Jump to content

Talk:Prostitution in the State of Palestine: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Protected
oops
Line 4: Line 4:
{{WikiProject Sexuality|class=Stub|importance=Mid|sex-workers=yes|sex-workers-importance= }}
{{WikiProject Sexuality|class=Stub|importance=Mid|sex-workers=yes|sex-workers-importance= }}
}}
}}
{{ambox|'''Admins''': When you close the requested move, be sure to remove the move protection!}}
{{ambox|type=content|issue='''Admins''': When you close the requested move, be sure to remove the move protection!}}


==Prostitution where?==
==Prostitution where?==

Revision as of 06:49, 6 December 2012

Prostitution where?

There is a constant renaming between Prostitution in Palestine and Prostitution in the Palestinian territories, both of which are probably incorrect. Should it now be "Prostitution in Palestine", "Prostitution in the palestinian territories", "Prostitution in the Palestinian Authority" or the "Prostitution in the State of Palestine"?Greyshark09 (talk) 17:48, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You oppose to which title?Greyshark09 (talk) 21:16, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose to which name?Greyshark09 (talk) 21:16, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There has indeed been some disruptive moving of this article, but I think my position is still mostly clear. This article should be at Prostitution in the Palestinian territories for now, although I would prefer Prostitution in Palestine if Palestinian territories is moved to Palestine. So I suppose that's a support right now. I believe Nyttend and I have the same position. --BDD (talk) 22:35, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose to which name? (this is a poll)Greyshark09 (talk) 21:16, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, sorry; I was rushed (and apparently not paying enough attention) and thought that this was a request to move Prostitution in the Palestinian territories to Prostitution in Palestine. I believe that our articles on these activities in these jurisdictions should be entitled Prostitution in the Palestinian territories and List of airlines of the Palestinian territories. Nyttend (talk) 21:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Emmette why did you change my comment in the first place? to match your point? it was supposed to be a simple poll, why are you abusing my comments? why are you behaving against WP:GF?Greyshark09 (talk) 21:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
They were opposing to your proposal, not to mine! You rephrased my comment, but it was YOUR rename proposal, i changed it back into my original meaning.Greyshark09 (talk) 21:52, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I did not rephrase your comment. I added the move discussion template and added List_of_airlines_of_the_Palestinian_territories to the discussion. You are the one who is behaving strongly against AGF. At the time they voted oppose this page said "Prostitution in the Palestinian territories → ?" title and the title was "Prostitution in the Palestinian territories" so they were opposing a title other then "Palestinian territories". Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 22:00, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You did same thing as you did last time [1], but this time you cannot say that you were not "aware" that it is not allowed (pretty aggressive thing is renaming the article, putting a rename procedure in my name and asking other editors to comment...). So would you like another complaint on this? This time you need to be more convincing.Greyshark09 (talk) 22:15, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is by the way also a disruptive editing attempt on your behalf.Greyshark09 (talk) 22:19, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Move warring in the face of nothing but opposition on the talk page is highly disruptive. This page will not again be moved until the discussion is closed, since it's been fully protected. You're still going to be able to edit the text; it's just not moveable except by admins. Protection is indefinite because the RM doesn't have a defined concluding time; the admin who closes the discussion will need to unprotect it. Nyttend (talk) 06:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]