Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 January 7: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Nominating Image:Rahman.mady cv.pdf |
|||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
:<span class="plainlinksneverexpand lx">[[:Image:{{ucfirst:Tesco metro manchester.jpg}}]] ([{{fullurl:Image:Tesco metro manchester.jpg|action=delete}} delete] | [[Image talk:{{ucfirst:Tesco metro manchester.jpg}}|talk]] | [{{fullurl::Image:{{ucfirst:Tesco metro manchester.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode::Image:{{ucfirst:Tesco metro manchester.jpg}}}}}} logs])</span> - uploaded by [[User talk:Abfab27#Image:Tesco metro manchester.jpg listed for deletion|Abfab27]] (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Abfab27|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro§ion=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify]</span> | [[Special:Contributions/Abfab27|contribs]]). |
:<span class="plainlinksneverexpand lx">[[:Image:{{ucfirst:Tesco metro manchester.jpg}}]] ([{{fullurl:Image:Tesco metro manchester.jpg|action=delete}} delete] | [[Image talk:{{ucfirst:Tesco metro manchester.jpg}}|talk]] | [{{fullurl::Image:{{ucfirst:Tesco metro manchester.jpg}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode::Image:{{ucfirst:Tesco metro manchester.jpg}}}}}} logs])</span> - uploaded by [[User talk:Abfab27#Image:Tesco metro manchester.jpg listed for deletion|Abfab27]] (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User_talk:Abfab27|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro§ion=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify]</span> | [[Special:Contributions/Abfab27|contribs]]). |
||
*Unencyclopedis, it's just a load of people, who probably have not consented to be photographed, in a shop; also, the image is way too large. '''[[User:Rodhullandemu|<font color="7F007F">'''Rodhullandemu'''</font>]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|Talk]]) 18:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
*Unencyclopedis, it's just a load of people, who probably have not consented to be photographed, in a shop; also, the image is way too large. '''[[User:Rodhullandemu|<font color="7F007F">'''Rodhullandemu'''</font>]]''' ([[User_talk:Rodhullandemu|Talk]]) 18:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
It shows how popular Tesco is and loads more but if you wanted to delete it all you had to do was ask, not be so arrogant about the whole thing! |
|||
====[[:Image:Z1.JPG]]==== |
====[[:Image:Z1.JPG]]==== |
Revision as of 22:53, 7 January 2008
January 7
- Khaosworks (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This image was kept at its 18 December 2007 IfD; however, DRV overturned that result because the IfD tag was removed from the image after less than two hours, and never replaced, preventing the possibility of a full discussion. For a full list of the image's defects, see the first debate. Delete per inadequate fair use rationale. Xoloz (talk) 15:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Weak delete - it looks like an RFU image, although the gas mask design was unique. I think we'd be better off with getting an image from the episode both representative of most of the plot and unreplacable. Will (talk) 17:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- weak delete - similar to above, can be replaced by an image more key to the plot. StuartDD contributions 20:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- BoredAndViolent (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyright violation ˉˉanetode╦╩ 02:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Cartoonbook (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Likely copyvio image of living people. Uploader has uploaded multiple copyrighted images claiming free license. [1] [2] --Kelvinc (talk) 03:04, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Cartoonbook (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Likely copyvio image of living people. Uploader has uploaded multiple copyrighted images claiming free license. [3] [4] --Kelvinc (talk) 03:04, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Non-encyclopedic image intended for promotional use on Wikipedia. As an aside, the contributing user's page is also up for deletion for similar reasons. jonny-mt 03:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- One Wikipedian's photoshopped concept of an expanded Kyle Field, violates Wikipedia's policy on original research. Also, where did the original photo come from? -- B (talk) 03:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- original photo came from here, but they have since taken that image down. No original authorship was stated on the image at the time and an altered image of a PR photo I believe qualifies under fair use. Should it be marked as such?
- Furthermore, this does not violate WP:NOR as such a concept has been discussed. This is merely an illustration of such a concept. If it is not acceptable on the Kyle Field page, then it certainly can be left on my user page and need not be deleted altogether. — BQZip01 — talk 04:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well, you have no rights to grant someone else a license to use a TAMU-authored photo. So we cannot use it as a "free" image and on Wikipedia, it does NOT meet our non-free content requirements because it is replaceable - the building exists now, so you could take a photo of it yourself and photoshop that. But more than that, even if that concept has been expressed, you are making assumptions about how it will look and that's original research. --B (talk) 04:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Then I guess we disagree, it is simply one artist's interpretation. If modification of a fair use image is not appropriate, then please remove the image altogether, but I'm pretty sure I am in the right here under U.S. law (...and yes, I know that U.S. law does not necessarily apply to Wikipedia, but it certainly applies to the creation of said image). If I need to specify another license, then please tell me what should have been used. — BQZip01 — talk 05:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- If the consensus is Delete, then delete it. I guess we disagree on application of policy/guidelines. If its use in an article (versus a user page) is in question, then the appropriate place is discussion on that talk page. I have removed said image from the page, so its active use is strictly on a user page now. — BQZip01 — talk 06:06, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Whether you could use this image outside of Wikipedia under a claim of fair use is not something that I can tell you (Wikipedia doesn't give legal advice - you would need to ask a lawyer). Some schools are territorial about such things and others don't care if you aren't trying to sell it. But on Wikipedia, because it is considered replaceable, it does not meet our non-free content policy. --B (talk) 06:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, so we were talking about "rights" and that's what I was focusing on, but I can see how WP policy might differ.
- Can we agree that said picture may be perfectly acceptable as an application of legal fair use (as I interpreted it IAW WP policy & US law), but that such an image does not fall under Wikipedia's application of fair use and associated policies/guidelines? — BQZip01 — talk 21:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC) (UTC)
- Whether you could use this image outside of Wikipedia under a claim of fair use is not something that I can tell you (Wikipedia doesn't give legal advice - you would need to ask a lawyer). Some schools are territorial about such things and others don't care if you aren't trying to sell it. But on Wikipedia, because it is considered replaceable, it does not meet our non-free content policy. --B (talk) 06:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well, you have no rights to grant someone else a license to use a TAMU-authored photo. So we cannot use it as a "free" image and on Wikipedia, it does NOT meet our non-free content requirements because it is replaceable - the building exists now, so you could take a photo of it yourself and photoshop that. But more than that, even if that concept has been expressed, you are making assumptions about how it will look and that's original research. --B (talk) 04:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete See also Talk:Kyle Field#Kyle Field Expansion Photo—G716 <T·C> 05:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep — BQZip01 — talk (see above and talk page)
- Delete. Licensing is wrong; if fair use is claimed, it's still an unnecessary non-free image. -- RG2 06:34, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Lordiwasbornramblingman (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image being used only in a hoax article; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beeva Thapa. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 04:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Vaitastic16 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Previously linked to speedily deleted article - Now an orphan —G716 <T·C> 05:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- ClaudeReigns (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyright violation. This is a derivative work based on a photograph retreived from a stolen cellphone. The flickr user who uploaded this photoshop acknowledges this in the picture comments[5]. The only modification to the original photo is the insertion of the fingers and sidekick. The original photo may be seen at [6] (NSFW). ˉˉanetode╦╩ 05:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, the photoshopped image is licensed under {{cc-by-nc-2.0}}, so the nomination is moot. Deleted per WP:CSD#I3. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 05:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Jesus how many edit conflicts do I have to endure before I get a word in edgewise?? The parody is clearly protected under Hustler Magazine v. Falwell. If I can get proper license can it stay? ClaudeReigns (talk) 05:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hustler v Falwell dealt with freedom of speech, not copyright. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 06:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Jesus how many edit conflicts do I have to endure before I get a word in edgewise?? The parody is clearly protected under Hustler Magazine v. Falwell. If I can get proper license can it stay? ClaudeReigns (talk) 05:57, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, the photoshopped image is licensed under {{cc-by-nc-2.0}}, so the nomination is moot. Deleted per WP:CSD#I3. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 05:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unused image, uploader has no other edits or uploads. Not really encyclopedic. --Icarus (Hi!) 07:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- It was used solely on Evan McCandless, which was speedily deleted because the person, Evan McCandless, is not notable. As this is a picture of him, it probably doesn't need to be here on Wikipedia, either. Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 09:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Krayzed896 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Logo for a non-notable artist, whose article Krayzed was speedily deleted. Image is thus now orphaned, and unlikely to ever be used encyclopedically. Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 10:22, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Images watermarked with URL or external commercial site. User is also spamming articles with the same URL. The JPStalk to me 12:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- commons - reasonable quality image, appropriate licence Fasach Nua (talk) 13:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Images watermarked with URL or external commercial site. The JPStalk to me 12:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- commons - reasonable quality image, appropriate licence Fasach Nua (talk) 13:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Rob05046421 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- LQ (uploader used it for speedy deleted article) MightyWarrior (talk) 13:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Jason61616 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic image used only on vanity page Mayalld (talk) 16:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedis, it's just a load of people, who probably have not consented to be photographed, in a shop; also, the image is way too large. Rodhullandemu (Talk) 18:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
It shows how popular Tesco is and loads more but if you wanted to delete it all you had to do was ask, not be so arrogant about the whole thing!
- Misbahulrizvi (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- unused user photo Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Chajeshukarie (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- don't need the back cover of a single (NFCC8) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Chajeshukarie (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- don't need the back cover to an album (NFCC8) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Chajeshukarie (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- don't need nonfree back cover of this single (NFCC8) Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Chajeshukarie (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- don't need back cover of album Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Chajeshukarie (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- don't need non-free back cover to this album Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, sourced to copyrighted website Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- obvious screenshot, not PD Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, probably old user photo Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, sourced to copyrighted websit Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Zanicnight (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Zapptastic (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:15, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Harryfronman (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, probably copyrighted by professional photographer Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Blandabaillj (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Khaledghaith (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- CV. Yes I know that stands for Copyright Violation, but here it's also an actual CV, of the Prime Minister of Kuwait, apparently. I'm pretty sure it's useless and also pretty sure it's not GFDL. Orphan file. Absentee uploader. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 20:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- I think it's somebody's Curriculum Vitae. Not at all useful. Orphaned file. Absentee uploader (this upload was their only contribution). • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 21:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Trainedintheartofhate (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Krytoh first uploaded from a copyrighted site without cc-by-sa-2.5 proven. The fourth version uploaded by user:Trainedintheartofhate is unsourced, likely a copyvio. Other versions are the same and now on commons:WestPalmBeach1885. As this is now orphan and its name is too generic, I would like to suggest deleting it and locking it out to stop further overwriting. Jusjih (talk) 21:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Basilbc2000 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Somebody's CV. Unencyclopedic. Orphaned. Absentee uploader (this upload was their only contribution). • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 21:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic. Orphaned. Just somebody using us as a free webhost. File was their only contribution. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 21:19, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Alpha-hosting (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, may use copyvio images as components Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:28, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Allenwaverly86 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Firepyro515 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic. Orphaned. Just somebody using us as a free webhost. Absentee uploader. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 21:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, sourced to copyrighted website Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic. Orphaned. Just somebody using us as a free webhost for their CV. Absentee uploader. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 21:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic. Orphaned. Just somebody using us as a free webhost for their CV. Absentee uploader. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 21:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Brummiesteven (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Brummiesteven (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:49, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic. Orphaned. Just somebody using us as a free webhost for their CV. Absentee uploader. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 21:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic. Orphaned. Just somebody using us as a free webhost for their CV. Absentee uploader. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 21:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Unencyclopedic. Orphaned. Just somebody using us as a free webhost for their CV. Absentee uploader. • Anakin (contribs • complaints) 22:02, 7 January 2008 (UTC)