Jump to content

Talk:Flood myth: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Flood myth/Archive 3) (bot
FabBol (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
Line 45: Line 45:


Do I [[Special:Diff/1172783543|see]] a source from 1971, to support a source from 1931? Similar [[Special:Diff/1172324626|here]]. If this hypothesis has more support, more sources are likely available, including some more recent that may put it in perspective. Thanks, —[[User:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#44a;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Paleo</span>]][[User talk:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#272;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Neonate</span>]] – 11:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Do I [[Special:Diff/1172783543|see]] a source from 1971, to support a source from 1931? Similar [[Special:Diff/1172324626|here]]. If this hypothesis has more support, more sources are likely available, including some more recent that may put it in perspective. Thanks, —[[User:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#44a;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Paleo</span>]][[User talk:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#272;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Neonate</span>]] – 11:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

== Biblical Flood mostly missing ==

Is there a particular reason why the biblical Flood is almost entirely missing from this page (apart from a few offhand references)? It would seem to be one of the most prevalent versions of such a myth in contemporary mythology. [[User:FabBol|FabBol]] ([[User talk:FabBol|talk]]) 18:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:05, 10 September 2023

Perspective on flood myth in Jersey & Australia

Peaceray (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Or Nunn, Patrick; Cook, Margaret (1 January 2022). "Island tales: culturally-filtered narratives about island creation through land submergence incorporate millennia-old memories of postglacial sea-level rise". World Archaeology. 54 (1): 29–51. doi:10.1080/00438243.2022.2077821. ISSN 0043-8243. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other theories

Should I add a link to Immanuel Velikovsky, who iirc explained all of the Hebrew Testament with a comet hypothesis ?

Or is there already too much comet content>

Linlithgow (talk) 16:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Too much already to add something so thoroughly refuted. Doug Weller talk 19:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Erich Schmidt

Do I see a source from 1971, to support a source from 1931? Similar here. If this hypothesis has more support, more sources are likely available, including some more recent that may put it in perspective. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate11:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biblical Flood mostly missing

Is there a particular reason why the biblical Flood is almost entirely missing from this page (apart from a few offhand references)? It would seem to be one of the most prevalent versions of such a myth in contemporary mythology. FabBol (talk) 18:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]