User talk:Sanic the Third Person

July 2022

Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jessa Duggar Seewald have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 21:05, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Hey friend. I notice you didn't bother reading the edit. Please don't contribute to her abuse further. Even if it makes you feel macho. Sanic the Third Person (talk) 21:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jessa Duggar Seewald. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jessa Duggar Seewald was changed by Sanic the Third Person (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888525 on 2022-07-16T21:14:31+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 21:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC) @Bishonen: help me get out of this pickle again Sanic the Third Person (talk) 21:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 21:19, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Sanic the Third Person (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

poop sounds

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=poop sounds |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=poop sounds |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=poop sounds |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}