User talk:JVkamp: Difference between revisions
Line 138: | Line 138: | ||
I am sorry, but I currently have access to no information which I would be comfortable disclosing. I am, however, still looking into the matter and will keep you updated. I have obtained access to two different models of the weapon, and will inform you of my findings. That being said, if I were yourself, I would not hold hopes on acquiring further background or historical details on the weapon.[[User:MVMosin|MVMosin]] 22:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC) |
I am sorry, but I currently have access to no information which I would be comfortable disclosing. I am, however, still looking into the matter and will keep you updated. I have obtained access to two different models of the weapon, and will inform you of my findings. That being said, if I were yourself, I would not hold hopes on acquiring further background or historical details on the weapon.[[User:MVMosin|MVMosin]] 22:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC) |
||
:I made some minor revisions to the PSS article some time ago, along with comments on the article's discussion page. Seeing as neither the edits nor the comments have been addressed by you, I want to make sure that you have seen them. |
|||
:On that note, I am researching this weapon every time that I have the time, and I have gotten a few bits of information on it. I don't know how much it will actually contribute to the article, but I will make note of it on the article's discussion page right now, so that you can comment on how to include it or expand upon it. I will also address a few other things there, so make sure that you take a look. [[User:MVMosin|MVMosin]] 23:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:02, 7 April 2007
A tag has been placed on PSS Silent Pistol, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Subwayguy 03:04, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
The article was basically empty when I tagged it, but now it looks fully completed and adequate. Keep up the good work! Subwayguy 03:35, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/65/Waricon.svg/48px-Waricon.svg.png)
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
- Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, peer review, and project-wide collaboration.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- Our requests page has extensive lists of requested articles, images, maps, and translations.
- We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 20:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Reliable sources
In a nutshell, reliable sources are those which a reader would go to to verify the claims made in an article. A reference on the Internet or a book, with its ISBN, are preferable. In general, we need more than one. The biggest problem is to avoid Original Research. We try to make sure that we are an encyclopedia, which reports on other sources, not a site where the first posting of an item is made. Is that any clearer? Please let me know. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Pssimage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pssimage.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:22, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikiproject Firearms
Thanks for joining. I would put some fancy template banner here but I haven't made one. Once again, thanks for joining and I hope you'll encourage others to do the same.--LWF 23:52, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006
The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:54, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 01:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007
The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!
Delivered by grafikbot 10:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Military History elections
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!
Delivered by grafikbot 14:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007
The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by grafikbot 15:30, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Firearms userbox
A discussion on the WikiProject Firearms userbox is currently underway on the project talk page. Samples of various proposed userboxes can be found here and here. As a member, your input is valuable and appreciated. If you would like to contribute to the discussion or vote on your favorite, please visit the Userbox section of the talk page. Thanks! —Thernlund (Talk | Contribs) 01:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007
The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
PSS Pistol Information
Regarding your request for information on this subject: During my service with the Committee, I did become familiar with this pistol; however, as I was not involved in such special operations for which it was designed, and as my personal interest and personal work (having worked as a gunsmith only within the United States) never fell upon it, I can not say that I have had direct experience with this weapon. I will, however, look into this, as it has now piqued my interest as well.
As for your query regarding my new assignment, I will, pending my pre-requisital examination, be working with a security detail for executive members of the Belarusian state authority. MVMosin 02:04, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
I am sorry, but I currently have access to no information which I would be comfortable disclosing. I am, however, still looking into the matter and will keep you updated. I have obtained access to two different models of the weapon, and will inform you of my findings. That being said, if I were yourself, I would not hold hopes on acquiring further background or historical details on the weapon.MVMosin 22:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- I made some minor revisions to the PSS article some time ago, along with comments on the article's discussion page. Seeing as neither the edits nor the comments have been addressed by you, I want to make sure that you have seen them.
- On that note, I am researching this weapon every time that I have the time, and I have gotten a few bits of information on it. I don't know how much it will actually contribute to the article, but I will make note of it on the article's discussion page right now, so that you can comment on how to include it or expand upon it. I will also address a few other things there, so make sure that you take a look. MVMosin 23:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)