User talk:Radon210: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:00, 17 December 2007

Alexfusco5 (talk · contribs)

This is Radon210's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #286

Alexfusco5 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

How do I set an image on a Wikipedia Page?

Hello, this is VGAfanatic. First of all, I wanted to thank you for the humble welcome you gave me as well as the picture of those cookies. If they were real, I would have surely thought them delicious. But my point is that the gesture was kind and I am glad you were so nice to me. For the second time, I thank you.

But now, I have an important question to ask you. The image you sent me and others like it: Do you know how I can set them specifically? I have read the web page on how to set it up, but do you know how I have to make the link for the image? If you have a liable answer, would you be kind enough to reply? If the answer is in the help page, would you be willing to tell me where it is?

District of Herbert.

Huh? I'm changing the page to reflect the results of the recent election. Things such as:

George's caption "is a candidate" to "was a candidate".
Removing the "Lindsay retained seat in 2004" because him retaining it in 2007 superceeds that.
Noting that because Lindsay retained the seat, but his party lost, it is no longer a bellwether seat.

If you took the time to read the page, you'd understand that.

Thanks for your interest.

Duggy 1138 (talk) 02:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, thought you were doing the typical delete random text Alexfusco5 02:08, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear history of Iran

The material I reverted was plagiarised from here. It would be alright to cite this material in a summarisable form, but the entire article should not be copy and pasted verbatim in to the article. --68.253.35.241 (talk) 02:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your edit summary but could not find the source of it. Feel free to do it again as long as you list the website Alexfusco5 02:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Menudo

You are correct in blocking the guy for deleting sourced Menudo stories Menudo Do not let other admintrators over ride you and allow this guy to bully you with legal threats.--Blue5864 (talk) 02:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Southern California freeways

I meant to move some stuff from Mojave Freeway into Interstate 15 in California. Alot of informations is stubby and basically repeats 4 times. I meant to FW it to I-15 after it copy the section. And control cities, major intersections imitates repeatively at least 3 times. Only AARoads does this. The I-15 is split into many small sections. I just delete part of it before I send it on to another page. Just be patient. I will take care of those problem --Freewayguy (Comm 90) 03:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Sorry thought you were removing random text because there was no edit summary Alexfusco5 03:08, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Menudo cookies

Thanks for the cookie! It's become just a little ridiculous. One of the things I love about Wikipedia is that we can always fall back on WP:CITE when these things come up. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 03:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

c'mon--Blue5864 (talk) 04:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Melt the clouds of sin and sadness, drive the dark of doubt away!

Joy

Marlith ^T/C has given you a kitten! Kittens promote Wikilove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and keep up the excellent editing! Send kittens to others by adding {{subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Marlith ^T/C 03:48, 8 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Gwlad

Hi,

One of the users of this webpage highlighted my contribution to the Gwlad page as vandalism. I was attempting to contribute to one of the criticisms on the page by a moderator (i.e. the writing style is turgid and self-referential).

I use the Gwlad site myself, and am trying to put across the point that wikipedia wants content in a format suitable to an encyclopedia. The creators of the page have a choice, to write in a humourous style (which won't be accepted) or to write in a factual style that may have a chance of acceptance. I was attempted to aim for the second of those two choices.

I hope this clears things up. I very rarely add things to wikipedia and don't want to be accused of vandalism

Yours

Pete —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cupking13 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, however it appeared to be removal of random text Alexfusco5 15:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A sincere apology

I just want to say I sincerely apologize for my behavior yesterday. While there is no excuse for bullying tactics of any sort, I was at wits-end and having no prior knowlege of the Wiki protocol necessary to evoke change, was in somewhat of a panic. I'm pretty sure my frustration was quite evident, so I won't continue to elaborate. Now that I have calmed down and understand the process, I completely see my errors. Through the help of yourself, Dreaded Walrus, and Antandrus, the situation is now somewhat contained and we can now move forward with damage control.

The launching of a Boy-Band is a carefully orchestrated process, especially one with worldwide auditions, pre-auditions, not one but two MTV shows, trademark clearances, etc. All in all it is pretty daunting... in and of itself.

Jose, Monti, Chris, Emmanuel, and Carlos have worked exceptionally hard to make it through the process to this point. Incredibly long-hours, crazy travel schedules, rehearsals, more rehearsals, and little sleep. But having stuff like this individual suddenly smearing irrelevant, 17 year-old, tabloid headlines: "DRUGS and GAY SEX SCANDAL" all over the internet has truly tested my mettle.

Again, I apologize for my lack of knowlege, patience, and protocol yesterday and look forward to being a harmonious cog in the great Wiki wheel.

Christopher R (talk) 18:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I will strike your warnings Alexfusco5 19:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher I needed the above to prove who I was actually dealing with and now you have provided it. I can assure you that your calling me "NUTSO" and intentional tort is actionable to say the least. I again thank you for confirming who you are and who you are working for we will be in touch soon.--Blue5864 (talk) 22:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blue5864, I believe that is a legal threat and I know you have recently been blocked for legal threats Alexfusco5 01:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alex, I think you should report this to AN/I immediately, and BT should be indeffed, especially given his history of legal threats. Mr Which ^??? 01:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Idea, I already posted to the previous blocking admin Alexfusco5 01:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the "cookie"... Mr Which ^??? 03:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carter 3 Is Shelved

Carter 3 is shelved. Read here. http://www.xxlmag.com/online/?p=17124

Thanks for posting use the edit summary next time Alexfusco5 01:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ghost of Christmas Past

The two paragraphs that I deleted from Ghost of Christmas Past were a repetition of the first two paragraphs of the article. Someone must have accidentally copy-pasted them to the end of the article. --134.198.237.42 (talk) 02:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry there was no edit summary and it appeared vandal Alexfusco5 02:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Estonian mythology

What exactly did you find vandalistic about my changes to the article Estonian mythology? - 88.196.99.83 (talk) 20:19, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference and content removal without edit summary Alexfusco5 20:20, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which reference or which significant content did I remove? Is not adding edit summary really vandalism? Did you at least read the article after my edits? -- 88.196.99.83 (talk) 21:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No but your lack of an edit summary made it difficult to tell the difference Alexfusco5 22:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Template Barnstar
		For Making some Useful recent Changes Coolmoose (talk) 21:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... Alexfusco5 21:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Bell vandal

Please help on the Rob Bell article!! User "Lyonscc" keeps reverting all changes that he deems inappropriate simply because "it is in his opinion" that they are "libelous". I've already been threatened to be banned, by the time you read this I bet I will have already been. 72.86.14.75 (talk) 22:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

With the Rob Bell article, there were several Wikipedia:Coatrack issues that 72.86.14.75 continues to add back in, even though other users, including myself have removed them. Included in these are attempted additions of links to blogs as references.--24.145.236.116 (talk) 03:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will review the references in the article and remove the unacceptable ones Alexfusco5 12:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This revewier, 72.86.14.75, is still reverting a multitude of formatting changes and content updates. He is also refusing to use the discussion page, which I and other reviewers HAVE been trying to use. The links to Casey Freswick are violations of Wikipedia:Coatrack, and are blog sources. The link (which he places at the top) to wayofthemaster radio is also a violation of Wikipedia:Coatrack. I would engage him on the talk page, but he is not forthcoming.--Lyonscc (talk) 13:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User Gump is also reverting to old changes, now, as well, and refusing (see his history note) to discuss changes on the discussion page. He was warned before for this behavior. Gump and 72.86.14.75 appear to be attempting to use Wikipedia as their launching point for criticism of Bell, directing people to their blogs (primarily apprising.org) and to obscure negative reviews of one of Bell's books and one of his videos. Criticism is fine, but this is in violation of Coatrack and neutrality - and there seems to be no redress because they won't discuss their changes!

Actually, user Gump was temporarily blocked, not just warned.--Lyonscc (talk) 16:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted Gump twice, and this should not put me in jeopardy of the 3RR because this is dealing specificially with criticism contained within a Biography of a Living Person.--Thunderbolt2002 (talk) 15:10, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User Gump is back at it - reverting multiple changes to antiquated versions of the page and refusing to engage discussion in Talk:Rob_Bell on changes consistent with W:NOR, Wikipedia:Coatrack, and W:V. He has already been temporarily blocked for this once. --Lyonscc (talk) 19:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alex, I undid your revert, which went back to a VERY old version of the page, which still had a "Trivia" section and was missing multiple content additions. This article is under Arbitration right now, so please refrain from making changes without engaging us in the Talk:Rob_Bell page first. Apprising.org is a blog and does NOT meet W:V guidelines. For information on the Arbitration, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Rob_Bell--Lyonscc (talk) 22:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message I will request semi-protection Alexfusco5 22:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Way International "Vandalism"

I reverted your reversion. I was moving sections of the discussion page to the archives. I had two windows open while doing it and apparently hadn't saved the change on the archive page before deleting the section on the main discussion page.

Ten of Swords (talk) 22:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation Alexfusco5 22:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Tip

When I did that it said "invalid html code" or something like that...[[User:DeltaThetaZetaXiPhi|δθζφ]] (talk) 23:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, never mind i figured it out =) δθζξφ 23:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

how do i make the font bigger? δθζξφ 23:27, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much, it works now! δθζξφ 23:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Alexfusco5 23:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Adoption Offer

Cool! thanks!δθζξφ 23:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So what do you think is most important for me to learn?δθζξφ 23:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

okay, so i have a question. If anyone can edit wikipedia how do you keep a page from just getting deleted all toghether? δθζξφ 23:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

how do you put the hyperlinks in your text? δθζξφ 00:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

okay, i get it, so how do i tell if a page has been vandalised or not, and what is the easiest way to revert it?...twinkle?δθζξφ 00:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So is this right? User:DeltaThetaZetaXiPhi/monobook.js —Preceding comment was added at 00:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay, cool, im probably going to get off in a little bit too, but i'll be on tomorrow. =) thanks for adopting me and all the help. δθζξφ 00:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind welcome.

And, for not blocking me.Wikiipedia Is Like, Way Better Than World Book (talk) 02:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Alexfusco5 02:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biker Mice

If you had bothered reading i created List of Biker Mice from Mars episodes as i feel the current biker mice page is too unwieldy. Hence the removal from the page Dwanyewest (talk) 02:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Characters In Resident Evil Film Series: Johnny L.K. Blaze

Hi there. This character does not exist in the films. Obviously a joke edit to the Wiki by another person, Johnny L.K. Blaze is a reference to Leon Kennedy, a character that was said to be dead at the beginning of Resident Evil: Apocalypse and has never been seen or referenced. I just wanted to remove the mess someone had made of the page with this fake article and terrible punctuation. 82.18.53.50, 02:50, 10 December 2007 (GMT)

Thanks Alexfusco5 02:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roanoke

The changes I made to the last paragraph were valid and not at all vandalism. The last paragraph simply repeated information that was already posted in the main paragraph and was of no use to the article. All other changes were grammar fixes. Please revert back to my edit if you see fit.

Use the Edit summary next time Alexfusco5 21:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

sorry, i didnt notice i deleted half the article on the Kottonmouth Kings page. totally accidental. thanks 4 reverting it though. Jride247 (talk) 21:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) Alexfusco5 21:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Time

Okay, cool. Also, I have a question, if I come upon an article that has red links, should I get rid of them or just leave them? They are a waste if they link to no where... δθζξφ 00:05, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, how exactly do templates work? δθζξφ 00:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The vandal

I know, I suddenly saw them come up on my watchlist. They are a sockpuppet of this user. Acalamari 23:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

While I was adding my comment on the Talk Page of "Politicization of Science," I must have accidentally selected and replaced older text with my newer text. Sorry, my mistake. Now, what I wanted to ask you was this: how did you manage to revert my edit within the same minute I made it? Good job catching vandalism. --Armaetin (talk) 23:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Recentchanges Alexfusco5 23:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which was successful with a vote of 33/7/4.

Special thanks go to Epbr123 for nominating me and Pedro for the offer of help.

I am honoured by the trust placed in me by the community. I hope to repay this by the wise use of the tools, which I intend to use gradually. Mop & bucket is on the Christmas list - honest. Keith D (talk) 00:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem and congrats Alexfusco5 00:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing!

Thanks for signing, cheers!

	The Guest Book Barnstar
	This barnstar is awarded to Alexfusco5 for signing Sirkad's Guestbook.

No problem, thanks for signing mine Sirkad(Talk) 02:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, thanks for adopting my little bro, I would help him out but im in college so I don't really have the time. =P Cheers! Sirkad(Talk) 02:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime I enjoy helping new users Alexfusco5 02:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing of "Dan Debicella"

I don't understand why are my changes being reverted and tagged as vandalism. The information I'm adding to the wiki is more accurate and less partial than what is currently there. For instance part of my post includes a slightly more detailed description of which towns are in the district. Also, I added the political party he's a member of and a link to the national website. So why are these pertinent facts being allowed to be ommitted? The wiki shouldn't just be a cut and paste from the legislator's campaign website...it should be impartial. I'm willing to work to find a middle ground here so what should I do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratsofftoya (talk • contribs) 16:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looked like you were removing random blocks of text Alexfusco5 21:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I adopted a user and was wondering what your take was on this article i helped him create, it kept getting speedy deleted, so think it will now? User:M2W/Mail2World post what you think on my talk page. thanks for the help. Sirkad _talk^sign 00:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What criteria? Alexfusco5 00:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No context. Sirkad _talk^sign 01:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recreate it has plenty of context does not meet WP:CSD#A1 Alexfusco5 01:04, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help man. Sirkad _talk^sign 02:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime, BTW you should move it to the mainspace now Alexfusco5 02:13, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, im gonna let him do it, he did most the work anyway =P. Sirkad _talk^sign 04:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article

What should I do to improve my article? --M2W (talk) 01:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should first move it to the mainspace and then add more information. After it is submitted to the mainspace it will be edited by many users which will improve it Alexfusco5 01:40, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really, really bad haikus from a new admin

Setting new lows in thank-you spam:

Click there for my RfA spam haikus! → → →

Grazie, Alex! Thanks so much for your support in my RfA.

Enjoy these haiku, --A. B. ^(talk) 14:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS Italian is a cool language -- I'm envious that you can speak it.

Thanks and good luck as an admin. Alexfusco5 15:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Questions

Not atm. thanks. δθζξφ 17:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prank message

I've removed the message from (a) a number of articles and (b) your user and user talk pages. I believe that this is against the rules; if not, it certainly isn't appropriate behavior. I suggest that you focus your efforts on constructive editing of articles. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 18:04, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did NOT put it in any articles and I believe WP:USER says that I can have on my userpage. If someone uses it in the mainspace, It is not to my knowledge and not what it was intended for. Thank You Alexfusco5 18:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alex - are you familiar with this statement?

The Wikipedia community generally frowns upon simulating the MediaWiki interface, and it should be avoided except when necessary for testing purposes.

That's from the guideline you cited. I'm going to assume that you didn't realize that what you're doing did involve the MediaWiki interface, and now that you do, you'll take the prank messages off your user pages. Or explain why you think you're in compliance with the guideline -- John Broughton (♫♫) 19:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will do it on some days only, is that okay with you? BTW thanks for removing from those articles I was unaware that they were there. Alexfusco5 21:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not okay to do it on some days only. I don't have any authority to waive the rules. As for not knowing about the other links to the prank page, if you click on the link "What links here" (on the left, in the toolbox), when you're at that page, you'll see all the pages that do link to it. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 21:32, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a newbie and what I mean is April fools day and holidays I can occasionally have it on my userpage. BTW I don't always check the 'what links here' Alexfusco5 21:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can do whatever you want; you know the rules and I'll let you deal with the consequences. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 23:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Lens entry

Hi,

I work for the Independent Lens series on PBS at ITVS, I am not vandalizing the page. Thanks for the sandbox tip. Independent Lens (talk) 22:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Use the edit summary next time Alexfusco5 22:15, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey i found it

I fell special

Now start making changes to articles. Alexfusco5 23:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indefblockeduser

Isn't replacing the userpage of an indefblockeduser with {{Indefblockeduser}} proper use of the template? Certainly it's not vandalism, and the warning you put on my talk page should be removed. 72.78.226.150 (talk) 23:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry thought he wasn't blocked also subst the template Alexfusco5 23:56, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The template instructions specifically state not to subst it. 72.78.226.150 (talk) 23:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks Alexfusco5 23:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal Fighting

We keep bumping into each other in anon's Talk Pages. Just want to say, that's pretty funny. Just had to comment on that. Bgs022 (♬) 02:39, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it is pretty funny Alexfusco5 02:40, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new at this, so forgive me if I'm posting this in the wrong place, but how dare you accuse me of vandalizing a page when all I did was remove gossip? Someone (you, perhaps?) keeps posting gossip on one of the pages. Isn't gossip against the rules Aren't things in Wiki supposed to be objective and factual? Seems to me that the real vandal is the party posting gossip, not my removal of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mykidsareplayinginthetoilet (talk • contribs) 02:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not accuse you of vandalism this is your first edit Alexfusco5 02:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Broadway14122 would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Broadway14122 to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Radon210. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

Broadway14122 (talk) 20:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC) [reply]

I am considering the RFA although it is a bit earlier than I would have thought. I actually am asking the opinion of others. Those of you interested may comment Alexfusco5 00:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RFA

I would not suggest entering you RfA right now. When passing a decision, editors are very tough and sometimes incivil when supporting and opposing them. I would suggest giving it two more months. In the meantime I would suggest working more on making articles better, writing you own articles, helping settle decisions and so forth along with what you are doing now. If you wish you can apply for Wikipedia:Admin Coaching to educate yourself and have a better chance at succeding. I also would suggest removing that talkheader on this talkpage, as that might get a few opposes. Personally, I would not oppose because of that, but some people will. Sorry, I do hope you pass in the future. Thank you. Marlith ^T/C 01:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Work

Good work on reverting all the vandalism and for "beating to the punch" several times :) Also, I'm wondering, do you use a AVT (Anti-Vandalism Tool)? I'm struggling to find a great one.

Keep up the good work --Diehardinfo (talk) 00:06, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I use twinkle but you need to create an account to use it Alexfusco5 00:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Card

Welcome to Wikipedia, and...

-- Vintei Talk 01:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Christmas card Alexfusco5 01:33, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Blessed editing, and...

Marlith ^T/C 00:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and same to you :):):) Alexfusco5 00:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A KINDLY REQUEST TO HELP ME CHANGE MY NAME

dear alex bunch of salam, hope be fine,

dear! im a a user of Pashto wikipedia and help wiki in pashto, add topix in pashto wiki and my name is JALALAKUT, so now i wana change my name to usman mansour (عثمان منصور) if u kindly tel me how to change my name from JALALAKUT TO عثمان منصور, so i wi be very thankful to you.

best of luck

usman mansour

pashto wiki user