Talk:Michael of Zahumlje: Difference between revisions
Tpbradbury (talk | contribs) update project boxes |
{{subst:GAN|subtopic=Royalty, nobility and heraldry}} |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|12:58, 20 October 2010 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Kebeta|Kebeta]] ([[User talk:Kebeta|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Royalty, nobility and heraldry|status=|note=}} |
|||
{{WPBiography|living=no|class=c|priority=low|listas=Visevic, Mihailo}} |
{{WPBiography|living=no|class=c|priority=low|listas=Visevic, Mihailo}} |
||
{{WikiProject Serbia|class=c|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Serbia|class=c|importance=low}} |
Revision as of 12:58, 20 October 2010
Michael of Zahumlje is currently a Royalty, nobility and heraldry good article nominee. Nominated by Kebeta (talk) at 12:58, 20 October 2010 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
Biography C‑class | |||||||
|
Serbia C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Croatia C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Religion
Serbian Orthodox Christianity in 912.!!?? The split between Catholic and Orthodox church happened in 1054, and Serbian Orthodox Church was established in 1219. Furthermore, Višević participated at Synod in Split in 925 which was summoned by Pope from Rome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ro0103 (talk • contribs) 20:40, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:26, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Mihailo Višević → Michael of Zahumlje — Mihailo Višević has 1.490 google hints (mostly mirrors Wikipedia content) while Michael of Zahumlje has 1.680 google hints. More important Mihailo Višević has 3 google book hints (all non-English), while Michael of Zahumlje has 8 google book hints (all English). Kebeta (talk) 10:49, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. On Google Books, I'm getting many more more results for Mihajlo Višević (with a j) than for Mihailo Višević or Mihailo of Zahumlje, even though many of these are not in English. Because it's difficult to judge from these meagre 'statistics', the advisable thing to do would prolly be to get the best sources of relatively recent date first and make your decision afterwards. Cavila (talk) 15:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yes you are right, on Google Books Mihajlo Višević has many more results than Mihailo Višević. Although, most of them are in Croatian language. Still, I think it would be best to move the article per WP:COMMONNAME (using the name which is most commonly used to refer to the subject of the article in English-language reliable sources). Kebeta (talk) 10:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- In favour of Michael of Zachlumia. Regionalization of early medieval Slavic names is best avoided when possible (as in this case). Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 16:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I wouldn't mind to see Zachlumia instead, but the use of Zahumlje seems to be equally if not better established in English-language sources. Cavila (talk) 18:50, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- In favour of Michael of Zachlumia. Regionalization of early medieval Slavic names is best avoided when possible (as in this case). Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 16:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
- Yes you are right, on Google Books Mihajlo Višević has many more results than Mihailo Višević. Although, most of them are in Croatian language. Still, I think it would be best to move the article per WP:COMMONNAME (using the name which is most commonly used to refer to the subject of the article in English-language reliable sources). Kebeta (talk) 10:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support. Although this stuff is well outside my comfort zone, I've just made a stab at rewriting the (previously unreferenced) article. Some English-language sources seem to use 'Mihajlo', but the best and most useful sources I could lay my 'hands' on - well, mostly through Google Books - prefer Michael rather than the Slavic version. Cavila (talk) 16:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support as nominator. Kebeta (talk) 10:35, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Serbia articles
- Low-importance Serbia articles
- WikiProject Serbia articles
- C-Class Croatia articles
- Low-importance Croatia articles
- All WikiProject Croatia pages
- C-Class Bosnia and Herzegovina articles
- Low-importance Bosnia and Herzegovina articles
- All WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina pages