User talk:ChurCuz

Welcome!

Hello, RossButsy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Talk:Harry Maguire. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mattythewhite (talk) 22:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Welcome back. Feel free to remove this entirely. If necessary, it can still be looked up in the revision history of the page, but it has served its purpose. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:28, 21 April 2021 (UTC)}}

July 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Kyle Walker, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Meters (talk) 06:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Infobox timestamps

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions were not quite right. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 23:18, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:RossButsy reported by User:Darkwarriorblake (Result: ). Thank you. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 23:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Reporting user for edit warring

Hi, I saw the comment you made on the last section I put on for a user engaged in edit warring. In order for your concern to receive its due attention, you should report the user at the Administrator's edit board, as I did. The rule is that you have to inform the user that they were reported. I am not an administrator, so there isn't anything I can do about it. --Osh33m (talk) 16:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

You literally broke Wikipedia's editing guidlines by removing my reply on your talk page without responding to me.You haven't added an edit reason. Why are you not saying a word to me? TheWeekdayz (talk) 19:49, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)No, RossButsy is not required to respond to your post and is allowed to remove anything (with very limited exceptions, none of which apply here) from their talk page. Meters (talk) 19:55, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

February 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at WT:FOOTY, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Spike 'em (talk) 16:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 19:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ChurCuz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I Shouldn’t have edit warred I took an exception to the other user as I added the edit of Harry Kane record breaking. If I am unblocked I won’t be editing any further about Harry Kane and Jimmy Greaves and who’s record is who’s. RossButsy (talk) 23:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I will remove this short block because I think the edit warring will not resume. Ping to Black Kite. 331dot (talk) 10:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

I'd like to see instead of you just disengaging from the topic to instead tell how editing disputes should be resolved instead of edit warring. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

To be fair I did engage with the other editor on both his talk page and WT:Football but they continued to revert. Not saying I was right because neither of us was but I didn’t just not engage in any discussion. RossButsy (talk) 09:37, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Discussion is the first step, but what should you do if that fails? I gave you a hint in my first post. 331dot (talk) 09:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Don’t edit war and discuss and if that fails disengage and as a last resort take it to a noticeboard. RossButsy (talk) 10:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring after multiple blocks that were meant to prevent the same behavior. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

I personally am not interested in apologies through unblock requests regarding this specific block. If it's found to be incorrect by another administrator, they're of course free to reverse it, but you've had enough unblocks in my view. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:47, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

No objection. RossButsy (talk) 18:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

One-revert restriction:
Until 02 April 2024, you are
prohibited from making more than one revert on a single page – whether involving the same or different material – within a 24-hour period.
An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions, whether in whole or in part, counts as a revert.

You have been sanctioned for repeatedly turning biographies of living people into battlegrounds by edit warring after multiple blocks for the same behavior.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Deprodding of JaackMaate

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from JaackMaate, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —C.Fred (talk) 23:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

@C.Fred: Hi again Fred just nominating the page again at MFD. RossButsy (talk) 00:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

It's an article, so it'll need to go through AfD. —C.Fred (talk) 00:15, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

I just did that and it redirected me to MfD RossButsy (talk) 00:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Discussion on your recent reverting

Hi. Please give a proper reason before reverting the information I added on Lionel Messi's article. I have replaced the regional language source with an English source after you showed concern. The Hindu is listed as a reliable source in Wikipedia. If you have any more concern, kindly discuss with me before making any revert. Thanks in advance. Thilsebatti (talk) 16:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Beccaynr (talk) 20:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating your WP:1RR restriction on the page Lionel Messi, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 month. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

Galobtter (talk) 20:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."