Talk:St. Marys River (Michigan–Ontario): Difference between revisions
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Rivers}}, {{WikiProject Canada}}, {{WikiProject Michigan}}. Tag: |
→Concrete berm: new section |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 23:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC) |
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 23:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Concrete berm == |
|||
:"A concrete berm was constructed along the north side of the rapids as remedial works to protect fish spawning habitat from lower outflow through the rapids. This was due, in part, to an increase of water outflow from the three hydroelectric dams." |
|||
Wait, how does this make sense? Can someone describe how it protects the spawning habitat? If the outflow through the rapids is lower, wouldn't that actually help/protect the spawning grounds? Perhaps I'm not understanding what's being protected from what, or which side of the berm the grounds are supposed to be on. [[User:Criticalthinker|Criticalthinker]] ([[User talk:Criticalthinker|talk]]) 07:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:54, 24 May 2024
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Apostrophes in Geographical Names
The external link cited here does not use the apostrophe. Does any expert on Canadian place names know what is official? (I'm getting enough of a fight with Jtdirl over American place names, where I know what is official, so I'm not about to change this until I can get some guidance from the Canadians!) -- BRG July 23
- As much as I dislike inappropriate apostrophe use, I would have to say that most of the official Canadian sources (e.g. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources) cite the river's name as St. Marys River. To add confusion, the local paper mill here in the Sault is St. Mary's Paper. FUNgus guy 11:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- The Canadian Post Office probably has a similar rule to that of the U.S. Postal Service (and other Federal agencies in both counties). Apostrophes are NOT used in geographical names, and also note the difficulty that apostrophes present on signs with the names printed vertically.
- Hence, note these place names: the Devils Tower, the St. Johns River, Kings County, Kings Peak, Kings Point, Kingsport, Prince George County, Virginia, and the Borough of Queens.
- There are some antique exceptions in the United States, such as Prince George's County, Maryland, and Queen Anne's County, Maryland.
- Also, note that the original name of Frankfort, Kentucky, was "Frank's Ford", and the orginal name of Berlin, Maryland, was "Burleigh's Inn".
- The Canadian Post Office probably has a similar rule to that of the U.S. Postal Service (and other Federal agencies in both counties). Apostrophes are NOT used in geographical names, and also note the difficulty that apostrophes present on signs with the names printed vertically.
Make sure to note this one:
D
E
V
I
L
S
T
O
W
E
R
98.67.108.2 (talk) 15:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Uninhabited Islands on the Ontario side of the river
East Neebish Island: GPS 46.343698, -84.112238 Sankey Island: GPS 46.348692, -84.101530 Watson Island: GPS 46.336083, -84.099180 Sutton Island: GPS 46.32270, -84.064274 Gaffney Island: GPS 46.335823, -84.114361 Iron Island: GPS 46.333263, -84.113247 Thom Island: GPS 46.333282, -84.110287 Forshaw Island: GPS 46.327461, -84.084040 Duval Island: GPS 46.324122, -84.085473 Foote Island: GPS 46.320288, -84.077984
<ref> www.googlemaps.com <ref> Musicwriter (talk) 01:08, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on St. Marys River (Michigan–Ontario). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718041951/http://www.lre.usace.army.mil/greatlakes/hh/outflows/historic%20connecting%20channel%20outflows/ to http://www.lre.usace.army.mil/greatlakes/hh/outflows/historic%20connecting%20channel%20outflows/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030422175459/http://www.chrs.ca/Rivers/StMarys/StMarys_e.htm to http://www.chrs.ca/Rivers/StMarys/StMarys_e.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Concrete berm
- "A concrete berm was constructed along the north side of the rapids as remedial works to protect fish spawning habitat from lower outflow through the rapids. This was due, in part, to an increase of water outflow from the three hydroelectric dams."
Wait, how does this make sense? Can someone describe how it protects the spawning habitat? If the outflow through the rapids is lower, wouldn't that actually help/protect the spawning grounds? Perhaps I'm not understanding what's being protected from what, or which side of the berm the grounds are supposed to be on. Criticalthinker (talk) 07:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Start-Class River articles
- Mid-importance River articles
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Mid-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class Ontario articles
- Mid-importance Ontario articles
- Start-Class Geography of Canada articles
- Mid-importance Geography of Canada articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class Michigan articles
- Mid-importance Michigan articles
- WikiProject Michigan articles