Jump to content

User talk:Soccermeko: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Soccermeko (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Cobaltbluetony (talk | contribs)
Line 93: Line 93:
== February 2008 ==
== February 2008 ==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Nicole Wray|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Nicole Wray]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''In addition, your edits are the subject of a [[WP:AN3RR|3RR notice]].'' —[[User:TravisTX|<font face="Georgia" color="#2F335F">Travis</font>]][[User_talk:TravisTX|<font color="#888888" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 18:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Nicole Wray|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Nicole Wray]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''In addition, your edits are the subject of a [[WP:AN3RR|3RR notice]].'' —[[User:TravisTX|<font face="Georgia" color="#2F335F">Travis</font>]][[User_talk:TravisTX|<font color="#888888" size="-1"><sup>talk</sup></font>]] 18:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

== Working on Wikipedia ==
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|48px|left]] Hello. I've left you a welcome template above that explains how Wikipedia works. Messages here on your talk page are an '''important means of working together''' and should not be discouraged. An inability to work with others here could result temporary [[WP:BLOCK|blocks]] or even a permanant[[WP:BAN|ban]], as Wikipedia operates by concensus. The above welcome message contains many useful links for you. And as a gesture of good will, see the message below. -&nbsp;<font face="Verdana">[[User:Cobaltbluetony|CobaltBlueTony™]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User_talk:Cobaltbluetony|talk]]</sub></font> 16:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[Image:Smiley.svg|left|62px]]

-&nbsp;<font face="Verdana">[[User:Cobaltbluetony|CobaltBlueTony™]]&nbsp;<sub>[[User_talk:Cobaltbluetony|talk]]</sub></font> has smiled at you! Smiles promote [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small>
</div><!-- Template:smile -->

Revision as of 16:33, 29 February 2008

Welcome To My Talk Page

  • Questions = if you have a question, title your comment "question"
  • Complaints = please name your title complaints
  • Pictures = if you have a problem about pictures, title the subject the name of the picture
  • Unsigned Signatures = unsigned signature will be deleted
  • Deleting my things = if you deleted my thing, then you will be report no matter who you are


Userpage

I saw you blanked your userpage. Do you want to have it deleted? In that case, you can stick {{db-g7}} to it and someone will deleted it. Punkmorten 18:55, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Re: Article Recreation

Unlike the other mixtapes, Speak My Mind (album) cites some sources - although it's not that much different when it was deleted here. It might get deleted again. Anyway, the reason mixtapes generally aren't notable is because they're just track lists and not much can be said about them. You can go to deletion review if you want it restored. I hope all of this doesn't discourage you from editing or anything. Spellcast (talk) 07:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Why does this page need to be protected? Please see WP:Protect for reasons why we protect pages. Admrb♉ltz (tclog) 07:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When you recreate a page, you have to address the concerns for it being deleted. The review site doesn't actually have a review. Also, 2 of the 3 singles aren't from the tape. You have to cite sources to show it's received significant coverage in reliable sources. See the Dedication 2 mixtape for example, that has several reviews and info. If you want to recreate it, you have to take it to deletion review. Continually recreating it like that will lead to a block. Spellcast (talk) 08:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Nicole Wray

"I'm Lookin'", "Borrowed Time", and "Dear Father" are way more of contemporary R&B, and Nicole's overall music is far from being as soulful and funky as Curtis Mayfield's or Marvin Gaye's, so please stop retrieving inaccurate genres. Also, genres should not be capitalised. Thank you. Funk Junkie (talk) 19:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Message

I've replied to your message on Talk:InDepenDance Day above. Also, see WP:NPA - threats like these aren't acceptable, thanks. Spellcast (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

InDepenDance Day

Please recreate so i can fix. Soccermeko (talk) 00:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will restore it to your user space. Please improve it there and do NOT move it to mainspace until an administrator has approved it. It will be at: User:Soccermeko/InDepenDance Day. Please familiarize yourself with the editor concerns as described at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Wray Starring in InDepenDance Day; Vol.1 The Takeover. JERRY talk contribs 04:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have editted it. please tell others Soccermeko (talk) 22:02, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I took a look at it, and marked several maintenance concerns. Some of the marks are invisible comments; (can only be viewed in edit mode). You may want to address these concerns. JERRY talk contribs 00:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Stand Up (Nicole Wray song)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Stand Up (Nicole Wray song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Stand Up (Nicole Wray song). Victao lopes (talk) 22:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nicole Wray's fourth studio album

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nicole Wray's fourth studio album, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Wray's fourth studio album. Thank you. Victao lopes (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bella Mafia (Mocha album)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bella Mafia (Mocha album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bella Mafia (Mocha album). Thank you. Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Soccermeko for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

InDepenDance Day

how this now. User:Soccermeko/InDepenDance Day Soccermeko (talk) 16:02, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added my comments to the page in red. JERRY talk contribs 16:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

Hi Meko, I can't nominate you for adminship considering you've just violated the three revert rule and when there is a current sockpuppetry case against you. If those issues get sorted out, you could try in a few months, thanks. Spellcast (talk) 20:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Nicole Wray discography

I'm sorry, I didn't realise I protected the wrong version. To request another admin make an edit to a protected page, place {{editprotected}} on the article's talk page. --Geniac (talk) 00:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, according to the protection log for the talk page, it is not nor has ever been protected from editing. --Geniac (talk) 00:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Don't Have To

An article that you have been involved in editing, Don't Have To, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Have To. Thank you. Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Fantasia Lovechild.JPG

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Fantasia Lovechild.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article I Wanna Be Your Lady (Nicole Wray), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 09:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Can't See

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article I Can't See, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of I Can't See. Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:51, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole Wray edits

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Nicole Wray. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Cloudz679 (talk) 21:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Erykah Badu discography. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 21:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nicole Wray. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. In addition, your edits are the subject of a 3RR notice.Travistalk 18:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Working on Wikipedia

Hello. I've left you a welcome template above that explains how Wikipedia works. Messages here on your talk page are an important means of working together and should not be discouraged. An inability to work with others here could result temporary blocks or even a permanantban, as Wikipedia operates by concensus. The above welcome message contains many useful links for you. And as a gesture of good will, see the message below. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]