Talk:Star Trek: Enterprise: Difference between revisions
→Incorrect math in Intro: new section |
|||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
: I found that while looking for other sources, so maybe you or some other [[wikt:cynophilist]] could find someplace appropriate to add it ... or maybe the dog just isn't notable. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.76.142.97|109.76.142.97]] ([[User talk:109.76.142.97|talk]]) 05:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
: I found that while looking for other sources, so maybe you or some other [[wikt:cynophilist]] could find someplace appropriate to add it ... or maybe the dog just isn't notable. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.76.142.97|109.76.142.97]] ([[User talk:109.76.142.97|talk]]) 05:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC) |
||
::: There is information about Porthos on the character page for [[Jonathan_Archer#Porthos|Jonathan_Archer]]. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.77.204.50|109.77.204.50]] ([[User talk:109.77.204.50|talk]]) 11:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC) |
::: There is information about Porthos on the character page for [[Jonathan_Archer#Porthos|Jonathan_Archer]]. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.77.204.50|109.77.204.50]] ([[User talk:109.77.204.50|talk]]) 11:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Incorrect math in Intro == |
|||
In the intro the article states that the end of ST:E marked an 18 year hiatus of no new star trek episodes. This math is incorrect, as the drought was from 2005 to 2017. I have attempted to rectify this mistake but have had my edits removed due to vandalism. |
Revision as of 11:55, 30 November 2021
Star Trek: Enterprise has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 8, 2016. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Scott Bakula was the only actor considered to play Jonathan Archer in Star Trek: Enterprise? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Porthos?
What, no mention of the Captain's best friend? 92.5.241.222 (talk) 12:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
- What, you mean like this: The Beacon Journal of Ohio interview with Berman and Braga "`Star Trek' heading to new space territory".
Although fan passion can lead to raging debates over the smallest Star Trek detail, reaction to the first part of Enterprise has for the most part been good, Braga said.
``We were really worried about the dog, said Braga, referring to Archer's dog, Porthos, who travels with him. ``We loved the idea of the dog because it was one of those myriad elements that humanize this crew. But we were worried that people would think, `Oh, look at this obvious ploy for sympathy.... '
``We were overwhelmed how positive people were toward the dog, he said. ``It's really astonishing. Everybody loves this dog.
- I found that while looking for other sources, so maybe you or some other wikt:cynophilist could find someplace appropriate to add it ... or maybe the dog just isn't notable. -- 109.76.142.97 (talk) 05:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
- There is information about Porthos on the character page for Jonathan_Archer. -- 109.77.204.50 (talk) 11:54, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Incorrect math in Intro
In the intro the article states that the end of ST:E marked an 18 year hiatus of no new star trek episodes. This math is incorrect, as the drought was from 2005 to 2017. I have attempted to rectify this mistake but have had my edits removed due to vandalism.
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class Star Trek articles
- Top-importance Star Trek articles
- WikiProject Star Trek articles
- GA-Class science fiction articles
- Mid-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- GA-Class television articles
- Mid-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class American television articles
- Mid-importance American television articles
- American television task force articles
- WikiProject United States articles