Jump to content

Talk:Star Wars: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rv per WP:NOTFORUM
→‎Question: new section
Tags: Reverted New topic
Line 150: Line 150:
In the premise section, it was listed that Jedi and Sith primarily uses a weapon called the lightsaber which can virtually cut through anything. Shouldn't there be a note stating that there are some materials which is impervious to lightsaber like Beskar and Zillo Beast skin? [[User:JEDIMASTER2008|JEDIMASTER2008]] ([[User talk:JEDIMASTER2008|talk]]) 03:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
In the premise section, it was listed that Jedi and Sith primarily uses a weapon called the lightsaber which can virtually cut through anything. Shouldn't there be a note stating that there are some materials which is impervious to lightsaber like Beskar and Zillo Beast skin? [[User:JEDIMASTER2008|JEDIMASTER2008]] ([[User talk:JEDIMASTER2008|talk]]) 03:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
:Unnecessary. It already states it can cut through virtually anything, which already tells the reader there are some things it can't cut through. It would be completely undue and unnecessary to start listing the things that cannot be cut through, especially when they would then need explained as to what they are. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 07:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
:Unnecessary. It already states it can cut through virtually anything, which already tells the reader there are some things it can't cut through. It would be completely undue and unnecessary to start listing the things that cannot be cut through, especially when they would then need explained as to what they are. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|<i style="color: Blue;">talk</i>]] 07:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

== Question ==

Will there be Episodes X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV and XV? Are them confirmed already? [[Special:Contributions/190.231.171.103|190.231.171.103]] ([[User talk:190.231.171.103|talk]]) 14:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:38, 10 September 2023

Template:Vital article

Former good articleStar Wars was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 20, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 29, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 29, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
January 13, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 15, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 18, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
February 21, 2007Featured topic candidateNot promoted
May 31, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
April 6, 2008Good article nomineeListed
April 17, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
July 12, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 18, 2017Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Semi-protected edit request on 13 December 2022

Next to "In February 2020, a film was announced to be in development from director J. D. Dillard and writer Matt Owens", please add, "however, Dillard announced he was no longer attatched to direct that film in November 2022."[1] 99.209.40.250 (talk) 17:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Taylor, Drew (November 8, 2022). "J.D. Dillard Star Wars Movie No Longer Happening". Retrieved December 13, 2022.
 Done RealAspects (talk) 13:56, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

#The Skywalker Saga (history) - 2022 discs

Not sure how this should fit in, but I have (in Australia) a set of three 4k disks issued by Disney in 2022 containing respectively Episodes I-III, IV-VI and VII-IX of the Skywalker Saga. These are the films alone. The three disks sell separately and side-by-side with single-film disks containing add-ons. Errantios (talk) 13:28, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2023

Please remove the word eponymous for describing Star Wars in the title. Star Wars is not named after anything, so it has no meaning in this sentence. Like this: Star Wars is an American epic space opera[1] multimedia franchise created by George Lucas, which began with the 1977 film[a] and quickly became a worldwide pop culture phenomenon.

Other people are copying this description to other pages, and spreading this incorrect use. Thank you! Hunterongames (talk) 08:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Booker, M. Keith (2020). Historical Dictionary of Science Fiction Cinema. Historical dictionaries of literature and the arts. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 390. ISBN 978-1-5381-3010-0.
 Not done for now: I believe what is being referred to here is that the original film shares its name with the name of the franchise as a whole, which does appear to be the case - is there something I might be misunderstanding? Tollens (talk) 08:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Tollens Thanks for your reply!
You are correct that the film was originally titled Star Wars, but it is currently titled and widely known as Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope. IMDB has it listed under the newer title, with the original title in parentheses below. Famous people on Wikipedia - actors, actresses, authors, etc - are most often listed under their pen-names or assumed names, with an explanation about their birth names. I don't understand why the original title is being privileged in this case.
I'm new to editing, so I'm still trying to understand the conventions regarding naming. Hunterongames (talk) 09:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The current wording is fine. This is a movie IP and not a person. Biographies have different rules. The original film was called Star Wars so the current wording is in line with the sources. Nemov (talk) 12:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I'm still trying to get a handle on the rules for naming movies. As one example, Birds of Prey (and the Fantabulous Emancipation of One Harley Quinn) is listed under just Birds of Prey (2020 film), which is one of the shortened later versions of the title, but NOT the original. The first sentence in that article does use the full original title, but explains about the later renaming.
Is this the convention? I'm not opening the can of worms again regarding moving Star Wars (1977 film) to Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope, but I'm just pointing out that the article naming conventions don't seem consistent to me and trying to understand the choices. Hunterongames (talk) 13:18, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It can be tricky looking at other articles because each of those decisions are made by individual consensus and the specific details are likely different. Nemov (talk) 15:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@NemovThanks for the reply! I'll keep that in mind as I get more familiar with the editing process. Hunterongames (talk) 05:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 April 2023

Mandalorian is misspelled under "upcoming films" 2603:8001:D400:45BB:9DE9:E39C:713C:4B81 (talk) 23:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed -- ZooBlazertalk 23:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lightsaber info

In the premise section, it was listed that Jedi and Sith primarily uses a weapon called the lightsaber which can virtually cut through anything. Shouldn't there be a note stating that there are some materials which is impervious to lightsaber like Beskar and Zillo Beast skin? JEDIMASTER2008 (talk) 03:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary. It already states it can cut through virtually anything, which already tells the reader there are some things it can't cut through. It would be completely undue and unnecessary to start listing the things that cannot be cut through, especially when they would then need explained as to what they are. Canterbury Tail talk 07:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Will there be Episodes X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV and XV? Are them confirmed already? 190.231.171.103 (talk) 14:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).