User talk:Vitreology

Post-mortem interval

Having done some work on the area, and started stages of death, I have moved the article back as you suggested. Charles Matthews (talk) 13:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Charles Matthews, thank you for the high quality work you've done on this article. It looks much better now. Vitreology talk 22:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedian ophthalmologist has been nominated for renaming

Category:Wikipedian ophthalmologist has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 23:12, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Vitreology! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I'm looking for a site which allows the public to collaborate on a "tree of knowledge", has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

October 2023

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 22:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

See here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_medical_wikis#EyeWiki Vitreology (talk) 23:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

That list has a different inclusion criteria - for List of wikis, it needs an article to itself, not an entry on some other list. MrOllie (talk) 23:14, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Are you seriously doubting the notibility of EyeWiki?

How does it fail to meet Wikipedia's notibility criteria? Vitreology (talk) 23:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

It fails to meet the list's critera, which states (in a HTML comment) that any list entry without a corresponding Wikipedia article will be removed. If you are sure it is notable you are welcome to write the article first. MrOllie (talk) 23:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

The subject does qualify for a serparate, stand-along article according to Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I suspect just nobody has taken the time to create the page yet. Vitreology (talk) 23:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

You make this so painful. Vitreology (talk) 23:20, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Writing articles is the purpose of this project. If that is 'painful' I don't know what to tell you. Also: your article will need to meet WP:GNG. That means 3 independent, in depth, reliable sources. Frankly I am dubious that the sourcing exists, but I look forward to being proved wrong. Without such sourcing the article will qualify for swift deletion. MrOllie (talk) 23:34, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Deleting and disrupting seems to be your purpose. You've already created an edit conflict in the article I just created. Stop disruptive editing. Vitreology (talk) 23:46, 25 October 2023 (UTC)