User talk:Princepratap1234

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Regarding Ayesha Singh

Ayesha Singh is currently playing a major role in Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin. She also played an important role in a TV Show Zindagi Abhi Baaki Hai Mere Ghost and also did a major role in a movie Adrishya. Kindly requesting to please stop the deletion process. Fierce lady (talk) 05:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Fierce lady,

Please stop badgering other editors. Assume good faith. This editor has the right to nominate an article for deletion if they believe it doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:41, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Ayesha Singh

Respected Princepratap1234 , Ayesha Singh is playing the lead role of SAI JOSHI in Star Plus Most Popular TV Show Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin . Apart from this show , Ayesha Singh has played the lead role of Amy D'Costa in Zindagi Abhi Baaki Hai Mere Ghost . She has debuted in the year 2015 and played a pivotal cameo role in Zee TV Popular Show Doli Armaano Ki as Ratti Sinha . She is the Female Lead in her Bollywood Debut Adrishya . She is TOP-5 TV Personality by FMN and Ormax Rating as well . I have mentioned three major roles apart from the current show Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Meiin . So , I request to take back your vote given for deleting this page . Here's the appreciation article : [1] 49.206.48.15 (talk) 05:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Sreemoyee

You've removed some information from the lead section of the following summary with the edit summary 'unsourced'. The informations are not unsourced. The infobox has a link to the show in hotstar. I've replaced a source which indicates the production. So, I request you not to revert them. Thank you. Shinnosuke15, 18:07, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Aneri Vajani

thanks for reverting my edits on Anupamaa related to Aneri's character. As I was also going to do the same. Because I wasn't able to find out the citations related to same that she has started shooting from yesterday. Though I saw it on post by sbs. But the citations were not provided. Pri2000 (talk) 20:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Hey!

Can a draft be proposed for deletion? I tried adding the template using {{subst:Proposed deletion}} but I guess that's only for articles. Are there any templates for deletion of drafts apart from MfD? ManaliJain (talk) 06:03, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

ManaliJain, use this one {{subst:Proposed draft deletion}} and read Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of drafts.Princepratap1234 (talk) 07:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I went through this page but this template isn't working. ManaliJain (talk) 08:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

ManaliJain , use this one {{Db-g7}}.Princepratap1234 (talk) 09:23, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Alright, thank you! ManaliJain (talk) 10:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Your viewpoint?

Tell me one thing, is it okay to directly create an article for a film instead of a draft? Like yes, it's been done by many but are there any chances of the article to get deleted for any reason if being created directly as it's a stub? I want you to have a look on Draft:Tiku Weds Sheru and tell me should I give it for a review and wait or should I create an article directly with the details and sources I have. It's already been replicated once by an editor and I don't want that to happen again. Please give me your genuine opinion on this. ManaliJain (talk) 12:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

ManaliJain, it's not mandatory to create draft ,you can directly create article in mainspace if it's notable. For creating articles on future films, see WP:NFF and WP:FUTFILMS.Princepratap1234 (talk) 17:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Alright, I've seen these two links. But since many of the upcoming films already have their articles so should I also create an article of it instead? ManaliJain (talk) 04:16, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

ManaliJain, not sure but if principal photography has begun then i think you can create a page.Princepratap1234 (talk) 07:14, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Okay, thank you!! ManaliJain (talk) 08:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Hey, sorry for asking this again, what should I do with the draft now? Just blank the page and not edit anymore so eventually it'll get deleted after six months or should I propose it for deletion again (which I don't think is right coz I had requested it for undeletion yesterday itself). I know it has got messed up but it all started with that sock making it a havoc and now I'm kinda confused with all this. ManaliJain (talk) 11:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

ManaliJain, just leave it , it will be deleted after 6 months.Princepratap1234 (talk) 11:34, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes alright, thank you again. ManaliJain (talk) 13:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover of gal karke.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of gal karke.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

GQ - Reliable?

Hi, hope you're having a good day. Just wanted a quick opinion on whether GQ is considered a reliable source (according to me, it does)? This one by GQ India [2] mentions Gupta starring in the particular show (though we don't know his character's name yet) but can this one get added to the article? ManaliJain (talk) 05:53, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

ManaliJain, Read this [3] ,can be considered reliable for entertainment related things. Happy new year Manali!. Princepratap1234 (talk) 06:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Yess, thanks. Happy new year to you too! ManaliJain (talk) 06:50, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Article

Contact kijiye mujhe ek Article banwana hai ek Actor ke baare mein. Email - susovbloggs.immovableforce@gmail.com 2409:4060:10A:405F:0:0:2B1D:90B0 (talk) 20:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

FYI

I am not sure if you are aware, this is a courtesy ping. A user has accused you of sockpuppetry here. 2405:201:4013:8136:BCD7:2385:E02A:2FD7 (talk) 23:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Fake edits by an user

A user is continuously doing false edits on Anupamaa . And that person do exactly same edits like an earlier blocked user on Duryodhana article. Surprisingly both have same names from television series Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai's characters Kartik+Naira=Kaira their son Kairav and new addition Kartik+Sirat=KaiRat. So I feel both are sockpuppet of each other. I'm providing link to their edits also: [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] Now comes her continuous disruptive fake edits on Anupamaa [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] Now on the basis of similarities of edits in Duryodhana, Wives of Karna and Vrishketu and the disruptive fake edits on Anupamaa again and again can we file a sockpuppetry case and disruptive fake edits case against her??? Pri2000 (talk) 20:41, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Pri2000, you should file Sockpuppet investigation.Princepratap1234 (talk) 05:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

thanks Pri2000 (talk) 09:13, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

@Princepratap1234:I've filed the case. Kindly review it. And tell me if any changes are required

[25]Pri2000 (talk) 12:22, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

I have shifted your comments to the right place and you didn't reply to my message.Princepratap1234 (talk) 13:26, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

About our fight

See Mr. Pratap please listen calmly what I'm saying. As I'm also saying this in a calm mood. Even I'm fed up with this fight. I doesn't know who that user is. What I just know is I creates talk pages for new editors. So did I today. Even I did it same for Adoringparas too. And many other new editors in past. I doesn't know how and why copied my language in her comment. But seeing her further sentence now I came to know that it's one other sock of Krishika Sahni aka Kiki. The master of everyone. I previously told you she always do stupidities. As I know her very well. So she did in the form of this new user Gari whatever this girl's further name is in this new account. The language "Huge Fan Following" is only used by her. Earlier also she added his "Insta King of the week" title given by Tellychakkar in his article. So she did today. Maybe she came to know about her sockpuppetry case. I doesn't know from where she came to know about it. Because I blocked her and she blocked me several months back. And I won't tell that ill mannered girl about the same. And sorry for booking case against you. But the editing history of my talk page only pointed towards you. Like you start any conversation with "Hi" and "Hey" so do they. Like you're a citizen of UP like me so do that IP. Even that person repeatedly used exactly the same language which you did. And Manali's email also. Made me observe the similarities between you both. I didn't filed the case intentionally to demean you. I was really fed up with that constant harrasment. Same happened with me last week also. And today you booked me falsely without even discussing like earlier. Like you did at that Tajmashaik time. I clearly told you that girl just copied my text. So the new user today by altering some text. I found that user new. And as per my nature created her talk page with the help of my talk page. But I didn't knew that it'll lead to sockpuppetry case and ugly fight between us. When it started intensifying I warned that user too. And I'm 100% sure she's Kiki. But it kept intensifying from both of us. Now I kept a calm in my mind and left you this message. Hope you'll understand what I'm trying to say. And will help me in filing that Gari in Kiki's case. I promise I'll not bother you. Pri2000 (talk) 14:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Pri2000, ok I understand so we should stop all these things here.Princepratap1234 (talk) 14:35, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

@Princepratap1234:yes. Main apka case remove kr rhi hun. Ap mera kariye. Aur wo new user Gari jo bhi hai usko Kiki ke case mein merge kariye pleasePri2000 (talk) 14:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Pri2000, Ok.Princepratap1234 (talk) 14:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

I removed you from that complaint. I only mentioned those IPs who mentally harassed me Pri2000 (talk) 14:52, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Pri2000, thanks and you are so sweet.Princepratap1234 (talk) 14:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 15:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Princepratap1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't know why am I blocked as the user who suspected me has taken her request back [26] Princepratap1234 (talk) 15:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address the claim that you've been logging out to leave abusive messages on people's talk pages. Yamla (talk) 15:29, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Princepratap1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand my mistake and i promise I won't repeat it. I have contributed a lot to Wikipedia and have been very good editor. I want to start contributing again so please unblock me. Princepratap1234 (talk) 07:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I think your best chance of being unblocked is to take the standard offer and wait 6 months with no sock puppetry, including logged out editing, and re-apply then. PhilKnight (talk) 19:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help

Ravensfire,ManaliJain, Pri2000, could you please file SPI case against him [27] as he is sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wefffrrr. Princepratap1234 (talk) 17:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

You retain access to this talk page solely so you can contest your block, not so you can engage in block evasion by proxy. --Yamla (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Yamla, sorry but i was correct ,see [28].Princepratap1234 (talk) 13:44, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

For the final time. You have access to this talk page solely so you can contest your block. You will not get another warning. --Yamla (talk) 13:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)