Jump to content

Talk:Kilt: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
→‎Word Origin: new section
Line 69: Line 69:


The oldy form of the kilt days back to the 5th century, to Scotia (Hibernia) and Dal Riata. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C8:8580:1C00:2016:C7EF:E470:6DDC|2A00:23C8:8580:1C00:2016:C7EF:E470:6DDC]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C8:8580:1C00:2016:C7EF:E470:6DDC|talk]]) 13:43, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Ad
The oldy form of the kilt days back to the 5th century, to Scotia (Hibernia) and Dal Riata. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C8:8580:1C00:2016:C7EF:E470:6DDC|2A00:23C8:8580:1C00:2016:C7EF:E470:6DDC]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C8:8580:1C00:2016:C7EF:E470:6DDC|talk]]) 13:43, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Ad

== Word Origin ==

''According to the Dictionary of the Scots Language and Oxford English Dictionary, the noun derives from a verb to kilt, originally meaning "to gird up; to tuck up (the skirts) round the body", which is apparently of Scandinavian origin''.

The above seems slightly misleading.

What the Dictionary of the Scots Language actually says is:

[O.Sc. kilt, to tuck up, from 1513, to hang, 1697, North Mid.Eng. kilt, to gird, a.1340. The n. is not found in O.Sc.]

In other words (and in common with the OED) the DSL confirms that the verb to kilt is Middle English, first recorded around 1340. It doesn't seem to have found its way into Scotland until 1513. Though its earlier origin into England may well have been 'Scandinavian' its direct origin as far as Scotland is concerned would seem to be from the English of England.

The noun 'a kilt' appears to have been first recorded in 1746 in both Scotland and England.

Revision as of 17:36, 12 June 2021

Template:Vital article

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kilt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kilt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Irish not Scots troops

The caption on the original woodcut, the full picture which can be seen elsewhere on Wikipedia, says these are Irish troops. No mention of Scots. Cassandra

The source of this image says Scottish, but there does seem to be confusion about it. A google search shows a mix. This comprehensive blog suggests the Irish heading is an error by the Germans. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:24, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed inclusion criteria for List of tartans

 – Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere.

Please see Talk:List of tartans#Inclusion criteria, a proposal for a three-point list of inclusion criteria. There are at least 7000 tartans and we cannot account for them all in a single article.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  20:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missing History - Kilt / Tartan tunic.

I notice this article excludes the kilts predecessor, the Tartan tunic dating back to the 5th century.

The Traditional tunic was no different than the full body kit, a one-piece with a waist belt to hold the sword.

Occasionally the Gaels would bare cloaks marching the fly plaid.

The tunic also was just above the knee, recorded within Saxon and Roman history, the Romans made a clear relationship between the Gaels and the Gaul based on dress and lifestyle, tartan dating back thousands of years also.

I would like to see the ancestry of the kilt and tartan placed on this article, I can see stubborn nationalists stating tartan and the kilt was strictly Scottish invention whist is completely inaccurate based of factual evidence and documentation.

The Scots regularly praise their Celtic ancestors, yet many refuse to accept Scottish identity descends from the Celts of Europe.

The oldy form of the kilt days back to the 5th century, to Scotia (Hibernia) and Dal Riata. 2A00:23C8:8580:1C00:2016:C7EF:E470:6DDC (talk) 13:43, 22 May 2020 (UTC)Ad[reply]

Word Origin

According to the Dictionary of the Scots Language and Oxford English Dictionary, the noun derives from a verb to kilt, originally meaning "to gird up; to tuck up (the skirts) round the body", which is apparently of Scandinavian origin.

The above seems slightly misleading.

What the Dictionary of the Scots Language actually says is:

[O.Sc. kilt, to tuck up, from 1513, to hang, 1697, North Mid.Eng. kilt, to gird, a.1340. The n. is not found in O.Sc.]

In other words (and in common with the OED) the DSL confirms that the verb to kilt is Middle English, first recorded around 1340. It doesn't seem to have found its way into Scotland until 1513. Though its earlier origin into England may well have been 'Scandinavian' its direct origin as far as Scotland is concerned would seem to be from the English of England.

The noun 'a kilt' appears to have been first recorded in 1746 in both Scotland and England.