User talk:Serols: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:22, 19 November 2021

Eddy de Jongh page

Please note that all the recent changes made to the page 'Eddy de Jongh' have been made by Eddy de Jongh himself. These changes are all but unconstructive as they correct a number of mistakes and provide more information. Moreover, I've included a selected bibliography. 'Book chapters should actually read 'articles', as that is what they are first and foremost. Please do not bar me from editing my own page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C02:2F23:EE00:F8CB:6810:7BD3:586D (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2001:1C02:2F23:EE00:F8CB:6810:7BD3:586D, please use sources. --Serols (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I left all sources intact in the 'career' section, bar one, which accompanied a sentence that made little sense.

As for the bibliography, every single entry there is a source in and of itself, so how can the use of sources be a problem of the editing I did (which consisted mostly of correcting a number of details)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A45F:869A:1:45CF:5948:4757:4946 (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In actual fact, you were so quick to undo changes made, you cannot possibly have come to the substantiated conclusion this page was being violated. You probably even failed to see that the final adjustments were made to parts of the page I myself had uploaded only a few hours earlier.

For your information, this page was created by Crispulop (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crispulop), who even states the following on his page: Since 2015 I started writing pages on first the Spinoza Prize winners and subsequently members Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW). As of early I have created over 100 articles. I am not even really interested in academics, I think I just liked that the notability of KNAW members is very clear per Wikipedia:Notability (academics). So if you feel you can improve on those articles, please do! --2A02:A45F:869A:1:11DA:C3BD:FA6F:AF22 (talk) 10:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, such edits do not make sense at Wikipedia.en. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

Sorry for reverting your edit, I was using an anti-vandalism tool that updated the page without me noticing. I was trying to revert vandalism. I immediately undid my rollback. ― Qwerfjkl | 𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂 (please use {{reply to|Qwerfjkl}} on reply) 12:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Qwerfjkl, please be careful with what you do. Regards --Serols (talk) 12:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your sterling anti-vandalism work. ― Qwerfjkl \| 𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂 (please use `{{reply to\|Qwerfjkl}}` on reply) 12:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I've lost count of how many times I've seen your name on my watchlist with regards to fighting vandalism. Thank you for all your hard work in this area. Nice one! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for continuously stopping so much vandalism! Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 16:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Venedykt Aleksiychuk

Even though official Church communications will often transliterate the bishop's name from Ukrainian (i.e. "Venedykt"),his eparchy's offical style is to translate his name into English (i.e. "Benedict"), he also self-signs official documents with the "Benedict" nomenclature. I think the Wiki should reflect his personal style and his eparchy's style. julianhayda (talk) 4 August July 2021

Hello julianhayda, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names, thanks. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello i'm </MrDDBOI>

thanks for you help and i hope many should procces more with guide on via any desk. MrDDBOI (talk) 06:37, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	You are at the forefront of keeping Wikipedia vandalism free, Good luck 😊 ~ Itsskv08 (Talk) 14:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reza Abbaszadeh

Sir, I recently join Simple English wikipedia. Where I found Reza Abbaszadeh. Then I came to english Wikipedia. I do research for an hour and found he write huge amount of wrong info and submitted paid news as he want. Beside some news media I found he donated 1 million dollar. how could he do having net asset of 12 Million dollar. Again it also be check in world Millionaire list and Abbaszadeh University

where you can see  a University map location have only 11 reviews in past 11 month ago all are same time. Even he uses US number for German Located University. Even the University has no website also.

For spreading this false he targetted the indian and nigerian paid news agency and some pr distribution. Like he feautured in forbesIndia.com but not in Forbes.com.

So please check and delete this false news

Hello, whith other such edits you risk your account 1 2. --Serols (talk) 15:50, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for stopping vandals, and warning users for hours, you deserve this. Signed, Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 13:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jnana Yagnas edit to Tejomayananda and Chinmayananda Saraswati

I added this link as an explanation of Jnana Yagna and NOT as promotional material. I am not affiliated with https://chinmaya-sacramento.org/jnana-yagnas

Jnana Yagna is a very technical Sanskrit term and wanted to provide a reference to the same. Upon duckduckgo search you find that this is the first link that pops up with the most reasonable explanation of the term (please read through the link, no promotion involved on the page to the best of my reading) Emvy20 (talk) 17:33, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

if you have a better reference for Jnana Yagna I am happy to oblige! Bottomline it helps to provide a link to Jnana Yagna as it is a very technical term. Thank you Emvy20 (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Emvy20, please note Wikipedia:Weblinks. --Serols (talk) 17:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see the weblinks you sent but am missing the point of them. Are you implying they apply as references to help the term "Jnana Yagna"? Emvy20 (talk) 18:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Emvy20, from here Wikipedia:External_links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided. --Serols (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Serols! this is helpful. The link added does NOT fall into the criteria of links to be avoided. Furthermore the link is from Chinmaya mission branch of Sacramento and actually Swami Chinmayananda and Tejomayananda are from this organization. So essentially the weblink falls in this category: "link to an official page of the article's subject". Hope this clarifies that this not a spam or a promotional edit. Happy to answer any other questions you may have! Emvy20 (talk) 18:36, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Emvy20, please read also -> no links in the flowtext. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:40, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! I noticed you deleted my edits, so please add a external reference (as opposed to weblink) to the Jnana Yagna term yourself. It tremendously helps improve both the pages. Thank you.

Warning

Hi @Serols:, Recently, you had warned the user Cookallstar by Vandalism2 as He/She did it on Abhinaya (actress). Please give me reason for this warning. Thank you ! Fade258 (talk) 17:37, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fade258, because of this edit. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Serols But i didn't see any offensive word. In my point of view, this would be NPOV issue as the editor had present their thought. Thank you ! Fade258 (talk) 17:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fade258, the edit is absolute nonsense. Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia. --Serols (talk) 17:58, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Serols, Yes, I know if this is not an NPOV issue then How we can find NPOV issue in BLP. Fade258 (talk) 18:03, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

Hi @Serols, this World Youth Archery Championships page needs to be renamed to World Archery Youth Championships. This is how the event is called.

Why are you stating Robert Rusler is openly bisexual?

Why are you stating Robert Rusler is openly bisexual? Just because his Facebook states he’s interested in men and women doesn’t mean he’s openly bisexual. It could be a mistake, or something we’re not privy too. I don’t think it’s wise to state he’s openly bisexual when there is no proof as that could be Libel. Please leave your reasoning on the talk page for Robert Rusler. Thank you. 107.3.228.215 (talk) 17:40, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 107.3.228.215, I reverted your edit because you have problems with spelling 1. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:45, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dear,

you are unhinged if you think that was an act of anti-vandalism. what a bizarre instance of institutional capture on this ridiculous website.

Conforth

I've raised the current problem at WP:BLPN, but you may think of a better approach. Regards, Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ghmyrtle, thank you for the information. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

my edits were constructive

stop Nickioutsold (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nickioutsold, I have a different opinion, see article name and here. --Serols (talk) 09:14, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And now you lost your account. --Serols (talk) 18:43, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed non-working archiving settings

Hi! I took the liberty of removing the (not in use) auto-archiving settings for User:Lowercase sigmabot III at the top of this page, since it looks like User:ClueBot III is doing the archiving. I've left that configuration in place. --rchard2scout (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello rchard2scout, thank you for the information, that fits. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:35, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help

Hello Serols:

I'm sending you this message because I need your help. I noticed that you fixed the erroneous edits of an anonymous user in the article called "Carme Forcadell". That user had changed Carme Forcadell's nationality from "Spanish" to "Catalan" and you corrected it.

That is why I ask for your help, because I have found the same problem in other articles: I corrected the nationality of other politicians who are also from Catalonia but my edits were reversed by another user. I ask you, please, to correct those nationality errors for me. I prefer not to do it again because I am concerned that if I insist my edits could be considered arbitrary.

The articles with that problem are as follows:

-Roger Torrent -Lluís Corominas -Joan Ignasi Elena -Laura Vilagrà -Violant Cervera -Gemma Geis i Carreras -Josep Bargalló -Elsa Artadi

Thank you Aziyade Gil (talk) 06:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aziyade Gil, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The same problem again

Hello Serols:

Forgive me for bothering you again. But I have had the same problem as before with the "Spanish-Catalan" theme. This time it was in the article called "Antoni Gaudí". This time another user reversed my edit and it wasn't just that: the explanation he gave was that my edit was vandalism.

I don't understand why my edit was deemed vandalism!

I do not like to be arrogant, even I consider that I am still a user who has a lot to learn, but I do not understand why others revert an edition that is correct.

Please could you help me again?

Thanks Aziyade Gil (talk) 18:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aziyade Gil, Antoni Gaudí is a special case, see the article talk page Talk:Antoni_Gaudí. Unfortunately, I can not help. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Obi2canibe

Hello, Serols. You have new messages at Obi2canibe's talk page.
Message added 14:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Obi2canibe (talk) 14:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for editing out/reverting information on the Mangal tribe. The majority of the Mangals have always remained neutral in recent years and do not have any affiliation to any millitant groups. Wiki-wizard80s (talk) 17:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For your anti-vandalism work (for some reason I thought you were an admin but it appears you are not). ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#0001} 15:47, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already found the person who can help us with the problem of "Spanish-Catalan"

Hello Serols:

I have good news for you: I noticed that in the edit history of the article called Carme Forcadell another user had previously corrected an edit by someone who had made the same mistake that you corrected: the error of "Catalan" instead of "Spanish". That user is called Crystallizedcarbon and he is Spanish. He had a conversation with the user who had written "Catalan" and gave him good arguments to explain why the article should say "Spanish politician from Catalonia".

I think he is the ideal person to ask for help and a third opinion about that problem. I think that with him we will solve the problem.

Here is the link to the discussion page of the user Crystallizedcarbon and the conversation with the arguments that he gave to the other user.

Greetings

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Crystallizedcarbon#Catalan_vs_Spanish_in_lead Aziyade Gil (talk) 03:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aziyade Gil, thank you for the information. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:51, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iván Zarco

Hi @Serols:, you just reverted an IP edit at Iván Zarco, where the IP editor left an edit summary in Spanish. This is what it said via Google Translate: "There is bogus content in that text that I have deleted. I am Ivan Zarco, if you put the text again I will proceed to report you for false content that is causing family problems for publishing something totally false" This is obviously problematic because it shows a potential CoI (assuming the IP really is the person), as well as what verges on a threat. Given that the editor assumes we understand Spanish, it may be fairly futile posting an explanation in English on a talk-page they may not even find, but who knows? I leave it to your discretion. Elemimele (talk) 15:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Elemimele, thank you for the information. Such threats come more often. Have a nice weekend --Serols (talk) 15:46, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hi Serol.Thanks for your feedback.As I am a new author it happened by mistake.Going forward I will be careful. Thank you for your suggestion.Wiky2021 (talk) 14:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Changes related to Hillar Teder

Hi serols, I want to add things on my profile and about things that affect me and my life, but it was deleted from you. How can I add these if you delete them? Hillarteder (talk) 13:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hillarteder, please note Wikipedia:Weblinks - no links in the flowtext. --Serols (talk) 13:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just asking about calling Byzantine Empire Roman

Hello. I just did IP edits fixing the inconsistency on the articles about Byzantine dynasties, half say Byzantine and half say Roman. They called themselves Roman which is why I think Roman should be used (in the infobox long name only, Byzantine should be used elsewhere). I'm just wondering if you reverted my edits then why don't you at least change all the articles about the Byzantine dynasties that say "Roman Empire" back to Byzantine too, so there is consistency? Either that or let me change the ones that say Byzantine to Roman, you pick. SaturatedFatts (talk) 18:20, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SaturatedFatts, please read Byzantine Empire and please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:24, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I think "Roman Empire" is extremely recognizable, I'm not sure why you think that's the issue. The issue is consistency. Why do these articles say "Roman" and the ones you reverted say "Byzantine"? Byzantine Empire under the Justinian dynasty and Byzantine Empire under the Palaiologos dynasty SaturatedFatts (talk) 18:30, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SaturatedFatts, I have said everything. --Serols (talk) 18:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not very talkative I see. Well, I am going to edit the ones that say "Roman" to "Byzantine" since you don't allow me to edit the ones that say "Byzantine" to "Roman" and consistency is important here. Have a nice day. SaturatedFatts (talk) 18:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SaturatedFatts, again, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. --Serols (talk) 18:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I read it the first time you linked it. I've changed all the dynasties after the collapse of the Western Roman Empire to Byzantine, so it is recognizable AND consistent. SaturatedFatts (talk) 18:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indians and +44

Without context, "Indians" almost exclusively refers to Amerindians. The people of India are called "East Indians".
A band is way more important than a calling code. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.234.80.57 (talk) 14:24, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and now you are blocked with an expiration time of 31 hours. --Serols (talk) 14:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

We must stand together and help each other brother Nkakha (talk) 10:36, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion

I don't understand Why do you call it greco buddhist art And gandharan art The article seems to be a victim of eurocentrism Indian art is not derived from Greece Please stop this bias.. IRONCULT117 (talk) 12:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IRONCULT117, this ia unsouced and the wrong place and her you deleted Greco-Buddhist art, this is the article name. Please underclass such changes --Serols (talk) 12:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For undoing vandals edits as they pop up. For whatever reason I thought you were an admin but clearly you're not and simply just another vandal fighter. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021 - A Genuine Concern

Hello. Would like to know why you removed multiple terrorist incidents from the Terrorism in India page? it doesnt seem to be the case of vandalism and thus a genuine concern came to me that you are being mistaken. Would love to have your reply. Thanking You TheUniversalEditor — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheUniversalEditor (talk • contribs) 17:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheUniversalEditor, please use upper and lower case. Please change that. --Serols (talk) 18:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is why I will never donate to Wikipedia and discourage everyone from doing that

I rolled back your change at the page [1] because is was not constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.123.150.27 (talk) 15:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. sorry, but If you make it again, you get the next warning. --Serols (talk) 15:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hunterston Brooch

Hi Serols. I'm going to change the article back to my version. It was vandalised by user:Aquacraze777 on the 25th of August, and I was just repairing the refname to fix the cite error. Please see Help:Cite errors/Cite error references no text for details. Thanks 89.241.33.89 (talk) 15:43, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 89.241.33.89, thank you for the information. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, hope you are doing well. I believe you didn't checked what was removed because we(different users) are working on the page to fix the tone that promotes the subject and I removed all the promotional and unreferenced material from the page Guadalupe Hayes-Mota. If I did anything wrong, please do let me know thank you. JK.Kite (talk) 19:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JK.Kite, the answer is on your talk page. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but should I clean the tone right? I did last time but a user reverted saying there's still tone issue that I cleaned. What are these links??? JK.Kite (talk) 19:27, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JK.Kite, do not quite understand what you mean. You have deleted the info box with your editing, therefore my comment on your talk page and revert. The links belong to another post. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect reversal of my contribution.

Your reversal of the change I made ("one of the worst films ever made") is incorrect. The movie is currently on the Wikipedia list of worst films ever made, and I was revising the entry (which incorrectly stated "one of the best films ever made") to correct suspected vandalism.

Please restore the change I made. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4450:8182:E500:EDE2:F6DE:7746:FC43 (talk) 11:10, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2001:4450:8182:E500:EDE2:F6DE:7746:FC43, sorry for my revert, your edit was ok - see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect reverasal of my contribution.

Dear Serols, your reversal was incorrect. I changed the name Mtwara Rural to Mtwara District as per 2012 Census by the National Bereau of Statistics.

recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mtwara Rural

please restore the change I made , thanks. Khalidsalewa (talk) 14:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Khalidsalewa, please note aticle title and Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. Important is also to use sources. I will not take the change back. I hope you did not make these changes anymore. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Serols. So The user 97.101.193.162 has Vandalised assault rifle list, attacks your talk page and false accused me.

Please voice your concerns at WP:ANI instead, and please provide evidence in form of diff links when doing so. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

So The user 97.101.193.162 has attacked and made a lot of vandalism, and used false accuse against me, and attacked your talk page. He said Freak Off although swearing can be hashtagged. 97.101.193.162 has swear using bad words, so thanks for saving your talk page. So I removed the edit from 97.101.193.162 because he broke rules like false accuse & vanalism. Serol, You saved the day. You’re a hero in Wikipedia. Actually 97.101.193.162 got blocked from 2 months. Well that’s true. I’m sure about it. You’re destroying vandalism. If You sign my comment, then thank you for signing it. I’m here to trust you. By: User 101.127.139.158

Hello 101.127.139.158, thank you for the information and your friendly words. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You’re Welcome Serols :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.127.139.158 (talk) 01:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks Like 97.101.193.162 is deleting blocks for no reason so he got blocked for 3 months. His block timing increased for removing a block for no reasons. Sign my comment so I can eventually be helping you. Big update at the date:17 October 2021. By:2406:3003:2002:57:11da:1ced:a437:57a2

Hello, this is user 97.101.193.162. I'm contacting you to report user 101.127.139.158 and his alternate IP 2406:3003:2002:57:11DA:1CED:A437:57A2. This user has spent the last 24 hours harassing me and claims to have the power to "Block" me for disruptive editing. I have already reported him to the Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism page, yet he continues to harass me. Can you do anything? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.101.193.162 (talk) 11:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

If anyone fits the description "Defender of the Wiki" and "Tireless Contributor" at the same time, it's you. You seem to be patrolling recent changes 24/7! Thank you very much for your tireless work in defending the encyclopedia against spam, vandalism and other policy violations. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ~ ToBeFree, many many thanks. Have a nice Sunday. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 12:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

Hi so I see that you removed my edit to the skara Wikipedia page and I see you are talking about my spelling can you tell me what I spelled wrong and what was bad about my grammar and give me advice to improve Wikilover126 (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikilover126, please use upper and lower case. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:21, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will try to improve that Wikilover126 (talk) 14:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok done is it now good?

P.S. I added citation’s in case if that might be needed Wikilover126 (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikilover126, its ok now. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read pages before editing them

You evidently did not read the page before making this edit. You have failed to reach your intended audience.

Have a day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.228.78.75 (talk) 13:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 207.228.78.75, more edits like [2] this] you risk to block. --Serols (talk) 15:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted criticism of your actions here, so 47 of your edits have been reverted. Keep fighting against anonymous IP addresses, and stay irrelevant! 207.228.78.5 (talk) 13:42, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare's influence

Hey Serols,

Regarding your message on my talk page and the edit I made to Shakespeare's influence, I did put my reasoning for removing the infobox in the edit summary (specifically that 1] other similar articles such as Religious views of William Shakespeare and Reputation of William Shakespeare do not contain an person infobox as they are not biography articles and 2] that the main article's infobox and this articles box are different and will continue to drift out of sync with one another).

Do you think that my edit summary was too brief or that I should have brought it up on the talk page first (I couldn't see any discussion there on this and don't think there was a particular consensus around keeping it) Cakelot1 (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cakelot1, please do not delete the infobox, the box contains important information. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that this information in the infobox is an almost duplicate of the infobox on the main page (compare William Shakespeare with Shakespeare's influence). It dosn't seem usful to have a duplicated slightly incorrect biographical infobox on a non-biographical page. I'll probably bring it up on the talk page to see what others think of removing it. Cakelot1 (talk) 13:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edmund Nagle

Hi, thanks for rollbacking the additions to Edmund Nagle while I sat there staring at the page wondering what I should do. Thought I'd note that while you labelled it as unsourced content it was also a straight rip of this website. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pickersgill-Cunliffe, with specification of the source, the editing would be ok. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already solved the problem of "Spanish-Catalan"

Hello Serols:

I am writing you this message to tell you that I re-edited the articles of Catalan politicians and I was successful. This time I used the consensus formula: "Spanish politician from Catalonia" and nobody reversed my edits.

Personally, I think that the other users who edited those articles and who insisted that only the term "Catalan" be used is because those users are in favor of the Catalan independence ideology. And I think it is very likely that those users know the consensus but prefer to ignore it.

I think that Wikipedia content should be neutral and not influenced by the political ideology of the users. I think that the consensus formula is quite neutral.

Here I send you the link to one of my editions so that you can see the explanation that I used in the edition summary:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1047293241

Greetings Aziyade Gil (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aziyade Gil, thanks for the information. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 15:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About The Ice Cream Man page

I apologize if I messed up your work on it. I was only trying to add the cover image. I'm new to Wikipedia editing and would like to fix the issues I caused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halyna11 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About The Ice Cream Man page pt2

I would like to help fix it, as long as there's a way to add the cover image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halyna11 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Halyna11, the cover image does not exist, otherwise I would have inserted it. If you work something, please use the button Show changes, before you publish the editing. Please ask me, if you need help. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 15:16, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Serols reported by User:ToBeFree (Result: ). Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ~ ToBeFree, thank you for informing me. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RFPP Decline and Query

Hi Serols,

I just declined your RFPP request about Quranism. I obviously first looked at the most recent set of large removals by an IP, and I was wondering why you a) reverted them stating unexplained content removal when they had edit summaries and b) reported it as vandalism.

I also checked back a few days further, and while there are clearly content disagreements, I couldn't spot clearcut vandalism, please feel free to point out if incorrect Nosebagbear (talk) 18:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nosebagbear, thank you for informing me. If it is ok for you, it's that for me too. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:42, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2.97.230.9

Hi Serols. I'm confused. This IP made an unconstructive edit at 14:10 UTC and you gave the IP a uw-vandal3 at 14:11 UTC, but then reported them to AIV a minute later despite the IP having made no further edits. It's not the first time I've seen you do this but I'm often on my phone. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HJ Mitchell, the last vandalism edit was 14:45 UTC, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But you miss my point. They made that edit as I was typing (and I've now blocked the IP), and after you reported them to AIV. At the time you made the AIV report, they hadn't edited since the warning you gave them. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HJ Mitchell, please see the edit history, the IP has made vandalism edits in three hours, there would have been more, what happened. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm familiar with their edit history. What I don't understand is why you warned them, and then reported them to AIV before they made another edit. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HJ Mitchell, I do not understand your problem. The IP had three warnings after three vandalism edits 1 2 3 in two hours, two of them from me, so I reported that. After that came the fourth 4. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that you gave the third warning for the third edit (fine), but then reported them to AIV a minute later before they made any other edits. I don't understand why you would escalate to AIV before the IP edits again.

Hello HJ Mitchell, please sign your comments.

Take a look at it from another side: If the IP had been blocked after the third warning, would not have given the fourth vandalism edit anymore. I think in Wikipedia there is enough vandalism, since you would not have been needed. The discussion is finished for me. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You always revert something like vandalism edits! TylerMagee (talk) 15:27, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

jesus christ, stop reverting vandalism so fast, I can't keep up! Every time I go to revert something, you've already done it. 9yz (talk) 18:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 9yz, I'm doing it slower now. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Recent Changes Barnstar
		Keep up the good work on RC Patrol! Mako001 (talk) 13:15, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For reverting vandalism when you encounter it. For whatever reason I thought you were an admin but it appears you are not. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I understand Can u help me on creating a Bio !!

I agree Princejoel44 (talk) 20:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Princejoel44, see here -> Wikipedia:How to create a page. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar (or maybe 2) for you!

		The Admin's Barnstar
		You should be an admin! Lopbunny69 (talk) 18:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Admin's Barnstar
		So 2 admin stars should be good! Lopbunny69 (talk) 18:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You deserve to be an admin so you get TWO admin barnstars! (how fitting!) Lopbunny69 (talk) 17:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for reverting vandalism on thousands of articles I think so. Have a nice day. And oh... you got so many awards!!!! RainbowLover334148 (talk) 07:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yaqub-Har

[3] - maybe a bit harsh but there is no way they can edit that article sensibly at the moment. I couldn't think of a better word than "gibberish". Doug Weller talk 12:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doug Weller, you have made the best. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 13:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Clark Regarding Pacific White-Sided Dolphins Article

I made a change to the article on Pacific White-Sided Dolphins. The citation with the scientific name is NOAA Fisheries or https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/pacific-white-sided-dolphin

Ryan2021 (talk) 01:41, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ryan2021, this source is perfect. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

...recent edit summary, for my reversion. The link is dangerous as it stands. Better to have no link than an unsafe one. If you want, take the time to find a working link! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:246:C700:558:EDC1:CD9B:658C:A37C (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a link. Minkai^(rawr!)_{(see where I screwed up)} 16:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2601:246:C700:558:EDC1:CD9B:658C:A37C, your edit was ok. sorry for my revert. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry

I apologise for apparently vandalising the page. I’ve only just read your messages now and I’ve now realised what i’ve done. I just wanted to let you know that I’m sorry

Mr Fredericks 2A02:C7F:5027:4300:2026:D375:98AA:AC95 (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please stop with your vandalism. --Serols (talk) 16:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian Soviet Republic

The user used sources from communist era writers. He also made fantastic claims, which are not supported by the sources. He elevated/highlighted sentences from the original context of his source, where it is enough to read and see the full context/ pages of his source which prove that his sentences are not represent the reality. --Kandallok (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The most stupid and misleading sentences can be found in the lead of the article.

For example, the war with Czechoslovakia and the establishment of Slovak Soviet Republic is a caesura in the chain of events. He stated that Czech Serbo-French and Romanian armies occupied territories because they fought aganst communism. False. Béla kun and his comrades were POWs in Russia, when Serbo-French Romanian and Czech forces started to occupy the territories of the liberal/capitalist First Hungarian Republic led by Count Mihály Károlyi. So the capitalist/Liberal Hungary lost around 75 % of its territory before the communist coup attempt and creation of Svoiet Republic. So the territorial occupation of neighbouring countries did not start as a war against communism, but simply for for territorial gain/occupation against the capitalist First Hungarian Republic.

He also stated that military officers supported the war. However they left the Red army (with their leader Aurel Stromfeld ) after the establishment of Slovak Soviet Republic. He also stated that everybody supported the communists, which is false, because the Communists government had no authority in the countriside, where the communist waged war against the people of the countryside, the so-called Red Terror (Hungary).He also failed to mention of the original name of the Republic, which is lost in the mistranslation.

--Kandallok (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For all of your efforts to revert vandalism and make Wikipedia a better place! My Pants Metal (talk) 18:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For beating me to the revert button a ridiculous amount of times! Coolperson177 (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Recent Changes Barnstar
		SoNiC SpeEd!1!!!11! Lopbunny69 (talk) 15:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 580: / Line 580: @@
-=== Hungarian Soviet Republic ===
+== Hungarian Soviet Republic ==
 The user used sources from communist era writers. He also made fantastic claims, which are not supported by the sources. He elevated/highlighted sentences from the original context of his source, where it is enough to read and see the full context/ pages of his source which prove that his sentences are not represent the reality.
 --[[User:Kandallok|Kandallok]] ([[User talk:Kandallok|talk]]) 16:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
@@ Line 589: / Line 589: @@
 He also stated that military officers supported the war. However they left the Red army (with their leader Aurel Stromfeld ) after the establishment of Slovak Soviet Republic.
-He also stated that everybody supported the communists, which is false, because the Communists government had no authority in the countriside, where the communist waged war against the people of the countryside, the so-called [[Red Terror (Hungary)]].
+He also stated that everybody supported the communists, which is false, because the Communists government had no authority in the countriside, where the communist waged war against the people of the countryside, the so-called [[Red Terror (Hungary)]].He also failed to mention of the original name of the Republic, which is lost in the mistranslation.
 --[[User:Kandallok|Kandallok]] ([[User talk:Kandallok|talk]]) 16:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)