Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:03, 16 November 2006

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/header

Alerts

Bot-reported

2409:4073:4e9e:1c9f::280a:4201 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sualongvong (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anushka P Shetty (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 15:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Arabuloku (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1307 (LTA 1307, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:13, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User reported

Scorpion0422 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log),vandalised my user space because he doesn't like my edits and twice nowremoved the blatantvandal template from his talk page. The editorialconflict is not a big deal and we can work towards consensus butvandalizing userspaces should not be tolerated. L0b0t 16:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This does not appear to be a case of simple vandalism to me or at least I can't find anything in his contribs. Can you provide diffs of the offending edits? --Chris (talk) 17:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This is the diff from his account based vandalism, please note his IP (142.156.1.223) has a long history of vandalisng my user space and has been blocked, Scorpian then had to request an unblock so it was changed to anon only [2] here. L0b0t 17:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also Scorpion's edit summaries are full of personal attacks and vitriol. L0b0t 17:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I already said, that is not my IP. Plus, the IP he keeps citing is a public IP and I used a computer at a local library last week that had a banned IP. Wasn't me. Suggesting you watch a certain episode is hardly apersonal attack. ANd by the way, my name is Scorpion0422. Not Scorpian -- Scorpion0422 17:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rex Germanus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - this and some other guy are duking it out on the Dutch people article. I know there was an arbcom ruling and in my opinion, looks like they are breaking it. However, it is disruptive in my opinion and needs some admininstrator attention. Thanks. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

short-term blocked both users for the moment; other admins invited to consider consequences in terms of Arbcom probation. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmr (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Sloppy editing, a history of warnings, image and copyright problems, personal attacks --ArmadilloFromHell 17:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Monstar1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Vandalism only account. --Gdo01 17:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

195.93.21.131 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) mini vandalism spree with long history of vandalism. -THB 17:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
165.234.100.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Lots of vandalism - replacing words with "satan". Possibly dahdahdah since he/she was banned. (See contributions for evidence) --- Dinnerbone (^Talk/_Cont) 17:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- 40 reverts and counting. Gdo01 17:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
66.202.117.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) presistent vandalism Tlmclain | Talk 17:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
64.8.191.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) presistent vandalism -- Rami R 17:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
65.105.177.162 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Has recieved numerous warnings and continues to vandalize.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
204.113.238.250 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) vandalism after test4 Fan-1967 17:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
165.139.22.67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) nothing but vandalism since 2004. numerous warnings, including many violated final warnings -- Oliverkroll 17:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thefourdotellipsis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and The4dotelipsis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log): accounts setup only to impersonate legitimate user Thefourdotelipsis, recreate a previously deleted "suspected socks" category, and troll people by editing their userpages. The type of vandalism suggests to me that it's the same person as Darth Abeonis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), previously blocked. —Silly Dan _(talk) 18:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 * {{IPVandal|204.113.238.250}} vandalism after test4 [[User:Fan-1967|Fan-1967]] 17:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * {{IPvandal|165.139.22.67}} nothing but vandalism since 2004. numerous warnings, including many violated final warnings -- [[User:Oliverkroll|Oliverkroll]] 17:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
+* {{vandal|Thefourdotellipsis}} and {{vandal|The4dotelipsis}}: accounts setup only to impersonate legitimate user [[User:Thefourdotelipsis|Thefourdotelipsis]], recreate a [[:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Sakura Avalon|previously deleted "suspected socks" category]], and troll people by editing their userpages. The type of vandalism suggests to me that it's the same person as {{vandal|Darth Abeonis}}, previously blocked. &mdash;[[User: Silly Dan|Silly Dan]] <sub>[[User talk:Silly Dan|(talk)]]</sub> 18:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)