Talk:Patriot Prayer: Difference between revisions
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
:I agree, this article is more of a hit piece, and it doesn't even contain a link to the organization's website or any discussion of their purpose and beliefs. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A|2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A]] ([[User talk:2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A#top|talk]]) 16:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
:I agree, this article is more of a hit piece, and it doesn't even contain a link to the organization's website or any discussion of their purpose and beliefs. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A|2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A]] ([[User talk:2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A#top|talk]]) 16:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
::I agree, this article is one great big [[Thumbing the nose|nose-thumb]] at the very concept of [[Wp:Neutral_point_of_view|NPOV]]. I'm sure there's no point in trying to fix that -- it's what Wikipedia is infamous for, after all -- but I did go ahead and add external links to the organization's official websites. [[User:NCdave|NCdave]] ([[User talk:NCdave|talk]]) 04:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== Image size == |
== Image size == |
Revision as of 04:53, 26 May 2019
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Patriot Prayer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Proud Boys was copied or moved into Patriot Prayer with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 8 sections are present. |
What is their agenda?
I came to this page wondering what this group's agenda is after they were mentioned in a news article: what do they support? what do they believe? what is their platform? After reading about halfway in I started skimming, after three-quarters I abandoned the article as it doesn't really tell us anything about the group. Can anyone knowledgeable add at least 1 section that describes anything about what the group represents or what its purpose is (even if that is to say they don't have one)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.173.36 (talk) 16:56, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- @192.91.173.36: Being racist, basically. PeterTheFourth (talk) 21:39, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- I agree, this article is more of a hit piece, and it doesn't even contain a link to the organization's website or any discussion of their purpose and beliefs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:600:9500:3180:D503:3948:FFA4:E08A (talk) 16:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Image size
@Beyond My Ken: Why do you insist on having images displayed larger than necessary? Can't we just use the default setting instead of your personal preference? ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:25, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- So people can see them, of course. Postage stamp-sized images do not help anyone, and do not enhance an article. What do you image the ability to size images is there for? Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:26, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- There's a reason we have a standard thumb size. ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:36, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, so that if someone doesn't put in a size, the image will have a default size to display at. But it's a default size, not a "standard" size. Nowhere does policy or guidelines say that the default size is the preferred size. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:51, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Your personal preference is not more important than the default setting. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Again, DEFAULT -- i.e. what to do if nothing's specified -- NOT "standard". If you don't like getting the same results all the time, then stop doing the same thing all the time. Edit constructively, instead. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Your personal preference is not more important than the default setting. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, so that if someone doesn't put in a size, the image will have a default size to display at. But it's a default size, not a "standard" size. Nowhere does policy or guidelines say that the default size is the preferred size. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:51, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- There's a reason we have a standard thumb size. ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:36, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Piped wikilinks
Hello Moredps, I'm not interested in an edit war, but your insertion of a wikilink to Christian Identity, renamed Hell Shaking Street Preachers is misleading and constitutes an EASTEREGG. The target article includes no mention of Hell Shaking Street Preachers. If you want to edit Christian Identity and add a properly referenced mention of Hell Shaking Street Preachers, have at it. Until then, the piped wikilink needs to go. Rhadow (talk) 16:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- In the alternative, you could create an article on Hell Shaking Street Preachers. Rhadow (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
yes I'm not intrested in an edit war either that's why i put this down as minor, I'm not sure if they even need a page they are a small group of white nationalist Christians I'd like to encourage others to read christian identity/Groups, as there isn't really much about them but they can be recognized through common traits.--Moredps (talk) 20:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
sorry for trying to delete this so many times we fixed the piped link so I didn't think it was necessary to keep this around but while it's here I may as well ask if people think the Hell shaking street preachers wikilink would look better next to the proud boys at the top of the article.--Moredps (talk) 05:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)moredps
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class Conservatism articles
- Unknown-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- Start-Class Oregon articles
- Low-importance Oregon articles
- WikiProject Oregon pages
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles