User talk:Namayan: Difference between revisions

; Archives
	Apr 2006 – Dec 2006

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:43, 26 May 2007

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Namayan.

Welcome to my talk page. Don't forget to add ~~~~ at the end of your message. Start a new topic here.

There's a new Map of Manila

I've updated the Manila map you've wanted me to update for the longest time. See the Tambayan for the details. =) --seav 10:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed DBTI to DBTC. --seav 06:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ph_seal_abra_lacub.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph_seal_abra_lacub.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ph seal basilan isabela city.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph seal basilan isabela city.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Antipolo_City_Seal.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Antipolo_City_Seal.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. bluemask ^(talk) 14:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ph seal isabela maconacon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph seal isabela maconacon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ph_seal_negros_occidental_bago_city.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph_seal_negros_occidental_bago_city.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Would you mind weighing in on this debate? --evrik ^(talk) 15:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ph_seal_negros_occidental_cadiz_city.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph_seal_negros_occidental_cadiz_city.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ph_seal_negros_occidental_himamaylan_city.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph_seal_negros_occidental_himamaylan_city.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Legislative districts of Davao del Norte

I really like your articles on the legislative districts of the Philippines. Great job! I'm currently making a map showing all the districts (with an inset for Metro Manila), even daring to include Kalayaan municipality in the Spratlys. It won't be finished though until I figure out how to properly divide Maguindanao/Shariff Kabunsuan, Caloocan, Antipolo, Parañaque and Davao City, as well as the new divisions in Taguig-Pateros, Zamboanga Sibugay and Sultan Kudarat.

I found just one error so far in the articles, in Davao del Norte. According to this COMELEC Resolution, San Isidro belongs to the same district as that of its mother municipalities, Asuncion and Kapalong (DDN's 1st district). The NSCB adds a bit of confusion, as it still displays the incorrect designations for the two districts of the province. I could've moved it myself but I'm afraid of making errors in the population figures. Keep up the good work! Dakilang Isagani 03:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for posting all those resources! I've come across the Parañaque and Davao maps, but the former is dubious in terms of the exact border delineation and the latter is not to scale. Also, I've been really racking my brains out trying to remember the map site that had barangay borders - I'm very glad you shared the link! I'll try to have the congressional district map(s) ready by next week.

By the way, just a general rambling: Isn't it peculiar that Cotabato City still falls under the label of "1st District of Maguindanao"? I mean, San Jose del Monte and Antipolo both have their names on their district designations even though they are merely component cities of Bulacan and Rizal respectively. Why the COMELEC made an exception to an independent component city boggles me. -- Dakilang Isagani 02:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The maps are almost finished, with just minor adjustments for Davao City and Metro Manila pending. I came across the COMELEC's Education and Information Department website that had this document. It divides Pasig and Pasay into two districts each. Are these among the newer congressional districts created since the last election? By the way, the document does not divide Taguig and Marikina into districts, although Parañaque and Valenzuela were. Dakilang Isagani 00:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ph_seal_negros_occidental_kabankalan_city.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph_seal_negros_occidental_kabankalan_city.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Map of the legislative districts of the Philippines

Here's the coloured version of the legislative districts map that I've been working on. The provincial and relevant city boundaries are thicker than the intra-provincial/city district boundaries.

File:Legislative districts of the Philippines (coloured).png

What do you think? --- Dakilang Isagani 05:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if the locator maps I made for individual districts would be up to the high standard set by Coffee for Philippine regions, provinces, cities and municipalities. I need your opinion/suggestions on how to improve them. Take a look at samples of my district locator maps:

CALOOCAN CITY

This one's fairly easy on the eyes, methinks. By the way, should I remove the text explaining the Philippines' territorial disputes over Scarborough Shoal, Kalayaan and Sabah?

ANTIPOLO CITY

I think this district is the smallest in terms of land area outside of Metro Manila. I can make individual province/city maps with municipal/barangay boundaries but that would take at least until the end of summer to entirely accomplish.

By the way, thank you very much for the barnstar! I really appreciate it. --- Dakilang Isagani 07:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, according to the COMELEC document I mentioned before, the two barangays of Post Proper Northside and Southside still belong to Makati's 2nd Congressional District, as R.A. 8487 did not mention these barangays as part of the new legislative district of Taguig yet (the RTC ruling was in 2003, the Republic Act was signed on February 1998). I took these into account on the maps I've made so far. --- Dakilang Isagani 07:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It'd be awesome if you could find out for sure whether those two barangays are indeed part of the congressional district of Taguig City, before I multpily the mistakes. I think it would require another RA to amend the original Taguig cityhood charter to include the barangays in dispute to the district. In the meantime, those barangays are now administratively part of Taguig City. I would think that residents would now vote for city officials (executive branch of government) of Taguig but not congressional representatives (legislative branch) of Taguig yet. --- Dakilang Isagani 20:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. ;-) Only that it might take a few more days, I hope that's OK. In the following weeks I might be able to only make the district locator maps for Metro Manila, with the others to be made in the summer. --- Dakilang Isagani 18:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is fantastic! Would it be possible to do a political map, showing which districts are controlled by what party, based on the 2007 election results? Gareon 15:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cheche Lazaro

Thank you for letting me know - she sounds very notable then.

The article does need cleanup, so I will tag it as such. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Guroadrunner (talk • contribs) 17:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use images are banned in templates

I know it sucks, but just letting you know... --Howard the Duck 10:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you changed the text of {{KOR}} from South Korea to Republic of Korea. Was there a consensus somewhere on this that I missed? I don't mind the change, but it seemed abrupt and I didn't notice anything on the talk page. Awartha 07:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you going after me?

If you have problems with this template please use the discussion page.23prootie 08:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About the Province by Province results of the each candidate in 1998 and 2004 Presidential election the the Philippines

If you have the copy of the province by province results of the last 2 Presidential elections in the Philippines in 1998 and 2004 elections, canyou please post the province by province results on my talk page then you post the province by province results of 1998 and 2004 Presidential elections to their respective articles in Wikipedia if available to you the province by province results of 1998 and 2004 Presidential elections in the Philippines. --Joseph Solis in Australia 08:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please post the detailed data with the province by province vote of the last 2 presidential election in the Philippines in 1998 and 2004 to their respective articles in Wikipedia. Thank you. --Joseph Solis in Australia 07:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commonwealth Congress

But there was a plebiscite in 1940 that abolished the National Assembly and replaced it with the 1st Congress of the Commonwealth of the Philippines which convened only in June 1945. That why it should be made 1st Congress of the Commonwealth of the Philippines or Commonwealth Congress in the Template:PhilippineLegislatures OKay. Plus your book had an error which was corrected by the Philippine National Historical Institute and i have the corrections. Ü — rizalninoynapoleon 17:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Batasang Bayan

I read from the Senate of the Philippines e-library that the Batasang Bayan was both an advisory and a legislative body patterned after the Philippine Commission. I know some people who served the Batasang Bayan and they said it was an transitional legislative body which functioned until the elections for the Interim Batasang Pambansa. So it has to be in Template:Philippine legislatures and refer to the book of Cesar Pobre "Philippine Legislature:100Years". Ü — rizalninoynapoleon 17:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commonwealth Congress (Response)

Can u send through [rizalninoynapoleon@yahoo.com e-mail] the sessions, laws passed, major legislation, etc. Thanks.Rizalninoynapoleon 09:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)— rizalninoynapoleon' 05:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Philippine elections

I have obtain a cd containning summaries of elections (1946-Present) Including information about the Philippine general election, 2007 and the Philippine general election, 2010 Rizalninoynapoleon 09:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)— rizalninoynapoleon' 09:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ph_seal_lanao_del_norte_iligan_city.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ph_seal_lanao_del_norte_iligan_city.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bigr Tex 22:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Admin?

Sure, I've deleted all the old versions of those images. It's not a problem, if you really don't need them. By the way, are you interested at all in becoming an admin? You've been here for a year, plus 3 years anonymously, you have 6500 edits (including 400+ page moves), you use edit summaries properly, and you seem very hardworking and trustworthy... all things that would go over well with the people at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. The only roadblock I see is that your edits in the Wikipedia namespace are very few.. they're exclusively to Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines and its talk page. It's not something that would bother me, but the people voting there might see a low number and immediately think "inexperienced". TheCoffee 02:01, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Legislative Advisory Council

I am now have terminated some parts (copyright) of the article Legislative Executive Advisory Council of the Philippines due to copyright violations. This is the end of this issue. I am sorry for the trouble. User:rizalninoynapoleon 01:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My edits accidentally put on the wrong page. User:rizalninoynapoleon 01:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Philippine quasi-legislatures

You've listed {{Philippine quasi-legislatures}} for deletion, but have not given a reson for it. As of now, the consensus on the discussion page is to keep, most because there is no explanation. You might want to discuss your reasons here before a final decision is made. Thanks. - BillCJ 01:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Japan Philippines Locator.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Philippines Japan locator.png. The copy called Image:Philippines Japan locator.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 09:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Election quick counts

COMELEC ruling says that quick counts must be posted and updated on websites and will not be removed from the webpage so please tell Sir Howard that you can't remove the quick counts it even in the Amended Modernization Act of 2007.--rizalninoynapoleon 12:04, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Panlilio

COMELEC has just proclaimed that Fr. Eddie Panlilio (YEHEY! To end jueteng in Pampanga) as the new Governor of Pampanga. Howard, Scorpion and Others today is a day to end corruption and poverty and i ask that Among Ed should have a page he deserves it. Don't you second the motion rizalninoy 23:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Legislative districts

Hi,

Thanks for the reply :). I would like to get the dataset on who was serving where when, i.e. the congressmen for each district for each term. If it is not too much to ask you, can you send it through my mail? (bentong dot isles at gmail dot com) Thanks! --Bentong Isles 13:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will just copy them from here :). Thanks! --Bentong Isles 14:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Batasang Bayan

I found the Presidential Decree No. 995 which has contains its functions and shows that it is an legislative body though provisional it might help as a reference and i have consulted the IPRS of the Batasan and said that the said legislature was as legislative body like the Batasang Pambansa. Pls. send message ASAP Rizalninoynapoleon 17:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC) Rizalninoynapoleon[reply]

Correction...that very source you mentions says (Emphases provided):

Section 1. Creation. There is hereby created a Legislative Advisory Council 
which shall hereinafter be known as the Batasan Bayan.

Section 4. Functions. The Batasan Bayan shall function as an advisory body 
to the President on legislative matters....

It clearly says "Advisory". Are you sure you're reading your sources correctly? Strike two. --- Tito Pao 04:55, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 111: / Line 111: @@
 ::: Will do. ;-) Only that it might take a few more days, I hope that's OK. In the following weeks I might be able to only make the district locator maps for Metro Manila, with the others to be made in the summer. --- [[User:Dakilang Isagani|Dakilang Isagani]] 18:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
+:::: This is fantastic! Would it be possible to do a political map, showing which districts are controlled by what party, based on the 2007 election results? [[User:Gareon|Gareon]] 15:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 == Re: Cheche Lazaro ==