Jump to content

Talk:Ingenuity (helicopter): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
flight 26 length: Somehow the reply order got jumbled up, I think I've fixed it now.
Line 60: Line 60:
The map and helicopters' waypoints at [https://mars.nasa.gov/maps/location/?mission=M20 mars.nasa.gov] show a twice shorter route of circa 186-187 m against 360 m in the flight log. Was it a roundup trip? The [https://twitter.com/NASAJPL/status/1516931305845321729 NASAJPL twitter] sheds no light upon that. [[Special:Contributions/92.100.192.48|92.100.192.48]] ([[User talk:92.100.192.48|talk]]) 05:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
The map and helicopters' waypoints at [https://mars.nasa.gov/maps/location/?mission=M20 mars.nasa.gov] show a twice shorter route of circa 186-187 m against 360 m in the flight log. Was it a roundup trip? The [https://twitter.com/NASAJPL/status/1516931305845321729 NASAJPL twitter] sheds no light upon that. [[Special:Contributions/92.100.192.48|92.100.192.48]] ([[User talk:92.100.192.48|talk]]) 05:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
:The map does make flight 26 look much shorter than flight 25, even though the Log shows 26 to be a little over half the length of 25 (360m vs 708m). I don't see a figure of 186-187m, unless you're guesstimating it by eyeballing the map. Best thing for now, I think, is to use the explicitly published Flight Log data. [[User:DonFB|DonFB]] ([[User talk:DonFB|talk]]) 07:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
:The map does make flight 26 look much shorter than flight 25, even though the Log shows 26 to be a little over half the length of 25 (360m vs 708m). I don't see a figure of 186-187m, unless you're guesstimating it by eyeballing the map. Best thing for now, I think, is to use the explicitly published Flight Log data. [[User:DonFB|DonFB]] ([[User talk:DonFB|talk]]) 07:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
:: If you really don't know other distance measurement tools for maps, than eyeballing, let me draw your eyeballs to the left botton corner of the [https://mars.nasa.gov/maps/location/?mission=M20 NASA's map]. Hope you know what the words '''Map Scale''' above the b/w line mean, and how to measure pixels. You shall get the same estimate of 186÷187.
:: If your eyeballs are too exhausted to measure pixels here's the direct way to pure mathematics. Upload [https://mars.nasa.gov/mmgis-maps/M20/Layers/json/m20_heli_waypoints.json this file] using the 'Helicopter Waypoints' from the left menu of the map (opened with the 'hamburger' button). Values like ''"Easting": 4353346.094, "Northing": 1093714.79 '' are the metric coordinates for each arrival point. Take this pair from the last two lines, and trivial Pythagorean theorem shall return the exact value of '''186,67'''.
:: Since the Flight log '''already'' explicitly publishes 360 m there's nothing to wait from this source. Sorry, but your comment did not help to resolve the obviuos discrepancy.11:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/92.100.192.48|92.100.192.48]] ([[User talk:92.100.192.48#top|talk]])</small><!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:When I look at the map, it seems like the Flight 26 flightpath has been removed. However, in the future, instead having to go through the process of either eyeballing or calculating via latitute/longitude values, you can actually get the exact lengths that the map uses here: [https://mars.nasa.gov/mmgis-maps/M20/Layers/json/m20_heli_flight_path.json]
:When I look at the map, it seems like the Flight 26 flightpath has been removed. However, in the future, instead having to go through the process of either eyeballing or calculating via latitute/longitude values, you can actually get the exact lengths that the map uses here: [https://mars.nasa.gov/mmgis-maps/M20/Layers/json/m20_heli_flight_path.json]
:Since Flight 26 has been removed, I'll use Flight 25 as an example - if you scroll to the very bottom of the source, you can see this line:
:Since Flight 26 has been removed, I'll use Flight 25 as an example - if you scroll to the very bottom of the source, you can see this line:
Line 65: Line 68:
:"Length_m" is the length in meters of Flight 25. These numbers are more precise than the flight log's values - sometimes the flight log can actually deviate considerable because they rounded to a 'nice' number. (see the conversation on my talk page where this was discussed in detail). This is much easier to check than manual calculations, eyeballing, or pixel counting, so its a real time saver!
:"Length_m" is the length in meters of Flight 25. These numbers are more precise than the flight log's values - sometimes the flight log can actually deviate considerable because they rounded to a 'nice' number. (see the conversation on my talk page where this was discussed in detail). This is much easier to check than manual calculations, eyeballing, or pixel counting, so its a real time saver!
:[[User:AlliterativeAnchovies|AlliterativeAnchovies]] ([[User talk:AlliterativeAnchovies|talk]]) 15:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
:[[User:AlliterativeAnchovies|AlliterativeAnchovies]] ([[User talk:AlliterativeAnchovies|talk]]) 15:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
:: If you really don't know other distance measurement tools for maps, than eyeballing, let me draw your eyeballs to the left botton corner of the [https://mars.nasa.gov/maps/location/?mission=M20 NASA's map]. Hope you know what the words '''Map Scale''' above the b/w line mean, and how to measure pixels. You shall get the same estimate of 186÷187.
:: If your eyeballs are too exhausted to measure pixels here's the direct way to pure mathematics. Upload [https://mars.nasa.gov/mmgis-maps/M20/Layers/json/m20_heli_waypoints.json this file] using the 'Helicopter Waypoints' from the left menu of the map (opened with the 'hamburger' button). Values like ''"Easting": 4353346.094, "Northing": 1093714.79 '' are the metric coordinates for each arrival point. Take this pair from the last two lines, and trivial Pythagorean theorem shall return the exact value of '''186,67'''.
:: Since the Flight log '''already'' explicitly publishes 360 m there's nothing to wait from this source. Sorry, but your comment did not help to resolve the obviuos discrepancy.11:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/92.100.192.48|92.100.192.48]] ([[User talk:92.100.192.48#top|talk]]) </small><!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Each figure may be true and may be false depending upon whether the flight was a roundup trip or not. [[Special:Contributions/92.100.192.48|92.100.192.48]] ([[User talk:92.100.192.48|talk]]) 11:37, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Each figure may be true and may be false depending upon whether the flight was a roundup trip or not. [[Special:Contributions/92.100.192.48|92.100.192.48]] ([[User talk:92.100.192.48|talk]]) 11:37, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:00, 24 April 2022

Again Trouble

@Shinkolobwe, DonFB, Randy Kyrn, Yarnalgo, Huntster, Sepidnoor, and Schrauber5:, guys what has again happened NASA has skipped airfield O gone directly from N to PChinakpradhan (talk) 03:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is is a problem. Earlier they skipped airfield I also in naming Here's the earlier discussion called Airfield I or J?? Chinakpradhan (talk) 04:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Explain edit; split section?

I garbled my Edit Summary on Special:Diff/1081886894. I wanted to say:

Status 373 ("Balancing the Risks...") describes "waking Ingenuity at this time without flying" -- "at this time" refers to 9:30 LMST. So, Flight #24 was not a "test" of 9:30 LMST; the test was already done when they woke it without flying to see if it would have enough battery charge at that time of morning. But I think this is all a little too much detail for the Summary text.

ON ANOTHER SUBJECT:

We should think about possibly splitting the "List of flights" section into its own article. The list has become quite long, and will keep growing as long as the helicopter can keep flying. Its length may make the article too unwieldy. Comments? DonFB (talk) 08:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support it Chinakpradhan (talk) 02:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We must Follow the ru:Список полётов Ingenuity where a separate page is made (not their table format) and also put the flight experience table on this page there Don FB Chinakpradhan (talk) 04:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List must be the list of numeric data like the Flight Log at the NASA JPL. Move the wordy explanations for each flight to the new section of the article. 92.100.192.48 (talk) 05:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]
The wordy explanations are what make the list of flights consume a lot of space. If we separated numeric data from summaries, the summaries would still take up a lot of space in the article. Also, I think keeping the summaries in the main article and splitting the numerics into a separate List Article would be quite inconvenient for readers who want to be able to see both types of information in one place. Another possibility is to make the flight list collapsed by default, so the reader is not overwhelmed by it when perusing the article. If they want to see it, a single click would expand it. DonFB (talk) 07:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

flight 26 length

The map and helicopters' waypoints at mars.nasa.gov show a twice shorter route of circa 186-187 m against 360 m in the flight log. Was it a roundup trip? The NASAJPL twitter sheds no light upon that. 92.100.192.48 (talk) 05:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The map does make flight 26 look much shorter than flight 25, even though the Log shows 26 to be a little over half the length of 25 (360m vs 708m). I don't see a figure of 186-187m, unless you're guesstimating it by eyeballing the map. Best thing for now, I think, is to use the explicitly published Flight Log data. DonFB (talk) 07:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you really don't know other distance measurement tools for maps, than eyeballing, let me draw your eyeballs to the left botton corner of the NASA's map. Hope you know what the words Map Scale above the b/w line mean, and how to measure pixels. You shall get the same estimate of 186÷187.
If your eyeballs are too exhausted to measure pixels here's the direct way to pure mathematics. Upload this file using the 'Helicopter Waypoints' from the left menu of the map (opened with the 'hamburger' button). Values like "Easting": 4353346.094, "Northing": 1093714.79 are the metric coordinates for each arrival point. Take this pair from the last two lines, and trivial Pythagorean theorem shall return the exact value of 186,67.
Since the Flight log 'already explicitly publishes 360 m there's nothing to wait from this source. Sorry, but your comment did not help to resolve the obviuos discrepancy.11:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.100.192.48 (talk)
When I look at the map, it seems like the Flight 26 flightpath has been removed. However, in the future, instead having to go through the process of either eyeballing or calculating via latitute/longitude values, you can actually get the exact lengths that the map uses here: [1]
Since Flight 26 has been removed, I'll use Flight 25 as an example - if you scroll to the very bottom of the source, you can see this line:
{"type":"Feature","properties":{"Flight":25,"Sol":403,"Length_m":708.433},"geometry":{"type":"LineString","coordinates":[[77.442472,18.450772],[77.4306,18.454775]]}}
"Length_m" is the length in meters of Flight 25. These numbers are more precise than the flight log's values - sometimes the flight log can actually deviate considerable because they rounded to a 'nice' number. (see the conversation on my talk page where this was discussed in detail). This is much easier to check than manual calculations, eyeballing, or pixel counting, so its a real time saver!
AlliterativeAnchovies (talk) 15:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Each figure may be true and may be false depending upon whether the flight was a roundup trip or not. 92.100.192.48 (talk) 11:37, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]