Jump to content

User talk:Nihonjoe: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Caspian blue: refactored for clarity
→‎re: Talk:Caspian blue: note on the refactoring
Line 245: Line 245:
::I'm manipulating nothing. The diffs clearly indicate who wrote what. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 21:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
::I'm manipulating nothing. The diffs clearly indicate who wrote what. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 21:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
:::Sorry for my poor English but you're clearly misleading as if I wrote all the comments toward you since you're complaining about the comments that I did not say under the title with my name.--[[User talk:Caspian blue|'''Caspian''' blue]] 22:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
:::Sorry for my poor English but you're clearly misleading as if I wrote all the comments toward you since you're complaining about the comments that I did not say under the title with my name.--[[User talk:Caspian blue|'''Caspian''' blue]] 22:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
::::I've refactored it, hoping to eliminate any possible confusion. I only hope that Caspian blue will respect similar refactoring on [[User talk:Nihonjoe#Thank you for the intervention]] --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 22:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:52, 8 July 2009

User:Dendodge/Yes

日本穣 may not always respond swiftly to queries, so thank you for your patience.

Please place new topics at the bottom of the page.

Archives

Generally, I'll reply here if you post here, so please watch this page if you want to see my reply. If I don't reply within a couple days on another page where you replied to one of my comments, feel free to drop a message here. I have over 9000 pages on my watchlist, so I don't always catch everything new. Thanks! ···日本穣

Newtype USA April 2007 Issue (Part 2)

Hi Nihonjoe! Sorry about resurrecting a really old discussion of ours, but I started working on the Le Chevalier D'Eon article again, and I need some more information about the series' novelization. I found zilch about the novel in my online research, so I thought I'd have better luck with that issue. :-/ Does the it say anything more about the novel (like release date, publisher/s, no. of pages, etc.)? And does it say if anime was based on the novel? Thanks, and sorry for the trouble! None of the public libraries that I have access to carry the magazine. :| --SilentAria talk 10:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to look up the article again. It may be a little over a week, though, as I'm busy with some other things right now that may take my time. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:27, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh okay; take your time, and thanks in advance! :D --SilentAria talk 18:41, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Still working on it; thanks for being patient. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Newtype Japan 1990 - 1994

In any of the magazines you have, does it mention anywhere the date that members of CLAMP left the group? If any of the magazines you have does, then could you put the references to them on the article about clamp? It would help alot. Thanks for the trouble. AngelFire3423 (talk) 15:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:34, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference library request

Any chance of nabbing the Newtype USA, September 2003 (Volume 2 Number 9) article on Sailor Moon, please? I believe it may have the ratings for Pretty Guardian Sailor Moon, but I'm still interested in it even if that's not the case. Thank you. --Malkinann (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in the middle of moving, so I may not be able to access it for a bit. I'll keep your request on my talk page, though, and take care of it as soon as possible (which, again, may be a while). ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers, good luck with the move! --Malkinann (talk) 21:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! A stub template or category which you created has been nominated for renaming or deletion at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type most likely doesn't meet Wikipedia requirements for a stub type, through failure to meet standards relating to the name, scope, current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy, and should not be considered personal in nature.--Jeremy (blah blah) 07:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re Akemi Loli Mokoto's unblock request

There's a related thread at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Sanity check; as you'll see I originally blocked mostly per WP:USERNAME but had reblocked as a sock before I noticed they'd got an unblock request in. The puppetmaster account is Saikano (talk · contribs), and the socks caught so far are listed at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Saikano and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Saikano. Hope this helps. EyeSerenetalk 19:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Peace offering

Thank you for the visit and noble peace offering. Whilst editing music articles, I got to know that the article of Diapason (magazine) was deleted by you perhaps due to a failure of sourcing unable to meet the notability criteria. I was considering asking you to undelete since the French classical music magazine has archived its notability comparable to the British Gramophone (magazine). Given the acclaimed classical award, Diapason d'Or and some sources[1][2], I think you easily can be persuaded to undelete it. However, well I was very hesitant to do so for the reason that you came to me. So I highly appreciate your amicable approach to me for reconciliation. I hope we can agree that "past is just past" and someday we can work together. Thanks.--Caspian blue 21:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored it to User:Caspian blue/Diapason (magazine) so you can work on it and bring it up to snuff before it's placed in the mainspace. This is to prevent it from being speedy deleted again. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. The article is indeed very poorly written, but it is worthwhile to be here. Best regards.--Caspian blue 21:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know if you need any help moving it back into mainspace (since it will be over a redirect). Sometimes the system doesn't like that, and you may need an admin to do it. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note

Just a note without specific names mentioned. I made a report to WP:UAA regarding a new username. It only came to my attention because the user made immediate, and in one case, extensive edits to specific pages that I watch now because of issues related to a persistent and determined sock master who was finally outed and blocked. I felt the username was possibly a problem, and I'm not certain that it still isn't. It isn't always because a name implies a connection to a company, although I understood that such commercial name references still aren't permitted even if there is no evidence of editing on behalf of the company. Perhaps in this case, it could mean that it is a company that provides public internet access. In any case, I'm not asserting this new user is the same person, but it is suspicious and I have added the name to my watchlist because of the myriad of problems from the sock. I'm not telling you this for any reason other than to notify you regarding the possibility. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this regarding the one you reported today? ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is, and I see you've dealt with the username. Regardless, I do expect the person related to the sock to come back. I do think this was the person, FWIW. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Since you're watching the articles in question, feel free to let me know specifically if you notice the editor coming back. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:11, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The sock has been tagged so it will show up in the category listing. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, thanks! I will continue to keep an eye on similar accounts popping up. I was never surprised that this would happen. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The interesting thing about that editor is that he/she used specific accounts to edit specific articles and only accidentally tripped up when one username responded to talk post that was with another username. I did notice the account Ashleerocks contributions pop up and begin to edit the same articles that were edited by the confirmed sock Xxtinadbest contributions, including various Eurovision articles, Kým nás máš, Britney Spears discography, Saturdays songs, and what brought it to my attention, repeated efforts to insert unreleased discography information into Hayden Panettiere. I had left a note at the User talk:Ashleerocks page addressing the more than too much coincidence [3] but received no response and the editor continued. I'm fairly certain this is another sock and I'd cite WP:DUCK if I were making a new sock case. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk)
After reviewing the account, I agree that it's a sock and have therefore blocked it. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:39, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Honestly, I don't go looking for socks, but it seems like once you've been here for a while, you can't help but come across them. Much appreciated. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interaction

Hello! Regarding your message, please consider these edits [4] [5] [6] and compare the related contribs. Also, this quick reaction may be explained with experience. Maybe you can understand my lack of patience towards this new user now? -- Matthead  Discuß   11:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, regardless of that, you shouldn't stoop to his level and fly off the handle. Just because someone else is uncivil doesn't mean you get a free pass. That's all I'm trying to get across to you. Thanks. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:27, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if you think they are likely the same person (Sennen goroshi is living in Japan according to his user page, and the two IPs resolve to the same ISP in Japan), then gather up all the evidence you have and we can go from there. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, what can I say? I am not a Checkuser or something, and I am not inclined to start an official request on my own, just to get lectured about AGF and don't bite the newcomers or something. Yes, I think Sennen goroshi and the two Tokyo-based IPs are operated by same person, even though that is a big city with a lot of inhabitants, of which many are from abroad. I had encountered Sennen on Talk:Nürburgring lap times, an article on a German race track, and the lap times recorded there, in racing events since 1927, by the magazine Sport auto (Germany) since 1995, and by various sources in recent years. Due to the internet, other media, computer games, and US and Japanese manufacturers publishing lap times of their sportscars, this track has attracted some international attention in recent years - and a lot of fans who support their favourite car. After a dispute about the reliability, credibility and significance of sources, I had suggested to split off List of Nordschleife lap times (racing) and List of Nordschleife lap times (sport auto). After initial opposition, it was him who copied times to the sport auto article in April 2009. In the same month he stopped contributing, while in May, 61.23.81.111 showed up, to be succeed by 119.173.81.176, with both IPs making their first edit Talk:Nürburgring lap times. Coincidence? Well, after the block of the 119-IP expired, he had nothing better to do than messing with Sport auto (Germany), an article barely edited by others. -- Matthead  Discuß   21:51, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, if you have the proof or at least incredibly good circumstantial evidence (especially with two IPs from the same place), then all the good faith has been used up and we can look into this further. If you want to collect data which may show this connection, do so and then pass it along to me. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Circumstantial evidence should be in the edits by the IPs, which aren't that many (13 by 61., some 46 by 119.) compared to those of Sennen. For a non-racing related example, he changed a redirect to some lesser known music group [7], as did 119 [8]. When reverted, both insisted on it [9] [10]. I don't know whether this is incredibly good or proof of anything. What exactly is required?-- Matthead  Discuß   03:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
While those are similar edits, they are pretty much unrelated as they are different articles/redirects. If you can show where the IPs and Sennen were doing the same things to the same articles, that could be used to further investigate the issue. That's why I suggested keeping some sort of log (just create a text file with diff URLs), and when you get a good number of them (perhaps 6-10), then post them here and I'll look into it for you. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Company deletion

Hi. In regards to deletion of IDModeling I had made suggested changes per Wikipedia editors and it has been deleted with no notation other than what was previously noted. Can you please clarify reasons for deletion? Jeb69 (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As indicated when it was deleted (both times), the article was "about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". Please see WP:CORP and WP:RS for more details on what is required for a company to have an article about them on Wikipedia. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey Typhoon

Can you look in Newtype USA Issue 2 (DEC 2002) page 47 for info on Monkey Typhoon aka Asobotto Senki Goku? Thanks. Extremepro (talk) 10:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in the middle of moving, so it may be a while. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 17:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

T-shirt

I believe that you haven't yet gotten one of these. :) –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 14:06, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 17:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You said something on my talk page a week ago.

Last week you raised a concern about my username. [11] The reason I want this username is because the IP it refers to is often blocked, and sometimes I'd like to edit from there. My username reflects that. I looked at the username policy and I didn't see anything about usernames resembling IP addresses, so would there be an easier way to solve this? -38.116.202.144temp 17:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on your user talk. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:38, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nicer

I think you need to be nicer to me. Pzrmd (talk) 19:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How am I not being nice to you? ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
please read wp:civ. Pzrmd (talk) 20:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've read it many times. Exactly how am I not being civil? If you're going to come here and accuse me of not being nice to you, you need to provide some evidence that backs up your claim. As far as I can tell, the only interaction I've had with you is the RFC/U on Docu, and I've been civil to everyone there, including you. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
you're not being nice again. Pzrmd (talk) 20:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you aren't going to provide any sort of example of how I'm not being nice to you, then this conversation is over. I'm not going to waste any more of my time responding to vacuous statements. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
hey, I supported your RfB. Pzrmd (talk) 20:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see here where Joe has been incivil to you, and the fact that you supported his RfB really has no bearing on the matter. Please either present a specific instance of Joe's incivility towards you, or drop the matter. ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 21:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
you need to be nicer too. why am I the only civil person in this RfC? Pzrmd (talk) 21:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I am quite nice. However, this seemed to call for conciseness, not bending over backwards to guarantee that I didn't come off as snippy. And this isn't an RfC (or are you referring to something else?); it's simply a discussion on a user talk page. ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 21:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The RFC/U in question is this one. Apparently I've been mean there to Pzrmd, though I still haven't figured out where. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
stop trolling, Nihonjoe. Pzrmd (talk) 21:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, this is getting out of hand. If you don't have anything productive to say, please stop harassing me. I'm more than willing to address specific concerns, but all you're doing is throwing out vague "you need to be nicer to me" comments without any evidence to back it up. If you don't stop, this issue is going to be escalated. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, I wasn't even serious, as I think you could tell. Pzrmd (talk) 21:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, there was no indication that you were anything but serious; and in any case, this isn't how you should joke around with other editors (for starters, generally you shouldn't randomly start a joke thread on the talk page of an editor who you've had little prior interaction with). ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 21:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nihonjoe. It depends on how much the shipping of those magazines will cost. Do you have a ball park figure in US$? And how many of each magazine do you have? Around what time period did you subscribe to them? -sesuPRIME 19:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a ballpark cost for shipping as it will likely depend on where I'm shipping them. There are around 20 PSMs, 10 or so OPM, maybe 5 EGM, and one Nintendo Power. I don't have exact numbers as they are located someplace else. I may have additional ones around here, too. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If Sesuprime ends up not wanting them, I'm interested. I already have a number of those magazines, but am always looking to fill in the holes though. Would it be possible to get a full listing of the issues? Shoot me an email if you can. (Guyinblack25 talk 21:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Sure, but it will be a bit (a week or two) as I'm in the middle of moving. I'm looking to get rid of them in a lot, though, not piecemeal. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. I guess it depends on how many of the issues I already have. Just shoot me an email whenever you have the info. If I don't receive one, I'll assume Sesu got them. (Guyinblack25 talk 00:44, 3 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Eh, let Guy have them; my main interest was in the NPs. -sesuPRIME 01:50, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I know I have some other NPs somewhere around if you want them. I just haven't gotten to them yet in clearing everything out of this place. :) ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Around when are those NPs from? -sesuPRIME 19:46, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A few years ago. I'll let you know when I locate them. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, here's a list of some of them (there will be more listed as I find them):
  • NP: volumes 183-187, 189, 192
  • PSM: volumes 3, 8, 11, 78
  • EGM: volumes 173, 175-177, 180, 183-186, 188-193, 197-198
  • OPM: volumes 67-73, 75, 77-79, 81-82, 85-87, 89, 92-93, 97-98, 101-102 (most of them have the discs, 2 copies each of 76-77 and 79)
  • Official Dreamcast Magazine: volumes 3-11
Again, I'll list more as I find them (including the stack I mentioned originally, which is different than the issues listed above). ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the listing. I'll compare it against my collection when I get home. May take me a while though because I have most of them boxed up. (Guyinblack25 talk 17:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]
Just keep in mind this isn't all of them. I have quite a few more of them. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Miyajima, Hiroshima

I think there is a problem with Miyajima, Hiroshima page. I think there needs to be details about the township on this page. The page refers to the "former" town, but the town still exists (ie the buildings). What has happened is the delegation of the town has now joined with another city. Whats up skip (talk) 05:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to bring this up on the Talk:Miyajima, Hiroshima page (or theWikiProject Japan talk page. If you have sources for information, though, feel free to begin working on it. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Table Hiragana

Thanks for opening the talk and please feel free to voice you opinion as well. I do not seek to destroy other peoples good faith (hard!) work however I found the choices made very "unhelpful" and in literally no way improving.

I myself now the table-style very well - however i don't think that we should only write for people who already "know stuff" we should try to keep it KISS principle.

Btw: I was aware of the 3 edit rule ;) I just don't like people undoing me after I wrote a good explanation (and they don't)...

My regards 79.192.239.160 (talk) 00:02, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Names on the man

Okay, I finally looked up the 穣 in your signature, and chuckled for a minute. But I gotta ask, of all the kanji for じょう (or じょ), why that one? —Quasirandom (talk) 05:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It uses the "prosperity" meaning, and was given to me by the father of Yuki Saito. Never met the singer/actress, but I've met her father a couple times. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha. Cool. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:43, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: WP:NOTPLOT

Good morning. You recently made a cogent and articulate comment at WT:NOT on the topic of plot summaries. Would you consider joining the effort at Wikipedia:Plot-only description of fictional works?

The goal is to more fully explain all the nuance and detail about dealing with plot summaries without bloating WP:NOT any more than it already is. In that regard, this page is intended to parallel WP:WINAD, a drill-down page which very successfully elaborates on and clarifies WP:NOTDICDEF.

Thanks in advance for any thoughts you might have. Rossami (talk) 14:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I read through it and I think it looks good. I think it does a good job of emphasizing that having plot information is good, but that it shouldn't be the only content of an article (or even the majority in most cases). ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:22, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for working on the UAA backlog. Seems like lots of admins must be on vacation. Some of my notes from last night are still there. ありがとうございます    7   talk Δ |   02:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. I try to swing by once or twice a day to see how things are. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kamon Tatsuo

Hey Joe. Thanks for the the Kamon Tatsuo article. I haven't heard that name in a while, but it sure brings back memories. The article does not really mention anything to the fact that his music is known for its humor. I have always considered him to be the "Weird Al" Yankovic of Japan. Unfortunately I do not have any references to contribute, though. As always, thanks for your many contributions. Regards, Bendono (talk) 03:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I just started it and I have a few refs for expanding it. If you can find any possible refs and toss them on the talk page of the article, that would be helpful. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the intervention

If you can have a spare time, would you evaluate the two links from Korean Tourism Organization and Seoul Metropolitan Government? Ronz has accused me of restoring "spam links"[12][13] to Insadong one of favorite tourist zones in Seoul, but I've used sources from the sites for DYKs, and reviewers confirmed them as "reliable sites". Dekkappai saw his visits to my talk page regardless of my pleas not to visit my talk page, and he lived in South Korea, so he edited to remove the accusation from the article. Ronz violated 3RR today, but he reverted his edit after he seemed to realize that, so I'm not gonna report him to AN3 board. I just need your objective evaluations on the article's status quo. Thanks.--Caspian blue 21:32, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Ronz has accused me of restoring 'spam links'" Let's look at the facts:

  • I removed some links that had been spammed by a few editors to numerous articles with the edit summary, "External links: removed spammed links" [14]
  • Caspian blue reverted my edit with the summary, "rv by Ronz (talk) Not spam links. You must carefully check before insisting so." [15]
  • I reverted with the edit summary, "Undid revision 300126897 by Caspian blue (talk) removed promotional liks previously spammed across multiple articles) [16]
  • Caspian blue reverts again with the edit summary "rv by Ronz (talk) Please stop being disruptive and the "external links" provide useful sources, and if you do not like, change WP:EL" [17]

I don't see any such accusations. I see a misunderstanding by Caspian blue, his advise-giving in response, his accusations of disruption, and more advise-giving. All in edit summaries. --Ronz (talk) 21:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm..Sorry, Nihonjoe for being dragged into the dispute. I just needed your objective evaluation on the two sites. However, I might have brought to AN3 board, since Ronz clearly violated 3RR instead of the generosity.

1st revert: 2009-07-08T00:46:09
2nd revert: 2009-07-08T16:00:09
3rd revert: 2009-07-08T20:47:49
4th revert: 2009-07-08T20:59:32


What's more, I explicitly pointed out the misunderstanding and apologized for any confustion caused by my edits. [18]. This apology wasn't taken well [19]. --Ronz (talk) 22:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: Talk:Caspian blue

Yep. I would have refactored if given a chance.

Meanwhile, you appear to be encouraging statements such as:

  • I see there's a little Napoleon taking over a certain neighborhood in Seoul [20]
  • I always enjoy seeing a self-important jack-ass make an even bigger fool of himself, and I can use the laugh
  • I know exactly why he is doing that on "Korean articles" due to his conflicts with a non-Korean editor working on Korean and traditional Korean music. [21]
  • removing "notability" tag-- if you don't know Insadong, you're too fucking ignorant to touch this article. Take it to AfD. Note: refusing to source article based on demand from self-important jackass [22]

--Ronz (talk) 21:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ronz, you're manipulating your statement as If I made the comments. Except the third comment, all are not mine. Please don't harass me any more.--Caspian blue 21:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm manipulating nothing. The diffs clearly indicate who wrote what. --Ronz (talk) 21:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for my poor English but you're clearly misleading as if I wrote all the comments toward you since you're complaining about the comments that I did not say under the title with my name.--Caspian blue 22:42, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've refactored it, hoping to eliminate any possible confusion. I only hope that Caspian blue will respect similar refactoring on User talk:Nihonjoe#Thank you for the intervention --Ronz (talk) 22:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]