Talk:Hamburger: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Bit weird having burger and chips served directly on a table, isn't it? <b style="font:1.3em/1em Trebuchet MS;letter-spacing:-0.07em">[[User:nagualdesign|<b style="color:#000">nagual</b>]][[User talk:nagualdesign|<b style="color:#AA9">design</b>]]</b> 00:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC) |
Bit weird having burger and chips served directly on a table, isn't it? <b style="font:1.3em/1em Trebuchet MS;letter-spacing:-0.07em">[[User:nagualdesign|<b style="color:#000">nagual</b>]][[User talk:nagualdesign|<b style="color:#AA9">design</b>]]</b> 00:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC) |
||
Heavens to best my dear boy, you're right! How could anyone let this happen?!?! Such an obvious detail! [[User:Abider445|Abider445]] ([[User talk:Abider445|talk]]) 01:25, 6 June 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Semi-protected edit request on 17 April 2021 == |
== Semi-protected edit request on 17 April 2021 == |
Revision as of 01:25, 6 June 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hamburger article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Guild of Copy Editors | ||||
|
Hamburger is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||
|
Food and drink B‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||||||
|
The statement "A hamburger is a sandwich" is a seriously contested assertion
@Vaselineeeeeeee: The idea of a hamburger being a type of sandwich is not something that should be presented as an established fact. The histories of both the hamburger and the sandwich are unclear at best and there is no direct indication that one was derived from the other. Therefore, I maintain that the uncontroversial and factual statement, "a hamburger is a food" should be used in the summary of what a hamburger is instead of describing it as a sandwich. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richardkazuo (talk • contribs) 15:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Richardkazuo: Your ping wouldn't have worked since you didn't sign. But Wikipedia ultimately operates by what is supported by reliable secondary sources not editor's points of view. To be fair, this point isn't as well cited in this article as I would like, but I think it's clear from other articles like sandwich. Note that you're confusing different things. Shared history and whether one was derived from the other is besides the point. There's a reasonable chance quite a few sandwiches have are not derived from and share little history with other types of sandwiches. The issue is instead one of definition of the culinary term sandwich, and the common overreaching definition is one that includes burgers. Note that I come from NZ where the term sandwich is generally far more restrictive and definitely few people call an Original Recipe or Zinger Burger or a McChicken or a BK Chicken etc as "chicken sandwiches", they are burgers. However I can appreciate that ultimately a definition of sandwich which includes burgers is the one which is most well accepted and makes most sense. Nil Einne (talk) 07:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Infobox image
Bit weird having burger and chips served directly on a table, isn't it? nagualdesign 00:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Heavens to best my dear boy, you're right! How could anyone let this happen?!?! Such an obvious detail! Abider445 (talk) 01:25, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 17 April 2021
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Otto Krause, not Otto Kuasw
The years pass, and Wikipedia is still spreading bullshit. Nobody cares to correct this obvious typo - and I cannot do it, as the page is semiprotected.. 79.7.112.133 (talk) 10:47, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- There exist pre-Wikipedia sources that say "Kuase" [1][2] but no sources that say "Krause". This could very well be based on some typo someone made in the 20th century, but you would have to point to some sources saying "Krause". – Thjarkur (talk) 11:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- The typo "Kuasw" (also mentioned in your previous requests in 2016 and 2019) doesn't appear to have ever been in this article. – Thjarkur (talk) 12:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC)