Talk:Matt Haney: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:56, 21 July 2019

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Matt Haney article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Unassessed

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Matt Haney be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in San Francisco may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The bias of the moderators on this page is absolutely unbelievable.

The bias of the moderators on this page is absolutely unbelievable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:8C7E:F59E:5DA4:A3F9:B296:E216 (talk) 18:39, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit warring and tendentious editing are harder to believe. I locked the page to force you to come to the talk page so we can try to find WP:CONSENSUS on what to include, if anything. Mind WP:BLP and WP:CONTROVERSYSECTION before proposing any text additions here. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:31, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no edit warning, or tendentious editing coming from my side; which to most people would be obvious. Further I would urge you to keep the lock on the page to support your ridiculous bias because as soon as July 25th rolls around it's getting reverted to what is ACTUALLY happening, not just the way a bunch of smug over sensitive progressive adult toddlers stamping their feet are perceiving it to happen. Your intervention in this is nothing more than throwing around weight because of who you are in the "wiki" community. It's absolutely absurd and a complete disgrace. Hope you're proud of yourself, sweetie. If you or anyone else had a problem with it, they were free to edit the and or add/ delete sources, or take it here for discussion, not completely remove the entire section because they are offended. There are MORE than enough sources covering the entire situation, so your "consensus" means nothing. This is the perfect example of what makes Wikipedia trash. Good job.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 The bias of the moderators on this page is absolutely unbelievable.  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:18D:8C7E:F59E:5DA4:A3F9:B296:E216|2601:18D:8C7E:F59E:5DA4:A3F9:B296:E216]] ([[User talk:2601:18D:8C7E:F59E:5DA4:A3F9:B296:E216#top|talk]]) 18:39, 19 July 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :Your [[WP:EW|edit warring]] and [[Wikipedia:Tendentious editing|tendentious editing]] are harder to believe. I locked the page to force you to come to the talk page so we can try to find [[WP:CONSENSUS]] on what to include, if anything. Mind [[WP:BLP]] and [[WP:CONTROVERSYSECTION]] before proposing any text additions here. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 20:31, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
+There is no edit warning, or tendentious editing coming from my side; which to most people would be obvious. Further I would urge you to keep the lock on the page to support your ridiculous bias because as soon as July 25th rolls around it's getting reverted to what is ACTUALLY happening, not just the way a bunch of smug over sensitive progressive adult toddlers stamping their feet are perceiving it to happen. Your intervention in this is nothing more than throwing around weight because of who you are in the "wiki" community. It's absolutely absurd and a complete disgrace. Hope you're proud of yourself, sweetie. If you or anyone else had a problem with it, they were free to edit the and or add/ delete sources, or take it here for discussion, not completely remove the entire section because they are offended. There are MORE than enough sources covering the entire situation, so your "consensus" means nothing. This is the perfect example of what makes Wikipedia trash. Good job.