User talk:Abductive: Difference between revisions
SuggestBot (talk | contribs) SuggestBot recommends these articles... |
m Question about geolocation source |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|replace |
|replace |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Cap Haitien explosion == |
|||
Thank you for providing the coordinates for the Cap Haitien explosion. Are you able to provide a source for the geolocation information? Regards. [[User:Pmallas|Pmallas]] ([[User talk:Pmallas|talk]]) 18:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot == |
== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot == |
Revision as of 18:24, 14 December 2021
This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Cap Haitien explosion
Thank you for providing the coordinates for the Cap Haitien explosion. Are you able to provide a source for the geolocation information? Regards. Pmallas (talk) 18:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Prunus elaeagrifolia
I'm interested in the note [a] that you put at Prunus elaeagrifolia. Was it based on a source? The epithet elaeagnifolia would more obviously be based on Elaeagnus + i + folia, meaning 'with leaves like Elaeagnus'. The etymology of Eleagnus varies a bit by source; I'm currently constructing something for the article. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Peter coxhead: There was a source online, and it might even be one of the ones in the article, but since so much time has passed I can't be sure what the source was. If you can't find it let me know. Abductive (reasoning) 08:18, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- I've looked at the sources in the article that I can find online, and searched in Google Scholar for "elaeagrifolia elaeagnifolia", and all I've found, so far anyway, is sources using elaeagnifolia with elaeagrifolia as a synonym/typographic variant. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'm looking for it. Abductive (reasoning) 09:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. IPNI is muddled, I've found. It agrees that the correction to "elaeagnifolia" is wrong for Pyrus elaeagrifolia, but not for Prunus elaeagnifolia which it says has the basionym Amygdalus "elaeagnifolia" although Amygdalus ealeagrifolia notes that the "n" is incorrect (albeit with currently a typo). I've pointed out to them the inconsistencies. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:34, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- I think that was it, I seem to recall that phrase "The correction is unwarranted". Abductive (reasoning) 09:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- It's the sentence
He seems to have meant elaeagrifolia, "wild olive-leaved"; from elaea, "olive tree"; agrios, "wild".
which isn't sourced that I'd like to either source or remove. IPNI doesn't say what the original derivation was, and none of my books on plant names do either. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:18, 13 October 2021 (UTC)- @Peter coxhead: Ah, well, I read it at the time, I think in a resource on HathiTrust, but I can't find it now. So go ahead and change it, I'm always happy when someone works on my stubs. Abductive (reasoning) 10:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'll look for a bit longer, because I think the explanation is right, and important in the article as it supports the use of this spelling. I'd like to move it to the main text, but then it definitely should be sourced. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:26, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe I'll look some more too. Abductive (reasoning) 06:30, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Peter coxhead: I found this scrap of text floating around, according to W. Greuter (pers. comm. via e-mail on 29 Apr 2011), this name was likely intentionally based on the Greek "elaeagros" meaning wild olive tree, not "elaeagnos", and thus the original spelling is not a correctible orthographic error which dates to 09-Mar-2017, before I created the article. Abductive (reasoning) 10:37, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Excellent! There can hardly be anyone more expert on the ICNafp than Walter Greuter. Thanks. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:40, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Glad to be of assistance. Abductive (reasoning) 10:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Excellent! There can hardly be anyone more expert on the ICNafp than Walter Greuter. Thanks. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:40, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'll look for a bit longer, because I think the explanation is right, and important in the article as it supports the use of this spelling. I'd like to move it to the main text, but then it definitely should be sourced. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:26, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Peter coxhead: Ah, well, I read it at the time, I think in a resource on HathiTrust, but I can't find it now. So go ahead and change it, I'm always happy when someone works on my stubs. Abductive (reasoning) 10:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- It's the sentence
- I think that was it, I seem to recall that phrase "The correction is unwarranted". Abductive (reasoning) 09:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. IPNI is muddled, I've found. It agrees that the correction to "elaeagnifolia" is wrong for Pyrus elaeagrifolia, but not for Prunus elaeagnifolia which it says has the basionym Amygdalus "elaeagnifolia" although Amygdalus ealeagrifolia notes that the "n" is incorrect (albeit with currently a typo). I've pointed out to them the inconsistencies. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:34, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'm looking for it. Abductive (reasoning) 09:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- I've looked at the sources in the article that I can find online, and searched in Google Scholar for "elaeagrifolia elaeagnifolia", and all I've found, so far anyway, is sources using elaeagnifolia with elaeagrifolia as a synonym/typographic variant. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
WikiCup 2021 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:
- The Rambling Man (submissions) with 5072 points
- Lee Vilenski (submissions) with 3276 points
- Amakuru (submissions) with 3197 points
- Epicgenius (submissions) with 1611 points
- Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1571 points
- BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 1420 points
- Hog Farm (submissions) with 1043 points
- Bloom6132 (submissions) with 528 points
All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
- The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
- Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
- Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
- The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
- The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
- Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.
If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Shiba inu coin
Looking through the edit history you seem very intent on claiming shib to he a pump and dump and adding fraud to the line. This is completely untrue and unfounded accusations. I highly suggest you do a little more research into these kind if things before editing, shib is infact a defi ecosystem with upcoming layer 2 solutions, working exchange (dex) , nft gaming, staking systems and is supported by a massive community of almost 1million holders. If you would like help locating valid sources fir this information let me know, for now I'll leave it to you to do the right thing. 49.195.146.38 (talk) 21:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)