Jump to content

Talk:Afroditi Latinopoulou: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
remove personal attack
Tag: Reverted
Undid revision 1231024586 by D.S. Lioness (talk) WP:TPO - do not edit others comments
Line 41: Line 41:
:1) Fixed the sources, which are now backed by proper links. 2) Rephrased to clarify that it was the reason she got banned from running. 3) Fixed grammar. 4) Sure? 5) Fixed. 6) You previously removed that source. 7) Seek consensus; I don't care about other pages.
:1) Fixed the sources, which are now backed by proper links. 2) Rephrased to clarify that it was the reason she got banned from running. 3) Fixed grammar. 4) Sure? 5) Fixed. 6) You previously removed that source. 7) Seek consensus; I don't care about other pages.


... you'd be wise to keep a low profile when it comes to removing cited material to whitewash far-right politicians and push your own POV, which clearly violates Wikipedia's rules. You didn't attempt to engage in any discussions on this talk page, indicating you'd rather make removals than point out parts you disagree with. Also, nobody cares about a three-year-old statistic from 2021—she has 100k followers on Instagram now, but that doesn't make it relevant at all. [[User:Michalis1994|Michalis1994]] ([[User talk:Michalis1994|talk]]) 06:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
According to the logs, you got banned from Greek Wikipedia for abusing multiple accounts, repeatedly removing cited content to whitewash articles, changing the narrative, and pushing a pro-Russian POV. If those details are accurate, and I see no reason to doubt them, you'd be wise to keep a low profile when it comes to removing cited material to whitewash far-right politicians and push your own POV, which clearly violates Wikipedia's rules. You didn't attempt to engage in any discussions on this talk page, indicating you'd rather make removals than point out parts you disagree with. Also, nobody cares about a three-year-old statistic from 2021—she has 100k followers on Instagram now, but that doesn't make it relevant at all. [[User:Michalis1994|Michalis1994]] ([[User talk:Michalis1994|talk]]) 06:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:01, 26 June 2024

seek consensus

User:Michalis1994 The Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle specifically states : Making bold edits is encouraged, as it will result in either improving an article or stimulating discussion. If your edit gets reverted, do not revert again. Instead, begin a discussion with the person who reverted your change. My comments about your changes are:

there is no need to point out in the introduction that her party is far right. In English WP, it is not common. You can check at the articles of Jordan Bardella or Nigel Farage. D.S. Lioness

Why did you remove cited sentence in Life section ?

Why did you remove this ? In August 2022, Afroditi Latinopoulou announced that she would join the "Patriotic Force for Change" a party of Konstantinos Bogdanos [6] as Vice President. In March 2023 when Bogdanos, decided to cooperate for a joint election with the Patriots – Prodromos Emfietzoglou, Latinoupoulou disagreed and was removed from the coalition.[7]


Please see very carefully EDIT SUMMARY because i explain my changes. D.S. Lioness (talk) 02:10, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also Michalis1994, we do not remove other editors comments at talk pages. BabbaQ (talk) 14:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of sources and other minor problems

User:Michalis1994 I am still waiting for your answers. Since I intend to continue to add content to the article it would be good if you could answer my questions so that we can move forward. Do not move the sentence about followers again. You should discuss first.

1. She has repeatedly sparked reactions with her views on women's nature, and human rights, which many Greek journalistic organisations have condemned as hate speech Where exactly do the sources talk about hate speech?

2. "A notable incident occurred in 2022 when she was banned from running with New Democracy after making comments[18] about Greek TV presenter Danae Barka" as I mentioned in edit summary there is already in the paragraph above. Why do you put it twice?

3. Although the party's manifesto lacks information on economic policy, Latynopoulou's ideology is often described.... it's obviously wrong syntax

4. Why don't you write her name as it is in the title?

5. ...and has expressed transphobic views Where exactly do the sources talk about transphobic view?

6. ...It is a celebration of vulgarity, emphasising the sexuality of sadomasochists and other various abnormalities in public view... Where in the source is written ?'

7. Why it is necessary to point out in the introduction that her party is far right? In English WP, it is not common. You can check at the articles of Jordan Bardella or Nigel Farage.

D.S. Lioness (talk) 02:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1) Fixed the sources, which are now backed by proper links. 2) Rephrased to clarify that it was the reason she got banned from running. 3) Fixed grammar. 4) Sure? 5) Fixed. 6) You previously removed that source. 7) Seek consensus; I don't care about other pages.

According to the logs, you got banned from Greek Wikipedia for abusing multiple accounts, repeatedly removing cited content to whitewash articles, changing the narrative, and pushing a pro-Russian POV. If those details are accurate, and I see no reason to doubt them, you'd be wise to keep a low profile when it comes to removing cited material to whitewash far-right politicians and push your own POV, which clearly violates Wikipedia's rules. You didn't attempt to engage in any discussions on this talk page, indicating you'd rather make removals than point out parts you disagree with. Also, nobody cares about a three-year-old statistic from 2021—she has 100k followers on Instagram now, but that doesn't make it relevant at all. Michalis1994 (talk) 06:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]