Herrenvolk democracy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| image2 = Flag_of_South_Africa_(1928–1994).svg |
| image2 = Flag_of_South_Africa_(1928–1994).svg |
||
| caption2 = Apartheid South Africa |
| caption2 = Apartheid South Africa |
||
| footer = The [[Confederate States of America]] (flag, top; 1861–1865), [[Apartheid]] [[South Africa]] (flag, middle; 1948–1994), and [[Rhodesia]] (flag, bottom; |
| footer = The [[Confederate States of America]] (flag, top; 1861–1865), [[Apartheid]] [[South Africa]] (flag, middle; 1948–1994), and [[Rhodesia]] (flag, bottom; 1965–1979) are considered archetypical examples of ''Herrenvolk'' democracy. Elections were generally [[Free and fair election|free]], but voting suffrage was restricted based on [[Race (human categorization)|race]], with governance that reflected the interests of the politically dominant racial group. |
||
| image3 = Flag of Rhodesia (1968–1979).svg |
| image3 = Flag of Rhodesia (1968–1979).svg |
||
| caption3 = Republic of Rhodesia |
| caption3 = Republic of Rhodesia |
Revision as of 14:14, 24 February 2024
Herrenvolk democracy is a system of government in which only a specific ethnic group participates in government, while other groups are disenfranchised.[1] Ethnocracy, in which one group dominates the state, is a related concept. The German term Herrenvolk, meaning "master race", was used in 19th century discourse that justified colonialism with the supposed racial superiority of Europeans.[2]
Characteristics
This elitist form of government is typically employed by the majority group to maintain control and power within the system. It typically coincides with the false pretense of egalitarianism. There is a prevailing view that as people of the majority gain freedom and liberty and egalitarian principles are advanced, the minority is repressed and prevented from being involved in the government. This principle can be seen in the development of both the United States—especially the Southern states—and South Africa in the 19th and 20th centuries.[3] In these historical scenarios, even as legislation moved toward universal male suffrage and later toward universal suffrage for white people, it also further entrenched restrictions on political participation by black people and upheld their disenfranchisement.[4] Southern Rhodesia and later Rhodesia restricted voting rights by qualifications like income and literacy, thus effectively restricting the franchise to the white population.[5]
The term was first used in 1967 by Pierre van Den Berghe in his book Race and Racism.[6] In his 1991 book The Wages of Whiteness, historian David R. Roediger reinterprets this form of government in the context of 19th-century United States, arguing that the term "Herrenvolk republicanism" more accurately describes racial politics at this time. The basis of Herrenvolk republicanism went beyond the marginalization of black people in favor of a republican government serving the "master race"; it contended that "blackness" was synonymous with dependency and servility and was, therefore, antithetical to republican independence and white freedom.[7] Consequently, the dependent white worker at this time used his whiteness to differentiate himself from and elevate himself over the dependent black worker or enslaved person.[8] According to this ideology, black people were not merely "non-citizens"; they were "anti-citizens" who inherently opposed the ideals of a republican government.[9]
See also
- Ethnic democracy
- Ethnic nationalism
- Dominant minority
- Jim Crow laws
- Planter class
- Solid South
- Voter suppression
References
- ^ Vickery, Kenneth P. (June 1974). "'Herrenvolk' Democracy and Egalitarianism in South Africa and the U.S. South". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 16 (13): 309–328. doi:10.1017/s0010417500012469. JSTOR 17826.
- ^ Gründer, Horst (1999). "Ideologie und Praxis des deutschen Kolonialismus" [Ideology and practice of German colonialism]. In Beck, Thomas (ed.). Überseegeschichte [Overseas history]. Stuttgart: F. Steiner. pp. 254 et seq. ISBN 9783515074902.
- ^ Anderson, T. L. "Herrenvolk Democracy: The Rise of the Alt-Right in Trump's America". Critical Theory and the Humanities in the Age of the Alt-Right. Palgrave Macmillan: 88.
- ^ Vickery, Kenneth P. (June 1974). "'Herrenvolk' Democracy and Egalitarianism in South Africa and the U.S. South". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 16 (3): 311–315. doi:10.1017/s0010417500012469. JSTOR 17826.
- ^ West, Michael O. (18 December 2008). "Equal Rights for All Civilized Men": Elite Africans and the Quest for "European" Liquor in Colonial Zimbabwe, 1924-1961 (PDF). p. 382. doi:10.1017/S0020859000111344.
- ^ van den Berghe, Pierre L. (1967). Race and Racism: A Comparative Perspective. NY; Sydney: Wiley.
- ^ Roediger 1997, p. 172.
- ^ Roediger 1997, pp. 59–60.
- ^ Blevins, Cameron. "U.S. History Qualifying Exams: Book Summaries: The Wages of Whiteness". Retrieved 28 September 2013.
Bibliography
- Roediger, David R. (1997). The Wages of Whiteness. Philadelphia: Verso Books. ISBN 9781844671458.