User talk:RajsharmaBond007: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:57, 1 August 2021

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

RajsharmaBond007 (talk · contribs) has been paid by FT Media on behalf of TECHNOXIAN.

May 2021

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 13:01, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 13:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Micromouse. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. MrOllie (talk) 14:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Raj kumar Sharma

Hello, RajsharmaBond007. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Raj kumar Sharma, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Please note that in accordance to our conflict of interest editing guidelines, I have moved your article to Draft:Raj kumar Sharma, as editors with a conflict of interest should not create articles straight onto the mainspace. When you are ready to submit the draft for review by our Articles for Creation reviewers, please do so by adding {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page. Thank you. Template:Z204 Sdrqaz (talk) 10:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page move of AICRA

Given that you were already made aware of our conflict of interest editing guidelines, you should know that editors with a conflict of interest should not create articles straight onto the mainspace. Please stop creating that page in the mainspace; I have moved it to Draft:AICRA. When you are ready to submit the draft for review by our Articles for Creation reviewers, please do so by adding {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page. Thank you. Template:Z204 Sdrqaz (talk) 15:29, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for suggestion. will do the same RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 16:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TECHNOXIAN moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, TECHNOXIAN, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 20:57, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thx Celestina. will the same. RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 03:05, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AICRA (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All inline links should be removed, please, and turned into references if appropriate, Wikilinks, or external links in a section so named. See Wikipedia:External links

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AICRA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:AICRA, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 21:17, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Timtrent, All links referred in my article is from reputed national newspapers, websites and TV. Do you expect more of it? Kindly check the links or specify.

Also as per my understanding, I have removed inline links. If there is any mistake, kindly specify. thx RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 07:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RajsharmaBond007! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 21:17, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TECHNOXIAN (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TECHNOXIAN and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TECHNOXIAN, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Umakant Bhalerao, I believe you have not gone through the article properly. If you consider information of an organization as advertisement then everything on Wikipedia is advertisement. Also all reference links mentioned are from reputed national newspapers or TV. I believe these resources should be acceptable. In case of any disconnect, kindly be specific in your concern. thx RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 07:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Technoxian (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today. Youtube is not a valid reference

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Technoxian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Technoxian, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 07:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FutureTech Media moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, FutureTech Media, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 06:05, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for suggestion. I've added few verified links to support article. Hope its sufficient enough for my submission. thx. RajsharmaBond007 (talk) 06:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 06:05, 1 August 2021 edit DMySon (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 20,808 edits →‎FutureTech Media moved to draftspace: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:57, 1 August 2021 edit undo RajsharmaBond007 (talk \| contribs) 74 edits →‎FutureTech Media moved to draftspace: Reply Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 100:		Line 100:

	An article you recently created, [[Draft:FutureTech Media\|FutureTech Media]], is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from [[WP:RS\|reliable]], [[WP:IS\|independent sources]]. <small>([[WP:42\|?]])</small> Information that can't be referenced should be removed ([[WP:V\|verifiability]] is of [[WP:5\|central importance]] on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to [[Wikipedia:Draftspace\|draftspace]] (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's [[WP:GNG\|general notability guideline]] and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. [[User:DMySon\|DMySon]] ([[User talk:DMySon\|talk]]) 06:05, 1 August 2021 (UTC)		An article you recently created, [[Draft:FutureTech Media\|FutureTech Media]], is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from [[WP:RS\|reliable]], [[WP:IS\|independent sources]]. <small>([[WP:42\|?]])</small> Information that can't be referenced should be removed ([[WP:V\|verifiability]] is of [[WP:5\|central importance]] on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to [[Wikipedia:Draftspace\|draftspace]] (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's [[WP:GNG\|general notability guideline]] and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. [[User:DMySon\|DMySon]] ([[User talk:DMySon\|talk]]) 06:05, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

			:Hi, Thanks for suggestion. I've added few verified links to support article. Hope its sufficient enough for my submission. thx. [[User:RajsharmaBond007\|RajsharmaBond007]] ([[User talk:RajsharmaBond007#top\|talk]]) 06:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)