Talk:Kolkata: Difference between revisions
Ohnoitsjamie (talk | contribs) not useful |
→ITC Royal Bengal: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
{{edit semi-protected|Kolkata|answered=yes}} |
{{edit semi-protected|Kolkata|answered=yes}} |
||
Please revert vandalism. March 2nd's change by Rajen Gain (changing the description of a cathedral to "Hindu temple", that of the business district to "poverty" and that of a tram to "slums") is not only nonsensical but also broke the formatting. [[User:Nikolaj'u|Nikolaj'u]] ([[User talk:Nikolaj'u|talk]]) 16:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC) |
Please revert vandalism. March 2nd's change by Rajen Gain (changing the description of a cathedral to "Hindu temple", that of the business district to "poverty" and that of a tram to "slums") is not only nonsensical but also broke the formatting. [[User:Nikolaj'u|Nikolaj'u]] ([[User talk:Nikolaj'u|talk]]) 16:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
== ITC Royal Bengal == |
|||
Is that a CGI image instead of a real picture for ITC Royal Bengal? I think better images should be added. [[Special:Contributions/103.161.55.94|103.161.55.94]] ([[User talk:103.161.55.94|talk]]) 14:32, 16 April 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:32, 16 April 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kolkata article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
|
![]() | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | Kolkata is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 26, 2006. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 5, 2004 and August 24, 2011. |
Calcutta History - DUBIOUS sentence
It says: "By the 1850s, Calcutta had two areas: White Town, which was primarily British and centred on Chowringhee and Dalhousie Square; and Black Town, mainly Indian and centred on North Calcutta." This simply isn't possible, the European element of Calcutta according to the 1901 census were 11,425 British in the city, the total population being 949,144 - so the British were roughly 1% of the population. Even though the Europeans may have enjoyed more personal living space, it's abundantly clear that aside from a few streets and tiny enclaves like Chowringhee and Dalhousie Square, the metropolis was (demographically speaking) overwhelmingly Indian in virtually all geographical areas. To say that the Indians mainly centred on the north, presumably leaving the other vast areas of the vast city (East, West, South, central) dominated by or with a substantial presence of Europeans, is clearly FALSE. One source given for this statement is this tiny article: https://web.archive.org/web/20120112023055/http://www.laits.utexas.edu/solvyns-project/hardgraveportrait.html - in this short article I can find no reference to anything about any so-called "white town" nor any information about Calcutta's erstwhile racial demographics, nor anything relating to the 1850's! Instead it's about an artist that drew some nice drawings of city life between 1791-1804. The second source given was a book "Calcutta through 300 years: Changing visions, lasting images" - which I admit I haven't read, but it appears to be a coffee table picture book, with postcard and artists impressions of the city over a period of a few centuries, a glossy unofficial souvenir book published to mark the city's 300th anniversary (1990), very nice I'm sure, but not really an academic source I think. Zac 26/11/19 -
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 August 2021
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to edit some foundation related data. Their are some misconceptions about Kolkata foundation. Soumyadeep176 (talk) 10:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
I want to update some foundation related data. Their are some misconceptions about Kolkata Soumyadeep176 (talk) 10:41, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
- See the panel above: "... the request must be of the form "please change X to Y"." --David Biddulph (talk) 10:48, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 November 2021. Kolkata's gdp is more than 250 bilion us doller
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2409:4061:4E91:2A9B:A04E:92B1:6712:217A (talk) 06:39, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. melecie t 07:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
dear sir Kolkata's gdp ppp is more than 250 bilion us doller.
kolkata's gdp pppis more than 250 bilion us doller 2409:4061:4E91:2A9B:A04E:92B1:6712:217A (talk) 06:42, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2022
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please revert vandalism. March 2nd's change by Rajen Gain (changing the description of a cathedral to "Hindu temple", that of the business district to "poverty" and that of a tram to "slums") is not only nonsensical but also broke the formatting. Nikolaj'u (talk) 16:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
ITC Royal Bengal
Is that a CGI image instead of a real picture for ITC Royal Bengal? I think better images should be added. 103.161.55.94 (talk) 14:32, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use Indian English
- Wikipedia former featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- B-Class India articles
- Top-importance India articles
- B-Class India articles of Top-importance
- B-Class West Bengal articles
- Top-importance West Bengal articles
- B-Class West Bengal articles of Top-importance
- WikiProject West Bengal articles
- B-Class Indian cities articles
- Top-importance Indian cities articles
- B-Class Indian cities articles of Top-importance
- WikiProject Indian cities articles
- Past Indian collaborations of the month
- WikiProject India articles
- B-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- WikiProject Cities core articles
- B-Class WikiProject Cities regional capital articles
- WikiProject Cities regional capital articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Selected anniversaries (October 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (August 2011)