Jump to content

List of edit wars on Wikipedia: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Edit wars: cleanup; repeating links are fine in tables (and help with sortability)
Line 11: Line 11:
{{Dynamic list|multiple=no}}
{{Dynamic list|multiple=no}}
Various edit wars have been received coverage outside the website, and media articles noting several such wars have been published.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Edwards |first=Phil |date=2015-09-17 |title=Wikipedia's lamest edit wars show why the site is amazing and infuriating |url=https://www.vox.com/2015/9/17/9345487/wikipedia-lamest-edit-wars |url-status= |access-date=2024-07-21 |work=[[Vox.com]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Dvorak |first=John C. |date=2013-07-18 |title=Wikipedia's Edit Wars |url=https://www.pcmag.com/news/wikipedias-edit-wars |access-date=2024-07-21 |magazine=[[PCMag]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Gross |first=Doug |date=2013-07-14 |title=Wiki wars: The 10 most controversial Wikipedia pages |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/24/tech/web/controversial-wikipedia-pages/index.html |access-date=2024-07-21 |work=[[CNN]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2014-08-05 |title=Wiki wars: Do Wikipedia's internal tiffs deter newcomers? |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-28426674 |access-date=2024-07-23 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Daw |first=David |date=2011-07-25 |title=Wikipedia Wars: 10 Biggest Edit Battles |url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/481318/wild_wars_of_wikipedia.html |access-date=2024-08-01 |work=[[PC World]] |issn=0737-8939 |oclc=1117065657}}</ref> <!-- Entries are sorted by the beginning date of the conflict --><!-- Each entry in the list must cover a single edit war concerning one article specifically. Controversial topics, which attract edit-warring, but which also include several articles are not included as their own entry. -->
Various edit wars have been received coverage outside the website, and media articles noting several such wars have been published.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Edwards |first=Phil |date=2015-09-17 |title=Wikipedia's lamest edit wars show why the site is amazing and infuriating |url=https://www.vox.com/2015/9/17/9345487/wikipedia-lamest-edit-wars |url-status= |access-date=2024-07-21 |work=[[Vox.com]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Dvorak |first=John C. |date=2013-07-18 |title=Wikipedia's Edit Wars |url=https://www.pcmag.com/news/wikipedias-edit-wars |access-date=2024-07-21 |magazine=[[PCMag]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Gross |first=Doug |date=2013-07-14 |title=Wiki wars: The 10 most controversial Wikipedia pages |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/24/tech/web/controversial-wikipedia-pages/index.html |access-date=2024-07-21 |work=[[CNN]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2014-08-05 |title=Wiki wars: Do Wikipedia's internal tiffs deter newcomers? |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-28426674 |access-date=2024-07-23 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Daw |first=David |date=2011-07-25 |title=Wikipedia Wars: 10 Biggest Edit Battles |url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/481318/wild_wars_of_wikipedia.html |access-date=2024-08-01 |work=[[PC World]] |issn=0737-8939 |oclc=1117065657}}</ref> <!-- Entries are sorted by the beginning date of the conflict --><!-- Each entry in the list must cover a single edit war concerning one article specifically. Controversial topics, which attract edit-warring, but which also include several articles are not included as their own entry. -->
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|+
|+
!Article
! scope="col" | Article
! scope="col" | [[List of Wikipedias|Edition]]
!Wikipedia
!Start date
! scope="col" | Start date
!End date
! scope="col" | End date
!Description
! scope="col" class="unsortable" | Description
!Outcome<!-- Outcome does not necessarily indicate the current status of the article in dispute. Rather, it indicates the resolution of the specific aforementioned edit war. -->
! scope="col" class="unsortable" | Outcome<!-- Outcome does not necessarily indicate the current status of the article in dispute. Rather, it indicates the resolution of the specific aforementioned edit war. -->
! scope="col" class="unsortable" | {{abbr|Refs.|References}}
!References
|-
|-
|[[Gdańsk]]
! scope="row" | [[Gdańsk]]
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|December 24, 2003
|{{dts|December 24, 2003}}
|March 4, 2005
|{{dts|March 4, 2005}}
|Whether to use the German name, ''Danzig,'' or the current official name of the [[Poland|Polish]] city, ''Gdańsk'', was a subject of dispute and edit warring.
|Whether to use the German name, ''Danzig,'' or the current official name of the [[Poland|Polish]] city, ''Gdańsk'', was a subject of dispute and edit warring.
|A vote was held to determine the choice of name, with 80 editors casting 657 votes in two weeks. A clear majority of votes decided on the Polish-language name on the modern city, while references to the city in the period from 1793 to 1945 would use the German name.
|A vote was held to determine the choice of name, with 80 editors casting 657 votes in two weeks. A clear majority of votes decided on the Polish-language name on the modern city, while references to the city in the period from 1793 to 1945 would use the German name.
|<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lih |first=Andrew |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iIFrAwAAQBAJ |title=The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World's Greatest Encyclopedia |date=2009-03-17 |publisher=Hachette Books |isbn=978-1-4013-9585-8 |pages=122–130 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Fuchs |first=Christian |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=el0CDgAAQBAJ |title=Social Media: A Critical Introduction |date=2017-02-25 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-4739-8824-8 |at=Wikipedia Edit Wars and Vandalism |language=en}}</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite book |last=Lih |first=Andrew |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iIFrAwAAQBAJ |title=The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World's Greatest Encyclopedia |date=2009-03-17 |publisher=Hachette Books |isbn=978-1-4013-9585-8 |pages=122–130 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Fuchs |first=Christian |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=el0CDgAAQBAJ |title=Social Media: A Critical Introduction |date=2017-02-25 |publisher=SAGE |isbn=978-1-4739-8824-8 |at=Wikipedia Edit Wars and Vandalism |language=en}}</ref>
|-
|-
|[[Yogurt]]
! scope="row" | [[Yogurt]]
|English Wikipedia
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|December 25, 2003
|{{dts|December 25, 2003}}
|{{Circa|2012}}
|{{sort|2012|{{c.|2012}}}}
|Editors conflicted over the spelling used in the title of the article, with some promoting the [[American and British English spelling differences|American English]] ''yogurt'' and others the British English spelling ''yoghurt''.
|Editors conflicted over the spelling used in the title of the article, with some promoting the [[American and British English spelling differences|American English]] ''yogurt'' and others the British English spelling ''yoghurt''.
|Consensus was established in 2012 to title the article ''yogurt'', and to note variant spellings in the article's lead sentence.
|Consensus was established in 2012 to title the article ''yogurt'', and to note variant spellings in the article's lead sentence.
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Dale |first=Brady |date=2015-08-18 |title=Wikipedia's Culture War: A Decade-Long Fight Over How to Spell 'Yogurt' |url=https://observer.com/2015/08/wikipedias-culture-war-a-decade-long-fight-over-how-to-spell-yogurt/ |url-status=live |access-date=2024-07-21 |work=[[Observer.com]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Yau |first=Nathan |date=2024-06-26 |title=Decade-Long Battle for "Yogurt" vs. "Yoghurt" on Wikipedia |url=https://flowingdata.com/2024/06/26/decade-long-battle-for-yogurt-vs-yoghurt-on-wikipedia/ |access-date=2024-07-21 |website=[[FlowingData]]}}</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Dale |first=Brady |date=2015-08-18 |title=Wikipedia's Culture War: A Decade-Long Fight Over How to Spell 'Yogurt' |url=https://observer.com/2015/08/wikipedias-culture-war-a-decade-long-fight-over-how-to-spell-yogurt/ |url-status=live |access-date=2024-07-21 |work=[[Observer.com]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Yau |first=Nathan |date=2024-06-26 |title=Decade-Long Battle for "Yogurt" vs. "Yoghurt" on Wikipedia |url=https://flowingdata.com/2024/06/26/decade-long-battle-for-yogurt-vs-yoghurt-on-wikipedia/ |access-date=2024-07-21 |website=[[FlowingData]]}}</ref>
|-
|-
|[[Nanjing Massacre]]
! scope="row" | [[Nanjing Massacre]]
|English Wikipedia
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|May 13, 2004
|{{dts|May 13, 2004}}
|July 25, 2004
|{{dts|July 25, 2004}}
|A Japanese-language translation label in the article's introducing sentence was repeatedly replaced and rewritten.
|A Japanese-language translation label in the article's introducing sentence was repeatedly replaced and rewritten.
|A temporary consensus decided on the inclusion of {{Lang|ja|南京大虐殺}} ({{Translation|Nanjing Massacre}}). A second label, Nanjing Incident, was also added.
|A temporary consensus decided on the inclusion of {{Lang|ja|南京大虐殺}} ({{Translation|Nanjing Massacre}}). A second label, Nanjing Incident, was also added.
|<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Li |first1=Hongtao |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XRo6EAAAQBAJ |title=The Nanjing Massacre and the Making of Mediated Trauma |last2=Huang |first2=Shunming |date=2021-08-24 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-000-42786-8 |at=6.4.2 Confrontation over the “Introduction”: the writing politics of a Wikipedia entry |language=en}}</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Li |first1=Hongtao |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XRo6EAAAQBAJ |title=The Nanjing Massacre and the Making of Mediated Trauma |last2=Huang |first2=Shunming |date=2021-08-24 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-000-42786-8 |at=6.4.2 Confrontation over the “Introduction”: the writing politics of a Wikipedia entry |language=en}}</ref>
|-
|-
|[[Ganges]]
! scope="row" | [[Ganges]]
|English Wikipedia
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|c. 2006
|{{sort|2006|{{c.|2006}}}}
|Ongoing as of May 25, 2021
|{{sort|{{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}}|Ongoing as of May 25, 2021}}
|The name used for the river, whether Ganges (familiar to English speakers in [[Western world|Western countries]]) or Ganga (familiar to English speakers in [[India]]) has been contested.
|The name used for the river, whether Ganges (familiar to English speakers in [[Western world|Western countries]]) or Ganga (familiar to English speakers in [[India]]) has been contested.
|{{N/a}}
|{{N/a}}
|<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kumar |first=Sangeet |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mwkoEAAAQBAJ |title=The Digital Frontier: Infrastructures of Control on the Global Web |date=2021-05-25 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0-253-05650-4 |pages=93 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kumar |first=Sangeet |date=2017-06-03 |title=A river by any other name: Ganga/Ganges and the postcolonial politics of knowledge on Wikipedia |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293709 |journal=Information, Communication & Society |language=en |volume=20 |issue=6 |pages=809–824 |doi=10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293709 |issn=1369-118X}}</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite book |last=Kumar |first=Sangeet |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mwkoEAAAQBAJ |title=The Digital Frontier: Infrastructures of Control on the Global Web |date=2021-05-25 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0-253-05650-4 |pages=93 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kumar |first=Sangeet |date=2017-06-03 |title=A river by any other name: Ganga/Ganges and the postcolonial politics of knowledge on Wikipedia |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293709 |journal=Information, Communication & Society |language=en |volume=20 |issue=6 |pages=809–824 |doi=10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293709 |issn=1369-118X}}</ref>
|-
|-
|[[Star Trek Into Darkness]]{{Efn|Main article: [[Wikipedia Star Trek Into Darkness debate]]}}
! scope="row" | [[Star Trek Into Darkness]]{{Efn|Main article: [[Wikipedia Star Trek Into Darkness debate]]}}
|English Wikipedia
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|c. December, 2012{{Efn|On January 2013, the ''Daily Dot'' stated that the war had raged for "nearly two months."}}
|{{sort|2012-12|{{c.|December 2012}}}}{{Efn|On January 2013, the ''Daily Dot'' stated that the war had raged for "nearly two months."}}
|February 21, 2012
|{{dts|February 21, 2012}}
|The capitalization of ''into'' in ''Star Trek Into Darkness'' was a matter of debate as some wished to have it capitalized and others preferred "Star Trek into Darkness."
|The capitalization of ''into'' in ''Star Trek Into Darkness'' was a matter of debate as some wished to have it capitalized and others preferred "Star Trek into Darkness."
|Consensus was reached that the article be titled ''Star Trek Into Darkness'', with a capitalized ''into''.
|Consensus was reached that the article be titled ''Star Trek Into Darkness'', with a capitalized ''into''.
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Morris |first=Kevin |date=2013-02-12 |title=That epic Wikipedia "Star Trek" edit is still screwing up Google |url=https://www.dailydot.com/unclick/wikipedia-star-trek-into-darkness-google/ |access-date=2024-07-23 |work=[[Daily Dot]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Morris |first=Kevin |date=2013-01-30 |title=Wikipedians wage war over a capital "I" in a "Star Trek" film |url=https://www.dailydot.com/unclick/wikipedia-star-trek-into-darkness-capitalization/ |access-date=2024-07-23 |work=[[Daily Dot]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Lindbergh |first=Ben |date=2021-01-15 |title=The Fight to Win the Pettiest Edit Wars on Wikipedia |url=https://www.theringer.com/2021/1/15/22232667/wikipedia-lamest-edit-wars |access-date=2024-07-23 |work=[[The Ringer (website)|The Ringer]]}}</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Morris |first=Kevin |date=2013-02-12 |title=That epic Wikipedia "Star Trek" edit is still screwing up Google |url=https://www.dailydot.com/unclick/wikipedia-star-trek-into-darkness-google/ |access-date=2024-07-23 |work=[[Daily Dot]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Morris |first=Kevin |date=2013-01-30 |title=Wikipedians wage war over a capital "I" in a "Star Trek" film |url=https://www.dailydot.com/unclick/wikipedia-star-trek-into-darkness-capitalization/ |access-date=2024-07-23 |work=[[Daily Dot]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Lindbergh |first=Ben |date=2021-01-15 |title=The Fight to Win the Pettiest Edit Wars on Wikipedia |url=https://www.theringer.com/2021/1/15/22232667/wikipedia-lamest-edit-wars |access-date=2024-07-23 |work=[[The Ringer (website)|The Ringer]]}}</ref>
|-
|-
|[[Gamergate (harassment campaign)]]
! scope="row" | [[Gamergate (harassment campaign)]]
|English Wikipedia
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|c. August, 2014
|{{sort|2014-04|{{c.|August 2014}}}}
|c. 2015
|{{sort|2015|{{c.|2015}}}}
|Various editors accused the article covering the [[Cyberbullying|harassment campaign]] of having bias towards a [[Feminism|feminist]] viewpoint.
|Various editors accused the article covering the [[Cyberbullying|harassment campaign]] of having bias towards a [[Feminism|feminist]] viewpoint.
|Following a decision by the [[Arbitration Committee (Wikipedia)|Arbitration Committee of the English Wikipedia]], several editors were banned from editing on articles relating to sex and gender. Although this decision did not end the edit war, the harassment campaign lost momentum during 2015.
|Following a decision by the [[Arbitration Committee (Wikipedia)|Arbitration Committee of the English Wikipedia]], several editors were banned from editing on articles relating to sex and gender. Although this decision did not end the edit war, the harassment campaign lost momentum during 2015.
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Hern |first=Alex |date=2015-01-23 |title=Wikipedia votes to ban some editors from gender-related articles |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jan/23/wikipedia-bans-editors-from-gender-related-articles-amid-gamergate-controversy |access-date=2024-08-01 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hube |first=Christoph |date=2017 |title=Bias in Wikipedia |url=http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3041021.3053375 |journal=WWW '17 Companion |language=en |publisher=ACM Press |pages=717–721 |doi=10.1145/3041021.3053375 |isbn=978-1-4503-4914-7}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Salor |first=Enrinc |date=2016-03-13 |title=Neutrality in the Face of Reckless Hate : Wikipedia and GamerGate |url=https://tidsskrift.dk/ntik/article/view/25880 |journal=Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling |language=da |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=23–29 |doi=10.7146/ntik.v5i1.25880 |issn=2245-294X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Flöck |first=Fabian |last2=Laniado |first2=David |last3=Stadthaus |first3=Felix |last4=Acosta |first4=Maribel |date=2015 |title=Towards Better Visual Tools for Exploring Wikipedia Article Development — The Use Case of "Gamergate Controversy" |url=https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14701 |journal=Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media |language=en |volume=9 |issue=5 |pages=48–55 |doi=10.1609/icwsm.v9i5.14701 |issn=2334-0770}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Robertson |first=Adi |date=2015-01-28 |title=Wikipedia denies 'purging' feminist editors over Gamergate debate |url=https://www.theverge.com/2015/1/28/7927425/wikipedia-bans-gamergate-editors-violating-policies |access-date=2024-08-01 |work=[[The Verge]]}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Mortensen |first=Torill Elvira |title=Negative Emotions Set in Motion: The Continued Relevance of #GamerGate |date=2020 |work=The Palgrave Handbook of International Cybercrime and Cyberdeviance |pages=1–23 |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90307-1_75-1 |access-date=2024-08-01 |place=Cham |publisher=Springer International Publishing |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-90307-1_75-1 |isbn=978-3-319-90307-1 |last2=Sihvonen |first2=Tanja}}</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Hern |first=Alex |date=2015-01-23 |title=Wikipedia votes to ban some editors from gender-related articles |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jan/23/wikipedia-bans-editors-from-gender-related-articles-amid-gamergate-controversy |access-date=2024-08-01 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Hube |first=Christoph |date=2017 |title=Bias in Wikipedia |url=http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3041021.3053375 |journal=WWW '17 Companion |language=en |publisher=ACM Press |pages=717–721 |doi=10.1145/3041021.3053375 |isbn=978-1-4503-4914-7}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Salor |first=Enrinc |date=2016-03-13 |title=Neutrality in the Face of Reckless Hate : Wikipedia and GamerGate |url=https://tidsskrift.dk/ntik/article/view/25880 |journal=Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling |language=da |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=23–29 |doi=10.7146/ntik.v5i1.25880 |issn=2245-294X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Flöck |first=Fabian |last2=Laniado |first2=David |last3=Stadthaus |first3=Felix |last4=Acosta |first4=Maribel |date=2015 |title=Towards Better Visual Tools for Exploring Wikipedia Article Development — The Use Case of "Gamergate Controversy" |url=https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14701 |journal=Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media |language=en |volume=9 |issue=5 |pages=48–55 |doi=10.1609/icwsm.v9i5.14701 |issn=2334-0770}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Robertson |first=Adi |date=2015-01-28 |title=Wikipedia denies 'purging' feminist editors over Gamergate debate |url=https://www.theverge.com/2015/1/28/7927425/wikipedia-bans-gamergate-editors-violating-policies |access-date=2024-08-01 |work=[[The Verge]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journalÍ |last=Mortensen |first=Torill Elvira |title=Negative Emotions Set in Motion: The Continued Relevance of #GamerGate |date=2020 |work=The Palgrave Handbook of International Cybercrime and Cyberdeviance |pages=1–23 |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90307-1_75-1 |access-date=2024-08-01 |place=Cham |publisher=Springer International Publishing |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-90307-1_75-1 |isbn=978-3-319-90307-1 |last2=Sihvonen |first2=Tanja}}</ref>
|-
|-
|[[Garfield (character)]]
! scope="row" | [[Garfield (character)]]
|English Wikipedia
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|February 24, 2017
|{{dts|February 24, 2017}}
|February 27, 2017{{Efn|''The Washington Post'' states that edit warring on Garfield's gender occurred for "2½ days" before administrative intervention.}}
|{{dts|February 27, 2017}}{{Efn|''The Washington Post'' states that edit warring on Garfield's gender occurred for "2½ days" before administrative intervention.}}
|The infobox of the cartoon cat [[Garfield (character)|Garfield]], protagonist of the [[Garfield|''Garfield'' comic strip]], was changed multiple times to indicate an indeterminate gender, after podcaster [[Virgil Texas]] claimed in a tweet that an interview of strip creator [[Jim Davis (cartoonist)|Jim Davis]] indicated so and subsequently updated the infobox to reflect this.
|The infobox of the cartoon cat [[Garfield (character)|Garfield]], protagonist of the [[Garfield|''Garfield'' comic strip]], was changed multiple times to indicate an indeterminate gender, after podcaster [[Virgil Texas]] claimed in a tweet that an interview of strip creator [[Jim Davis (cartoonist)|Jim Davis]] indicated so and subsequently updated the infobox to reflect this.
|The argument ended in the consensus that Garfield was male, citing four strips. Jim Davis later clarified to ''[[The Washington Post]]'' that he was indeed male.
|The argument ended in the consensus that Garfield was male, citing four strips. Jim Davis later clarified to ''[[The Washington Post]]'' that he was indeed male.
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Schmall |first=Tyler |date=2017-03-17 |title=The great Garfield gender debate ends after Wikipedia edit war |url=https://mashable.com/article/garfield-gender-debate-rages-on |access-date=2024-07-21 |work=[[Mashable]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Cavna |first1=Michael |last2=Selk |first2=Avi |date=2017-03-01 |title=Garfield's a boy … right? How a cartoon cat's gender identity launched a Wikipedia war. |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2017/03/01/is-garfield-a-boy-how-a-cartoon-cats-gender-identity-sparked-a-war-on-wikipedia/ |access-date=2024-07-21 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Schmall |first=Tyler |date=2017-03-17 |title=The great Garfield gender debate ends after Wikipedia edit war |url=https://mashable.com/article/garfield-gender-debate-rages-on |access-date=2024-07-21 |work=[[Mashable]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Cavna |first1=Michael |last2=Selk |first2=Avi |date=2017-03-01 |title=Garfield's a boy … right? How a cartoon cat's gender identity launched a Wikipedia war. |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2017/03/01/is-garfield-a-boy-how-a-cartoon-cats-gender-identity-sparked-a-war-on-wikipedia/ |access-date=2024-07-21 |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]]}}</ref>
|-
|-
|[[Donald Trump]]
! scope="row" | [[Donald Trump]]
|English Wikipedia
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|July 16, 2018
|{{dts|July 16, 2018}}
|July 26, 2018
|{{dts|July 26, 2018}}
|Various editors wished to emphasize criticism of Trump's comments during the [[2018 Russia–United States summit]].
|Various editors wished to emphasize criticism of Trump's comments during the [[2018 Russia–United States summit]].
|After a vote "which clarified little," Wikipedia admin Awilley concluded the discussion with the article noting [[Bipartisanship in United States politics|bipartisan]] criticism of Trump's comments.
|After a vote "which clarified little," Wikipedia admin Awilley concluded the discussion with the article noting [[Bipartisanship in United States politics|bipartisan]] criticism of Trump's comments.
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Mak |first=Aaron |date=2019-05-28 |title=Donald Trump's Wikipedia Entry Is a War Zone |url=https://slate.com/technology/2019/05/donald-trump-wikipedia-page.html |access-date=2024-07-22 |work=Slate |language=en-US |issn=1091-2339}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Ford |first=Heather |title=Rise of the Underdog |date=2020-10-13 |work=Wikipedia @ 20 |pages=189–202 |editor-last=Reagle |editor-first=Joseph |url=https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/4956/chapter/1879827/Rise-of-the-Underdog |access-date=2024-07-22 |publisher=The MIT Press |language=en |doi=10.7551/mitpress/12366.003.0017 |isbn=978-0-262-36059-3 |editor2-last=Koerner |editor2-first=Jackie}}</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Mak |first=Aaron |date=2019-05-28 |title=Donald Trump's Wikipedia Entry Is a War Zone |url=https://slate.com/technology/2019/05/donald-trump-wikipedia-page.html |access-date=2024-07-22 |work=Slate |language=en-US |issn=1091-2339}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Ford |first=Heather |title=Rise of the Underdog |date=2020-10-13 |work=Wikipedia @ 20 |pages=189–202 |editor-last=Reagle |editor-first=Joseph |url=https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/4956/chapter/1879827/Rise-of-the-Underdog |access-date=2024-07-22 |publisher=The MIT Press |language=en |doi=10.7551/mitpress/12366.003.0017 |isbn=978-0-262-36059-3 |editor2-last=Koerner |editor2-first=Jackie}}</ref>
|-
|-
|[[History of the Jews in Poland]]
! scope="row" | [[History of the Jews in Poland]]
|English Wikipedia
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|May 15, 2019
|{{dts|May 15, 2019}}
|June 4, 2019
|{{dts|June 4, 2019}}
|A group of [[Nationalism|nationalist]]-aligned editors attempted to exaggerate the phenomenon of Poles returning [[Looting of Poland in World War II|looted Jewish property]] in the [[Post-war|postwar period]].
|A group of [[Nationalism|nationalist]]-aligned editors attempted to exaggerate the phenomenon of Poles returning [[Looting of Poland in World War II|looted Jewish property]] in the [[Post-war|postwar period]].
|After two weeks of edit warring, the nationalist group abandoned editing the article, which led to the article being corrected to show a much lower extent of property return than previously described.
|After two weeks of edit warring, the nationalist group abandoned editing the article, which led to the article being corrected to show a much lower extent of property return than previously described.
|<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Grabowski |first1=Jan |last2=Klein |first2=Shira |date=2023-04-03 |title=Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust |journal=The Journal of Holocaust Research |language=en |volume=37 |issue=2 |pages=133–190 |doi=10.1080/25785648.2023.2168939 |issn=2578-5648|doi-access=free }}</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Grabowski |first1=Jan |last2=Klein |first2=Shira |date=2023-04-03 |title=Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust |journal=The Journal of Holocaust Research |language=en |volume=37 |issue=2 |pages=133–190 |doi=10.1080/25785648.2023.2168939 |issn=2578-5648|doi-access=free }}</ref>
|-
|-
|''[[Once Upon a Time in Hollywood]]''
! scope="row" | ''[[Once Upon a Time in Hollywood]]''
|English Wikipedia
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|July 23, 2019
|{{dts|July 23, 2019}}
|July 26, 2019
|{{dts|July 26, 2019}}
|Several editors expressed backlash over the inclusion of [[Spoiler (media)|movie spoilers]] in the article's plot summary prior to a more public release. The article was also repeatedly vandalized with erroneous plot summaries.
|Several editors expressed backlash over the inclusion of [[Spoiler (media)|movie spoilers]] in the article's plot summary prior to a more public release. The article was also repeatedly vandalized with erroneous plot summaries.
|As public access to the film increased, editors swiftly resolved to include the entire plot.
|As public access to the film increased, editors swiftly resolved to include the entire plot.
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Robertson |first=Adi |date=2019-07-30 |title=A Wikipedia spoiler war created a ridiculous fake ending for Once Upon A Time In Hollywood |url=https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/30/20742519/wikipedia-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-tarantino-fake-twist-ending-spoilers |access-date=2024-07-21 |work=[[The Verge]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Tyler |first=Adrienne |date=2020-03-14 |title=Once Upon A Time In Hollywood's Fake Ending Controversy Explained |url=https://screenrant.com/upon-time-hollywood-movie-ending-fake-wikipedia-controversy/ |access-date=2024-07-21 |website=ScreenRant |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Nicholson |first=Tom |date=2019-07-31 |title=There's Been A Huge Fight Over The 'Once Upon A Time In Hollywood' Wiki Page |url=https://www.esquire.com/uk/latest-news/a28560628/once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-wikipedia/ |access-date=2024-07-21 |work=[[Esquire.com]]}}</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Robertson |first=Adi |date=2019-07-30 |title=A Wikipedia spoiler war created a ridiculous fake ending for Once Upon A Time In Hollywood |url=https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/30/20742519/wikipedia-once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-tarantino-fake-twist-ending-spoilers |access-date=2024-07-21 |work=[[The Verge]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Tyler |first=Adrienne |date=2020-03-14 |title=Once Upon A Time In Hollywood's Fake Ending Controversy Explained |url=https://screenrant.com/upon-time-hollywood-movie-ending-fake-wikipedia-controversy/ |access-date=2024-07-21 |website=ScreenRant |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Nicholson |first=Tom |date=2019-07-31 |title=There's Been A Huge Fight Over The 'Once Upon A Time In Hollywood' Wiki Page |url=https://www.esquire.com/uk/latest-news/a28560628/once-upon-a-time-in-hollywood-wikipedia/ |access-date=2024-07-21 |work=[[Esquire.com]]}}</ref>
|-
|-
|[[Recession]]
! scope="row" | [[Recession]]
|English Wikipedia
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|July 14, 2022
|{{dts|July 14, 2022}}
|July 30, 2022
|{{dts|July 30, 2022}}
|A dispute broke out among Wikipedia editors over the definition of an economic recession given in the article on that subject. Right-wing commentators accused editors on the platform of being influenced by the [[Presidency of Joe Biden|Biden administration]]'s interpretation of the term, inciting further edit warring.
|A dispute broke out among Wikipedia editors over the definition of an economic recession given in the article on that subject. Right-wing commentators accused editors on the platform of being influenced by the [[Presidency of Joe Biden|Biden administration]]'s interpretation of the term, inciting further edit warring.
|After the page was placed under protection from edits by new users, a consensus arose to explain the varied definition of the word among scholars and in common usage.
|After the page was placed under protection from edits by new users, a consensus arose to explain the varied definition of the word among scholars and in common usage.
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Bowman |first=Emma |date=2022-07-30 |title=What is a recession? Wikipedia can't decide |url=https://www.npr.org/2022/07/29/1114599942/wikipedia-recession-edits |access-date=2024-07-22 |work=[[NPR]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Breslow |first=Samuel |date=2022-08-11 |title=How a False Claim About Wikipedia Sparked a Right-Wing Media Frenzy |url=https://slate.com/technology/2022/08/wikipedia-recession-article.html |access-date=2024-07-22 |work=Slate |language=en-US |issn=1091-2339}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Dress |first=Brad |date=2022-08-02 |title=Wikipedia launching new restrictions for users editing 'recession' page |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3585404-wikipedia-launching-new-restrictions-for-users-editing-recession-page/ |access-date=2024-07-22 |work=[[Thehill.com]]}}</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite news |last=Bowman |first=Emma |date=2022-07-30 |title=What is a recession? Wikipedia can't decide |url=https://www.npr.org/2022/07/29/1114599942/wikipedia-recession-edits |access-date=2024-07-22 |work=[[NPR]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Breslow |first=Samuel |date=2022-08-11 |title=How a False Claim About Wikipedia Sparked a Right-Wing Media Frenzy |url=https://slate.com/technology/2022/08/wikipedia-recession-article.html |access-date=2024-07-22 |work=Slate |language=en-US |issn=1091-2339}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Dress |first=Brad |date=2022-08-02 |title=Wikipedia launching new restrictions for users editing 'recession' page |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3585404-wikipedia-launching-new-restrictions-for-users-editing-recession-page/ |access-date=2024-07-22 |work=[[Thehill.com]]}}</ref>
|-
|-
|[[2024 Nuseirat rescue operation]]
! scope="row" | [[2024 Nuseirat rescue operation]]
|English Wikipedia
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|June 8, 2024
|{{dts|June 8, 2024}}
|Ongoing as of June 14, 2024
|{{sort|{{CURRENTTIMESTAMP}}|Ongoing as of June 14, 2024}}
|An edit war erupted concerning whether an [[Israel Defense Forces|Israeli military]] raid during the [[Israel–Hamas war]] should be titled a "massacre" or a "rescue operation."
|An edit war erupted concerning whether an [[Israel Defense Forces|Israeli military]] raid during the [[Israel–Hamas war]] should be titled a "massacre" or a "rescue operation."
|{{N/a}}
|{{N/a}}
|<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Oxford |first1=Dwayne |last2=Shamim |first2=Sarah |date=2024-06-14 |title=Wikipedia war: Fierce row erupts over Israel's deadly Nuseirat assault |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/6/14/wikipedia-war-fierce-row-erupts-over-israels-deadly-nuseirat-assault |access-date=2024-07-22 |work=[[Al Jazeera]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2024-06-15 |title=Wikipedia article on Israeli army's Nuseirat massacre in Gaza sparks edit war, restrictions |url=https://www.newarab.com/news/wikipedia-article-nuseirat-massacre-sparks-edit-war |access-date=2024-08-01 |work=[[The New Arab]]}}</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Oxford |first1=Dwayne |last2=Shamim |first2=Sarah |date=2024-06-14 |title=Wikipedia war: Fierce row erupts over Israel's deadly Nuseirat assault |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/6/14/wikipedia-war-fierce-row-erupts-over-israels-deadly-nuseirat-assault |access-date=2024-07-22 |work=[[Al Jazeera]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=2024-06-15 |title=Wikipedia article on Israeli army's Nuseirat massacre in Gaza sparks edit war, restrictions |url=https://www.newarab.com/news/wikipedia-article-nuseirat-massacre-sparks-edit-war |access-date=2024-08-01 |work=[[The New Arab]]}}</ref>
|-
|-
|[[Leon Schreiber]]
! scope="row" | [[Leon Schreiber]]
|English Wikipedia
|[[English Wikipedia]]
|June 30, 2024
|{{dts|June 30, 2024}}
|July 3, 2024
|{{dts|July 3, 2024}}
|South African politician Leon Schreiber's article was edited multiple times over his birthplace and nationality. Schreiber was born in [[South Africa]], however several users changed the article to indicate he was born in [[Zimbabwe]].
|South African politician Leon Schreiber's article was edited multiple times over his birthplace and nationality. Schreiber was born in [[South Africa]], however several users changed the article to indicate he was born in [[Zimbabwe]].
|On July 3, the article was protected from arbitrary editing and his birthplace was stated as South Africa.
|On July 3, the article was protected from arbitrary editing and his birthplace was stated as South Africa.

Revision as of 18:27, 1 August 2024

Illustration depicting two people with Wikipedia puzzle logos instead of heads in an arm wrestling match. Both are lying on the floor.
Representation of edit wars on Wikipedia by Czech illustrator Pavel Reisenauer [cs]

Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia which allows its users to write and edit articles via wiki software, which also allows users to revert each others edits. Conflicts between editors concerning content within articles may give rise to edit wars, in which a repeated exchange of opposing edits are published on a contested article. Some edit wars have received media and academic coverage.

Background

Wikipedia is a free, collaborative, online encyclopedia which allows its users to write and edit articles via wiki software.[1][2] The website allows provides a user-friendly interface for both editing on articles and reversing other users' edits.[3]: 189  Conflicts over content within articles often arise among editors, which may result in edit wars.[4]: 62  An edit war is a persistent exchange of edits representing conflicting views on a contested article,[4]: 62 [5][6] or as defined by the website's policy: "when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's edits."[7] Edit wars are prohibited on Wikipedia[8]: 146  and editors are encouraged to seek consensus through discussion, however administrative intervention may be applied if discussion is unfruitful in resolving the conflict.[9] Generally, edit wars are provoked by the presence of highly controversial content,[5] such as abortion or the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, but can also occur due to other disputed matters, such as the nationality of artist Francis Bacon.[6]

Edit wars

This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources.

Various edit wars have been received coverage outside the website, and media articles noting several such wars have been published.[10][11][12][13][14]

Article Edition Start date End date Description Outcome Refs.
Gdańsk English Wikipedia December 24, 2003 March 4, 2005 Whether to use the German name, Danzig, or the current official name of the Polish city, Gdańsk, was a subject of dispute and edit warring. A vote was held to determine the choice of name, with 80 editors casting 657 votes in two weeks. A clear majority of votes decided on the Polish-language name on the modern city, while references to the city in the period from 1793 to 1945 would use the German name. [15][16]
Yogurt English Wikipedia December 25, 2003 c. 2012 Editors conflicted over the spelling used in the title of the article, with some promoting the American English yogurt and others the British English spelling yoghurt. Consensus was established in 2012 to title the article yogurt, and to note variant spellings in the article's lead sentence. [17][18]
Nanjing Massacre English Wikipedia May 13, 2004 July 25, 2004 A Japanese-language translation label in the article's introducing sentence was repeatedly replaced and rewritten. A temporary consensus decided on the inclusion of 南京大虐殺 (transl. Nanjing Massacre). A second label, Nanjing Incident, was also added. [19]
Ganges English Wikipedia c. 2006 Ongoing as of May 25, 2021 The name used for the river, whether Ganges (familiar to English speakers in Western countries) or Ganga (familiar to English speakers in India) has been contested. — [20][21]
Star Trek Into Darkness[a] English Wikipedia c. December 2012[b] February 21, 2012 The capitalization of into in Star Trek Into Darkness was a matter of debate as some wished to have it capitalized and others preferred "Star Trek into Darkness." Consensus was reached that the article be titled Star Trek Into Darkness, with a capitalized into. [22][23][24]
Gamergate (harassment campaign) English Wikipedia c. August 2014 c. 2015 Various editors accused the article covering the harassment campaign of having bias towards a feminist viewpoint. Following a decision by the Arbitration Committee of the English Wikipedia, several editors were banned from editing on articles relating to sex and gender. Although this decision did not end the edit war, the harassment campaign lost momentum during 2015. [25][26][27][28][29][30]
Garfield (character) English Wikipedia February 24, 2017 February 27, 2017[c] The infobox of the cartoon cat Garfield, protagonist of the Garfield comic strip, was changed multiple times to indicate an indeterminate gender, after podcaster Virgil Texas claimed in a tweet that an interview of strip creator Jim Davis indicated so and subsequently updated the infobox to reflect this. The argument ended in the consensus that Garfield was male, citing four strips. Jim Davis later clarified to The Washington Post that he was indeed male. [31][32]
Donald Trump English Wikipedia July 16, 2018 July 26, 2018 Various editors wished to emphasize criticism of Trump's comments during the 2018 Russia–United States summit. After a vote "which clarified little," Wikipedia admin Awilley concluded the discussion with the article noting bipartisan criticism of Trump's comments. [33][34]
History of the Jews in Poland English Wikipedia May 15, 2019 June 4, 2019 A group of nationalist-aligned editors attempted to exaggerate the phenomenon of Poles returning looted Jewish property in the postwar period. After two weeks of edit warring, the nationalist group abandoned editing the article, which led to the article being corrected to show a much lower extent of property return than previously described. [35]
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood English Wikipedia July 23, 2019 July 26, 2019 Several editors expressed backlash over the inclusion of movie spoilers in the article's plot summary prior to a more public release. The article was also repeatedly vandalized with erroneous plot summaries. As public access to the film increased, editors swiftly resolved to include the entire plot. [36][37][38]
Recession English Wikipedia July 14, 2022 July 30, 2022 A dispute broke out among Wikipedia editors over the definition of an economic recession given in the article on that subject. Right-wing commentators accused editors on the platform of being influenced by the Biden administration's interpretation of the term, inciting further edit warring. After the page was placed under protection from edits by new users, a consensus arose to explain the varied definition of the word among scholars and in common usage. [39][40][41]
2024 Nuseirat rescue operation English Wikipedia June 8, 2024 Ongoing as of June 14, 2024 An edit war erupted concerning whether an Israeli military raid during the Israel–Hamas war should be titled a "massacre" or a "rescue operation." — [42][43]
Leon Schreiber English Wikipedia June 30, 2024 July 3, 2024 South African politician Leon Schreiber's article was edited multiple times over his birthplace and nationality. Schreiber was born in South Africa, however several users changed the article to indicate he was born in Zimbabwe. On July 3, the article was protected from arbitrary editing and his birthplace was stated as South Africa. [44]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Main article: Wikipedia Star Trek Into Darkness debate
  2. ^ On January 2013, the Daily Dot stated that the war had raged for "nearly two months."
  3. ^ The Washington Post states that edit warring on Garfield's gender occurred for "2½ days" before administrative intervention.

References

  1. ^ Butterfield, Andrew; Ngondi, Gerard Ekembe; Kerr, Anne (January 21, 2016), Butterfield, Andrew; Ngondi, Gerard Ekembe; Kerr, Anne (eds.), "Wikipedia", A Dictionary of Computer Science, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-968897-5, retrieved July 21, 2024
  2. ^ McArthur, Tom McArthur; Lam-McArthur, Jacqueline Lam-McArthurJacqueline; Fontaine, Lise FontaineLise (May 24, 2018), McArthur, Tom; Lam-McArthur, Jacqueline; Fontaine, Lise (eds.), "Wikipedia", The Oxford Companion to the English Language, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-966128-2, retrieved July 21, 2024
  3. ^ He, Zeyi (January 12, 2015). Digital By-Product Data in Web 2.0: Exploring Mass Collaboration of Wikipedia. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4438-7358-1.
  4. ^ a b Jemielniak, Dariusz (May 14, 2014). Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-9120-5.
  5. ^ a b Ayers, Phoebe; Matthews, Charles; Yates, Ben (2008). How Wikipedia Works: And how You Can be a Part of it. No Starch Press. p. 384. ISBN 978-1-59327-176-3.
  6. ^ a b O'Sullivan, Dan (February 11, 2016). Wikipedia: A New Community of Practice?. Routledge. p. 124. ISBN 978-1-134-76624-6.
  7. ^ Rutten, Ellen; Fedor, Julie; Zvereva, Vera, eds. (April 12, 2013). Memory, Conflict and New Media: Web Wars in Post-Socialist States (0 ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203083635-11. ISBN 978-0-203-08363-5.
  8. ^ Thomas, Paul A. (September 15, 2022). Inside Wikipedia: How It Works and How You Can Be an Editor. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-5381-6322-1.
  9. ^ Levene, Mark (January 14, 2011). An Introduction to Search Engines and Web Navigation. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-118-06034-6.
  10. ^ Edwards, Phil (September 17, 2015). "Wikipedia's lamest edit wars show why the site is amazing and infuriating". Vox.com. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  11. ^ Dvorak, John C. (July 18, 2013). "Wikipedia's Edit Wars". PCMag. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  12. ^ Gross, Doug (July 14, 2013). "Wiki wars: The 10 most controversial Wikipedia pages". CNN. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  13. ^ "Wiki wars: Do Wikipedia's internal tiffs deter newcomers?". BBC News. August 5, 2014. Retrieved July 23, 2024.
  14. ^ Daw, David (July 25, 2011). "Wikipedia Wars: 10 Biggest Edit Battles". PC World. ISSN 0737-8939. OCLC 1117065657. Retrieved August 1, 2024.
  15. ^ Lih, Andrew (March 17, 2009). The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World's Greatest Encyclopedia. Hachette Books. pp. 122–130. ISBN 978-1-4013-9585-8.
  16. ^ Fuchs, Christian (February 25, 2017). Social Media: A Critical Introduction. SAGE. Wikipedia Edit Wars and Vandalism. ISBN 978-1-4739-8824-8.
  17. ^ Dale, Brady (August 18, 2015). "Wikipedia's Culture War: A Decade-Long Fight Over How to Spell 'Yogurt'". Observer.com. Retrieved July 21, 2024.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  18. ^ Yau, Nathan (June 26, 2024). "Decade-Long Battle for "Yogurt" vs. "Yoghurt" on Wikipedia". FlowingData. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  19. ^ Li, Hongtao; Huang, Shunming (August 24, 2021). The Nanjing Massacre and the Making of Mediated Trauma. Routledge. 6.4.2 Confrontation over the “Introduction”: the writing politics of a Wikipedia entry. ISBN 978-1-000-42786-8.
  20. ^ Kumar, Sangeet (May 25, 2021). The Digital Frontier: Infrastructures of Control on the Global Web. Indiana University Press. p. 93. ISBN 978-0-253-05650-4.
  21. ^ Kumar, Sangeet (June 3, 2017). "A river by any other name: Ganga/Ganges and the postcolonial politics of knowledge on Wikipedia". Information, Communication & Society. 20 (6): 809–824. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293709. ISSN 1369-118X.
  22. ^ Morris, Kevin (February 12, 2013). "That epic Wikipedia "Star Trek" edit is still screwing up Google". Daily Dot. Retrieved July 23, 2024.
  23. ^ Morris, Kevin (January 30, 2013). "Wikipedians wage war over a capital "I" in a "Star Trek" film". Daily Dot. Retrieved July 23, 2024.
  24. ^ Lindbergh, Ben (January 15, 2021). "The Fight to Win the Pettiest Edit Wars on Wikipedia". The Ringer. Retrieved July 23, 2024.
  25. ^ Hern, Alex (January 23, 2015). "Wikipedia votes to ban some editors from gender-related articles". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved August 1, 2024.
  26. ^ Hube, Christoph (2017). "Bias in Wikipedia". WWW '17 Companion. ACM Press: 717–721. doi:10.1145/3041021.3053375. ISBN 978-1-4503-4914-7.
  27. ^ Salor, Enrinc (March 13, 2016). "Neutrality in the Face of Reckless Hate : Wikipedia and GamerGate". Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling (in Danish). 5 (1): 23–29. doi:10.7146/ntik.v5i1.25880. ISSN 2245-294X.
  28. ^ Flöck, Fabian; Laniado, David; Stadthaus, Felix; Acosta, Maribel (2015). "Towards Better Visual Tools for Exploring Wikipedia Article Development — The Use Case of "Gamergate Controversy"". Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 9 (5): 48–55. doi:10.1609/icwsm.v9i5.14701. ISSN 2334-0770.
  29. ^ Robertson, Adi (January 28, 2015). "Wikipedia denies 'purging' feminist editors over Gamergate debate". The Verge. Retrieved August 1, 2024.
  30. ^ Template:Cite journalÍ
  31. ^ Schmall, Tyler (March 17, 2017). "The great Garfield gender debate ends after Wikipedia edit war". Mashable. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  32. ^ Cavna, Michael; Selk, Avi (March 1, 2017). "Garfield's a boy … right? How a cartoon cat's gender identity launched a Wikipedia war". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  33. ^ Mak, Aaron (May 28, 2019). "Donald Trump's Wikipedia Entry Is a War Zone". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved July 22, 2024.
  34. ^ Ford, Heather (October 13, 2020), Reagle, Joseph; Koerner, Jackie (eds.), "Rise of the Underdog", Wikipedia @ 20, The MIT Press, pp. 189–202, doi:10.7551/mitpress/12366.003.0017, ISBN 978-0-262-36059-3, retrieved July 22, 2024
  35. ^ Grabowski, Jan; Klein, Shira (April 3, 2023). "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust". The Journal of Holocaust Research. 37 (2): 133–190. doi:10.1080/25785648.2023.2168939. ISSN 2578-5648.
  36. ^ Robertson, Adi (July 30, 2019). "A Wikipedia spoiler war created a ridiculous fake ending for Once Upon A Time In Hollywood". The Verge. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  37. ^ Tyler, Adrienne (March 14, 2020). "Once Upon A Time In Hollywood's Fake Ending Controversy Explained". ScreenRant. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  38. ^ Nicholson, Tom (July 31, 2019). "There's Been A Huge Fight Over The 'Once Upon A Time In Hollywood' Wiki Page". Esquire.com. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
  39. ^ Bowman, Emma (July 30, 2022). "What is a recession? Wikipedia can't decide". NPR. Retrieved July 22, 2024.
  40. ^ Breslow, Samuel (August 11, 2022). "How a False Claim About Wikipedia Sparked a Right-Wing Media Frenzy". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved July 22, 2024.
  41. ^ Dress, Brad (August 2, 2022). "Wikipedia launching new restrictions for users editing 'recession' page". Thehill.com. Retrieved July 22, 2024.
  42. ^ Oxford, Dwayne; Shamim, Sarah (June 14, 2024). "Wikipedia war: Fierce row erupts over Israel's deadly Nuseirat assault". Al Jazeera. Retrieved July 22, 2024.
  43. ^ "Wikipedia article on Israeli army's Nuseirat massacre in Gaza sparks edit war, restrictions". The New Arab. June 15, 2024. Retrieved August 1, 2024.
  44. ^ Alexander, Mary (July 4, 2024). "Wikipedia edit war not proof that South Africa's new home affairs minister Leon Schreiber is 'a Zimbabwean foreigner'". Africa Check. Retrieved July 21, 2024.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_edit_wars_on_Wikipedia&oldid=1238025901"