User talk:BenCKP: Difference between revisions
Decline |
No edit summary |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi, Yes this is another account my old ones were blocked from editing because all were the socketpuppet of '''NomanPK44'''. With '''NomanPK44''' I used to do disruptive editing, especially on Indo-Pak-related pages that is the main reason I was blocked from editing from '''NomanPK44''' account. Yes I know I have abused multiple accounts and I am extremely sorry for that. When I created this account I did decide that I will not do any disruptive edits and will always try to obey the Wiki rules u can also check the editing history of this account most of my edits were productive contribution and doesn't contain vandalism that's why I ask u to please allow me to use this account and unblock me. I have understand the wiki rules and how wiki works vandalism has no place here and I will always try to stop it and also not do it. [[User:BenCKP|BenCKP]] ([[User talk:BenCKP#top|talk]]) 13:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC) |decline = You obviously hadn't the slightest intention of following [[WP:SOCK]] or [[WP:EVADE]]. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 13:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)}} |
{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi, Yes this is another account my old ones were blocked from editing because all were the socketpuppet of '''NomanPK44'''. With '''NomanPK44''' I used to do disruptive editing, especially on Indo-Pak-related pages that is the main reason I was blocked from editing from '''NomanPK44''' account. Yes I know I have abused multiple accounts and I am extremely sorry for that. When I created this account I did decide that I will not do any disruptive edits and will always try to obey the Wiki rules u can also check the editing history of this account most of my edits were productive contribution and doesn't contain vandalism that's why I ask u to please allow me to use this account and unblock me. I have understand the wiki rules and how wiki works vandalism has no place here and I will always try to stop it and also not do it. [[User:BenCKP|BenCKP]] ([[User talk:BenCKP#top|talk]]) 13:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC) |decline = You obviously hadn't the slightest intention of following [[WP:SOCK]] or [[WP:EVADE]]. [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 13:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)}} |
||
{{unblock | reason=Yes I didn't follow socket rules and I am sorry for that. But u also have to realize that I don't have any other options I wanted to edit on Wiki that's why I use to create another account and when they get banned I didn't appeal because I thought the appeal won't get approved as I was doing somewhat disruptive editing with the new accounts as well but when I created this account I decided that I won't be doing any disruptive editing and will be following the rules of the wiki that's why I always tried to not do and disruptive editing with this account. That is the main reason I am appealing to u that please reconsider and allow me to edit as I am not doing what I use to do with my previous accounts and don't again ban me please. [[User:BenCKP|BenCKP]] ([[User talk:BenCKP#top|talk]]) 13:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 13:34, 25 May 2022
Welcome!
|
Peaceray (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
BenCKP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, Yes this is another account my old ones were blocked from editing because all were the socketpuppet of NomanPK44. With NomanPK44 I used to do disruptive editing, especially on Indo-Pak-related pages that is the main reason I was blocked from editing from NomanPK44 account. Yes I know I have abused multiple accounts and I am extremely sorry for that. When I created this account I did decide that I will not do any disruptive edits and will always try to obey the Wiki rules u can also check the editing history of this account most of my edits were productive contribution and doesn't contain vandalism that's why I ask u to please allow me to use this account and unblock me. I have understand the wiki rules and how wiki works vandalism has no place here and I will always try to stop it and also not do it. BenCKP (talk) 13:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You obviously hadn't the slightest intention of following WP:SOCK or WP:EVADE. Yamla (talk) 13:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BenCKP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Yes I didn't follow socket rules and I am sorry for that. But u also have to realize that I don't have any other options I wanted to edit on Wiki that's why I use to create another account and when they get banned I didn't appeal because I thought the appeal won't get approved as I was doing somewhat disruptive editing with the new accounts as well but when I created this account I decided that I won't be doing any disruptive editing and will be following the rules of the wiki that's why I always tried to not do and disruptive editing with this account. That is the main reason I am appealing to u that please reconsider and allow me to edit as I am not doing what I use to do with my previous accounts and don't again ban me please. [[User:BenCKP|BenCKP]] ([[User talk:BenCKP#top|talk]]) 13:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Yes I didn't follow socket rules and I am sorry for that. But u also have to realize that I don't have any other options I wanted to edit on Wiki that's why I use to create another account and when they get banned I didn't appeal because I thought the appeal won't get approved as I was doing somewhat disruptive editing with the new accounts as well but when I created this account I decided that I won't be doing any disruptive editing and will be following the rules of the wiki that's why I always tried to not do and disruptive editing with this account. That is the main reason I am appealing to u that please reconsider and allow me to edit as I am not doing what I use to do with my previous accounts and don't again ban me please. [[User:BenCKP|BenCKP]] ([[User talk:BenCKP#top|talk]]) 13:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Yes I didn't follow socket rules and I am sorry for that. But u also have to realize that I don't have any other options I wanted to edit on Wiki that's why I use to create another account and when they get banned I didn't appeal because I thought the appeal won't get approved as I was doing somewhat disruptive editing with the new accounts as well but when I created this account I decided that I won't be doing any disruptive editing and will be following the rules of the wiki that's why I always tried to not do and disruptive editing with this account. That is the main reason I am appealing to u that please reconsider and allow me to edit as I am not doing what I use to do with my previous accounts and don't again ban me please. [[User:BenCKP|BenCKP]] ([[User talk:BenCKP#top|talk]]) 13:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}