uralic.) Kalmyk, like Ossetian and Udmurt, may have been influenced by Turkic languages, but that doesn't make them Turkic. —Ninjoust (talk) 20:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

I'd concur with all of these points made earlier. Apparently, you are still not WP:LISTENing and adhering to the rules. Please change your behavior or you'll be blocked for good. —Ninjoust (talk) 20:11, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Hey guys, stop fighting! =( Чибуево Жаңшулокикомев (talk) 15:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Ninjoust,But if I'm will not doing the Turkic styles of transliteration for non-Turkic languages such as Ossetic, and Kalmyk. You will not be able to do the Turkic styles of transliteration for other languages as Komi, etc.? Andrey Sabirov (talk)