Jump to content

Talk:Kanjuruhan Stadium disaster: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 23: Line 23:
* '''Support''' per nom. [[User:Yogwi21|Yogwi21]] ([[User talk:Yogwi21|talk]]) 05:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
* '''Support''' per nom. [[User:Yogwi21|Yogwi21]] ([[User talk:Yogwi21|talk]]) 05:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)


*'''Strongly oppose'''. This is a potential mass murder, which most people in the world are not yet even aware of, there is no need to be hurrying to come to conclusions about its nature. Disaster is neutral and accurate and doesn't employ dehumanizing animalistic language. See [[Hillsborough disaster]]. Absolutely not. No. [[User:Sumbuddi|Sumbuddi]] ([[User talk:Sumbuddi|talk]]) 05:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
*'''Strongly oppose'''. This is a potential mass murder, which most people in the world are not yet even aware of, there is no need to be hurrying to come to conclusions about its nature. Disaster is neutral and accurate and doesn't employ dehumanizing animalistic language. See [[Hillsborough disaster]]. Absolutely not. No. Vile, especially considering that Wikipedia WILL be used as sources in news articles (more often than the other way round) [[User:Sumbuddi|Sumbuddi]] ([[User talk:Sumbuddi|talk]]) 05:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:23, 2 October 2022

Title

@WaddlesJP13: Shouldn't the title include "disaster" instead of "stampede" in order to harmonize it with articles of similar case? Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 00:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeromi Mikhael: That may have to be decided between you and page creator SunDawn (and possibly other people, but it may be easier to make the page move now rather than later). I'm not really too familiar with this event and only merged the two articles since both appeared in the Page Curation backlog whilst I was page reviewing. Waddles 🗩 🖉 00:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeromi Mikhael: After looking at Template:Human crushes, it looks like many other similar articles use "stampede" rather than "disaster". Waddles 🗩 🖉 01:03, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 October 2022

2022 Kanjuruhan Stadium disaster2022 Kanjuruhan Stadium stampede – Apologies if its too early for this, but many similar articles have been titled with "stampede" as opposed to "disaster". This would also be a more accurate title, specifying the nature of the disaster as a stampede. See 1 and 2 for a few examples. Precise and recognizable in accordance with WP:CRITERIA. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 04:25, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strongly oppose. This is a potential mass murder, which most people in the world are not yet even aware of, there is no need to be hurrying to come to conclusions about its nature. Disaster is neutral and accurate and doesn't employ dehumanizing animalistic language. See Hillsborough disaster. Absolutely not. No. Vile, especially considering that Wikipedia WILL be used as sources in news articles (more often than the other way round) Sumbuddi (talk) 05:22, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]