User talk:Jimfbleak

Jim	Talk	Contribs	Sandbox	Logs	Blocks	Deletions	Protections	Scripts	Bird talk	Commons

Please add your message to the bottom of this page, give it a heading and sign it using four tildes ~~~~.

Time Warner Cable Full Service Network

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwinfl91 (talk • contribs) 14:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

I totally disagree with your decision on my submission for an article on the Time Warner Cable Full Service Network. It is not an advertisement since the FSN has not existed since 1997. It is an attempt to tell the history of a project that was the beginning of digital interactive TV that we use today. Some of the information was copied from another Full Service Network article on a company in Pa. The two are not related in any way and the original article should be separated into two separate articles and then I would not trying to create a new page. Please take another look at my submission with the understanding that it cannot be advertising for something that doesn't exist any more. I also disagree with the 63% copied unless you are talking about the section I copied from the article I mentioned above. I can go in and rewrite those sections also if that is necessary but first I need you to understand that in NO way is this an attempt to advertise anything.

11:01, 22 March 2021 Jimfbleak talk contribs deleted page Draft:Time Warner Cable's Full Service Network (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: still 63% copied, this is just a promo, not an encyclopaedia article) (thank)

Warren (wwinfl91) ≈≈≈≈

Repliedon user talk page, WP:TFA needed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of page

I am getting totally frustrated by your persistent deletion of my publication on the basis on notability. What makes someone notable? The article already cites credible media sources that authenticates the notability of the subject. I have made several adjustments against advertisement and self promotion (advertising) of the subject as you have stated. I wish to request that this pages be merged and removed from deletion Elijah Onyeagba and Elijah Chinezim Onyeagba PhD. I also wish to know why a page will be deleted even though yet published but still in the 'draft'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torksimlife (talk • contribs) 16:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Replied on user talk page, unsourced/self-sourced promo, possible COI, copyright violation Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Jim

Thank you for taking time to enlighten me on the various errors in my article. I have made necessary adjustment and wish to republish the article inline with Wikipedia guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torksimlife (talk • contribs) 14:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Jim,

I wish to request for the restoration of my article Elijah Chinezim Onyeagba PhD for necessary corrections most importantly editing the text you indicated was copied from media sources. Thanks. Talk to me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torksimlife (talk • contribs) 14:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Torksimlife, please sign your messages using four tildes ~~~~ You haven't declared your [[WP:COI|conflict of interest as requested. I've already said that we don't accept copyright violation even in a draft. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Heading

Hello Jim I was writing my first article, but wasn't done yet, and you've already deleted it. Could you bring it back up and let me make the necessary changes and hopefully have it be accepted? A Flaneur A Flaneur (talk) 18:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Replied on user talk page. Autobiography, no sources, images at least are copyright violations Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

See c:User talk:A Flaneur where the remaining two files of the several uploaded are being discussed for deletion. File:Quality Expo International.jpg remains since there is every likelihood that it was a picture taken by the uploader. Fiddle Faddle 11:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Fiddle, yes, I'd only seen one of those, but it's pretty clear the others were likely to be candidates for the chop. I've also seen the permalink where he states that he is Goodden. I agree with the Expo outcome too, obviously an amateur snap. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

I make it a practice when I do an AFC review to follow the pictures. I think it ought to be a standard part of our role. Fiddle Faddle 12:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

The Devil Is a Part-Timer! (season 1)

Sir, you have deleted a wrong page because the page was spilted in agreement with other editors. Spilting the page based on season is not a copyright violation. Please reconsider your decision. Thank you. いちか かすが (talk) 17:10, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

You didn't even check the talk page for that one. That page was copied from List of The Devil Is a Part-Timer! episodes and split into a new page. SpectresWrath (talk) 22:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

いちか かすが, SpectresWrath Not sure what you are saying here. After I ran the plagiarism script Earwig, the page was deleted as a copyright violation of this page marked © Copyright 2021 Episode Ninja, so how it was created doesn't seem to be relevant. Are you suggesting that the page that it was copied from might also be a copyright violation? If not, please clarify why you think the deleted page is not an infringement of the episode ninja page. I'm always prepared to restore if I've made an error, but it's not clear how that's the case here. Either it's a significant copy of the Ninja page or it isn't, how the page was created isn't a factor. The claimed discussion that led to this page being created can't override our rules or copyright law, so please be clearer why this page should be restored, explaining why you think the text isn't a violation of the Ninja page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Sir, Article was originally taken from the article "The Devil Is a Part-Timer!". The article was then splited based on seasons released. So, content copied from a wikipedia article cannot be a copyrighted violation under the free-liciensing policy. Hence, I requested you to change your decision. いちか かすが (talk) 09:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Here's an example: This is on the talk page. SpectresWrath (talk) 19:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

This isn't my first time dealing with a case like this, Episode Ninja copied from wikipedia. Look at the history dates from List of The Devil Is a Part-Timer! episodes and you'll see these summaries were written years ago. Episode Ninja copied and pasted on their site with a Last Updated: Feb 3, 2021 on it. What more proof do you want. SpectresWrath (talk) 04:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

SpectresWrath, one reason I deleted was that the date you created the page was after Feb 3, 2021, so it looked as if you had done the copying, but in the light of what has been said above, I can see that's not necessarily the case, so I'll restore Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

I dont know who you are but you just removed my new page.

It's hard for a scientist to see how Wikipedia editors run amok. I referenced everything, actually I wrote the article that you or one of you criticied as being copied, I changed it, contested it, reasoned, and yet it is now deleted. How can it be? How? Who is in charge here, how can an editor delete a page without substantial evidence for copyright violation? And without explaining why except for a copypasted official text that says nothing about the concrete situation. I write science papers for 20 years but what you guys do is unprecendented in science. You destroy stuff, not build stuff. I see I am not the only one whose text you remove without evidence. Not nice. --Hargitai (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hargitai, if you read my comments, you would see that what you wrote was an 85% copy of a page which is not explicitly free to use for any purpose including commercial, confirmed with a plagiarism script. I'm sorry you find our rules and copyright law "not nice", but that's how we work. We have no other way of confirming who owns the copyright unless the site you copied states that it's public domain, anyone can claim to own the copyright. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

I am sure that you did violate Wikipedia's policy, because:

-- Part of that 85% text was my input (you can even SEE my name there in the source two times) -- All parts were properly referenced. IT CANNOT BE PLAGISARISM IF IT IS REFERENCED. It is referenced - source is given -- proper credit given. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism. -- Wikpedia rules say: "If you have strong reason to suspect a violation of copyright policy and some, but not all, of the content of a page appears to be a copyright infringement, then the infringing content should be removed with the source url in the edit summary if possible." and --- If all of the content of a page appears to be a copyright infringement... the page will normally need to be deleted. In other words, if 15% was NOT copyright violation, even if I accept that you cannot identify the authors, the rest HAD TO BE kept as per wikipedia rules posted here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyright_violations Wikipedia is clear on the disctinction betweeen "ALL" and "SOME,, but not all" and there is no 85% or other threshold that you have invented for the easy deletion. -- It was not at all obvious reason for speedy deletion. I guess that you did not even check my changes after you posted the speedy deletion note. --Hargitai (talk) 18:39, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hargitai I ran the script immediately before I deleted, so it was 85% copied even then. There is a name, but we have no way of verifying that the author has released the text as PD if the page doesn't say so, nor can we verify that you are who you claim to be. Attribution is good, but it doesn't justify wholesale copying. We allow, like most sites, attributed quotes for illustration or exemplars, with a guideline of about 10% of text, but not unrestricted copying. If you don't like our tight copyright rules, I'm afraid you will have to post on FaceBook or similar where you can put pretty well whatever you want Jimfbleak - talk to me?

It was N O T unrestrcted copying. I edited the text, added proper references. How could you possible word things like "she was the honorary member of the International Cartographic Association's Commission of PLanetary Cartography until 2013" differently ?????????? You rely on machine made decisions and do not look at the text itself. This contained biographic data that is really impossible to word differently. If she died on September 13, thenn your machine will tel lyou that I copied it. How can you say it differently, especially since I wrote the original material and your machine only tells that I use the same words for describing the same things. This is really sad that you destroy content reclessly not even giving a chance. Its now not about copyright rules but common sense or the lack of good intentions Hargitai (talk) 21:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC). BTW are you serious that you frighten off someone to Facebook who wanted to contribute to Wikipedia??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hargitai (talk • contribs) 22:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

@Hargitai: You can't just copy large chunks of text. You need to avoid direct copying or close paraphrasing except in some unavoidable cases (but then the percentage would be much lower, something like 15-25%). Otherwise, it is a violation of copyright law - which is not compatible with the terms of use (the content needs to support the CC BY-SA license: except in cases of fair use or authorisation by the rights holder, that precludes wholesale copying. In fact, no matter the license of the content here, copying from other sources would be plagiarism, which is usually wrong not just from a legal point of view). See this for more information. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:45, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Nice conversation between the blind. It was not a large chunk of text. If you would take the time to read the text, it was compiled from diffferent sources. Biographical data will be the same no matter who copies what from where. Facts of life cannot be stated dfferently that how they are. You are sooo inflexible and make arguments without looking into the actual text you delete. A percentage machine will not tell you what's in the content. Do you think that I would use my time for arguing with you if I just copied a "large chunk of text" in no time? No, I WORKED on this entry and you deleted my WORK with no trace. I CAN"T BELIVE someone destroying otther peoples works based on a machine decision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hargitai (talk • contribs) 06:49, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Hargitai Please sign your messages. Of course I checked the text visually, the script is just to give a percentage. There is no doubt that you substantially copied that page. A way forward; if, as you claim, you own the copyright on that page, simply add a PD tag or Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported Licence tag releasing the text for any purpose including commercial. That's the only way that we can verify your ownership of the ICPC page that was copied. I've just deleted the page again, this time nearly 100% copied, FWIW, by a different user. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello again. I created a new Kira Shingareva page a week ago from a different source, which was my original article on this topic. I included the CC licence text in that website on that day. I have seen a notice that "improve this page because it uses only one source" OK. There was no speedy deletion sign. Now I see that the page again is gone, deleted without any notice. Did you delete it? Or what happened? Perhaps someone really dont want this page to be created?

--Hargitai (talk) 08:24, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Restoration of Draft:Frank_M_Fenton

Thank you for your comments on the username talk page. If you will kindly see, Mayor Fenton has passed away and the record is being corrected as the original editing was performed due to the Wikipedia information being inaccurate. Hence, per your comments, there is no COI. Further to that notice, the deletion of the draft of said page is not advertising nor self promotion. Rather, it is stunning that this username did not have a page upon a recent search. A team is painstakingly preparing a draft with proper citations to add to the Wikipedia library. Please kindly restore the draft page for this username so that it may be worked upon and reviewed by Wikipedia prior to publication.

FrankMFenton (talk) 01:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

FrankMFenton Restored with these changes, guidance to follow on your talk page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:30, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Please see KylieTastic's talk page

I saw you block a load of folk who I reported at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Irbsnspices15. I'm hoping that KylieTastic somehow got caught up in this by accident Fiddle Faddle 13:30, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Fiddle, yes, unblocked and mea culpa, old age I guess. I hadn't seen that SPI, I'll check it out. Thanks for heads up Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

I think we're all entitled to a bad day, you know. Fiddle Faddle 13:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Wondershare Recoverit Data Recovery

Hey Jimfbleak, I want to recreate the Wikipedia article for Wondershare Reoverit Data Recovery by following all the guidelines and policies and I want to write this article with a neutral point of view. Can please restore it to draft so I can edit or guide me on how can I recreate it. Thank you RASSIOPEIA (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Replied on user talk page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Updating Yext's Revenue

Hi Jimfbleak, I'd like to update Yext's revenue in the main body and sidebar of the company's page. In fiscal year 2021, the company reported $354.7 million in revenue. Source: US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) would you be able to help me with this? Please let me know any additional info you may need. Thank you MercurySol122 (talk) 23:52, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

MercurySol122, source looks OK, and it's just numbers, so I think it's OK for you to update that yourself Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:56, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Jimfbleak, I just submitted my changes and cited the SEC source. MercurySol122 (talk) 15:47, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

M.R. Gandhi

Hi — sorry to hassle you, but I can see on the talk page of the creator of M.R. Gandhi that you've had recent dealings with them, so I thought I'd ask you for advice regarding this article which has popped up again. I don't think I can request speedy on it, since that was done before. I don't see much point it moving it to drafts, as it'll no doubt just come back like a boomerang. I could take it to AfD, I suppose, but thought I'd ask you first before starting that process. Any suggestions? Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:04, 30 March 2021 (UTC) Hi Jimfbleak:

M.R. Gandhi

You left a note on my talk page, which implied that I had added material to an article where I had a conflict of interest.

You can verify the page of M.R Gandhi He was nominate in the election in 1.Nagercoil (state assembly constituency) wikipedia page also shown 2016 2.colachel (state assembly constituency) wikipedia page also shown 2011 3.Kanyakumri (state assembly constituency) wikipedia page also shown 2006

jimfbleak,I don't know what you expect from me to tell about simple person M.R. Gandhi. He is a person only few people or media notice because of simplicity and no other media cover. thefederal.com show about M.R. Gandhi is BJP's Gandhi dispels 'saffron myths' in Tamil Nadu villagesMRGANDHINGL (talk) 12:25, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Wikipedia is not for self promotion. If you're not being taken notice of by the media or other external sources, well then you don't have an article. See WP:GNG and WP:COI. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

RandomCanadian, thanks. DoubleGrazing This account is obviously either self-promoting or has an undeclared COI. Numerous deletions and warnings have had no effect, and the account has made no useful edits, so I've blocked it now. AfD tends to concentrate on notability, whereas this is interminable repeats of the same promo, taking no account of warnings Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Repinging DoubleGrazing, messed up previous Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:07, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I was considering whether the draft page needed G11 too, but in the end assumed correctly that there'd be someone to deal with that. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:32, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)