Talk:Peter Landin: Difference between revisions
→When did Landin invent the stack?: new section Tag: Reverted |
→When did Landin invent the stack?: never mind. misread the article. |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~crary/819-f09/Landin66.pdf |
https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~crary/819-f09/Landin66.pdf |
||
== When did Landin invent the stack? == |
|||
The article claims that Landin invented the stack, but it doesn't cite references before 1964. John McCarthy published his paper about Lisp in 1960, and Lisp had a stack, although McCarthy used the phrase "public push-down list" instead of "stack". |
Revision as of 01:40, 20 July 2021
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Typo in the title of "The next 700 programming languages"
I have been unable to find any support for the claim that 700 in "The next 700 programming languages" was a typo. A while ago, the text said that it should have been 100, and now it says 200. Where does this information come from? Bringert 15:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Landin's paper begins with a quotation about there being "over 700 application areas" for programming languages at that time. Landin proposed that application-specific languages could be derived from his ISWIM family of languages, and as there were 700 current application areas, a language could be derived for each - and beyond. Therefore it does not look like a typo, unless the quotation was inaccurate.
However, the language ISWIM was named by a typo. Landin originally named it ISWYM for "I see what you mean". When the galleys were shown to him with the word changed to ISWIM he decided he preferred the interpretation "If you see what I mean" and stuck with it. citation? Perhaps someone could ask the man himself. --81.149.133.88 16:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I removed the remarks about the title being a typo. I had also attempted to find a reference for this and couldn't find one, but the remarks immediately above is the clincher. A B Carter (talk) 19:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
For information, the "700" typo information comes verbally from the man himself, who I know. I will try to get him to write this down next time I see him! — Jonathan Bowen 22:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- It seems that this was miscommunicated. See the article for an updated reason. Again, I will try to get him to record this more formally if possible. — Jonathan Bowen 11:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Rod Burstall repeated the "typo" claim in his acceptance speech for an award at ICFP today. No idea what his actual source was, though as he was active in the field at the time he might have had contemperaneous knowledge of it happening. GaneshSittampalam (talk) 22:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Computer science articles
- Mid-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- C-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- C-Class WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies - person articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies - person articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- C-Class Yorkshire articles
- Low-importance Yorkshire articles
- WikiProject Yorkshire articles