Jump to content

Talk:Reddit: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 2 discussions to Talk:Reddit/Archive 3. (BOT)
No edit summary
Line 95: Line 95:


:I think you mean "xenophobic" and if you have links to reputable sources that fit Wikipedia's policies, feel free to provide them. [[User:ASpacemanFalls|ASpacemanFalls]] ([[User talk:ASpacemanFalls|talk]]) 16:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
:I think you mean "xenophobic" and if you have links to reputable sources that fit Wikipedia's policies, feel free to provide them. [[User:ASpacemanFalls|ASpacemanFalls]] ([[User talk:ASpacemanFalls|talk]]) 16:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

==Replace "Nathan Allen"==
Hi. My suggestion is to replace "Nathan Allen" in: "Nathan Allen speaks about the r/science community to the American Chemical Society" My suggestion is to replace it with "A forum moderator". The person is not notable, also not in this context; it's a forum moderator. Whose name happens to be Nathan Allen, yes, but the video itself already shows this information. For me personally, at least, the name added nothing. It just made me wonder if Nathan Allen is a famous person that I should know; and he's not. --[[Special:Contributions/2001:1C06:19C9:400:B2FF:CA0D:C1C3:53CB|2001:1C06:19C9:400:B2FF:CA0D:C1C3:53CB]] ([[User talk:2001:1C06:19C9:400:B2FF:CA0D:C1C3:53CB|talk]]) 19:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:48, 20 February 2023

Template:Vital article


New intro, please

Could someone please rewrite what this is, in the first sentences. I have worked in computers for years, and used them for decades, and I don't even know what is being said, much less basic computer users.... Misty MH (talk) 09:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This might help:
https://www.digitaltrends.com/web/what-is-reddit/
Misty MH (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 March 2022

I wanna fix some mistakes i found 2001:569:502D:8B00:1024:6E70:7F8A:2BD5 (talk) 19:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2022

is an British social network located in London — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A04:241E:901:F200:2035:8CFB:772E:5B5C (talk) 19:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —Dexxor (talk) 19:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

r/Chonglangtv

I cleaned up the section on the removal of r/chonglangtv however I want to propose its removal, it only has one source and genreally doesnt seem to be all that relevant, in addition it doesnt seem to be much of a controversy, if no one has any objections ill go ahead and remove the section. Googleguy007 (talk) 18:47, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 04 August 2022

In the controversies section under 2022, the linked source (Link 347) leads to [page not found]. Unchecked mail (talk) 06:16, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Added archive URL; thanks for spotting! Felix QW (talk) 09:47, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reddit page is missing it’s political lean.

Reddit is a strongly liberal site. Page should be updated to reflect the lean of the site admins.

Disclaimer required that it’s not publicly admited. Redwikiwombat (talk) 01:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source noting this, otherwise your perspective isn't enough (and OMG you probably are only seeing a tiny bit of Reddit). --ZimZalaBim talk 01:54, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What about the collectionable avatars?

Collectible avatars are NFTs, but in the form of a Reddit avatar. A lot of Reddit users didn't like this, so it could count as a controversy.

~~ MegaValenX (talk) 11:20, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: about the collectionable avatars

I haven't seen that there was already information on them on this wiki page, so ignore everything I wrote up there.

MegaValenX (talk) 13:42, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is the word groomer actually banned on reddit?

The source article was removed and I see a lot of usage of the word on non-banned accounts. Here's an example of someone testing it: https://www.reddit.com/r/WEARESC_OT/comments/w25iem/is_the_word_groomer_banned_on_reddit/ . How else can we verify if this is correct or not? Cartossin (talk) 14:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Academic publishing is a leap to far

"Data from Reddit can also be used to assess academic publications."

I think this is too broad a statement. Is this suggesting that Reddit can be used to replace peer review, (because that is quite a leap and I doubt it applies to many sections of science especially medicine)? It needs to be expanded into more detail or removed.

~~~~ Novomanias (talk) 17:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC) Novomanias (talk) 17:21, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sinophobia

Reddit is a sinophobic, racist hate site and this should be documented clearly on Wikipedia rather than censored like it is on Reddit. 97.90.41.3 (talk) 14:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mean "xenophobic" and if you have links to reputable sources that fit Wikipedia's policies, feel free to provide them. ASpacemanFalls (talk) 16:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replace "Nathan Allen"

Hi. My suggestion is to replace "Nathan Allen" in: "Nathan Allen speaks about the r/science community to the American Chemical Society" My suggestion is to replace it with "A forum moderator". The person is not notable, also not in this context; it's a forum moderator. Whose name happens to be Nathan Allen, yes, but the video itself already shows this information. For me personally, at least, the name added nothing. It just made me wonder if Nathan Allen is a famous person that I should know; and he's not. --2001:1C06:19C9:400:B2FF:CA0D:C1C3:53CB (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]