Talk:Medieval II: Total War: Kingdoms: Difference between revisions
Jay Menglass (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Yes, very much so. Just about all major viking migrations ended by 1100 at the latest. The term Vikings in this scenario is being used to describe the medieval kingdom of Norway. Even thought I don't believe there was any succesful scandanavian invasion of Britain in the high and late middle ages the creators of the game probably felt that adding a viking like horde to the campaign would spice up the playing ground and add more over all strategic outcomes to the map of the british isles. --[[User:Jay Menglass|Jay Menglass]] 20:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Jay Menglass |
Yes, very much so. Just about all major viking migrations ended by 1100 at the latest. The term Vikings in this scenario is being used to describe the medieval kingdom of Norway. Even thought I don't believe there was any succesful scandanavian invasion of Britain in the high and late middle ages the creators of the game probably felt that adding a viking like horde to the campaign would spice up the playing ground and add more over all strategic outcomes to the map of the british isles. --[[User:Jay Menglass|Jay Menglass]] 20:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Jay Menglass |
||
::The Viking-age was permanently over in 1080, this is represented in the normal game by letting the typical 'viking-units' be outdated quite fast. The term 'Viking' in the normal game refers to the Danish kingdom, as can be seen in the fact that they start with Denmark as a homebase. And indeed there wasn't any Scandinavian military influence in the rest of Europe from the end of the viking age (ca 1060) until Sweden became a great power in the early modern period (ca 1500). What I'm personally interested in is if there will be a representation of the 100 years war between England and France that started in 1337 (:p)[[User:Krastain|Krastain]] 11:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Crusader Map == |
== Crusader Map == |
||
Revision as of 11:05, 18 April 2007
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Medieval II: Total War: Kingdoms article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Vikings
Isn't 1258 too late for vikings? 63.226.180.162 17:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, very much so. Just about all major viking migrations ended by 1100 at the latest. The term Vikings in this scenario is being used to describe the medieval kingdom of Norway. Even thought I don't believe there was any succesful scandanavian invasion of Britain in the high and late middle ages the creators of the game probably felt that adding a viking like horde to the campaign would spice up the playing ground and add more over all strategic outcomes to the map of the british isles. --Jay Menglass 20:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Jay Menglass
- The Viking-age was permanently over in 1080, this is represented in the normal game by letting the typical 'viking-units' be outdated quite fast. The term 'Viking' in the normal game refers to the Danish kingdom, as can be seen in the fact that they start with Denmark as a homebase. And indeed there wasn't any Scandinavian military influence in the rest of Europe from the end of the viking age (ca 1060) until Sweden became a great power in the early modern period (ca 1500). What I'm personally interested in is if there will be a representation of the 100 years war between England and France that started in 1337 (:p)Krastain 11:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Crusader Map
Who ever added the new information on the Crusader campaign (about the mongols being unplayable and the map stretching from greece to afganistan)im just wondering for my own knowledge where did you get that information from? --Jay Menglass 23:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Jay Menglass