Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/feedback: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Bots
2,553,283 edits
Line 2,194: Line 2,194:
;Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
;Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
*None <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Djosefchak|Djosefchak]] ([[User talk:Djosefchak#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Djosefchak|contribs]]) 18:17, 20 September 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*None <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Djosefchak|Djosefchak]] ([[User talk:Djosefchak#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Djosefchak|contribs]]) 18:17, 20 September 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Feedback from [[User:Qhqofficial2022|Qhqofficial2022]] (3 October 2022) ==

<!-- Answer next to the asterisks below the questions. You need not answer all of them. -->
;What was your submission?<!--Either [[Draft:Draft Title]] or [[Article Title]] -->
[[Dog Home Foundation]]

*

;Did you find the instructions clear?
yes
*

;How quickly was your submission reviewed?
its take 2 weeks
*

;Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
Thank you very much for the introduction, I have made all the necessary changes according to your instructions and submitted the article.
*

Revision as of 22:38, 3 October 2022

This page is for user feedback from users of the Wikipedia:Article wizard and the Articles for creation process.
Please let us know what you think of the wizard (what was good? what was bad? what was confusing?), particularly any suggestions for improvement. Note: this page is for new contributors, or established users actively using the wizard. Established users who are not active users of the wizard are asked to comment at Wikipedia talk:Article wizard. Thank you.

Feedback from Dorothy Potter Snyder (5 January 2020)

Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Having difficulty knowing how to improve the article. The sample article for a "Start" quality article is much shorter and has fewer references than the article I wrote. I don't see any grammar mistakes in my article. Therefore, it would be helpful for me to know specifically what demerits this article has to earn it such a low grade; then I could work with greater clarity towards improving it.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Took four+ months.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • My only suggestion is that for those of us who are new at contributing to Wikipedia, it would serve us better for editors and fellow contributors to make sure they're not making comments or suggestions in "shorthand". Lack of clarity in critiques can be frustrating to newbies. Spell it out.

Dorothy Potter Snyder (talk) 00:30, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dorothy Potter Snyder:, I added a note at the top of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Grading scheme, which hopefully should make some things clearer, at least as far as what 'Start' means or what to aim for 'higher' ratings and where to get feedback. Also don't see 'Start' as a 'demerit', these classes are a way to track what remains to be done before it meets the criteria for the 'next' level. Most of the articles I created were Stub/Start/C classes myself. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from JNStove (7 February 2020)

Did you find the instructions clear?

Not really - I wasn't sure why my article only received 'Start' status (no specifics were mentioned)*

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Promptly*

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

I would like some specific suggestions for improving my article please.* — Preceding unsigned comment added by JNStove (talk • contribs) 10:11, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JNStove:, I added a note at the top of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Grading scheme, which hopefully should make some things clearer, at least as far as what 'Start' means or what to aim for 'higher' ratings and where to get feedback. Also don't see 'Start' as a 'demerit', these classes are a way to track what remains to be done before it meets the criteria for the 'next' level. Most of the articles I created were Stub/Start/C classes myself. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Theo8436 (9 March 2020)

Did you find the instructions clear?
  • . I'm sure they are clear put I get lost in here easily.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quickly! I was so excited that I reached a live person!
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from GreatStellatedDodecahedron (26 March 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • The instructions were clear but pretty complicated
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within 90 minutes
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Samsmachado (1 April 2020)

What was your submission?

Him (Cummings play)

Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes!
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • 2.5 months
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from SaladH (1 April 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, the page detailing the process of writing a first article was well written.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within 24 hours! Sooner than I expected :P
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Darmozrac (7 April 2020)

What was your submission?

Melicytus alpinus

Did you find the instructions clear?

sort of , it was a bit overwhelming but clear enough

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

speed of light

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

not at the moment — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darmozrac (talk • contribs) 10:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Gladiator-Citizen (13 April 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • I think I needed a bit more specific guidance when the entry was first rejected.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quickly - which was appreciated
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Yes, as I say above, I needed more specifics like " read about how references must be right after the statements which need proof; and also read about what to do when references are repeated several times through the article." I would not have been so discouraged. Having said that I think I have made leap forward in learning what is important.

I can see some small improvements I can still make and I think the alterations other editors made after submission really improved it. So thanks MurielMary and all concerned. Gladiator-Citizen (talk) 04:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Funny bandana (21 April 2020)

What was your submission?

Mega Cabs

Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Within 2-3 days. I was really surprised by how quickly it was reviewed but it was also a stub article.

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

No, I think it's pretty good the way it is right now.

Feedback from ThePhantom65 (24 April 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, very clear
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • A few hours
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Bdm166 (26 April 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quickly.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from FloyFavorite (1 May 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Draft:Elizabeth Doten
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, only a little arcane ...
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Um, not very quickly -- 2 months. but I was warned.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • No -- I am honored for my article to be accepted. I really like to be part of the Wikipedia process.

FloyFavorite (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from ElsaObuchowski (10 May 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, for the most part.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within an hour or two.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from ElenaEt (11 May 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • some of them
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Thanks to all the people who help answering my questions

@nickmoreau thanksElenaEt (talk) 23:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Earthianyogi (14 May 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, instructions are exhaustive. A shorter version could add value to the process, like a short summary of instructions, maybe it already exists.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within a week, I think.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • New articles could be automatically checked for basic items, such as the number of words in the new submission, number of references, if the article title already exists as a subheading within another article, etc.

Earthianyogi (talk) 10:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Pairko (15 May 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Plesiotherapy
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Licks-rocks (16 May 2020)

What was your submission?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connemara_marble

Did you find the instructions clear?

yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

within two days

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

no — Preceding unsigned comment added by Licks-rocks (talk • contribs) 11:57, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Bmantha (27 May 2020)

What was your submission?

Biodiversity Park, Visakhapatnam

Did you find the instructions clear?
  • yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • in a very short time highly remarkable time - few days soon after my submission
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

really the process is nice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmantha (talk • contribs) 01:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Turini2 (27 May 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • yes, very!
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • In just a few hours!
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Rnagfn (29 May 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Costliest cities in the world
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within 16 days
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Uffda608 (31 May 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Less than a day
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Dmbrinton (1 June 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Robert K. Brinton (mountaineer)
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within a week of its submission
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • The process was amazingly smooth and we were assisted in it by several very helpful editors. This was our first Wikipedia submission (I worked together with my sister on it). We were quite worried about the potential conflict of interest issue since the page had to do with my fathers ski mountaineering and rock climbing career but again we received help on this issue and are very thankful that the article was accepted for inclusion in Wikipedia. We'll continue to edit the article as we hope to add a few photos but consider that the main work on it has now been completed.

Dmbrinton (talk) 04:41, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dmbrinton, in the future can you officially disclose your COI per the instructions at WP:DISCLOSECOI? This would be helpful when assessing articles written by you. Sam-2727 (talk) 04:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Okah Ewah Edede (3 June 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes I did.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Two days. That was pretty fast. Thanks to Zanimum.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Not really, I just have two articles I would want the admins to look at, and if they meet Wikipedia's standard, have them indexed for search engines find?
  • Here are the links below:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maheshwara_Medical_College_and_Hospital

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T._G._S._Mahesh

Okah Ewah Edede (talk) 22:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from JoJo Anthrax (4 June 2020)

What was your submission?
  • John Lester Johnson
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • 2-3 hr
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • The new article has "taken with it" the Talk page of my Sandbox, which contains all sorts of messages and comments that predate the article, and indeed have nothing to do with it. I might have missed it, but it might help if the instructions include a suggestion along the lines of "Editors should clear their sandbox Talk page prior to submission - here is how to do that..." Not surprisingly, I do not know how to remove it or otherwise re-set the new article's Talk page.

Feedback from Earthianyogi (5 June 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Angelika Bischof-Delaloye
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • When an article is declined, the author should be encouraged to discuss it with the reviewer directly. Thx

Feedback from Totihan30 (9 June 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Antonio Mercadante
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • No, not at all, but I can easily conclude that was because of my personal intellectual limitations
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Slowly, in my sense. The entire process took two years.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Jonscottcorp (17 June 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • NO
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • N/A
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I followed all instructions and created article with same standards as other wiki pages. I was told it wont be approved because I have to add more info and details. I kept adding more info as I was told and now they say it will probably be deleted because its like an advertisement. Other wiki pages regarding non profit and voting are published, live , with no issues. This article started as the same format as other ones which does not make sense why I needed to add more information and details. Now that I did, they say it will be deleted. JonscottcorpJonscottcorp (talk) 01:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Dtrinikodi (25 June 2020)

What was your submission?
  • charitha pattiaratchi
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very Quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from WakingLili (25 June 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Not really. I created the page in my sandbox first, then used the "Submit for Review" button -- that form is the page I found confusing. First, I wasn't sure what to put for "Subject/heading," because it wasn't clear how it would be used. Is that the name of my article, an edit summary, a message that will accompany the submission, or something else? I ultimately used the title of my article... which meant that when the "Your article has been submitted for review" template was added to the bottom of the page draft, its section heading was also the title of the article, which didn't inspire confidence that I had done the right thing. Second, that heading and template were inserted into the page draft between the "References" heading and the actual list of references. Third, the fact that the form had a giant text edit box which contained a message not to edit it was also confusing. The fact that things worked out this time gives me a lot more confidence for my next submission, but it was my first article and I waited before completing the Submit for Review form because I didn't want to do things wrong. (I know, I know... I should just be bold, but I wanted to do it right.)
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Nearly instantaneously -- thank you to reviewer Timtrent!
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • On the "Submit for Review" form, put clearer instructions about what to do with the "Subject/heading" field. It would help to explain briefly where the field will be used.
  • Get rid of the giant text box that says "don't edit this text box," if possible.
  • If feasible, fix the transclusion of the "Your article is under review" template so that it appears either before the "References" heading or after the end of the references list.

WakingLili (talk) 23:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Atomortis (29 June 2020)

What was your submission?
  • the submission was about an Artist
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Absolutely clear. In the beginning, it was challenging to understand the quality of a source, as a website did not fall under a legitimate information source.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • In less than a month and sometimes less than 2 weeks.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I think having those forums of discussion was also an additional supportive process in order to correct mistakes.

Nonetheless, the experience was wonderful and fruitful.

Feedback

It feels so great to see my article got accept and included in 'class'=C and among the 18th accepted page. Much regards (F5pillar---/ Hey wassup🖋📩) 07:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Atifkumar123456 (21 July 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Profile creation
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • In a Day. That was very fast
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Earthianyogi (24 July 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Kawal Rhode
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • No
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Quite quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Sort the WP:PROF Criteria-1 sorted by having a quantitative threshold for the number of citations needed to qualify.

Feedback from Earthianyogi (24 July 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Vicky Goh
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • No
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Quite quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Sort the WP:PROF Criteria-1 sorted by having a quantitative threshold for the number of citations needed to qualify.

Feedback from Earthianyogi (24 July 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Sanjukta Deb
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • No
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Fairly quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Sort the WP:PROF criteria-1 with a quantitative threshold.

Feedback from DeltaSquad833 (26 July 2020)

What was your submission?
  • SS De Klerk
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • faster than expected
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from VidhyadhariK (28 July 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Articles for creation: Chaithra Rai
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes I found the clear instructions, and I got a very helpful suggestion on the helpdesk also.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • It took 45day for review and acceptance, But I am happy as this is my first article submitted
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from DeltaSnowQueen (28 July 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yep
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Like lightening! I was expecting eight weeks but it was less than an hour.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Cisternet (30 July 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes! Very clear.

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Very quickly - within a week.

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

The first time my article didn't get accepted, and it would have been helpful to know which citations didn't meet the quality standard so I could correct more efficiently. However, after I posted a request for this information, another editor helped, and after I did a thorough edit, my article was accepted! It just might have been more expedient to receive that info upfront. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cisternet (talk • contribs) 14:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Nithiin1983 (31 July 2020)

What was your submission?

Neha Narang

Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

No

Feedback from DaSupremo (4 August 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Nana Oti Akenten
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Quite quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • None

Feedback from Nihaal The Wikipedian (13 August 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • It was very quickly reviewed . It took less than a day.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I request fixing any future bugs because it is a stub class and I want to improve it .

Nihaal The Wikipedian (talk) 07:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Muhammad236 (24 August 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed? it takes time but ok at least reviewed.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Yes please give time to improve the article not to delete so quickly without any notice.

Feedback from Ackee123 (4 September 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • There is so much data in Wikpedia on how to do things I do find it challenging. I have been trying to submit other pages for artists but I realize now I was trying to do too much. Specially as family life has been hectic .. but I found a 5 minute tutorial on Youtube that explained what I needed to do simply and in a friendly manner.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • My submission was reviewed surprisingly quickly as I imagine you are inundated with requests. I am grateful for that. Especially as I want to get more diverse artists represented in Wikipedia.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • It would be great to have a visual 1 - 2 - 3 kind of one sheet showing how to set up a Wikipedia article simply. It would link back to Wikipedia pages for more detail. I am going to try to make one for Wikipedia and for Wikimedia as I am writing a series called The Super Simple Guide.. the idea is to break things down into simple blocks that are visually easy to receive information in a stress-less manner

Thanks also to the Wiki editors who have been trying to help me along the ways

Ackee123 (talk) 22:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Rahulsoman (9 September 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • The submission getting reviewed Quickly.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Loafiewa (13 September 2020)

What was your submission?

On the Heights of Despair

Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Less than 24 hours

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

I was told that I could make an article without using AfC since I've made 10 edits over the last 4 days, but I didn't see any option to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loafiewa (talk • contribs) 15:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Gleeanon409 (29 September 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • n/a
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • very
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I almost exclusively edit using the Visual Editor on my wee old iPhone, with a practical window about 2”*2”; the AfC banners across the top of the article are oppressive, and a barrier to editing. With regular articles AfD and clean-up tags are auto-shrunk and I click to expand and read them.
    I think you may have a sizable percentage of editors who give up rather than edit with those large billboard rejections atop their work. Gleeanon409 (talk) 23:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Insaaniyat (2 October 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Working with Wikipedia is fantastic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insaaniyat (talk • contribs) 05:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Violeta Čapovska (7 October 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Draft:Ivan Čapovski
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, very clear, professional and kind
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quickly, within 24 hours
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 2A01:6500:A105:2514:16F9:E9A0:B008:5D13 (5 November 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Hello there, I fail to understand how can I erase the number 1 from my article.

Can you help me with that?

How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Vladd2000 (23 November 2020)

What was your submission?
  • Pavel Trusov
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • They were OK at best.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Almost 4 months.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Dom672 (27 December 2020)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes they were clear, however the editor was very helpful in showing me a good example
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quickly, within the space of 12 hours it had been reviewed twice!
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from AWikiAA (3 January 2021)

What was your submission?
  • Draft:John Chavis Memorial Park
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • within a day or two
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • noting specific areas of improvement in the article as they relate to the rubric (feedback: "How so?" or "needs more detail here")

Thanks for the speedy review!

Feedback from SenatorLEVI (7 January 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Quite clear.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?

(Less than a day, it was very surprising and also nice.

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Hashim Tariq bhat (18 January 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Shoukanai (22 January 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within a week
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Go4navy (24 January 2021)

What was your submission?
  • Geetanjali Mishra
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Very clear
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quickly, hence extremely satisfied.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from St3095 (26 January 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, I did.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • About two days
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I edited the document and removed colon before category names. Click here. But, these categories didn't go outside the green box (template documentation) and the template are not shown in every single categories.

Feedback from Fossdd (31 January 2021)

What was your submission?

Pine Microsystems Inc.

Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes, of course. Was really easy. Loving it to contribute to Wikipedia.

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Very fast and quick. About maybe some minutes? Thanks to MarioJump83!

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Not really. You're great! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fossdd (talk • contribs) 11:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Phoenix7119 (7 February 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes. The instructions were relatively clear. I understood them. Thank you.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • For me, the entire process took three weeks.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Yes. Please make sure all of your editors understand what constitutes Wikipedia notability. Some of them are clueless. I must admit that I did receive positive feedback from a few people, and I thanked them. And the not so positive feedback provided opportunities for growth as well. But if it had not been for the Editor sdkb, appearing out of nowhere just a few hours ago, I don't know where I would be today. If it's possible, I would like to recommend sdkb for a top Barnstar Award for demonstrating courage, wisdom and fairness. It is clearly deserved.

Phoenix7119 (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Marie C. Grasmeier (14 February 2021)

What was your submission?
  • Maritime Sociology
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Mostly
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quick. Overnight. Thank you so much.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from BrownieKing (20 February 2021)

What was your submission?

My last submission is Tropical cyclones in 1999.

Did you find the instructions clear?

Yeah.

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Just, over a hour.

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Make it faster if they can. But still, good job! Kudos!

Feedback from BTV55 (4 March 2021)

What was your submission?
  • George A. LeMaistre
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, but I found the submission process unclear. I think the problem was the view mode, but I am not sure. I am still a newbie.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quickly. Maybe one hour?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Editing existing articles is easy. Creating a new article is pretty easy. Submitting the new article -- as noted above -- a bit baffling. The biggest obstacle for me remains the discussion process. I am never quite sure how or where that takes place and how matters are resolved, if, indeed, they are. That said, I am loving the opportunity to improve this resource. Thank you for all that everyone does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BTV55 (talk • contribs) 21:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from ProudMallu (9 March 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very fast
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from AGeorges60 (18 March 2021)

What was your submission?

Bio

Did you find the instructions clear?

Very clear

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

very quickly

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

For now I am in the process of learning and I am able to find documentation about everything I need. Certainly, I will get in touch again once I am more familiar with how things work.

Thank you very much for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AGeorges60 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Madge1938 (19 March 2021)

What was your submission?
  • Silvia Schulman
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Well, I've made the edits and submitted changes, but I have no idea what happens next!
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • it took a few months.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from LovingOperaForever (23 March 2021)

What was your submission?

I had different reviews, which from the general wiki point of view can be considered good, but until I got an expert reviewer about my topic, I couldn't move on. Often, the reviewers don't leave any comments and try to get a specific word; it becomes challenging.

Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes, but for a beginner like me, it takes a while to fit the process.

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

The reviews were quick, but the follows up very slow.

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Yes, assign the review to the right team directly (insert a new field to select the article's area) who has the proper knowledge, circumstances that can lead to a delay generated from the reviewer should suggest giving the review to someone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LovingOperaForever (talk • contribs) 20:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Generalrelative (6 April 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yup!
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Super quick!
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Just wanted to say thanks.

Generalrelative (talk) 16:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Socialsciencenerd (7 May 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Absolutely! They were very clear and extremely helpful.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Super-fast.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I think Wikipedia's current practice of encouraging newcomers to submit drafts for review and to obtain feedback is sensible. Once writers have a bit more experience, they can then try and create new pages directly.

Many thanks! Socialsciencenerd (talk) 09:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Yaakovaryeh (10 May 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Pretty clear (but IIRC, could have been clearer).
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • 16 weeks! :/
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Yes, in addition to giving a class rating, include (specific) suggestions for article improvement. The article is given rating but the grading scheme lists numerous criteria which makes it hard to determine which specific aspects require improvement.Yaakovaryeh (talk) 21:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from PhillipRyanNY (19 May 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Unfortunately not. I found everything to be rather confusing.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Not well at all. I've been accused of being paid to write the submission and being accused of having a conflict of interest. I think that's disgusting because your editors are slandering and defaming me and assassinating my character. We (my wife and I )are fans of the town of Marfa and the Marfa lights which we have visited for years. They are a huge phenomenon. There hasn't been a film made about Marfa since Giant with James Dean and it makes us proud. My wife is from Marfa, she grew up there. Once we learned about this film (which seems to have a ton of exposure already all over the internet with trailers and posters and photos that are now legally public domain) I looked it up on imdb and on Wikipedia. I saw that it didn't have a Wikipedia page. So I reached out to the film's social media pages to let them know we are fans of Marfa and that my wife is from there. I told them we are even fans of some of the actors in the film from other projects. It was a while until I heard back from them. I asked for permission as a fan to be able to set up a wiki page and again as a fan to mention them on social media. They said the producers were fine with that and that the film's release was delayed to do Covid, but that as long as we (my wife and I) were fans, they were fine with it.

You're making a mountain of out nothing, being far too dramatic. If your editors had spent this much time doing their own jobs then Destination Marfa would already have had its own Wikipedia page. I wouldn't have had to add anything.

I don't have any attachments to the film other than being a fan of the town of Marfa, I like the trailer they released and I like two or three of the actors. There is no conflict of interest because nothing subjective has been included in the article. It is all objective and all factual. I find your responses and behavior to be uncouth. You've played judge and jury with me and slandered and defamed me. Guilty till proven innocent, and I haven't done anything wrong. I apologize for whatever rules I wasn't aware of but am now aware of them.

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Well you could thank folks for contributing an article and be a little more professional and polite before slandering them. It doesn't make sense to personally attack people, it's just not smart. The process should be a little easier to understand, and you should ask the person submitting the articles more questions before accusing and judging them, it doesn't behoove anyone or make anybody want to ever read or use Wikipedia again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhillipRyanNY (talk • contribs) 16:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Aprilsola (6 June 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within a month
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from AVBT (6 June 2021)

What was your submission?
  • AVBT
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Difficult but ok
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • 4.5 months
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • It is indexed incorrectly. Instead of "surgical oncology" (which means cancer surgery) it should be indexed as "surgical procedures and techniques."

Feedback from Pikabruce (13 June 2021)

What was your submission?
  • Louise Alexander (dancer)
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Clear enough to get it done.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Amazingly fast. After the "up to five months" for approval warning, I was overjoyed to find it posted the next day.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Can't think of anything

Feedback from Mredwin (15 June 2021)

What was your submission?
  • A biography of Bob Boote
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Reasonable i.e. understandable in the end but confusing at first as I am wholly new to creating a page. There was a very large amount of support and advice available but navigatnig to it and getting what helped was tricky (for me)

I found the advice I received wha I asked specific questions very helpful. Many thanks then and to the final reviewer who cleaned up the article.

How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Immediately at first (& rejected) updateated and again after 4 months (& accepted)
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • It would have been nice to know if I was in a queue and that it was moving forward, but that would go against the policy of reviewers picking what they would review.

Feedback from WikiUName (18 June 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • NO - not really . . . . I am have a lot of trouble removed the wrong photo and replacing it with an acceptable one.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • seven months of editing - very painstaking and very slow and I never know how to communicate with anyone. . . hugely depressing and frustrating process . . . . three - four days of adding code at a time. . .
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • yes - if possible - dedicate a terrific competent editor - like captain eek - to a lay person like me . . . so that I can actually know how to add text / what to remove, etc. Right now - I would like to add a photo and launch the article . . . I have no idea how to do either. . . .

Feedback from Henk Jan de Jonge, 26 June, 2021

What was your submission?


Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Thank you for promoting this draft to the start-class. I have read the 'editing suggestions' belonging to this category. However, the references are all to reliable, verifiable, impartial sources or to publications in peer reviewed, publicly accessible publications. If there are other imperfections (grammar, style?), can you please point these out to me? Thank you.

2A02:A465:C8D5:1:B80A:5789:DBD7:E263 (talk) 09:08, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from JashonC2005 (30 June 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from JashonC2005 (30 June 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 大丽 (3 July 2021)

What was your submission?
  • Tong Zeng
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • The writing is very standard, professional and easy to understand. It's just that I need to convert to Chinese. The time is slower.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • I got the review very quickly. It's only a few hours. It's very efficient. Thank the editor who reviewed my articles for me.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Dear editors

First of all, thank you for your recognition and encouragement.

I'm still studying at University in Beijing. I learned a lot by writing Wikipedia.

My grandfather told me the story of Tong Zeng. They are a generation. I adore Mr. Tong Zeng very much. Recently I got his approval to write his article. Coincidentally, Mr. Tong Zeng told me that he recently had an email exchange with Mr. Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia. He congratulated Wikipedia on its 20th anniversary!

Mr. Tong Zeng also said that he would be very honored to be on Wikipedia! Because Wikipedia is the most popular public welfare website.

In addition, I have a request. My article can take a step further from "C". Can you give me more help in this aspect, such as some specific opinions according to my article.

Because I need to look at Wikipedia over the wall. I wonder if there are any volunteer editors of Wikipedia in Beijing.

I wish you all the best!

Beijing: 大丽

7,3

Feedback from Missmeg01 (6 July 2021)

What was your submission?
  • John Steven Gurney
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, but I had to do a lot of searching around to find instructions for each step of the way. It was very much less than straightforward.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • It was about 7 months of waiting.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • The randomness of the review process (the note that articles are reviewed in random order) is ridiculous. They should be reviewed in the order they are received so that there is at least a light at the end of the tunnel when you submit an article. When I submitted, I saw a note that said it could be up to 3 months. This kept getting longer and longer the longer I waited. I felt helpless and it was very frustrating. It does not make me want to go through the process of creating an article again.

Feedback from Neil Erickson (9 July 2021)

What was your submission?
  • Orson Rehearsed
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • In a timely fashion
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Worked great!

Feedback from GRALISTAIR (16 July 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Not too bad
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Definitely slow and room for improvement > 4 months
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 80.147.39.57 (16 July 2021)

What was your submission?
  • Lucy Mensing
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • well, not quite
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • fast, thanks
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • clearer instructions to new users how to upload a ready submission (assuming good knowledge of the wiki language)

Thanks for your help, Stuart!

Feedback from Hanjaf1 (17 July 2021)

What was your submission?

Tobias Adrian

Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes, but I needed help interpreting them, I think.

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Surprisingly fast. Almost immediately. It was submitted, reviewed, revised, re-reviewed, and accepted within 24 hours.

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

No.

Feedback from Lowryedale (26 July 2021)

What was your submission?

Thomas Ellerby Portrait Painter

Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Not for someone who has never been taught anything to do with computers and is having trouble understanding very basic jargon! Seeing where to click for the next stage to be achieved was frequently a real challenge! I did try to read and understand the help guides and am sure 99% of the time the fault was mine but would have loved to find something very basic. I expect it is there but there was just so much information.

Part of the problem was that I had two people sending me messages and one very kindly expanded on the article and my references which then threw me into confusion when I wanted to follow the advice and expand my own. Still I have achieved a stub but still not sure what really happens next and keep being asked how even that can be viewed by others!

How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very, very rapidly - within minutes!
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Adityanag2002 (2 August 2021)

What was your submission?
  • It was about Perin Bharucha nee Chandra a women freedom fighter from Indian sub-continent
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • It took a while but i am glad it was reviewed after initial rejection
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Could you make the interface for submission a little more visually simple. Thanks

Feedback from 100.2.238.109 (9 August 2021)

What was your submission?
  • It was a list of launches by the Minotaur.
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • It took 2 months, and that was lucky. Another 2 of my submissions took 6 months (while pending for one review).
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Yes! Rather than reviewing the submissions in a random order (which caused of my drafts to take 4 minutes for review and another 6 months), review by longest waiting.

Feedback from Vanilie (9 August 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • yes very much
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • less than 5 days which feels very quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • not at the moment but I have a question. The image was deleted, I'd like to know the reason. Thanks!

Feedback from TheresNoTime (23 August 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • I approached this from the viewpoint of a brand new editor (or, as much as I could). I used the Article wizard, which made it very easy to go through the process of ensuring the topic was likely notable enough for inclusion, and provided me guidance on paid/COI editing. The instructions were well written and clearly understandable.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • My submission was reviewed in 6 days
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I could imagine a legitimate new user, who wouldn't have the foreknowledge that drafts can take a while to be reviewed, would be anxious to know how much longer they have to wait. This could be more proactively shown to the editor (though I appreciate the AfC queue is not a true queue)

Feedback from PavanWiki123 (12 September 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, instructions were very clear
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • It was quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • No suggestions thanks

Feedback from Dsfulker (27 September 2021)

What was your submission?
  • Harold Morrison
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, but I will admit this was my first attempt, so it was challenging. Being a man, I tend to try it first then read the instructions once I'm hopelessly lost. However, in this case, I scanned the instructions, got things started, read through them more carefully, fixed several things I'd overlooked, then really read them and realized that I was in for a bit more work than I originally thought. I still see where there are a number of tweaks needed to make him more clean and proper, but coming from a genealogical research background, it was interesting to attempt to enter things from a slightly different perspective. I found the experience difficult and a bit anxiety-ridden, as each "comment" that was posted or when I had a slight "correction" (added categories prior to approval), I kept thinking that I was going to make someone angry and ruin my chances for approval. Now that I've been through the process once, I'll definitely take my time, try not to make rookie mistakes, and take a deep breath when someone is being helpful and hopefully consider that being noticed and receiving comments and helpful hints is all part of the process.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • It was a bit over a month, I think. I didn't count the exact timeframe.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I would love if there were coaches who could chat you through the process, but I suspect like many sites, the number of staff who are "online" is very few and probably centered around development and support of the site, and less available for this purpose. Plus such things increase costs, and that's always a challenge. I think the only thing that might be helpful (and may already be there, there was a lot of help information) might be a sample Wikipedia article - one that was done right and shows examples of all the bells and whistles - so that you could look at it in a finished form, look at it in edit mode and see the behind the scenes pieces, and such. And my only other thought was perhaps an official "You Tube" on creation would have been a good thing too. That too might already be out there, but you never know until you ask. Thanks for an interesting and tremendous learning experience.

Feedback from RealKorgi (17 October 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Quickly
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • The page was renamed from Village Council to Village. It's not a Village, its more like a district or zone.

Feedback from 2006nishan178713 (19 October 2021)

What was your submission?

Dantak

Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes, the instructions were crystal clear.

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

It was reviewed and accepted within 2 days

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

No flaws experienced yet. Good Job Guys!!

Feedback from 41.115.1.220 (5 November 2021)

What was your submission?
  • 2021 South African Hip Hop Awards
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • In less than 5hours it was reviewed and pass Wikipedia article standard
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Dr Shailendra Rajan (10 November 2021)

What was your submission?
  • Journal of Applied Horticulture
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, but some of the points will be explict if helping videos are available for new editors. Instead of visiting videos from YouTube, wikipedia videos will be more meaningful and help in cultivating an excellent crop of new editors. Some of the new people may lose their patience because they don't want to read too much about the methodology but videos can make the things clear easily. However it was an excellent experience and I would like to add hundreds of articles on various aspects of horticulture science.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within an expected time and thanks to the dedicated experienced editors in this area
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from CT55555 (10 November 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • The same day
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 200.113.230.6 (11 November 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Rdxmen000 (12 November 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

thankyou very much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdxmen000 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Zainulabidv (22 November 2021)

What was your submission?

Sayyid Abdurahman Imbichikoya Thangal Al-Aydarusi Al-Azhari

Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

It took almost 2 months.. but still i'm happy as it got reviewed and approved....

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Ahlesunnatwaljamaatofficial.bd (24 November 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • I'm new in Wikipedia. I want to know how improve and approve my first article.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Bruxton (30 November 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, very good guidance. It was specific and targeted.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • That first time it was reviewed in about a day. Now I have resubmitted with improvements which were suggested.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from GRALISTAIR (9 December 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Reasonable
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Recent improvements are a great step forward

Feedback from Logosvenator wikiensis (11 December 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within exactly two hours.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Fridayphilosophy (23 December 2021)

What was your submission?
  • Manual of German Law
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • I am trying to be as generous as possible ... this requires me to sort out what I got wrong ...

A. I think Wiki wants less rather than more in an opening article on a new scholarly subject. So I provided too much information when I started .. but at least that demonstrated that I had researched the online and published sources to an excruciating degree of exactness. B. I think all non-Wiki cites are FNs REFs rather than having the non-Wiki URLs in the text. C. I think I was right to give up for two years since the editor who started reading the page was an expert in Japanese Manga (not sure what that was) and the webpage was on a well-known study of German law.

How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Two years (almost). And when it was deleted after Wiki editors refused to read my corrections, it was not reinstated at my request.

But this turned out to be a bonus, because the Wiki editor DGG did a spectacular job of clean, trimming and presenting the materials.

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • There is a long answer to this Q but I'm too new for you to (probably) care. I think what I have to do is to acquire sufficient Wiki culture (less is more, cites in your format)

and accept that every change will be resisted ... I apologize for the crass nature of what follows, but I am one of the world's leading experts in parliamentary procedure and practice. There are about 20 at my level in the world and I cover the subject in German, Italian and Catalonian as well. It would kind of nice if I could gently update some of the more important Wiki articles in this area ... and have an experienced editor (that means an editor who is experienced like DGG) tidy up the material so that I can gain Wiki-smarts faster. 'Manual of German Law' was an homage to one of my colleagues who died in January 2021 so this is not specialized knowledge that is imperishable. Thanks for listening. Still not sure how to compliment DGG but I'll keep working at it. Best wishes, Peter


​Peter J. Aschenbrenner Fellow, Royal Historical Society National Convenor (US) International Commission for the History of Representative and Parliamentary Institutions Annual Contributor, Public Law (Sweet & Maxwell, London) Decisions of the United States Supreme Court (Terms 2015-2020)

British and American Foundings of Parliamentary Science, 1774-1801 (Routledge, 2017) See routledge.com/British-and-American-Foundings-of-Parliamentary-Science-17741801/Aschenbrenner/p/book/9780367881528 The Papers of John Hatsell, Clerk of the House of Commons (Cambridge University Press for the Royal Historical Society, London, 2020; Camden Fifth Series; co-editor) See royalhistsoc.org/publications/camden-series/ James Monroe, John Marshall and 'The Excellence of Our Institutions' (Routledge, 2022, in press) ‘Can Nation-States Self-Stabilize? From Aristotle through Adam Smith to Hans Kelsen’, in Parliaments, Estates & Representation, vol. 41, no. 3 (December 2021), 259-279. doi.org 10.1080/02606755.2021.1949567 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fridayphilosophy (talk • contribs) 19:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from P37307 (24 December 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Less than one hour! Great job!
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I've edited many articles and researched this and that policy or template over the years so I was ahead of the curve and found it easy. At this point, I can't think of anything that would have made the process go smoother.

Feedback from 67.55.151.208 (30 December 2021)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • 34
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Lord Milner (30 December 2021)

What was your submission?
  • Lancelot Storr
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes (there were no instructions)
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • one month
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Yes. Small submissions, like this, are sometimes dismissed by editors as irrelevant, obscure or too trite. I don't think that's the case at all, and I'm very happy that you gave this your approval. Storr, by the way, was a member of the Imperial War Cabinet during World War I. Thank's for your help, and happy editing!

Feedback from Castlepalace (5 January 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • in about a day, much quicker than expected
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from E Wusk (22 January 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, pretty much.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Astonishingly... just a few minutes.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • No, it was superb. It was rated as start quality, which is fair. I couldn't do much more on this subject.

E Wusk (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from GRALISTAIR (7 February 2022)

What was your submission? Blocked isocyanates
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • YES
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • PRETTY QUICKLY
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Some articles seem to get reviewed quickly - others not so much. Would love to see a breakdown of what type of articles get approved quickly

GRALISTAIR (talk) 20:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Greatder (8 February 2022)

What was your submission? Draft:Organic Maps
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Not really. It was spread across many pages and ambiguos. There was no easy submit button and everything had to be done with clunky templates.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • 1-2 weeks I think? But creation and submission were the problem.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from LRFtheLion (9 February 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Very clear, and the resources were very helpful. This was my first article I have ever contributed, but I found everything I needed to learn how to properly format it, such that I was able to get it approved on my first try without having to resubmit after revisions. The one thing I was not entirely clear on was how to actively participate in the relevant Category tag projects to get feedback from those working on those projects on my draft article. But I think that has more to do with me needing to study up on how talk pages work on Wikipedia.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Eight days, very speedy!
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Maybe just some hand-holding instructions for how new editors and page authors can post a message on a category project to ask for feedback on a draft article. Thank you all, this was a very good experience, and I will think about whether there are other missing topics I am qualified to write articles on. LRFtheLion (talk) 01:02, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from RexEstChristus33AD (18 February 2022)

What was your submission?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T25_Sherman

Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Yeah idk why, maybe It was an oversight on my part or someone eleses but the page is called the 'T25 Sherman' instead of 'T25 Medium Tank' needs fixed.

Feedback from Llightex (27 February 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Kind of. I had to read WP:COI several times to figure out if 1) I could actually create an article where I have a COI with the subject matter and 2) the right process (AfC) to do so.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Fairly quickly, around a month
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • The message on my talk page said, "Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer." However, I went through the AfC process in order to properly create an article as per WP:COI. A future improvement might be to modify this message if someone made the article through AfC because of the WP:COI process (rather than because they are too new of an account to create articles themselves).

Feedback from Respectstherights (9 March 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Very
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Just over three months
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • It would be good to be able to see some kind of progress indicator - there are X articles waiting for review, Y articles submitted before yours, Z articles submitted since - though I don't know how easy that would be. It was just slightly disheartening to wait that length of time and not be sure if what I had written was good enough - so I waited to do other edits. I understand there are only a limited number of reviewers though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Respectstherights (talk • contribs) 12:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from NEOLANI2022 (10 March 2022)

What was your submission?
  • Jasmine Togo-Brisby
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • I think all things considering, I am happy that it was reviewed in the timeframe.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from DongZhuo3kingdoms (13 March 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes and I have found wikipedia easy to use. The only trouble I had was saving the first time, more due to my nerves from "publish changes" then anything wrong with the instructions which told me it would save them and the officer infobox template as more used to visual edit but once got hang of it, found myself quickly growing comfortable with it.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • I submitted it on 13:09 12th March UK time, it was published 1:19 on the 13th. I felt that was very quick.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • For draft articles, changing "publish changes" to save changes might be a helpful tweak? Generally has felt like wikipedia wanted to help make it easy to edit and create an article, I have appreciated the help and encouragement of other editors in my short stay here DongZhuo3kingdoms (talk) 10:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Moehrliblanchli (6 April 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes.

How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • First submission takes about 4 months ? But second was very quickly
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Pgallert (10 April 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • The instructions were clear but incorrect. This is an article where all contributors have a COI, with the original creator blocked for username policy violation and spam, so extra caution was definitely warranted. It was clear from the start that this article would meet significant opposition, which it did.
  • However, that it went as far as bending policy not to have it accepted, I found that surprising. With the exception of the last reviewer (User:Greenman), the AfC 'staff' involved invented policies ('Web site is down, so I cannot assess the ref, so I'm not going to accept it'), deliberately misjudged existing guidelines ('not notable' for a rector of a university), refused to communicate after they had beed notified of their mistake, and generally did not extend a iota of good faith.
  • I mean, I have created hundreds of articles here, and expanded thousands. For this particular one I have a COI, but that does not suddenly make me a bad editor.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • The review process was reasonably fast.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • If the intention was to drive COI editors underground, that might have been successful. The original creator will certainly never again hit the 'edit' button. As for me, I'm more resilient, so no worries. But I don't like the approach that was taken here.

Feedback from RexEstChristus33AD (15 May 2022)

What was your submission?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T25_Sherman

Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Name need to be changed to T25 Medium instead of shermanRexEstChristus33AD (talk) 04:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from TheRealSerenaJoy (16 May 2022)

What was your submission?
  • Andra Ursuta
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • about 7 weeks
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I think the process is solid, no suggestions at the moment.

The Real Serena JoyTalk 22:32, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from ཧེ་དར - སྦལ་ཏི། (20 May 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Absolutely
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within 24 hours
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Not at the moment

(ཧེ་དར - སྦལ་ཏི། (talk) 16:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Feedback from 82.164.156.239 (2 June 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

"Brox Sox" is deleting hours of good wikipedia work. Please do stop this mongering bafoon before he deletes half of Wikipedia concerning Norwegegian noble families. He's deleting things claiming "they're fictitious". Well, darling, all sagas that blend into the medieval times, to quite a large extent are mixed with fairytale. That is why they are the oldest families in Norway, being the very founders of the country and the text itself stated that it is not always easy to know what is true and what is not. It makes one sad and angry that someone would delete ones family history/genealogy, claiming it to be "fictitious" when one is very much breathing and alive, passing down the same true history opposed to Danish state propaganda that tried to exterminate the old pre-Danish Norwegian noble families for centuries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.164.156.239 (talk) 10:38, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from NeverTry4Me (6 June 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes. It was great instruction.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within hours.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • For users like me, senior reviewers should be involved. Kindly do not allow any reviewer who declines simply without checking the draft thoroughly.

Feedback from NeverTry4Me (6 June 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Sure and clear instruction.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • very quickly.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • For users like me, senior reviewers should be involved. Kindly do not allow any reviewer who declines simply without checking the draft thoroughly.

Feedback from NeverTry4Me (12 July 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes. Very much clear.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • OMG. It's a lightning-fast review. I couldn't finish my cup of tea after submission.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • So far, reviewers are doing a great job. Though backlogs are getting increased, they are really fantastic.

Feedback from NeverTry4Me (12 July 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Clear and much appreciable.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • It took a couple of weeks but as the refs and the subject to be reviewed thoroughly it was done per rule. Reviewer scope_creep did it finally.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • To date, I have no such hassle in AfC submission though many of my submissions are pending for weeks, it's fine as reviewers are doing it as a volunteer. They are too human and have other works. I understand their hard work here. I must appreciate their valuable efforts to build the earth's largest Encylopedia. My best regards to them.

Feedback from Greenhill54321 (13 July 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • I'd say about 65% clear, although eventually I made it through the process successfully, so it must have been clear enough. I struggled with knowing what would minimally be required for getting the draft approved. I assume it will evolve and hopefully improve over time, but wasn't sure about the minimum reqs to get this process going.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Initially, I received a message that it could take months for the draft to be reviewed. This was quite unmotivating, to be honest. In the end, it was reviewed the same day I submitted it, which was a very nice surprise and made me feel like my work was valued.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from NeverTry4Me (15 July 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Pretty clear.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within an hour.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • For the last few days, the page reviewers are being too fast. That's a great effort by them. My sincere thanks.

Feedback from NeverTry4Me (16 July 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Res, perfectly clear.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within a few hours.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Splendid efforts by the AfC reviewers. Many thanks to all of them.

Feedback from NeverTry4Me (17 July 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Very clear.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • It took a couple of days. But it's very normal for AfC submission.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • DIVINE is doing splendidly to clear the backlogs. My sincere thanks to him. And of course, thanks to all reviewers for their precious times. All are doing very fast nowadays.

Feedback from NeverTry4Me (4 August 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Very clear.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • It took minimal time. Dwaipayan is very active in AfC review. They are handling Wikiproject WP:VILL too smoothly.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • While WP:VILL is being handled very smoothly and quickly, some other categories are taking a long time. But it's ok as reviewers are doing volunteer here. Bigger drafts need a longer time as it needs to verify sources. I respect their efforts. My best regards

Feedback from Edward-Woodrow (12 August 2022)

What was your submission?

Scolopendra dehaani

Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Moderately clear.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quickly, I was quite impressed.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from BrendaJaneF (17 August 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • 10 days (draft created on 7 August 2022, accepted on 17 August 2022)
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Obuezie (12 September 2022)

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Very well thank you
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • it took 1 year +
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I really appreciate the voluntary efforts to review and create this article, however, I felt attacked by one of the editors I encountered in my difficult times trying to create and publish the article both in their comments and in trying so hard to get my efforts to create the article killed. I suggest that the friendly spaces rule be maintained as I was not paid or influenced to write the article. I was only trying to complete my 1Lib1Ref campaign assignment I started since 2020. I have the username of this editor and would make a formal report if I feel endangered by this user going forward. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Obuezie (talk • contribs) 20:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @Obuezie thank you for your contributions. Can you please be more specific? I looked at the messages on your talk page but did not see anything I would construe as uncivil. However, I may have missed something. S0091 (talk) 21:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@S0091 thank you so much. I am getting the help I needed already AdaObuezie (talk) 21:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Obuezie: We are volunteer editors and care deeply about how new editors are treated. You made an accusation that you "felt attacked" which seems strong language for an event you have not provided evidence for. Could you please explain? Chris Troutman (talk) 21:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman Please, kindly share an official email where I will make a formal report on that.Thank you AdaObuezie (talk) 21:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Obuezie: We usually discuss matters of editor conduct on-wiki. If you want to send an email, please look at Wikipedia:Volunteer Response Team for contact information. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman thank you for your assistance. I noticed that the comments I was referring to has been deleted for reasons best known to the executor. So I needed an email to send screenshots of my observations. That was why I requested for an email.I apologize, it wasn't to disrespect. Obuezie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Obuezie (talk • contribs) 21:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Djosefchak (20 September 2022)

What was your submission?
  • Limnopilos naiyanetri
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes! Everything was very straightforward. It took a little digging around through the tutorials but all of the info I needed was available.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within an hour
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Qhqofficial2022 (3 October 2022)

What was your submission?

Dog Home Foundation

Did you find the instructions clear?

yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

its take 2 weeks

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Thank you very much for the introduction, I have made all the necessary changes according to your instructions and submitted the article.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/feedback&oldid=1113928185"