User talk:Gsandler: Difference between revisions
Asilvering (talk | contribs) Notification: I've commented on your Articles for Creation submission (AFCH 0.9.1) |
|||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;"> [[File:AFC-Logo.svg|50px|left]] |
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;"> [[File:AFC-Logo.svg|50px|left]] |
||
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at [[Draft:Douglas Rigby]]. Thanks! [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 20:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC) </div> |
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at [[Draft:Douglas Rigby]]. Thanks! [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 20:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC) </div> |
||
:Thank you. Great suggestion. I've added three additional sources, all from authoritative publications. One of my original sources could not be verified. Not sure why. I checked it and it's a valid citation. [[Special:Contributions/73.89.211.188|73.89.211.188]] ([[User talk:73.89.211.188|talk]]) 21:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:00, 30 May 2023
Copyright problems with National District Export Council
Hello. Concerning your contribution, National District Export Council, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.districtexportcouncil.com/index.php?q=node/2. As a copyright violation, National District Export Council appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. National District Export Council has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:National District Export Council and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:National District Export Council with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:National District Export Council.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. HalfShadow 23:25, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on ThinkGlobal: Trade Leads for Importing and Exporting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:09, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. Apologies for taking shortcut on the original post.
Please have a look at this and let me know if it is ok.
gsandler 1820, eastern
The ThinkGlobal Institute moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The ThinkGlobal Institute, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NagalimNE (talk) 13:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: The ThinkGlobal Institute (September 11)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The ThinkGlobal Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The ThinkGlobal Institute, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Gsandler!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
|
February 2023
An article you recently created, Douglas Rigby, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, place {{subst:submit}}
atop the article, then publish. Silikonz💬 22:18, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Douglas Rigby (February 6)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Douglas Rigby and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Douglas Rigby (May 29)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Douglas Rigby and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: Draft:Douglas Rigby has a new comment
- Thank you. Great suggestion. I've added three additional sources, all from authoritative publications. One of my original sources could not be verified. Not sure why. I checked it and it's a valid citation. 73.89.211.188 (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)