Talk:Elvis Presley/Archive 23

Wikipedia:WikiProject Elvis Presley

I've created a WikiProject that will hopefully help focus the efforts of all of us involved with Elvis-related articles. Obviously, those of us who work on these articles collectively know pretty much everything there is to know about Elvis. However, we must keep in mind that this is an encyclopedia and just because it's published in a biography does not mean it should be included here. We want to present our knowledge to the reader as clearly and focused as possible, leaving out the gossip, hearsay and such. That's what the biographies are for. So, for what is relevant in terms of an encyclopedia, we want the readers to know everything we know.

In order to get things going in the most productive manner possible, I have the following proposal (which is reflected in the project pages, but can be changed if consensus does not support it):

A collaboration of the week, as many projects have. However, initially, rather than having a different article each week, we start with the Elvis article and do one section per week. With each section, we would follow a few short steps:

1. Paste the section, as it currently exists, to the talk page.
2. Discuss issues and possible changes.
3. Draft the rewrite and discuss.
4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 until consensus is reached.
5. Replace current section with the rewrite.

Should there be a need to extend the time frame to more than a week, that's fine. However, each section would get no less than one week. This allows all editors to have a say in each section—even those who only edit once per week.

If consensus supports this proposal, then we can start immediately. If everyone respects this, there should be no need for page protection. However, if edit wars resume and the page is once again protected, this process will still be able to go on as stated above. The only difference will be that only I or another involved admin will be able to replace the current version with the rewrite.

Please discuss. Lara❤Love 21:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Looks like a very workable idea. Rikstar 18:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

All articles have been assessed. Some still lack an importance rating, but they're at least all tagged. Now it's just a matter of article improvement. Shall we start today? Lara❤Love 18:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Still looks like a very workable idea. So... Early life currently reads as follows:

Early life

First draft

Presley's father, Vernon (April 10, 1916–June 26, 1979), had several low-paying jobs, including sharecropper and truck driver.When he was 5 years old he rode llamas and ate tacos. His mother, Gladys Love Smith (April 25, 1912–August 14, 1958) worked as a sewing machine operator. They met in Tupelo, Mississippi, and eloped to Pontotoc County where they married on June 17, 1933.

Presley was born in a two room house, built by his father, in East Tupelo. He was the second of identical twins—his brother was stillborn and given the name Jesse Garon. The family lived just above the poverty line and attended the Assembly of God church.Template:Fn Vernon has been described as "a malingerer, always averse to work and responsibility." In 1938, he was jailed for an eight dollar check forgery. During his absence, his wife, described as "voluble, lively, full of spunk", lost the family home. Priscilla Presley recalls her as "a surreptitious drinker and alcoholic."

Presley was bullied at school; classmates threw "things at him—rotten fruit and stuff—because he was different... quiet and he stuttered and he was a mama's boy."

At age ten, he made his first public performance in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show. Dressed as a cowboy, the young Presley had to stand on a chair to reach the microphone and sang Red Foley's "Old Shep." He won second prize.

In 1946, Presley got his first guitar. In November 1948, the family moved to Memphis, Tennessee, allegedly because Vernon—in addition to needing work—had to escape the law for transporting bootleg liquor. In 1949, they lived at Lauderdale Courts, a public housing development in one of Memphis' poorer sections. Presley practiced playing guitar in the laundry room and also played in a five-piece band with other tenants. Another resident, Johnny Burnette, recalled, "Wherever Elvis went he'd have his guitar slung across his back... [H]e'd go in to one of the cafes or bars... Then some folks would say: 'Let's hear you sing, boy.'" Presley attended L. C. Humes High School, but fellow students apparently viewed the young singer's performing unfavorably: One recalled that he was "a sad, shy, not especially attractive boy" whose guitar playing was not likely to win any prizes. Many of the other children made fun of him as a 'trashy' kind of boy playing 'trashy' hillbilly music."

Presley occasionally worked evenings to boost the family income. He began to grow his sideburns and dress in the wild, flashy clothes of Lansky Brothers on Beale Street. He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and was mocked and bullied for it. Despite his unpopularity, he was a contestant in his school's 1952 "Annual Minstrel Show" and won by receiving the most applause and thus an encore (he sang "Cold Cold Icy Fingers" and "Till I Waltz Again With You").

After graduation, Presley was still rather shy, a "kid who had spent scarcely a night away from home". His third job was driving a truck for the Crown Electric Company. He began wearing his hair longer with a "ducktail"—the style of truck drivers at that time.

I propose shortening this to:

Presley's father, Vernon (April 10, 1916–June 26, 1979), had several low-paying jobs, including sharecropper and truck driver. His mother, Gladys Love Smith (April 25, 1912–August 14, 1958) worked as a sewing machine operator. They met in Tupelo, Mississippi, and eloped to Pontotoc County where they married on June 17, 1933.

Presley was born in a two room house, built by his father, in East Tupelo. He was the second of identical twins (his brother was stillborn and given the name Jesse Garon). He grew up as an only child. The family lived just above the poverty line and attended the Assembly of God church.Template:Fn In 1938, Vernon Presley was jailed for an eight dollar check forgery. During his absence, his wife lost the family home.

At age ten, Presley made his first public performance in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show. Dressed as a cowboy, he had to stand on a chair to reach the microphone and sang Red Foley's "Old Shep." He won second prize.

In 1946, Presley got his first guitar. In November 1948, the family moved to Memphis, Tennessee, allegedly because Vernon—in addition to needing work—had to escape the law for transporting bootleg liquor. In 1949, they lived at Lauderdale Courts, a public housing development in one of Memphis' poorer sections. Presley practiced playing guitar in the laundry room and also played in a five-piece band with other tenants. Presley occasionally worked evenings to boost the family income. He began to grow his sideburns and dress in the wild, flashy clothes of Lansky Brothers on Beale Street. He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and was mocked and bullied for it. Despite any unpopularity, Presley was a contestant in his school's 1952 "Annual Minstrel Show" and won by receiving the most applause and thus an encore (he sang "Cold Cold Icy Fingers" and "Till I Waltz Again With You").

After graduation, Presley was still rather shy, and had spent little time away from home . His third job was driving a truck for the Crown Electric Company. He began wearing his hair longer with a "ducktail"—the style of truck drivers at that time.

Discussion

This version gets rid of quotes (which I think are generally unencyclopedic) and cuts the section down to facts, with a bit of interest thrown in. Rikstar 18:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

• I like it for the most part, but I think the "mama's boy" quote is an important one. I also think the comments of "trashy boy making hillbilly music" should also be included. I think it adds context to see where he started compared to where he ended up. In the 1946 paragraph, I think it would read/flow better with a slight tweaking of the following part: "Presley practiced playing guitar in the laundry room and also played in a five-piece band with other tenants. He occasionally worked evenings to boost the family income, and began to grow his sideburns and dress in the wild, flashy clothes of Lansky Brothers on Beale Street. He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and was mocked and bullied for it." Lara❤Love 19:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Got no problems with that. I just tried to add the above to the wikiproject you created but realised you'd added your last comment. Apologies. Rikstar 20:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I fully agree that the "mama's boy"quote is important

Boy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.69.5.141 (talk) 13:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Second draft

Now would read as:

Presley's father, Vernon (April 10, 1916–June 26, 1979), had several low-paying jobs, including sharecropper and truck driver. His mother, Gladys Love Smith (April 25, 1912–August 14, 1958) worked as a sewing machine operator. They met in Tupelo, Mississippi, and eloped to Pontotoc County where they married on June 17, 1933.

Presley was born in a two room house, built by his father, in East Tupelo. He was the second of identical twins (his brother was stillborn and given the name Jesse Garon). He grew up as an only child and "was, everyone agreed, unusually close to his mother." The family lived just above the poverty line and attended the Assembly of God church.Template:Fn In 1938, Vernon Presley was jailed for an eight dollar check forgery. During his absence, his wife lost the family home.

At age ten, Presley made his first public performance in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show. Dressed as a cowboy, he had to stand on a chair to reach the microphone and sang Red Foley's "Old Shep." He won second prize.

In 1946, Presley got his first guitar. In November 1948, the family moved to Memphis, Tennessee, allegedly because Vernon—in addition to needing work—had to escape the law for transporting bootleg liquor. In 1949, they lived at Lauderdale Courts, a public housing development in one of Memphis' poorer sections. Presley practiced playing guitar in the laundry room and also played in a five-piece band with other tenants. He occasionally worked evenings to boost the family income, and began to grow his sideburns and dress in the wild, flashy clothes of Lansky Brothers on Beale Street. He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and was mocked and bullied for it. Despite any unpopularity, Presley was a contestant in his school's 1952 "Annual Minstrel Show" and won by receiving the most applause and thus an encore (he sang "Cold Cold Icy Fingers" and "Till I Waltz Again With You").

After graduation, Presley was still rather shy, and had spent little time away from home . His third job was driving a truck for the Crown Electric Company. He began wearing his hair longer with a "ducktail"—the style of truck drivers at that time.

Rikstar 20:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

I endorse this version. It still lacks the trashy, hillbilly quote, but I missed at first that it was a quote from children, so I think it's fine to leave it out. I like this version. Lara❤Love 21:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. I missed out ref. for five-piece band. Now added above. Rikstar 21:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I really don't know if I have the stomach for going through this again, but I once provided a link to a presentation which stated that something like 2 out of every 3 children are bullied in school. (The other third are probably the bullies.) I don't see what's so noteworthy about Elvis being bullied. Most films about Elvis leave out any bullying scenes. Also, why pick on the South? By current standards, the entire country was conservative in the early/mid 50s. Yes, someone wrote it. A "reliable source", no doubt. The South was one of the first areas of the country where "black sounding" music was accepted by white people (there is a lot more complexity to this, but in general it's true), so how how could it have been more conservative than the rest of the country? As far as the trashy hillbilly music part, you "should" see that in reaction to some of the early public performances, and you could use a Barbara Pittman quote that can be heard at the Experience Music Project in Seattle that is specifically about this, though not specifically about Elvis.

Oh, and how do we know that any time we spend one this version of the article will stay around after protection is lifted? Steve Pastor 23:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

The bullied comment is removed in the above version. That's a good point about the South accepting black music before the rest of the country. This is the sort of stuff I don't think about. As for how will we know it will stay around after protection is lifted, we don't. But, if revisions are not appropriate and not discussed and agreed on here on the talk page, they'll be reverted. Once the article again achieves GA, it will be permalinked in the article history. Same with FA, should we get there. Lara❤Love 04:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Good points. The rewrite does mention he was "mocked and bullied", but because of his unconventional appearance. This seems to be a valid comment based on the sources I've read. I think it's significant because it shows he didn't give in to such intimidation. This attitude may well have contributed to him maintaining unconventional ways - not just regarding his looks - but with music, song choice, etc.

As for: "He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and was mocked and bullied for it.". This could be amended to:

"He stood out, especially in the conservative 1950s, and was mocked and bullied for it." (It could read: "... conservative America of the 1950s...", but I think that would be superfluous). Rikstar 09:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Of the two, the former reads better, "conservative 1950s". However, it's occurred to me that the reference to him standing out in the deep south refers to his look, not his sound. So in that the south accepted black music before the rest of the country has no bearing on this statement. This refers to his sideburns and flashy clothes, not his music. Lara❤Love 19:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Er...Ummm...The sideburns and ducktail haircut came from truck drivers of that day and location. So, if you were used to being around truck drivers... Lansky Brothers were selling those flashy clothes to folks other than Elvis. Bullies will seize on ANY reason to torture a victim, and most people have been bullied in their lives. If we can't agree on what the quote was about, I say leave it out. Presley's early recorded song choices were based on what Sam Phillips thought would sell, and what Scotty, Bill, and Elvis knew how to play. Steve Pastor 20:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I do not agree with the latest changes. Some important facts are missing:

• Vernon has been described as "a malingerer, always averse to work and responsibility."
• his wife, described as "voluble, lively, full of spunk".
• Priscilla Presley recalls her as "a surreptitious drinker and alcoholic."

At the beginning of a biography we need some brief information about Elvis’s parents and their character. It shows the proletarian background of the singer’s family. The information also explains why Elvis was so close to his mother. According to Peter Guralnick, his mother Gladys "worshiped him from the day he was born." Elvis himself said, "My mama never let me out of her sight. I couldn't go down to the creek with the other kids." Later, Gladys was so proud of her boy, that she "would get up early in the morning to run off the fans so Elvis could sleep." She was frightened of Elvis being hurt: "She knew her boy, and she knew he could take care of himself, but what if some crazy man came after him with a gun? she said...tears streaming down her face."

• Presley was bullied at school; classmates threw "things at him—rotten fruit and stuff—because he was different... quiet and he stuttered and he was a mama's boy."

This passage should not be removed, as it is well sourced and gives a nice impression of Elvis’s unpopularity at school at that time. At the start of his fame, guitarist Scotty Moore still attested that the singer was a "typical coddled son" and "very shy": "His mama would corner me and say, 'Take care of my boy. Make sure he eats. Make sure he -' You know, whatever. Typical mother stuff." But Elvis "didn't seem to mind; there was nothing phony about it, he truly loved his mother." Moore adds that Elvis "was more comfortable just sitting there with a guitar than trying to talk to you."

• The conservative “Deep South” makes sense as all of Elvis’s friends were described as Southern boys and the singer was later accused of racism. His poor, white origins in deeply racist Mississippi, his purchase of an old Memphis mansion, and his association with right-wing politicians such as Richard Nixon have often been cited as proof of his conservative feelings. Here is Michael T. Bertrand, Race, Rock, and Elvis (University of Illinois Press, 2000):

There are several reasons why no subject associated with Presley causes greater controversy and conflict than that of race. He was, after all, a white performer whose financial success rested upon the songs and styles of black artists historically excluded from the popular music marketplace. Second, he hailed from the former slave-holding and segregated South. Third, he belonged to a white working class traditionally antagonistic to its African American counterpart. Fourth, upon achieving affluence, he purchased an antebellum-style mansion in Memphis that to many recalled the Old South as represented in Gone with the Wind. Fifth, he associated with racially conservative politicians such as George Wallace and Richard Nixon. Finally, he presumably uttered a racial slur on at least one public occasion during his career. (p.26)

As the bearer of too many painful images and memories, Presley has become a symbol of all that was oppressive to the black experience in the Western Hemisphere. (p.27)

Many have almost systematically insisted that Presley, "looking the part of a hillbilly racist," generated nothing but distrust within the black community. A black southerner in the late 1980s captured that sentiment: "To talk to Presley about blacks was like talking to Adolph Hitler about the Jews." One journalist wrote upon the singer's death that African Americans refused to participate in the numerous eulogies dedicated to him. (p.200)

Interestingly, only critical information has been removed. This is not acceptable. Onefortyone 19:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

What critical information is that, 141? Lara❤Love 19:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Some examples. Elvis's father was "a malingerer, always averse to work and responsibility," his mother was described as "a surreptitious drinker and alcoholic." Elvis's classmates threw "things at him—rotten fruit and stuff." See also the conservative “Deep South” passage etc. Onefortyone 19:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Furthermore, the current version reads:

• In 1946, Presley got his first guitar.

The following passage should be added:

• In 1946, Presley's mother took Elvis to Tupelo Hardware to get him a birthday present. Although he wanted a rifle, he left the store with a $7.90 guitar.

It is of some importance that young Elvis wanted a rifle. According to Mark Crispin Miller, “Elvis gradually became an explosive megalomaniac as his wealth and boredom increased over the years. ... He loved guns, and regularly shot out television sets and light fixtures, sometimes nearly killing various acquaintances.” See Mark Crispin Miller, Boxed in: The Culture of TV (Northwestern University Press, 1988), p.191. Onefortyone 19:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd rather see a quote specific to Elvis and his mother rather than the descriptive quotes regarding his parents. I also like the quote that young Elvis "was more comfortable just sitting there with a guitar than trying to talk to you". However, the point is to trim the article so that all the information is presented in fewer words, so I disagree with your need to add information on top of information. We don't need example after example, quote after quote, to get this information across. Make the statement and support it with multiple references. Not all the references have to be quoted. Lara❤Love 20:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

The information must be added. The wording may be changed. However, short quotes from mainstream biographies show that reliable sources have been used. This is fully in line with Wikipedia policies. Onefortyone 20:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Ditto what Lara wrote about the non necessity of the information 141 wants included. Steve Pastor 20:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

The problem is that Elvis fans such as Steve Pastor are trying to exclude critical information from the article. Onefortyone 20:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

141, I don't believe all of the above information is necessary. Some only adds to further explain certain aspects of his life. It's better to state something clearly supported by references than to give three examples, in my opinion, when writing an encyclopedic article. Also, you don't have to quote a reference to show it's reliable. It's place on the reference list accomplishes that. Lara❤Love 20:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry Lara, the facts that Elvis's father was "always averse to work and responsibility" and that his mother was an alcoholic etc. are important. Onefortyone 20:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

What context does that add? And your comments regarding Steve Pastor are not productive. Assume good faith. We're all here to improve the article. Just because some of us don't agree with you does not mean we're acting in bath faith. Lara❤Love 20:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

The information about Vernon explains why Elvis was a mama's boy. Gladys began to drink excessively because Elvis was away from her. She died very early because of her alcoholism. This is important and deeply influenced Elvis's life. Onefortyone 20:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

That's not how it read/reads. Just throwing the information in there does not put it into context. And not all readers are going to put that together. Write it into a paragraph in such a way as to explain that without using more wording than necessary. Lara❤Love 20:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

This means that the first paragraph should be extended. This may be possible. We can also return to one of the former versions of the paragraph, if you agree. For instance, in order to underscore that Elvis was heavily bullied at school, it could be added that Elvis was cornered in the bathroom of his school by a couple of boys with scissors, but was rescued by upperclassman Red West. See Connie Kirchberg and Marc Hendrickx, Elvis Presley, Richard Nixon, and the American Dream (1999), p.6-7. Onefortyone 20:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

(←) None of the former versions I read explained it. If you're up to it, draft it below. Otherwise, I'll try something when I get off work. Lara❤Love 21:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Here is an excerpt from one of these older versions:

Elvis's parents were very protective. He "grew up a loved and precious child. He was, everyone agreed, unusually close to his mother."His mother Gladys "worshiped him," said a neighbor, "from the day he was born." Elvis himself said, "My mama never let me out of her sight. I couldn't go down to the creek with the other kids." In his teens, Elvis was still a very shy person, a "kid who had spent scarcely a night away from home in his nineteen years." He was teased by his fellow classmates who threw "things at him - rotten fruit and stuff - because he was different, because he was quiet and he stuttered and he was a mama's boy." Psychologists believe that the disappearance of his father "Vernon from Elvis' life when the King was three (Vernon was jailed for passing bad cheques) had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development" at an age when "a child naturally goes through a separation anxiety from its mother, which fathers can often help with. Elvis only had Gladys. They slept in the same bed up until Elvis was a young teen." Guitarist Scotty Moore still attested that the singer was a "typical coddled son" and "very shy": "His mama would corner me and say, 'Take care of my boy. Make sure he eats. Make sure he -' You know, whatever. Typical mother stuff." But Elvis "didn't seem to mind; there was nothing phony about it, he truly loved his mother." Gladys was so proud of her boy, that she "would get up early in the morning to run off the fans so Elvis could sleep".

See [1]. See also [2], [3], [4], [5], etc. However, much of this material has been removed. Onefortyone (talk) 21:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Also, are you going to be willing to agree to the removal of any supporting information from this article? Particularly in sections where a main article exists for such expansion of information? Lara❤Love 21:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

I do not believe that it is necessary to remove all supporting information from the article. Many other biographical articles also include such information. In my opinion, important details that deeply affected Elvis's life should not be removed from the main article, especially if they are well sourced and part of most books on Elvis. Onefortyone (talk) 21:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

This isn't really getting us very far is it? The material he cites above belongs in a detailed biog. 141 appears to want to use wikipedia to write his own biog of Presley. Does he want to help write an article that is worthy of GA/FA status? I have asked this question several times before, and 141 has not responded. Rikstar (talk) 22:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, Rikstar, I indeed want to help write a well-balanced article that is worthy of GA/FA status. Therefore, critical material should not be removed. For comparison, here are some excerpts from the Wikipedia page on rock singer Frank Black. It is listed among the featured articles. See [6]. There are several quotes in the “Youth and college” section of this article:

• Charles Thompson was born in Template:City-state on April 6, 1965. His father was a bar owner, and Thompson first lived in Template:City-state as a baby because his father wanted to "learn more about the restaurant and bar business". Thompson was introduced to music at a young age, as his parents listened to 1960s folk rock. His first guitar was his mother's, a Yamaha classical guitar bought with money from his father's bar tips, which he started to play at age "11 or 12".
• Thompson's family moved around, first with his father, and then his stepfather, a religious man who "pursued real estate on both coasts"; his parents had separated twice by the time he was in first grade. ... Thompson later described the music he listened to during his youth:

“ I used to hang out with some misfits. [...] We were the 'we listen to odd-ball music' kids. I wasn't hanging out at all-ages shows or trying to get into clubs to see bands, and I was buying records at used records stores and borrowing them from the library. You just saw Emerson, Lake & Palmer records. So I didn't know [punk] music but I started to hear about it in high school. But it was probably a good thing that I didn't know it, that I instead listened to a lot of '60s records and this religious music. ”

• Thompson shared a room with another roommate for a semester before moving in with future Pixies guitarist Joey Santiago. The two shared an interest in rock music, and Santiago introduced Thompson to 1970s punk and the music of David Bowie; they began to jam together.
• In his second year of college, Thompson embarked on a trip to San Juan, Puerto Rico as part of an exchange program. He spent six months in an apartment with a "weird, psycho, gay roommate", who later served as a direct inspiration for the Pixies' song "Crackity Jones"; many of the band's early songs refer to Thompson's experiences in Puerto Rico. Thompson failed to grasp the Spanish language, and left his studies after debating whether he would go to New Zealand to view Halley's Comet (he later said it "seemed like the cool romantic thing to do at the time"), or start a rock band. He wrote a letter urging Santiago, with the words "we gotta do it, now is the time Joe", to join him in a band upon his return to Boston.

Query: if there are so many quotes in this featured article on Frank Black, why should similar quotes be removed from the Elvis article, especially if they are well sourced and throw light on the many diverse aspects of Elvis's colorful life? Onefortyone (talk) 00:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view states,

• All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), representing fairly and, as much as possible, without bias all significant views (that have been published by reliable sources). This is non-negotiable and expected on all articles, and of all article editors.
• The neutral point of view is a means of dealing with conflicting verifiable perspectives on a topic as evidenced by reliable sources. The policy requires that where multiple or conflicting perspectives exist within a topic each should be presented fairly. None of the views should be given undue weight or asserted as being judged as "the truth", in order that the various significant published viewpoints are made accessible to the reader, not just the most popular one. It should also not be asserted that the most popular view, or some sort of intermediate view among the different views, is the correct one to the extent that other views are mentioned only pejoratively. Readers should be allowed to form their own opinions.

This means that well-sourced information should not be removed because some users didn’t like the information. Onefortyone (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Here are some commentaries by third-party users concerning the Elvis page:

• Elvis was a controversial figure. His sexuality, drug taking, divorce, eating disorders etc etc all attract differing points of view. To some he was a god; to others a fat bloke who died on the toilet. For many aspects of his life there is no definitive answer. He is dead and people will continue to write with bias and an agenda. To attempt to compromise, this article needs to show both sides with suitable references and let the reader decide. Unfortunately brevity and balance appear to be mutually exclusive but until both sides are allowed their say this article will fall further into disrepute.--Egghead06 (talk) 09:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
• I just think that when a user expresses an interest in additions, you can't tell him that it's closed to new content. It's discouraging. You mention a rewrite, and I assume that it means you are open to revisions: removals and additions. The guinea pig article is huge, but if there is good information out there, I can't let size take precedent over content. If the general consensus on the article talk is that it's too large, that's one thing, but consensus changes. the_undertow ^talk 00:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

These commentaries speak volumes. Onefortyone (talk) 01:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Frank Black is 40kb. Guinea pig is 60kb. Elvis is the size of them both combined, literally. It's topics branch off into 15 main articles. Not everything has to be included in this article. The basic information explained and supported here, expanded in the main articles. Give the reader the details, all the aspects, all the points of view. But you don't have to use 3 examples for every claim. We also don't need quotes from so many people. In many cases, it's one person's opinion, and not even always a notable person's opinion. Lara❤Love 07:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Frank Black is not such a big figure as Elvis. You should compare the size of the Elvis page with Wikipedia pages on other important figures in popular music. For instance, the good article on Paul McCartney is more than 123 kb, the featured article on Bob Dylan is more than 126 kb. Furthermore, the article still doesn’t include all details and points of view concerning Elvis’s life and career. For instance, there are no details about Elvis’s personal life at Graceland, his family life and the problems he had with his stepmother. Some critical points are still missing. There is nothing on his love of guns and his predilection for dangerous games to be found in the article. It has not been mentioned that several of his friends were badly treated by the singer and that Elvis was of the opinion that "the Smothers Brothers, Jane Fonda, and other persons in the entertainment industry of their ilk," had "poisoned young minds by disparaging the United States in their public statements and unsavory activities", etc. etc. Onefortyone (talk) 21:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree with LaraLove, and would emphasize the need to confine extra details - critical or otherwise - to the branch articles. Also, details about Gladys' alcoholism don't need stating in Early years when they are/can be covered in the section dealing with his mother's death (didn't she drink excessively after his "early years"?). I am pleased 141 has now declared he is 'on board' with other editors; I hope he agrees with myself and LaraLove about the need to keep multiple examples out when one will do, and that this has nothing to do with the suppression of criticism by "Elvis fans". Rikstar (talk) 09:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Elvis's mother was an alcoholic from the beginning. This must be mentioned in the "Early years" section. Furthermore, I am not of the opinion that significant quotes should be omitted, as many of these quotes represent the knowledge of authorities on Elvis from different points of view. As Egghead06 said, "this article needs to show both sides with suitable references and let the reader decide." Onefortyone (talk) 21:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Precisely. To clarify (because I apparently am being misunderstood to some not involved with the article), I don't want any critical information removed. I'm am an Elvis fan, but of his music and look, not so much his life and how he lived it. I want all the information there, as I believe Rikstar and others do. I just want the non-critical supporting details that are not necessary removed or moved to the branch articles. Lara❤Love 14:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Onefortyone, would you mind posting your desired section in the draft section below so we can work from there? Lara❤Love 21:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Third draft

Presley's father, Vernon (April 10, 1916–June 26, 1979) was "a malingerer, always averse to work and responsibility." He had several low-paying jobs, including sharecropper and truck driver. His wife, Gladys Love Smith (April 25, 1912–August 14, 1958), an alcoholic who was "voluble, lively, full of spunk," worked as a sewing machine operator. They met in Tupelo, Mississippi, and eloped to Pontotoc County where they married on June 17, 1933.

Presley was born in East Tupelo as the second of identical twins (his brother was stillborn and given the name Jesse Garon). He grew up as an only child and "was, everyone agreed, unusually close to his mother." The family lived in a two room house just above the poverty line and attended the Assembly of God church.Template:Fn In 1938, Vernon Presley was jailed for an eight dollar check forgery. During his absence, his wife lost the family home. Psychologists believe that the disappearance of his father "had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development" at an age when "a child naturally goes through a separation anxiety from its mother, which fathers can often help with. Elvis only had Gladys. They slept in the same bed up until Elvis was a young teen."

At age ten, Presley made his first public performance in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show. Dressed as a cowboy, he had to stand on a chair to reach the microphone and sang Red Foley's "Old Shep." He won second prize.

In 1946, Presley's mother took Elvis to Tupelo Hardware to get him a birthday present. Although he wanted a rifle, he left the store with a $7.90 guitar. (In later years, Elvis still "loved guns, and regularly shot out television sets and light fixtures, sometimes nearly killing various acquaintances.") In November 1948, the family moved to Memphis, Tennessee, allegedly because Vernon—in addition to needing work—had to escape the law for transporting bootleg liquor. At school, Presley was bullied; classmates threw "things at him—rotten fruit and stuff—because he was different... quiet and he stuttered and he was a mama's boy." At L. C. Humes High School, fellow students viewed the young singer as "a sad, shy, not especially attractive boy" whose guitar playing was not likely to win any prizes. Many of the other children made fun of him as "a 'trashy' kind of boy playing 'trashy' hillbilly music."

In 1949, the family lived at Lauderdale Courts, a public housing development in one of Memphis' poorer sections. Presley practiced playing guitar in the laundry room and also played in a five-piece band with other tenants. He occasionally worked evenings to boost the family income, and began to grow his sideburns and dress in the wild, flashy clothes of Lansky Brothers on Beale Street. He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and was mocked for it. Despite any unpopularity, Presley was a contestant in his school's 1952 "Annual Minstrel Show" and won by receiving the most applause and thus an encore (he sang "Cold Cold Icy Fingers" and "Till I Waltz Again With You").

After graduation, Presley was still rather shy, and had spent little time away from home . According to Scotty Moore, he "was more comfortable just sitting there with a guitar than trying to talk to you." His third job was driving a truck for the Crown Electric Company. He began wearing his hair longer with a "ducktail"—the style of truck drivers at that time.

This is my desired section. Onefortyone (talk) 00:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

It's longer than the current version. I think it's actually the current version rearranged with an extra sentence or two. Lara❤Love 01:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

So, after 141's considerable efforts to convince us that Gladys was a drunk because she missed Elvis, now we have the assertion that she was a drunk before that anyway. Which is true? Why not avoid needless conflict like this and just leave it out of this section?

Why do we need psychologists' beliefs about Presley's closeness to his mother? The draft states they were close. Gladys lost one son at childbirth. Why isn't this a stated reason for them being close? Because it's just more speculation.

The kid wanted a rifle. Why jump in to stuff about blowing out TV sets? Why at all? What a tenuous link, and so early in the article. This third draft is much worse than the second. And it's unnecessarily long. Why can't we keep it simple? The only useful addition is the Scotty Moore observation. Rikstar (talk) 21:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Elvis's mother was an alcoholic before she missed Elvis. She died very young because of alcohol-induced liver disease. LaraLove recommended to put the information into context so that "all readers are going to put that together." That's what I did. Psychologists believe that Elvis's closeness to his mother had a profound effect upon the singer's emotional development. This is very important and puts facts into context. The same is with Elvis's love of guns. Onefortyone (talk) 23:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Do we really need to know that Elvis and his mother "slept in the same bed up until Elvis was a young teen", whether it is true or not? I hope this sort of thing won't be in any version of this article. Steve Pastor (talk) 22:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Why not? If it illustrates the poverty of his early life and is properly sourced, what is the problem? It would have been fairly common for family members in the southern states to share sleeping arrangements at that time, and any sexual innuendo is surely in the mind of the beholder. You also have to remember that sexual maturity and awareness occurred at older ages back then. --Rodhullandemu (please reply here - contribs) 23:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I grew up in public housing and was poor in the same general time as Elvis, not 30 miles from the Mason Dixon line. I did not sleep with my mother. Nevertheless, if it was so common, then why include it? The banal nature of some of this stuff, such as the tales of bullying, call for exclusion from the article. Regardless, of whether it was "common in the south", as you state, mainstream media generally respects the private aspects of something like who slept with whom. Of course, you have to buy into the idea that even public figures deserve some kind of privacy. I understand that in this day and age, these standards are either breaking down, or have already broken down. Given the need to exclude information to make the article an acceptable size, I think it should be left out. Steve Pastor (talk) 23:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

The information that Elvis slept in his mother's bed up until he was a young teen both underscores the poverty of Elvis's early life and the closeness to his mother. Elvis was heavily bullied at school. He was even cornered in the bathroom of his school by a couple of boys with scissors, but was rescued by upperclassman Red West. See Connie Kirchberg and Marc Hendrickx, Elvis Presley, Richard Nixon, and the American Dream (1999), p.6-7. These are important facts having a profound effect on Elvis's life. Onefortyone (talk) 00:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

FYI "Bullying is a common experience for many children and adolescents. Surveys indicate that as many as half of all children are bullied at some time during their school years, and at least 10% are bullied on a regular basis." [7] Steve Pastor (talk) 01:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

And [8] Steve Pastor (talk) 01:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

This is from the Archeive of this page, regarding the bullying information. "At one point we agreed to take it out, and it is back. See page 5 of the presentation at this url [10].In this study only 31% of students reported that they HADN'T been bullied. I identify with anyone who has been the victim of bullies, but can anyone make a good argument as to why this is so important that it shouldn't be deleted? Steve Pastor 00:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)" My question was never answered, so I ask it again. And hope for something more than more quotes from books. Steve Pastor (talk) 01:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

As far as I can remember, there was no agreement to take the bullying information out. It is very important that Elvis was heavily bullied at school, as it had a great influence on his later predilection for Karate and playing dangerous games with his guys. Onefortyone (talk) 03:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

So, is the thinking that they slept together because they were poor and could only afford one bed? And that Elvis was close to his mother because they had slept together? And by the way, was it Elvis or his mother that is quoted saying that they did in fact sleep together? Steve Pastor (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

It was Elvis's father Vernon who said that Elvis and his mother slept together. Most published biographies include these facts. In addition, here is reputed Elvis expert Elaine Dundy on Gladys Smith's house:

The Smiths' house - you would have to call it a shack - would have been made of Mississippi pine... Inside, it would have a "breezeway," a hall running through the center from the front door to the back door. The front room would contain only one proper iron bedstead covered with a patchwork quilt. The bed would be placed diagonally against two walls, this being the position in which it would take up the least amount of space, while at the same time allowing room on either side of the bed to get in and out of it. All the children, except the youngest, who always slept in the same bed with its parents, slept on what were called "made beds" on the floor. Pallets were stuffed with clean soft crabgrass and sewn into what they called a thicket. And they all slept in the same room."

See Elaine Dundy, Elvis and Gladys, p.31. The same author writes about Gladys's close relationship with her son:

it was agony for her to leave her child even for a moment with anyone else, to let anyone else touch Elvis. Maternal love was not for Gladys a prettily sentimental attachment. Rather it was a passionate concentration which deepened into a painful intensity when her son was not there, directly in her sight. She imagined all sorts of horrors. She imagined he was being tortured and she was not there to stop it. It was physical torment for her to be separated from him. Maternal devotion is constantly misrepresented as either grasping, clinging, stifling or pathetic. It is none of these things. Every mother of a very young child has the primordial conviction, deeper than reason, that as long as her child is within her eyesight she will be able to protect him from all harm. Generally the mother outgrows this as the child grows up but Gladys all her life remained anxious over each one of Elvis' separations from her.

See p.71. Dundy adds on page 77 that neighbors also had "stories of Elvis' precocious solicitude towards his mother." Elvis always watched her and comforted her: " 'There, there, my little baby.' This strange reversal of roles between the parent and the child often takes place when one parent is absent." (p.80) Interestingly, "Vernon and Gladys were always 'his babies,' which was how the adult Elvis referred to them." (p.81) All this shows how unusually close Elvis was to his mother and how much this close relationship affected his life. Onefortyone (talk) 03:13, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for providing the attribution, although I note that there is no direct quote from Vernon. Note that the words the author used were "would have" rather than "did have" or "was" when describing the house. This is an indication that the author was describing typical conditions rather than the specific conditions. A good writer choses words carefully. There is no question that Elvis was close to his mother, but the choice of words in draft 3 will lead to misinterpretation by most readers without too much added text. The word salacious comes to mind also. And, again, we aren't writing an Elvis biography here.

Regading previous removal regarding bullying...Probably, the rest of us agreed to remove it, and you didn't. Rikstar has again included the bully bit in draft 4. So, if in spite of the fact that bullying is commonplace (and I hope you all have looked at the links I provided) and I was bullied, too, I would say heavily, and I didn't grow up to shoot tvs, etc.... Steve Pastor (talk) 20:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

4th draft

Presley's father, Vernon (April 10, 1916–June 26, 1979) had several low-paying jobs, including sharecropper and truck driver. Gladys Love Smith (April 25, 1912–August 14, 1958), who became an alcoholic, was "voluble, lively, full of spunk," and worked as a sewing machine operator. They met in Tupelo, Mississippi, and eloped to Pontotoc County where they married on June 17, 1933.

Presley was born in East Tupelo, the second of identical twins (his brother was stillborn and given the name Jesse Garon). As an only child he "was, everyone agreed, unusually close to his mother." The family lived in a two room house just above the poverty line and attended the Assembly of God church.Template:Fn In 1938, Vernon Presley was jailed for an eight dollar check forgery. It has been claimed that the absence of his father "had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development".

At age ten, Presley made his first public performance in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show. Dressed as a cowboy, he had to stand on a chair to reach the microphone and sang Red Foley's "Old Shep." He won second prize.

In 1946, Presley's mother took Elvis to Tupelo Hardware to get him a birthday present. Although he wanted a rifle, he left the store with a $7.90 guitar. In November 1948, the family moved to Memphis, Tennessee, allegedly because Vernon—in addition to needing work—had to escape the law for transporting bootleg liquor. At school, Presley was bullied "because he was different... he stuttered and he was a mama's boy." At L. C. Humes High School, fellow students viewed the young singer as "a sad, shy, not especially attractive boy"; some made fun of him for playing "trashy" hillbilly music.

In 1949, the family lived at a public housing development in one of Memphis' poorer sections. Presley practiced playing guitar in the laundry room and also played in a five-piece band with other tenants. He occasionally worked evenings to boost the family income, and began to grow his sideburns and dress in the wild, flashy clothes of Lansky Brothers on Beale Street. He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and he was mocked for it. Despite any unpopularity, Presley was a contestant in his school's 1952 "Annual Minstrel Show" and won by receiving the most applause and thus an encore (he sang "Cold Cold Icy Fingers" and "Till I Waltz Again With You").

After graduation, Presley was still rather shy. According to Scotty Moore, he "was more comfortable just sitting there with a guitar than trying to talk to you." His third job was driving a truck for the Crown Electric Company. He began wearing his hair longer with a "ducktail"—the style of truck drivers at that time.

A revision, to reduce it's length and redundant wording, for what its worth. I hope editors will note it is not simply a revert and that content remains because it has been discussed above. It isn't my preferred version, but like any decent editor, I am trying to accommodate others. Rikstar (talk) 11:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

The first sentence reads,

• Presley's father, Vernon (April 10, 1916–June 26, 1979) had several low-paying jobs, including sharecropper and truck driver.

I think it is important to mention that Vernon was "a malingerer, always averse to work and responsibility." This passage should not be removed, as there is no further information about the character of Elvis's father in the article and it underscores why Elvis's mother had such a strong influence upon her son.

• At age ten, Presley made his first public performance in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show. Dressed as a cowboy, he had to stand on a chair to reach the microphone and sang Red Foley's "Old Shep." He won second prize.

This passage may be shorter:

• At age ten, Presley won second prize in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show. Dressed as a cowboy, he sang Red Foley's "Old Shep." Onefortyone (talk) 19:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Or:

• At age ten, Presley won second prize in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show for his rendition of Red Foley's "Old Shep". Lara_Love 20:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree to shortening the Old Shep bit and prefer the above version. I think we could get rid of the direct quote about Vernon and make it:

• Vernon has been described as a malingerer, averse to work and responsibility [I think it reads better]. Rikstar (talk) 14:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

As far as the above discussion regarding his early life, there seems to me to be enough relevant, sourced information to create a main article on the matter. Thoughts? Lara_Love 20:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

You're probably right, but every section could potentially have its own main article. Would that be acceptable? Rikstar (talk) 14:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

I would think so. He's notable, and those years are sourced. It will be illustrated. This article needs to be shortened for readability. It should touch on all the major points and leave the reader with an understanding and knowledge of all the important aspects of his life and career. It should leave them wanting to read more, and for that, we expand in main articles on each topic. I see no reason his early years can't support a stand-alone article. There's certainly enough information. I assume these biographies go into more details regarding his parents, no? I don't know about them. I'm interested to find out more. This is a good way to make that available to everyone who hasn't read the bios. Lara_Love ^Talk 19:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

I am not so sure if it is really necessary that every section should have its own main article. As a colorful personality, Elvis needs one comprehensive article including many facts concerning his life and career. Query: how many users are going to read all the additional material presented in extra articles? Onefortyone (talk) 22:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

How many users are going to read an article the length of a book? Lara❤Love 14:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

I have now included the 4th draft of the first section with minor changes in the article. It is shorter than the previous version. I hope this is satisfactory to all. Onefortyone (talk) 05:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

References

Only passing by. I learned something from this content and had fun reading it, but the citation formatting is muddled (pls see below). Gwen Gale (talk) 17:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

I've removed the example. We can look on the article page. Lara_Love 19:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Original Research ?

On a quick skim-through here, I've noticed a number of original research violations. Specifically this paragraph which I have removed [9], is a synthesis of sources serving to advance a position (check out this WP:NOR, and this WP:SYN). From experience its quite easy to fall into this sort of trap when writing articles or essay's, so we'd best be on the lookout. Time permiting I will take a closer look at the article for more orignal research, any help would be appreciated.GiantSpitoon (talk) 23:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

The material you have removed is well sourced, as it is backed up by several mainstream biographies on Elvis (among them authorities such as Alanna Nash and Peter Guralnick) and eyewitness accounts of women the singer dated. You may include quotes from other sources contradicting the statements given in the said section, if there are any such sources, but do not remove well-sourced material that is not in line with your personal opinion. Here is Peter Guralnick, Last Train to Memphis: The Rise of Elvis Presley (1994), p. 415, on Elvis's alleged affairs with girls:

He was still seeing Yvonne Lime occasionally, but he was dating Anne Neyland, a former Miss Texas whom he had met on the MGM lot, and Venetia Stevenson, too, when a rumor that he was about to marry Yvonne in Acapulco broke at the end of May. "When I get married," he told the press, after the Colonel 's official denials, "it'll be no secret. I'll get married in my hometown of Memphis, and the whole town'll be there." He wasn't really serious about anyone for the time being, though. He was enjoying the single life, and when he got bored he just had to tell the guys to hunt up some girls in the lobby of the hotel. He would have them brought up to the suite, offered one observer, "and Elvis would go in the other room, he'd go in the bedroom or somewhere, and then when they came back with the girls, the girls would sit there for maybe ten or fifteen minutes, and finally one of the cousins would go in the bedroom and come out himself and another ten minutes would go by - and then in would come Elvis. And there would be like a silence, and then the cousins would say, 'Oh, Mary Jane, this is Elvis,' and the girls would be totally gone." For the more experienced girls it wasn't like with other Hollywood stars or even with other more sophisticated boys they knew. They offered to do things for him, but he wasn't really interested. What he liked to do was to lie in bed and watch television and eat and talk all night...

There can be no doubt that Elvis wasn't overtly sexually active. Onefortyone (talk) 18:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Well-sourced is irrespective of the point, what you are doing is drawing these sources together to advance a position which you appeared to have reached yourself, and that is original research; in other words your creating a new narrative from a pile of sources you have hand-picked - a big no no. Also, the above quotation you have given is open to interpretation and does not explicitly state what you conclude from it (for example, that may just be ONE ocassion here Presley decided not to do whatever...). Your conclusion that Presley was not generally overtly sexually active from this and other sources bundled together is just that, YOUR CONCLUSION, and is thus original research. Oh, and I do not appreciate being accused of removing material based on the fact that I personally don't like it, please assume good faith in the future as I am with you.GiantSpitoon (talk) 22:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

No, you are wrong. It is not my conclusion, as most sources say that Elvis was not overtly sexually active. Even his ex-wife Priscilla confirms that this was the case. By the way, it is very interesting that you, as a new user, are well informed about Wikipedia pages such as WP:NOR and WP:AGF and that you are so keenly interested in removing well-sourced content from the Elvis article. This strongly suggests that you may be a sockpuppet of another user who was edit warring on Elvis Presley in the past. Therefore, I cannot assume good faith. Onefortyone (talk) 20:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Unless you have a published source which draws your same conclusion based on the sources you have presented, what you have included is synthesis of published sources which advance an unpubished view point, and is therefore original research under WP:SYN. Whether it's well sourced or not doesn't matter! From a quick glance your most sources is a mere handful, and you cannot draw a conclusion yourself based on that handful (or even a more substantial amount) that Presley was not very sexually active. Also, please stop questioning my motives, just because I've read many of wikipedia's policies (like every new user should!) and am proactive in removing original research, that doesn't all of a sudden mean I'm a sockpuppet of anyone! I AM NOT here to pick fights, or remove 'well-sourced' information without reason, but I will remove original research where I can; that's my main interest here. And, to show my good faith, I volunteer to step back from editing out the paragraph and await further comment from the community.GiantSpitoon (talk) 23:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree with GiantSpitoon that this article is of very low quality due to the absurd level of "original research" being attempted here. There appears to be a continuing obsession with salacious trivia, and this article could use a vigorous amount of content pruning. The subject, Elvis, deserves Good Article status, but the presentation is bogged down with excessive amounts of pointless and unencyclopedic rubbish pushing questionable Points of View. Since I'm not the only one who feels this way, I'm sure that we could soon get to work trimming a lot of this improperly-presented content. Hoserjoe (talk) 22:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

During the time that I have participated in this article, 141 has outlasted all other editors, in spite of having been previously taken to arbitration for the same behavior that has been exhibited since being allowed back into the article. Numberous editors have removed 141's contributions repeatedly. 141, however, persists. Steve Pastor (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:17, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

It is interesting how one or two Elvis fans endeavor to uphold the myth of Elvis's intensive sex life that is primarily being promoted on some fan sites in order to stress the megastar's masculinity. However, too many independent sources say otherwise, and this is what counts on Wikipedia. According to reputed Elvis biographer Alanna Nash, "the so-called dangerous rock-and-roll idol was anything but a despotic ruler in the bedroom" and he "would never put himself inside one of these girls..." The author also writes that Elvis was overly attached to his mother and could not relate normally to mature women. During his military service, he had "discovered prostitutes and picked up the intense fear of sexually transmitted diseases which led to claims that he had a morbid fear of sexual penetration." June Juanico "recalls a time when she stood up to Elvis in front of his band of hangers-on, who even then were beginning to accompany him everywhere. He grabbed her arm, took her into the bathroom and declared: 'Look, you are so right, I am really sorry.' He kept her there for five minutes, then swaggered out, his image intact." See Tracy McVeigh, "Elvis Special: Love me tender." The Observer, Sunday August 11, 2002. Actress June Wilkinson remembered that Elvis gave her "a tour of his suite, sat me on the bed in his bedroom and sang to me for two hours. That was it." See Paul Parla and Charles P. Mitchell, Screen Sirens Scream!: Interviews with 20 Actresses from Science Fiction, Horror, Film Noir and Mystery Movies, 1930s to 1960s (2000). Cassandra Peterson alias 'Elvira' says she knew Presley for only one night and all they did was talk. See Ruthe Stein, "Girls! Girls! Girls! From small-town women to movie stars, Elvis loved often but never true," San Francisco Chronicle, August 3, 1997. In her memoir, Breathing Out (St. Martin's Press, 2005), Peggy Lipton relates that Elvis was like a "teenage boy". "He didn't feel like a man next to me - more like a boy who'd never matured." When he tried to make love with Lipton, "he just wasn't up to sex. Not that he wasn't built, but with me, at least, he was virtually impotent." In an interview, Cybill Shepherd reveals that Presley kissed her all over her naked body - but refused to have oral sex with her. His slow tender kisses ended at her bellybutton. Elvis explained to her, "Me and the guys talk and, well, white boys don't eat pussy." According to his own words, Elvis "didn't make love to Anita Wood the whole four years [he] went with her" "Just to a point. Then I stopped. It was difficult for her too, but that's just how I feel." In her book, Elvis and me, Priscilla Presley writes that she "felt sure the night would end with Elvis finally making love to me. I was drunk with ecstasy. I wanted him. I became bolder, reaching out to him, totally open and honest in my need. Then, as before when we'd reach this point, he stopped and whispered, 'Don't get carried away, Baby. Let me decide when it should happen. It's a very sacred thing to me. It always has been. You know that I want it to be something to look forward to." In another chapter, Priscilla says, "Any sexual temptations were against everything he was striving for, and he did not wish to betray me, the girl waiting for him at home who was preparing to be his wife." "Fearful of not pleasing him-of destroying my image as his little girl - I resigned myself to the long wait." According to sexual psychologists, "Elvis never made love to her again after the birth of his daughter, and would never have sex with a woman who had had a baby." See Carol Martin-Sperry, Couples and Sex: An Introduction to Relationship Dynamics and Psychosexual Concepts (2004). Reputed Elvis biographer Peter Guralnick concludes that for "the more experienced girls it wasn't like with other Hollywood stars or even with other more sophisticated boys they knew." Although they offered to do things for Presley, "he wasn't really interested. What he liked to do was to lie in bed and watch television and eat and talk all night..." If there are any other sources that contradict these many accounts which say that Elvis wasn't overtly sexually active, would you please cite them. According to Wikipedia policy, the "cite sources" guideline is the best way to ensure that you do not violate the NOR policy. "In short, the only way to demonstrate that you are not presenting original research is to cite reliable sources that provide information directly related to the topic..." That's what I have done. Onefortyone (talk) 02:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm just repeating myself again, but oh well ... This great big wad of text doesn't change the fact that the way they are presented is original research! Once again, I am citing WP:SYN here, you have drawn these hand-picked sources together to further the unpublished conclusion based on these that Presley was not 'overtly sexually active' - this creates a new narrative, and is therefore original research. Here, you cannot argue that because someone claimed this, and another person stated that, therefore one may conclude that fish can talk - for example; we're not writing an essay here! And, like I've said before (hint! hint!) its made worse in this case because many of the sources you present are open to interpretation (for example, because someone said Presley was like a 'teenage boy' does that necessarily mean he's not very sexually active?), or questionable (did those 'sexual psychologists' camp out near Presley's bed with a pad and pen? I wonder...). GiantSpitoon (talk) 04:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Dennis Hopper once said in an interview that Elvis was with four girls at the same time. When Dennis asked Elvis if he had sex with all four at the same time he replied "yes". A female friend has said on an E!TV special that Elvis had as many as 7 girls at a time in what she described as a Elvis having different woman in different rooms waiting for him. They joined him after he was finished. Juliet Prowse has stated on camera that Elvis was not only a wonderful kisser but a wonderful lover. Anne Helm, his co-star in Follow That Dream has stated on record that her and Elvis had sex very frequently while filming that movie. Elvis' co-star Joan Blackman also stated that her and Elvis had sex frequently on the movie set. So why isn't this incorportated into that section? Is it because it totally wipes out Onefortyone's wish that Elvis was gay? I say that this section should be removed because it is not factual and is distorted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfbinc (talk • contribs) 06:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Would you please provide evidence that reliable sources exist that confirm your claims. If you can quote the exact passages, it would be possible to include parts of the material in the Wikipedia article on Elvis. I did some further research in order to prove what you have written. However, I have not yet confirmed most of your claims.

In his book, Drive-in Dream Girls: A Galaxy of B-Movie Starlets of the Sixties (2003), Tom Lisanti writes about Juliet Prowse, "Regarding her first reaction when learning that she was being paired with Presley, Prowse commented in Drama-Logue, 'My first thought was, "Oh my God. I'm going to work with a juvenile delinquent." That was my first impression of him. Well, he couldn't have been more the opposite. A terrific guy!' ... The chemistry between Presley and Prowse continued off-screen as the duo became an item despite Prowse's on-going affair with Frank Sinatra. To keep the momentum going on screen, producer Hal B. Wallis asked Fox to borrow Prowse again for Elvis's next movie Blue Hawaii (1961) since they worked so well together previously." Prowse "wanted movie star treatment" and Elvis as a companion because she "didn't know anyone else in company ... and he's always surrounded by a dozen buddies." However, she decided not to do the film: "I was only one of three girls in Elvis's life, and one 16-year-old had a more interesting part than mine." The way she handled the matter "made her come across as more of a pampered prima donna than a career-conscious actress. ... She killed her chances of ever working with Presley again... In 1962, despite her very public romance with Elvis Presley, Prowse accepted Frank Sinatra's marriage proposal. She was once again in the headlines..." (p.308-309). Does this sound as if Prowse and Presley were lovers? It seems as if Prowse dated the singer primarily for publicity reasons, as many other starlets did. In an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, June Juanico "blames his manager, Colonel Tom Parker, for encouraging Presley to go out with beautiful women for the publicity."

Tom Weaver's book, I Was a Monster Movie Maker: Conversations with 22 SF and Horror Filmmakers (2001), includes a chapter on Anne Helm. The author writes that in the 1950s, Anne Helm was New York's top teenwear model who later appeared in some movies. In 1962, she "co-starred (and dallied off-screen)" with Elvis. It is not mentioned that they had a sexual affair.

Joan Blackman starred opposite Elvis in Blue Hawaii (1961), where they had an on-screen wedding. My sources do not mention that they "had sex frequently on the movie set," as you claim. What really happened on similar occasions is described by Julie Parrish, Presley's co-star in Paradise Hawaiian Style. The starlet relates, "One time on set I had a real pain in my side - a side-effect, I think - and Elvis scooped me up, carried me into his trailer and shut the door. Outside the crew was waiting and wondering, but Elvis was oblivious to the innuendo. He placed his hand over my side and tried to do some healing on me." See Tracy McVeigh, "Elvis Special: Love me tender." The Observer, Sunday August 11, 2002.

Bill Dakota writes,

Although many girls were invited to Elvis's mansion (it was printed in all the magazines), the evenings were spent watching television, drinking cokes and eating popcorn. No sex. Just television. There was an exception, I heard of. In Bel-Air one evening, Elvis is alleged to have had four girls taking turns giving him a blow-job. This was outside the mansion, at night, in the yard.

Actress, Yvonne Lime said, "For the most part, my time in Memphis was a quiet one. There were long hours of just sitting around, talking with Elvis and his parents. Or we'd watch television or gather around the piano and sing old Southern folk songs and spirituals. On Sunday I went to church with Elvis and his parents and afterwards a group of his old friends would drop by the house where we ate hot-dogs and danced and just sat around playing records and singing for hours and hours. And that was pretty much how we spent the six days I was there in Memphis."

See [10]. This means that the story concerning the "four girls" was an exception. There can be no doubt that most sources agree that Elvis wasn't overtly sexually active. Onefortyone (talk) 23:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

NOBODY was "overtly sexually active" in the 1950s, you moron! It just wasn't done. It's only a recent phenomenon that people give and get get blowjobs while driving, shopping, going to church, etc. In the 50s, it was common practice to visit a girl's home and sing songs and eat popcorn - and not a whole lot more. Maybe a goodnight kiss at the end of the evening. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.129.40 (talk) 21:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

In regards to my posting Dennis Hopper and Juliet Prowse quotes on Elvis' sex life, I can't. The Dennis Hopper quote came from a network special on his life which featured Bono spouting poetry about Elvis, and the Juliet Prowse quote came from clips of her speaking about Elvis in between commercials during a WTBS Elvis movie week special in the 90's. She also bragged about being the only women ever to be sleeping with Elvis and Sinatra at the same time. I'm still trying to locate those clips. As far as Joan Blackman is concerned, I remember reading about how they had to air brush Elvis' famous Blue Hawaii ukulele shot because of a "hard- on" he had from fooling around with Joan right before the shot. As soon as I look through my extensive Elvis book collection I'll post the reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfbinc (talk • contribs) 06:10, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

According to Tom Lisanti, Fantasy Femmes of Sixties Cinema (2000), p.282, Joan Blackman was "rumored to be one of Elvis's least favorite co-stars." Therefore, it seems unlikely that Joan and Elvis fooled around and fell in love right before the said shot. In fact, Elvis dated most of his female co-stars for publicity reasons, and the studio invented love stories in order to promote the movies. Onefortyone (talk) 23:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I actually thought we were getting somewhere regarding 141's recent involvement in this article. But, the above comments and accusations - assuming bad faith, "Elvis fans" promoting their biased agendas, sockpuppetry claims - are depressingly familiar. I am on record as saying that 141 has the resources, intelligence and communication skills to help make this an excellent featured article, but these are yet again being squandered by 141's negative editing tactics. The original research argument seems a sound one in this case, and it may well apply to other edits in this article. This problem can be solved with some simply editing - it won't be the end of the world as we know it - yet 141 is tenacious to the point of being disruptive in protecting his own edits and promoting his personal agendas. As Steve Pastor says, it is 141 who has been in trouble for his editing behavior before, not those others who are currently trying to edit this article with him. I have veered between severe (and justified) admonishment of 141 and being forgiving, simply because 141 continues to edit the Presley article. It beggars belief that he is allowed to make the same tired accusations time and again, and that his pattern of disruptive editing and warring has not lead to another ban of some form. I now wish, in spite of my previous attempts at goodwill towards 141, that he was banned permanently. Has it not occurred to anyone else that here we are for the umpteenth time, all running around in circles getting het up as 141 calls the tunes?Rikstar (talk) 06:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, Rikstar, a supposed sockpuppet of user Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo appeared on the scene removing, as usual, a well-sourced paragraph from the Elvis article and accusing me, without justification, of original research. Do you really think that this is OK? I hope not. The same thing happened several times in the past. There is much evidence that the said passage was deleted by a newly created sockpuppet. Compare, for instance, this edit with this one. See also [11] and [12] and this edit by Mingy Jongo, one of the many other sockpuppets of Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo, which includes the same accusations of original research. It is certainly no coincidence that GiantSpitoon, as a new user, is very familiar with Wikipedia pages such as WP:NOR or WP:AGF and even with the abbreviations used by Wikipedia administrators. Furthermore, apart from his interest in Elvis Presley, the very first edits by GiantSpitoon were contributions to Michael Jackson. See [13], [14]. Significantly, Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo (who, together with his other sockpuppets, also showed much interest in Elvis related topics) was voting against the good article reassessment of Michael Jackson because he found "this article to be quite biased and in general badly written." See [15], [16]. By the way, before the recent accusations, we were talking about the 4th draft of the first section of the article and not about the "Sex symbol" section. See [17]. Shouldn't we return to the previous discussion? Onefortyone (talk) 23:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd like to clarify a few things. Firstly, I'm disappointed onefortyone that you feel I've accused you of anything. All I've done is point toward a paragraph that in accordance with policy (WP:SYN) is original research, and judging from the posts of other users, I'm not alone in this stance. I'll repeat this again because apparently it didn't sink in the first time: I'm not out to attack anyone and I won't remove the contributions of others without a valid reason. We had minor dispute where we reverted which others edits, but instead of continuing I did the right thing by stopping the edit-war and taking it to the talk page for discussion, so why do you persist in attacking me? GiantSpitoon (talk) 03:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, GiantSpitoon, you claim in all innocence, "I'm disappointed onefortyone that you feel I've accused you of anything." Notwithstanding, your accusations are clearly directed at me: "what you are doing is drawing these sources together to advance a position which you appeared to have reached yourself, and that is original research..."; "what you have included is synthesis of published sources which advance an unpublished view point, and is therefore original research..." etc. Significantly, your first edit on Elvis Presley was the removal of an entire paragraph. See [18]. And you removed it without comment on the talk page. The comment only appeared a day later, after I had reinstated the paragraph. See [19]. However, it should be noted that most parts of the present state of the paragraph have been included by Rikstar. The said passage is an abridged version of a much longer paragraph written by me. Rikstar wrote, "Some of the above issues have been addressed by a new 'Sex Symbol' section. I felt this was an obvious addition, especially having read a lot of evidence which does support the idea that he wanted female company, but not always for sexual gratification." See [20]. See also this edit. As for the few other Elvis fans supporting your removal (some of whom are supposed to be socksuppets), they have not yet provided reliable sources that contradict the well-sourced content of the "Sex symbol" paragraph. Onefortyone (talk) 18:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

If I thought it would make a difference to 141, I would go through the archeives and repeat the arguments that have been made by other editors as to why this material does not belong in this article. Since 141 has been unable or unwilling to understand, or accept any other viewpoints on this subject, that exercise would be pointless. Oh, how about this one, the article is too long and has to be trimmed. Steve Pastor (talk) 20:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Ha! It looks like 141, through sheer stubborn compulsive-obsessiveness, has seized control of the story of Elvis Presley. Unfortunately, the result has no relation to the life of EP, and just reflects to tedious obsessions of 141. And that's a pity.

B Class rating

I've no objection to this, but the three comments under "The following comments have been left for this page" are all from assessments of the the FA candidate of over a year ago. The third comment is certainly no longer relevant, as there isn't a trivia section. My own comment - "However I am put off by the thought of the time it will take, and the inevitable interference that will come from those who have already made this article as bad as it is." - strikes me as still being of some relevance. Editing/discussion have gone quiet lately: I wonder why? I currently have no wish to continue trying to improve this article. It includes many bits that I and a consensus of others have tried to remove, but they remain because of the single-minded and inappropriate tenacity of one user. That user, Onefortyone, has asked me to return to discussing the Early years section, as if his other comments/contributions can be simply ignored. Dragging my name in to support his fight with GiantSpitoon earns no respect from me. This article is supposed to evolve into a better one over time; my views on what should or should not be included have also changed, in marked contrast to 141's general agenda. Soon, he'll be the only one editing the article. Fait accompli? Rikstar (talk) 06:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

In response to the recent comments made by user:141 dated 13th December 2007. Taken from Peter Guralnick,Last Train to Memphis. p 415. These are just a few more sentences that follow after what 141 quoted in that same paragraph. It reads: - the companionship seemed as important for him as the sex- and then in the early-morning hours they would make love. "He had an innocence at the time," said one of them. "I'm sure it didn't last.

Why did you leave this out? Does this not pertain to the text? Jaye9 19 December 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.142.39.219 (talk) 13:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Interesting. Perhaps there's a need to check all of 141s sources for selective reference. Perhaps there is also a need to evaluate the appropriateness of 141 continuing to edit this article. Lara❤Love 15:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

The Guralnick quote goes on: "But what he really wanted was to have a relationship, to have company. He was very clean-cut about it. There were a lot of things that he didn't like. And another thing that you could not do around him was mention drugs, he was dead set against it." etc. etc. That Elvis primarily wanted to have company, also male company, and not sex with girls, is also backed up by what is written directly before the passage on the girls in Guralnick's book. It is mentioned that Elvis apparently "loved the entourage" and that they went out to Russ Tamblyn's "beach house one or two more times" [i.e., a small, one-bedroom beach house on the Pacific Coast Highway just south of Topanga Canyon, where Elvis came with his friend Nick Adams, all of his cousins, hangers-on and some girls, etc.; see p. 410]. Elvis even asked if he could rent that house "for the next couple of months." Last year, I included a longer quote from Guralnick on my user page explaining why it isn't necessary to cite the whole passage. See [21]. If you would like to see a longer quote from Guralnick in the Elvis article, I have no problems with this. However, it is a fact that modern researchers question whether Elvis had actually sex with most of these girls. Even the Memphis Mafia members were not sure what was going on behind closed doors. Therefore, eyewitness accounts by women who say that they didn't make love are so important. Some users may remember that last year I even included the following passage at the beginning of the section (see [22], [23]):

Several authors have written that "Elvis busied his evenings with various girlfriends" or that his "list of one-night stands would fill volumes." According to eyewitness Byron Raphael, who worked for Presley's manager Parker, the star even had a secret one-night stand with Marilyn Monroe in a hotel room.

I did this for reasons of balance. This passage was later abridged by Rikstar in order to shorten the section, as we have, on the other hand, the many eyewitness accounts by former girlfriends (and other women the star dated) that they didn't have sex with Elvis. A longer version of the paragraph once read:

However, it is unclear whether the "sex symbol" actually had sex with most of the women he dated. His early girlfriends Judy Spreckels and June Juanico say that they had no sexual relationships with Presley. Raphael and Alanna Nash have stated that the star "would never put himself inside one of these girls..." During his military service, he had "discovered prostitutes and picked up the intense fear of sexually transmitted diseases which led to claims that he had a morbid fear of sexual penetration." Because of his shyness, Albert Goldman says, "no woman ever saw Elvis undressed." June Juanico "recalls a time when she stood up to Elvis in front of his band of hangers-on, who even then were beginning to accompany him everywhere. He grabbed her arm, took her into the bathroom and declared: 'Look, you are so right, I am really sorry.' He kept her there for five minutes, then swaggered out, his image intact." Julie Parrish, Presley's co-star in Paradise Hawaiian Style, relates, "One time on set I had a real pain in my side - a side-effect, I think - and Elvis scooped me up, carried me into his trailer and shut the door. Outside the crew was waiting and wondering, but Elvis was oblivious to the innuendo. He placed his hand over my side and tried to do some healing on me." ... Playboy star and actress June Wilkinson remembered that she "met Elvis on the set of King Creole. He invited me to dinner at the Beverly Wilshire Hotel. ... Then Elvis gave me a tour of his suite, sat me on the bed in his bedroom and sang to me for two hours. That was it. The next day ... we had dinner again. He was very sweet, and he was friendly. He had more than sex on his mind. He got me to the airport on time, and our paths never crossed again." etc. etc.

Furthermore, we may also add that, according to Albert Goldman, Elvis was "a pervert" and "a voyeur," who often refrained from intercourse with the women who came to his bedroom. The author also sees a "decline into infantilism." Even when Elvis did "have intercourse with an unfamiliar woman, he would never allow himself to ejaculate inside her." According to Alanna Nash, Elvis had gone impotent in his final years, due at least in part to extremely massive intake of narcotics, both uppers and downers. Nash also emphasizes that Elvis was overly attached to his mother and could not relate normally to mature women; that's why he sought out very young girls because he felt threatened by women his own age. In similar terms, Memphis Mafia members such as Joe Esposito not only report a "boyish charm" in him, but also "voyeuristic tendencies," a "full-blown Madonna complex" and drug-induced impotence in his decline. See Joe Esposito and Elena Oumano, Good Rockin' Tonight: Twenty Years on the Road and on the Town With Elvis (1994). By the way, it is also a fact that Elvis spent most of his time with the guys from the Memphis Mafia, not with girls. And he preferred to hide when he wasn't performing. Esposito recalled leaving Presley's Vegas suite to play poker in the wee hours of the morning: "We had a lot of people up there all the time. We had 15, 30, 50 people a night up in the suite. But it was hard for him, because when he was in town people were always looking for him. But the thing about it, see, we used to go down at 4, 5 in the morning just to play cards a little bit in the casino when it wasn't as crowded. But then all of a sudden it got crowded, bothered him, we had to back upstairs." For reasons of balance, all this well-sourced information may also be included in the article, if you would prefer that. On the other hand, is it really necessary to include all this stuff? I don't think so. As I already recommended on my user page, it may be a good idea to mention that Guralnick writes that for "the more experienced girls it wasn't like with other Hollywood stars or even with other more sophisticated boys they knew." Although they offered to do things for Presley, "he wasn't really interested." He preferred to lie in bed, watch television and talk (and to play cards with his guys). This or a similar statement is a good summary of Elvis's attitudes toward girls, and in the Wikipedia article we don't need to go into all details mentioned by Guralnick. Onefortyone (talk) 20:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

It pains me to see what one user, 141, has done to this article. I watched many others work very hard on getting it to FA status. Maria202 (talk) 15:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

The only problem is that some Elvis fans endeavor to remove sourced material they do not like from the article . Onefortyone (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom talk

OK. So we are all belly aching about 141. There seems to be no alternative to involving the Arbcom. I was about ready to do this when Lara stepped in, and I backed off. At least one other editor was with me on this at that time.

Who is ready to go to the Arbcom?

The form that has to be filled out is a bit daunting, probably by design, but the only way this is going to work is if we bite the bullet. Many of us have spent WAY too much unproductive time on this.

Please leave a simple message on this page. Please do not equivocate. I'm looking for a YES or NO. I'm guessing that this will be best received if we do it above board and out in the open. Steve Pastor (talk) 16:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Just a short note. We already had three arbcom cases concerning the Elvis article because my former opponent, Elvis fan Ted Wilkes alias multiple hardbanned User:DW took me to arbitration two or three years ago simply because my contributions were not in line with his personal view and he wanted to harass me. However, my opponents were later banned from the article. The arbcom says that "Onefortyone's editing has substantially improved from that in the earlier arbitration cases. A sampling of edits shows reference to reliable sources without overstating of their content. To a greater extent he allows the reader to draw their own conclusions." See [24]. This is a clear statement. Onefortyone (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Yep, and the same link contains other clear, but critical, statements about 141's editing tactics. Some things have not improved. Rikstar (talk) 04:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

What things do you think have not improved? As far as I can see, I am always citing my sources. Furthermore, you have confirmed above that I have "the resources, intelligence and communication skills to help make this an excellent featured article." Onefortyone (talk) 20:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Yep, and 141 also has "the resources, intelligence and communication skills" to stifle healthy debate and kill this article and its talk stone dead (For god's sake, I pay 141 a compliment, a gesture of goodwill, and he even uses that as a stick to beat his opponents with...) There have been numerous examples of 141 refusing to accept edits he personally disagrees with, pushing specific agendas, ignoring consensus... oh, I'm sorry, I am repeating myself, something else that always seems to happen when dealing with 141's tedious arguments. This article is going nowhere; few if any want to get involved with 141, and relative newcomers, openminded to the possibility of working usefully with 141, are now realizing how futile it is. And 141 will probably believe that this is everyone else's fault, and that he is entirely blameless because... he "is always citing his sources"!! I emphasize: there is a real possibility that 141 will, by undermining all opponents, stealthily get his skewed content inserted bit by bit. This is already happening; editors have given up removing stuff he wants in, resulting in e.g. a brief Ed Sullivan section that perplexingly mentions "ice cream", "pasha" and "harem girl". What does that inform readers about the Sullivan appearance?? It reads like a bunch of crap ('scuse my mouth). Like many other dubious bits, if it is changed or removed yet again with the blessing of a consensus in the name of improvement, you can bet 141 will change it back. I've not come across any user who edits in such a disruptive and subversive manner. It's time 141 left the building. Rikstar (talk) 23:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, Rikstar, did you realize that I have accepted many of your edits, as they are indeed improvements? What I am criticizing is that you and a few Elvis fans are frequently removing sourced content from the Elvis article. Time and again I have argued on the talk page why I find this material relevant. I have also tried to rewrite some passages in order to shorten the article. Notwithstanding, the abridged material also gets removed. Significantly, you are the person who says that what Elvis experts such as Greil Marcus have written in an essay directly related to the topic is "skewed content" and "reads like a bunch of crap" (see above), simply because you and Steve Pastor do not like the information that Ed Sullivan had "censored" or even "buried" the singer, as Elvis was only shown from the waist up and "stepped out in the outlandish costume of a pasha, if not a harem girl" during the Sullivan Show. It should be noted that I do not remove sourced paragraphs written by others. Only Elvis fans have the audacity to do so. Steve Pastor frequently wants to get rid of some information he doesn't like. For instance, he asked, "Do we really need to know that Elvis and his mother 'slept in the same bed up until Elvis was a young teen?' " See [25]. Rodhullandemu answered, "Why not? If it illustrates the poverty of his early life and is properly sourced, what is the problem? It would have been fairly common for family members in the southern states to share sleeping arrangements at that time..." See [26]. Relating to the content dispute, Egghead06 said, "To attempt to compromise, this article needs to show both sides with suitable references and let the reader decide." See [27]. This means that I am not the only one who thinks that specific information concerning Elvis's life should not be removed. And now Steve Pastor wants to take the content dispute a fourth time to arbcom? The arbcom members have certainly more important things to do and you should not waste their valuable time. As for the frequent removals, Professor Wall may be right with his opinions concerning the activities of the world-wide Elvis industry. Onefortyone (talk) 04:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, 141 is being disingenuous again. Time and again on this talk page others have argued why some of 141's edits should be removed - and he just goes ahead and ignores the consensus. 141 accuses me and others of wanting to remove material because we simply don't like it (because it's critical). How many more times have I to state that there are perfectly acceptable reasons for removing or rewriting material, however well-sourced it is? How many more times have I to state that I think the Marcus quote referring to ice cream, etc, is just a bad read that will beg more questions than it answers when the unintiated read it?? How many? Only 141 has the audacity to ignore a consensus of opinion and keep reinstating unsuitable material. I rewrote the Sullivan section after informing others of my intentions to make it read better, and 141 just changed it back, time and again. "I do not removed sourced paragraphs" proclaims 141, as if removing such material has always been done by others for the wrong reasons. Just another contemptible accusation that I find offensive, and 141 wants us all to hold hands and just forget about his history of disruption and get on with editing the Early years section? Sorry, 141 has left a very bad taste in my mouth. Just look how far this article hasn't progressed - because no one wants to work with one user. If arbcom members have more important things to do than address this issue, I'd like to know what they are. User Northmeister was one of only a few substantial contributors to this article, and he stopped because of 141's tiresome antics and accusations. What a pathetic and lamentable state of affairs. Rikstar (talk) 19:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Does this mean that you don't want to get on with editing the "Early years" section? Be that as it may, I do want to get on with the section and have now included the 4th draft with some minor changes in the article. As for the Sullivan passages, the chronology of inclusion may be of some interest. On May 18, 2007, I cited the main parts of an essay by reputed Elvis expert Greil Marcus on Elvis's Ed Sullivan appearances on the talk page in order to discuss its content. See [28]. You said, "This is interesting stuff and I've got more like it on my book shelves," and you wondered what might be significant for inclusion in the article. See [29]. Later, a well-sourced paragraph I had included in the article was repeatedly removed by Northmeister, Steve Pastor and Rikstar. I did not understand why. However, as I was willing to compromise, I tried my best to write shorter versions, and at last, only these few quotes from Marcus remained in the version I prefer: " 'Compared to moments on the Dorsey shows and on the Berle show, it was ice cream.' ... The fact that Presley was only shown from the waist up and 'stepped out in the outlandish costume of a pasha, if not a harem girl' during this last broadcast has led to claims that Sullivan had 'censored' or even 'buried' the singer ..." See [30]. To my mind, these are important remarks by an expert on rock 'n' roll music, as it is clearly shown that Elvis's Sullivan appearances differ from the more lively ones on the Dorsey shows and that Elvis was censored. As for the lamentable state of affairs, did you mention that GiantSpitoon, a supposed sockpuppet of my old opponent, user Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo has removed, as usual, a well-sourced paragraph from the Sex symbol section and started the unnecessary discussion above? Recently, even the entire section has been removed by Hoserjoe. See [31]. But it has been reinstated by LaraLove. See [32]. So much for the disruptive behavior of supposed sockpuppets. See also [33]. By the way, you, Rikstar, included this abridged version of the said section in the Elvis article, and I didn't reinstate the longer version written by me. So much for the claims that I am not willing to compromise. Onefortyone (talk) 06:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Just because you can trumpet the odd occasion when you have not done something that might annoy other editors does not negate how disruptive I and others have found your general contributions. The pasha-ice cream-harem girl stuff is a clumsy, confusing read. You said it, your contribution was judged unfit by a consensus of others so you just shortened it, leaving the confusing and obscure Marcus terms. You persistently refused to accept the wishes of a majority who liked neither your long or your shorter version of Marcus' personal comments. We have as usual discussed this issue ad nauseum, and all we have is a sub-standard edit to show for it. Rikstar (talk) 12:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Could it be that you and Steve Pastor simply do not like the terms used by reputed rock 'n' roll and Elvis expert, Greil Marcus, even if they are cited in a very abridged form, because they all too clearly show that Elvis was indeed censored and buried by Sullivan, at a time when Presley's music was not generally accepted? Onefortyone (talk) 03:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Not in my case anyway. You're back to your old "you're just a biased Elvis fan" argument again. Been there before, dealt with it before... Rikstar (talk) 20:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

This article has been degraded enough. Too much time and hard work has gone to waste. This article has great potential to be an FA. Currently, it can't even keep GA. It's time to fix the issues that ail this article. Lara❤Love 17:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

There is another problem. Am I right that a featured article should not be protected? However, if the article is unprotected, many vandals will, as usual, reappear. See, for instance, [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], etc. How can this be handled? This is not unimportant. Onefortyone (talk) 20:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:NOPRO only applies to the main page FA, which is so heavily watched that any vandalism it takes while featured is quickly reverted. Lara❤Love 03:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm with you Steve Pastor, Maria, LaraLove and anyone else of similar opinion. Rikstar (talk) 22:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

New perspective

I recently wrote a comment on the 18th November 2007 re: Peter Gurlanick. I have now signed in. However I am still on my learners plates,so please bear with me. In saying that,you all seem very nice and understanding group of people. So here we go! 141, in part of you text earlier in the piece, you mention For reasons of balance, all this is welled sourced information may also be included in the article,if you would prefer that. On the other hand, is it really necessary to include all this stuff? I don't think so.

Most of the article is simply an exercise in editorial vanity by a few (one in particular) self-centred and obsessive editors. The result is a very low quality Wikipedia article (as you can see from the broken-quality logo at the top of this Talk Page), certainly one of the worst focused on a historical person. 75% of it could be removed with no consequence except a vast improvement in encyclopedic usefulness. Hoserjoe (talk) 08:14, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

141, I think to be fair to the subject (Elvis Presley), the author involved in the text, the other editors and the readers themselves, yes, I think it is very important for the article to be balanced. --Jaye9 (talk) 13:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

User: Mfbinc mentions a few ladies stating they had a relationship with Elvis, to conteract the claims made by 141. 141 requests for sources to back these claims. He then mentions a book by Tom Weaver, I Was A Monster Movie Maker: Conversations with 22 SF and Horror Filmakers (2001),stating the book didn't mention Elvis and Anne Helm having an affair. Anne Helm, to my knowledge has not done many interviews about Elvis. She did however give an interview regarding her relationship with Elvis to authors Brown & Broeske, Down At The End OF Lonely Street P. 242-44,449. Due to the fact that there are three pages on her,I'll only include the "Humpy Bumpy" bits,okay. Anne Helme states it is to ignore his physical allure--the hair that was dark blond again,the deep olive tan. But stressed Helm,his appeal was more than physical. "He was so very,very sweet. I think a lot of women reached out to him because they felt he was lonely. I actually wrote some poetry about him when we were making the movie. It was that kind of romance." It was also very physical. "He really liked sex. A lot of nights I didn't go back to my own bungalow. I felt a little ashamed about it the next morning,because I knew that the people on the set realized what was going on." But Helm added,"I have to tell you,I had fun. And it was special. Two paragraphs along- "They sometimes played cards into the early-morning hours,when Presley would ask her to slip into a flouncy,yellow baby-doll nightie he had bought her. "I wasn't crazy about them,but he just loved them,Helm said,laughing. After they made love,he would give her pills-----Jaye9 (talk) 14:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you Jaye9, your comments and citations are very welcome. Please make sure the quotes from others you give are very clear i.e. in quotation marks, to keep them separate from your own comments. Please also state in detail the source of your quotes. Your contributions could prove very useful in improving this article. Rikstar (talk) 21:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Rikstar,your comments and advise were both usefull and encouraging to me,thank you.--Jaye9 (talk) 01:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments. Though it is very funny that a new user's first three contributions to Wikipedia are related to a specific discussion topic on Talk:Elvis Presley concerning Elvis's relationships with women, I would also recommend including the material in the Elvis article in an abridged form, provided that it is accurately cited. The source seems to be reliable and it supports the view that Elvis sometimes had sex with a girl. However, the passage is not yet accurately cited. That Elvis was very sweet, that several women felt he was lonely, that they seem to have had a lot of fun playing cards early in the morning etc. is in line with other sources. That Elvis was crazy about baby-doll nighties certainly underscores the singer's "decline into infantilism" (Goldman). Onefortyone (talk) 03:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Onefortyone, when you say funny, do you mean funny ha ha or funny parculiar? What can I say, only that my genuine reasons for being here, is to try and help were I can and to make this article as fair and as accurate as humanly possible. On that note, I wish you and yours a very merry christmas and that we can endeavour to have a cival and productive discussion re: this article, in the new year.--Jaye9 (talk) 09:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Just a thought but has anyone noticed how much of this controversy relates to Elvis' sexuality? I appreciate that it is some modern phenomenon as to the fascination concerning what people do with their genitals but, if so, why not hive it off to another article 'Elvis Sexuality'? There seems to be little doubt as to his place/date of birth, his music, his films, even his death - just what used to float his boat. This would not only free up this article but give a new life to those interested in his libido rather than that which made the man notable.--Egghead06 (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

If you've been around this article for a while, the situation can be summed up as 141. We are hoping to change that, but it will take time. Meanwhile, 141 has a number of ways to deflect the efforts of other editors. You could try making changes yourself to see what happens. Most people give up after a relatively short time, and find something more productive to do. Steve Pastor (talk) 17:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Making changes to 'see what happens' is exactly my idea of fun so will be leaving that to those who know something of his sexual proclivity (or care)!--Egghead06 (talk) 18:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I also do not understand why so much of the current controversy relates to Elvis's sexuality. This is the more surprising as the shortest sections of the entire article deal with Elvis as a sex symbol and with his wife and daughter. I did not start this discussion. It was GiantSpitoon who repeatedly removed half of the "Sex symbol" section. Before these removals, we were talking about the 4th draft of the first section of the article and not about the "Sex symbol" section. See [39]. Onefortyone (talk) 22:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

So much of the "current controversy" occurs because one particular user (guess) keeps trying to own this article, and the Talk Page. I'm in favor of taking it to arbitration, or even having him banned for his behavior in and about this article and Talk. It's a shame that this user has made such a mess of this page with his obsessive blather that the page is sinking into a swamp of user despair. Hoserjoe (talk) 00:22, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Despair is right. I cannot believe 141 is trying to distance himself from the sex content in this article and the talk pages, when he has been uniquely instrumental in making accusations regarding Presley's sexuality over a long period, covering everything from Elvis having a blow job, through sex with Nick Adams to claims of gay lyrics in many of Presley's hits and that Elvis had sex with his own mother. No one else has persisted with such a ludicrous and disturbing agenda, and I doubt few who know 141 have any faith that 141 will not return to such matters. It does not matter how little these claims are referred to in the current article; it's how many hours have been wasted having to respond to 141 to keep his tiresome unilateral claims out. This is the despair; the realization that 141 will clog up these pages whenever he chooses, with whatever material he chooses, however inappropriate it may be deemed by a consensus of others. As for 141's claim that "it is very funny that a new user's [Jaye9] first three contributions to Wikipedia are related to a specific discussion topic on Talk:Elvis Presley concerning Elvis's relationships with women", why is 141's paranoia at such a level that he has to assume so much bad faith on the part of a new contributor??? This is not nearly as offensive as it is unsettling and disturbing, and it's very offensive anyway. READ MY LIPS: 141 is killing this article. Rikstar (talk), 19:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, Rikstar, you are here talking about a discussion that is more than four months old. As there was no consensus of opinion to add a short, well-sourced note concerning Elvis's possible bisexuality, I didn't include the material in the article, although, from time to time, there are inquiries about the topic. See [40]. So much for the false claim that I have "persisted with such a ludicrous and disturbing agenda" (your words). As for my "paranoia" that I have "to assume so much bad faith on the part of a new contributor", you may remember that I am frequently harassed by new sockpuppets of old opponents. See [41]. However, you may have noticed that I did accept the contributions by Jaye9, as this user seems to have cited a reliable source. By the way, may I remind you of your handling of a request by another user who wished to include more facts about Elvis's father and stepmother in the article? In response, you rejected this legitimate request out of hand, arguing, without giving any reasons, that Elvis's songwriters deserve more of a mention than his stepmother. Interestingly, Steve Pastor also chimed in with, "there is much that has to be left out," although Elvis's problems with his stepmother are not unimportant, as they deeply affected the singer's personal life at Graceland. See [42]. Onefortyone (talk) 06:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

So, you didn't include stuff on his sexuality; that's because other users spent a disproportionate number of hours challenging your agenda. I personally found it tedious and time-consuming to the point of almost ending my involvement. It is rich of you to try and criticize my handling of issues on this talk page. I and others have been running round in circles wondering how to handle your involvement; we've tried responding in detail to the great wads of text you post, we've ignored your comments when they have been repetitive or not worthy of comment e.g. making the "it's well-sourced so shouldn't be removed" argument. I've realized how frustrating it is to NOT respond to you because it appears to lend undue credence to your comments. Olive branches have been extended to you (even a barnstar, from Northmeister) just to keep this damned thing going 'cos you're around. And yet perhaps on occasion, a user pushed beyond reasonable endurance will make a brief, curt dismissal of someting on these talk pages, and you want to slap a user's wrist for it? Please note "Elvis's songwriters deserve more of a mention than his stepmother" is a reason for not including details of his stepmother. You may not agree with it, but don't accuse me of not giving any reason in that particular case. Why you appear to criticize Steve Pastor, for simply agreeing with me and stating that the article can't contain details on everyone, is beyond me.

Sorry, Rikstar, you have not yet explained why Elvis's songwriters should deserve more priority than his stepmother in a biographical article on the star. Onefortyone (talk) 04:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Go ahead and finish the Early years section on these pages, wait for comments/approval from all those clamoring to join you in improving this article and, if I have the stomach for it, I may look at it. But do not interpret my reluctance to work with you as being a petulant rebuttal of your polite request; it is a reluctance to work with someone whose editing and talk comments have driven me beyond endurance. And I am not the only one. Rikstar (talk) 12:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Rikstar, I have been observing this article for six months now, and I would read your contributions, comments and your frustrations on trying to make this a good article, and sometimes you would talk about possibly leaving and I would say to myself please don't. You have shown to be articulate and balanced in your views, this is part of the reasons why I'm here. I have taken your advise about your suggestion for users to read 141's editing history for the past three years. Please excuse my tone, but I have just recently had endure this tripe for two hours. Is it against Wikipedia's policy for an editor to use selective referencing?, if that's the case, it's FULL OF IT. Do you have a copy of Peter Gurlanick's two volummes Last Train To Memphis & Careless Love? He is as I'm sure you would agree the definative biographer of Elvis Presley, even Onefortyone couldn't dispute that fact. If you do have these copies, have a look at the names listed, who he interviewed, but in 141's case, who he didn't. There is no mention of Dee Stanley, or gossip columnist William Dakota or Earl Greenwood for that matter. I wonder why?

To Steve Pastor add me to your list, please.--Jaye9 (talk) 15:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

You should stick close to the facts, Jaye9. Peter Guralnick indeed cites the books by Earl Greenwood and Dee Presley (Stanley) in his Elvis biography, Last Train to Memphis. See [43] and [44]. Onefortyone (talk) 03:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

I have just read some old talk pages to help Steve P. and his arbcom. I found it shocking and depressing to see how much 141 has tied up the time and patience of well meaning users for over 18 months with his material and comments. I had to stop reading. If you have any evidence of selective referencing, please post specific examples here. I only have volume two. I really am having to fight hard to maintain interest in this project, and I am very grateful for the support you and others have shown in having me on board. Rikstar (talk) 17:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

What is missing in your last edits is a substantial discussion concerning the content of the Elvis article and based on reliable sources. All I can see are accusations and attacks against me. One thing is clear: what stands me out from the other users (mostly Elvis fans together with some new sockpuppets of former opponents), who now join forces against me simply because my edits are not in line with their personal opinion, is that I am the only editor who frequently cites his sources, among them mainstream Elvis biographies, essays by reputed Elvis experts, books by people who knew Elvis and peer-reviewed studies published by university presses. This is fully in line with Wikipedia policy. Most other editors interested in the Elvis article do not cite books on Elvis or university studies on the rock 'n' roll era. For instance, Steve Pastor's only sources seem to be some DVDs. All what my opponents can do is to delete sourced material. It's a real pity. Onefortyone (talk) 03:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps the issue is not about the sources being used, but the selective nature in which information is being pulled from the sources and presented in the article. Lara❤Love 05:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

You could also say, perhaps the issue is not so much about the sources being used, but the selective nature in which well-sourced information is being removed from the article, simply because it is not in line with the opinion of some fans. For instance, a third-party user has called Hoserjoe's removals "whitewashing edits which remove much sourced content" and his edits were therefore repeatedly reverted. See [45], [46], [47]. Onefortyone (talk) 05:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Right. We know there is an issue with Hoserjoe and his alt account(s), but that's not the focus of discussion. We're talking about the possibility of information being selectively pulled from sources in order to skew the information to one's own desired point of view. There is also an issue of deciding just what and how much is relevant for inclusion in this article. Lara❤Love 06:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Last Train To Memphis by Peter Gurlanick. Bibliography - Presley,Dee,Billy Stanley,Rick Stanley, and David Stanley. Elvis We Love You Tender. Greenwood,Earl. The Boy Who Would Be King Index Earl Greenwood - no mention; Dee Presley - no mention Acknowledgements Earl Greenwood - no mention; Dee Presley - no mention

Careless Love by Peter Gurlanick. Bibliography- Presley,Dee,Billy Smith,Rick Stanley,and David Stanley. Elvis We Love You Tender. Greenwood,Earl. The Boy Who Would Be King Index Presley,Dee Stanley(stepmother),14,16-17,31,42,46,56-57,58,Graceland,35-36,64,77-78,80,89,93,117. Earl Greenwood - no mention Acknowledgements Earl Greenwood - no mention; Dee Stanley - no mention--Jaye9 (talk) 18:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

141, when I discussed Peter Gurlanick to Rikstar, I said he did not interview the likes of Gossip Columnist Bill Dakota, Earl Greenwood, or Dee Stanley, that is all that I stated, and that is a FACT. Dee Stanley was certainly in Elvis Presley life, she was married to his father. In all the pages cited in Careless Love, which by the way was first published in 1999, he never once discusses Dee Stanley's outrageous allegations, which she bought to light back well before "Careless Love" was ever published. Why is it that you seem to be so fixated on these types of topics, or even think they are worth mentioning. Obviously Peter Gurlanick did't seem to think so, otherwise he would have put it in.

I am not so fixated on these types of topics, as you claim. For more than a year now, there is no information about "Dee Stanley's outrageous allegations" in the Elvis article, though her claims are also mentioned by reputed Elvis expert, Greil Marcus, in his book, Double Trouble: Bill Clinton and Elvis Presley in a Land of No Alternatives (2001). By the way, thanks for admitting that Peter Guralnick has indeed used material written by Earl Greenwood and Dee Presley for his Elvis biography, as he has cited their books in the bibliographies to his two volumes. For a biographer, it is not necessary to interview anyone who has written books on Elvis, and there are many more contemporaries of Elvis whom the author didn't contact personally. Onefortyone (talk) 01:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh by the way 141, I am an Elvis Fan and a John Lennon fan, as well as many other artist, but don't worry I'm taking medication for it.--Jaye9 (talk) 19:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

User: Onefortyone 5 September 2007 (Talk),titled "Elvis and Marilyn Monroe",writes: The members of the Memphis Mafia certainly did not know every secret about Elvis. His early girlfriend Judy Spreckles says that the singer told her secrets "that I never told and will never tell." Robert L. Levinson's book,The Elvis and Marilyn Affair (1999) deals with a batch of love letters allegedley exchanged between Elvis and Marilyn Monroe during the filming of Love Me Tender and with a secret affair on the Fox lot in 1956 between Elvis and Marilyn. Though the story is fictitious,the author may have had some information about what was going on behind closed doors.--Jaye9 (talk) 04:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

What do we have here? Let's try to decipher this text,shall we. Point one: "The members of the Memphis Mafia certainly did not know every secret about Elvis". My response: True, that's a fair enough statement. Point two: "His girlfriend Judy Spreckles says that the singer told her secrets that I never told and will never tell." My response: What do those secrets intail?,do you know 141?,I certainly don't. Point three: "Robert L. Levinson's fiction book on The Elvis and Marilyn Affair (1999)". My response: Simply,pure fiction. Point four: "The Author may have had some information about what was going on behind closed doors". My response: We'll never know. 141,is this your idea of research? your personal opinion,thrown in with a bit of imagination. Yet, you recently criticize user: Steve Pastor, for using DVD'S (film footage)as his method of research. It is my contention,that not only books,but DVD'S and recordings are an important part of that research. I am certainly questioning this one example of what you call research. Yet this rumor,taken from your original source in the main article,"Byron Raphel wtih Alana Nash,"In Bed with Elvis" Playboy Novemver 2005 Vol 52,Iss. 11,p64-68,76,140. This is your only source by the way, makes we wonder how this could happen. 141,is this truly your idea of a compromise?--Jaye9 (talk) 05:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

What are you talking about? According to eyewitness Byron Raphael, who worked for Presley's manager, Colonel Parker, Elvis had a secret one-night stand with Marilyn Monroe in a hotel room. This was reported not only by the Playboy article of 2005, but also by many newspapers in October 2006. See, for example, New York Post, October 1, 2006; Daily Mail, October 4, 2006. However, this passage was later removed by Rikstar in order to shorten the text of the Elvis article, and I accepted this edit by way of compromising. Onefortyone (talk) 00:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

User:141 Writes NB: This is undoubtedly a source from Elvis's lifetime. By the way,the Guardian Article also proves(as many sources do)that Vernon & Dee Presley had indeed been living together with Priscilla and Elvis for a considerable period of time at Graceland. You should stick close to the facts to be found in published sources,Lockdale insted of making false accusations against other contributors. Talk:Elvis Presley/Archives:15. July 2006-December 2006?.--Jaye9 (talk) 04:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Vernon was often at Graceland,but since his marriage on July 3,1960,he lived in a house near Graceland with Dee and her three boys. Taken from: Joe Esposito and Elena Oumano,"Good Rockin'Tonight. p.56--Jaye9 (talk) 04:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

"It was not until 1963,when Priscilla turned seveenteen,that her father allowed her to live in Memphis". (skipped four sentences) At first,she did stay at Vernon's to keep her promise to her parents. But Priscilla spent most of her time with Elvis,and before you knew it,she was permanently installed at Graceland. (skipped two sentences to finish paragraph. Taken from: Joe Esposito and Elena Oumano book 'Good Rockin'Tonight". p.96--Jaye9 (talk) 05:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Jaye9, thank you so much for the information you are posting. It could prove invaluable in solving the problems with improving this article. I hope to have more time eventually to see how/if we can use your information, should the current problems continue. Your efforts are very much appreciated. Thank you - again. You are renewing my faith in wikipedia editing! Rikstar (talk) 15:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't understand why you are citing this material from an old discussion of 2006 with my former opponent Lochdale, Jaye9. Are you interested to include some information on the problems Elvis had with his stepmother, Dee Presley, at Graceland in the Elvis article? This would make sense, as another user has also requested to include some material on Dee Presley in the article. See [48]. For the record, on July 3, 1960, Vernon Presley married Dee Stanley. They indeed lived at Graceland for a period of time before moving to a house nearby. So much for your false claim about Vernon above that "since his marriage on July 3,1960,he lived in a house near Graceland with Dee and her three boys." The Guardian (or, to be more precisely, its Sunday edition, the Observer) you have mentioned above clearly says that Elvis "brought Priscilla back to the States to live at Graceland, ostensibly under the chaperoning protection of his father Vernon and his new wife Dee." See [49]. Here are some further sources:

• According to Conny Kirchberg and Marc Hendrickx, Elvis Presley, Richard Nixon, and the American Dream (1999), p.63, Vernon helped Dee "secure a divorce so that she could join him in Memphis after Elvis's discharge. The couple would officially tie the knot on July 2, 1960. The Stanley's three sons, David, Rick, and Billy (ages four, six and seven), who had been sent to a boarding school in the States while Dee's romance was in progress, moved into Graceland that summer and began calling Vernon 'Daddy.' ... Presley, meanwhile, went into a state of shock from which he never fully recovered. Two years had not yet passed since his beloved mother's death and already his father had replaced her with another woman, a woman he had stolen from another man, a woman with three young sons, all of whom considered Elvis their new big brother."
• In his book, Careless Love: The Unmaking of Elvis Presley (1999), p. 77, Peter Guralnick writes that "Vernon and Dee got married that Sunday, July 3. The following day Elvis went to the cemetery on his motorcycle and was almost run down by a girl who spotted him kneeling by his mother's grave in prayer. ... Vernon and Dee came home from their honeymoon and moved into Graceland with her three kids. He [Elvis] continued to speak well of Dee for public consumption. 'She seems to be a pretty nice, understanding type of person,' he had said when news of the marriage first began to leak out. 'She treats me with respect, just as she does Daddy. She realizes she could never be my mother. I only had one mother and that's it.' "

• In his study, Hero Myths: A Reader (2000), Robert Segal says on p.213: "Soon after Dee Presley became part of the family, Elvis showed her a picture of Priscilla, commenting that Priscilla was special to him."

• According to Dafydd Rees and Luke Crampton, Rock Movers & Shakers" (1991), p.403, " Priscilla Beaulieu returns to Memphis to stay at Graceland with Vernon and Dee Presley."
• According to Larry Geller and Joel Spector, If I Can Dream: Elvis' Own Story (1989), p.58, "Probably the most scandalous rumor circulating then was that Elvis kept a young girl [Priscilla] back at Graceland. ... As Vernon and Elvis promised Mr. and Mrs. Beaulieu, she did complete her schooling and, as far as the public knew, lived with Vernon, Dee and Dee's three little boys, Rick, David and Billy Stanley..."

• In Elvis and Gladys (2004), Elaine Dundy writes, p.329-330, "that Vernon had settled down with Dee where Gladys had once reigned, while Dee herself - when Elvis was away - had taken over the role of mistress of Graceland so thoroughly as to rearrange the furniture and replace the very curtains that Gladys had approved of." This was too much for the singer who still loved his deceased mother. One afternoon, "a van arrived from Goldsmith's department store, accompanied by one of the decorating assistants, Don Johnson, and all Dee's household's goods, clothes, 'improvements,' and her own menagerie of pets, were loaded on – 'We stuffed cats into that van for fifteen minutes!' recalls Don - while Vernon, Dee and her three children went by car to a nearby house on Hermitage until they finally settled into a house on Dolan Drive which ran alongside Elvis's estate. 'He didn't seem like Elvis ever again,' Lillian had said from her vantage point. But on the surface he remained precisely the same - as though in maintaining the status quo he could still keep Gladys alive."

Interestingly, in July 2006, my former opponent Lochdale, who was later banned from Elvis Presley by arbcom decision, included the same false claim that Elvis's stepmother Dee Presley never lived with the star at Graceland in the Elvis article. See [50]. What a coincidence! Onefortyone (talk) 00:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

--Jaye9 (talk) 11:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Please allow me to respond to your text above,but most importantly,pointing out to you what this was all about in the first place,which I will text in bold futher on. Point One: "I don't understand why you are citing this material from an old discussion of 2006 with my former opponent Lockdale,Jaye9"(part of text)signed:Onefortyone(talk)8 January 2008. Response: "If you have any evidence of selective referencing please post specific examples here". (part of text)signed:Rikstar(talk)30 December 2007.

Point two: user 141 writes: "By the way,the Guardian Article also proves(as many sources do)that Vernon & Dee Presley had indeed been living together with Priscilla and Elvis for a considerable period of time at Graceland". (part of text) Talk:Elvis Presley/Archives 15 July 2006-December 2006? Response: False and misleading. Point three: "Vernon was at Graceland,but since his marraige on July3,1960,he lived in a home near Graceland with Dee and there three boys". Joe Esposito and Elena Oumano,"Good Rockin'Tonight. p.56 Response: To vague,needed more clarification,so I continued with further referenceing from Joe Esposito's book being: "It was not until 1963,when Priscilla turned seveenteen,that her father allowed her to live in Memphis".(skipped four sentences) At first,she did stay at Vernon's to keep her promise to her parents. But Priscilla spent most of her time with Elvis,and before you knew it,she was permanently installed at Graceland".(skipped two sentences to finish paragraph) Taken from:Joe Esposito and Elena Oumano book Good Rockin'Tonight. p.96 signed;Jaye9(talk) 7 January 2008--Jaye9 (talk) 12:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Point four: User:141 writes; "Interestingly,in July 2006,my former opponent Lockdale,who was latter banned from (Elvis Presley)by arbcom decision,included the same false claim that Elvis's stepmother Dee Presley never lived with the star at Graceland in the Elvis article. See[50] What a coincidence!" signed:Onefortyone(talk) 8 January 2008 Response: Firstly,allow me to apologize,for not been able to text(point four)in it's correct format with the wording (Elvis Presley) & See[50],I am still learning to use Wikipedia correctly,sorry! Getting back to my response: 141,I never made the false claim that Dee Stanley never lived with Elvis. Please read that bold text which you cited,that Vernon & Dee Presley had indeed been living together with Priscilla and Elvis for a considerable period of time at Graceland,of which I'm contesting.--Jaye9 (talk) 14:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

141,I agree Dee & Vernon Presley,soon followed by her three sons did live with Elvis,between 1960-1962(or thereabouts),I will cite it for you: "On January 19,1960,my seventh birthday,there was another call from Mom. By now we were sure we'd never get out of the orphanage. Mom kept telling us we'd all be together soon,but she'd be telling us that for months. (skipped paragraph). When we arrived,Graceland was all natural-coloured limestone.(next page/third paragraph) We lived at Graceland for the next two years in what had originally been a garage for Elvis's many cars and motorcycles. In anticipation of our arrival it had been redone into one huge room that housed Dee & Vernon and the three of us.(next 16 pages) In December of 1961,while Vernon was having our new home on Dolan Street built,we made a sudden move to a house on Hermitage Street.(skipped paragraph) Work on the house on Dolan Street moved quickly,and we could see that it was going to be a big house". taken from "Elvis My Brother",by Billy Stanley with George Erikson p.4,5 & 21--Jaye9 (talk) 14:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I like your recent edits, Jaye9, as you are citing your sources. However, the different sources seem to disagree in some points. I did some further research. Here are some more sources. They support the view that Priscilla was living at Graceland since December 1960.

• Jon Pareles, The Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock 'n' Roll (1983), p.439:

"On Christmas 1960, Priscilla Beaulieu, the teenaged daughter of an Army officer whom Presley had met in Germany, visited Graceland."

• Kathleen Tracy, Elvis Presley: A Biography (2006), p.115-116:

"During the weeks of Priscilla's holiday visit, life at Graceland took a turn for the normal. Elvis lavished time and attention on Priscilla ... He even found it in his heart to be more polite and less vicious toward Dee. ... Priscilla endured the scrutiny of everyone with admirable grace. ... She had the innocent and idealistic outlook of a well-cared-for teenager. ... She was one of the few things Vernon and Elvis saw eye to eye on. Vernon made a constant fuss over Priscilla - ...- and between the two of them, her head was spinning. For her part, Priscilla seemed just as delighted to be back in America as she was to be at Graceland with Elvis. ... the house radiated a life that had been missing for years. ... As the end of Priscilla's holiday vacation neared, the thought of her leaving drove Elvis to despair. The solution was simple – she simply had to stay. She could go to school in Memphis and live at Graceland full time. Vernon was in full support. After weeks of peaceful cohabitation, Vernon was apprehensive of the mood Elvis would revert to if Priscilla left. Like everyone else, he believed Priscilla's mere presence would solve everything and make Graceland a home, happily ever after. With Vernon on the upstairs extension, Elvis talked to Joe Beaulieu for close to an hour, while Priscilla sat listening quietly but anxiously. ... After a sometimes-impassioned conversation, it had been miraculously arranged. Priscilla would move to Graceland as a guest of Vernon and Dee's, who would take personal responsibility for chaperoning her. ... Elvis enrolled Priscilla in an all-girls school, Immaculate Conception, wanting her well educated and sheltered from the attention of teenage boys. Under the guise of complying with Mr. Beaulieu's conditions, Elvis tightened a protective net around Priscilla that effectively made her a prisoner. ... The only one not thrilled with Priscilla was Parker. While it might be less difficult to pass her off as a friend of the family here for a visit, convincing the country that Elvis was a platonic host of a live-in 15-year-old girl would be almost impossible. The only saving grace was the number of people who lived at Graceland and the fact that Elvis kept her under close wraps and didn't flaunt her in public. While she adjusted to her new home, Priscilla seemed content to spend time at Graceland, but as she acclimated to her surroundings, the natural restlessness of a teenager surfaced. Elvis sternly cautioned her against going out alone at any time, citing his concern for her safety."

• Alanna Nash, The Colonel: The Extraordinary Story of Colonel Tom Parker and Elvis Presley (2003), p.206:

"The immediate promise was that a chaperoned Priscilla would live on nearby Hermitage Road with Vernon and his new wife, Dee. That arrangement lasted only a matter of weeks, Priscilla slipping back and forth between the houses."

This latter source seems to have found a solution for the contradicting statements. User:Onefortyone (talk) 00:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Final Response: The text in bold is what this was about in the first place and to conteract what was stated in that bold text. Priscilla did not move into Graceland with Elvis unti 1963,as Joe Esposito stated and by that time Vernon & Dee Presley with her sons were not living at Graceland, but in Dolan Street. This is the second time 141,I have had to respond to you,to prove what I said and didn't say,I conclude.--Jaye9 (talk) 14:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Did you actually read the quotes given above dealing with Priscilla's Christmas Holiday visit in December 1960 to Graceland and the arrangement made between Mr Beaulieu and the Presleys at that time, which "lasted only a matter of weeks"? I don't think so, as these sources strongly suggest that your claim that "Priscilla did not move into Graceland with Elvis until 1963," is wrong. Your own source says that "in December of 1961," Vernon had his "new home on Dolan Street built." This means that they were all living at Graceland before that date (Vernon, Dee, Priscilla and Elvis). So much for your appropriate handling of sources. Onefortyone (talk) 00:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Updating article

When changing the current sections to those we draft on the talk, be particularly careful not to removed base refs. Those being named refs with all the information (ie. <ref name=Bakers>Baker, Sammy (June 3, 1989). ''Thi...). I spent literally two weeks formatting almost 250 footnotes and references. Have some respect and consideration. Lara❤Love 15:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry for having removed a base ref. I didn't realize that this was the case. However, you undid the revision of the article's first section, saying, "This was not agreed on." I thought there was a kind of consensus to include the 4th draft of this section in the article. It was mainly rewritten by Rikstar. Here is the said section you reverted:

Presley's father, Vernon (April 10, 1916–June 26, 1979) has been described as a malingerer, averse to work and responsibility. He had several low-paying jobs, including sharecropper and truck driver. Gladys Love Smith (April 25, 1912–August 14, 1958), who became an alcoholic, was "voluble, lively, full of spunk," and worked as a sewing machine operator. They met in Tupelo, Mississippi, and eloped to Pontotoc County where they married on June 17, 1933.

Presley was born in East Tupelo, the second of identical twins (his brother was stillborn and given the name Jesse Garon). As an only child he "was, everyone agreed, unusually close to his mother." The family lived in a two room house just above the poverty line and attended the Assembly of God church.Template:Fn In 1938, Vernon Presley was jailed for an eight dollar check forgery. It has been claimed that the absence of his father "had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development".

At age ten, Presley won second prize in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show for his rendition of Red Foley's "Old Shep".

In 1946, Presley's mother took Elvis to Tupelo Hardware to get him a birthday present. Although he wanted a rifle, he left the store with a $7.90 guitar. In November 1948, the family moved to Memphis, Tennessee, allegedly because Vernon—in addition to needing work—had to escape the law for transporting bootleg liquor. At school, Presley was bullied "because he was different... he stuttered and he was a mama's boy." At L. C. Humes High School, fellow students viewed the young singer as "a sad, shy, not especially attractive boy"; some made fun of him for playing "trashy" hillbilly music.

In 1949, the family lived at a public housing development in one of Memphis' poorer sections. Presley practiced playing guitar in the laundry room and also played in a five-piece band with other tenants. He occasionally worked evenings to boost the family income, and began to grow his sideburns and dress in the wild, flashy clothes of Lansky Brothers on Beale Street. He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and he was mocked for it. Despite any unpopularity, Presley was a contestant in his school's 1952 "Annual Minstrel Show" and won by receiving the most applause and thus an encore (he sang "Cold Cold Icy Fingers" and "Till I Waltz Again With You").

After graduation, Presley was still rather shy. According to Scotty Moore, he "was more comfortable just sitting there with a guitar than trying to talk to you." His third job was driving a truck for the Crown Electric Company. He began wearing his hair longer with a "ducktail"—the style of truck drivers at that time.

By the way, which base ref was removed? I cannot find a reference to Sammy Baker in the article. Onefortyone (talk) 19:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

That was a fake example. I don't remember which reference it was. I fixed it. The above needs to be discussed and agreed upon before being added to the article. I still believe it's too long. It needs to be trimmed. Lara❤Love 15:48, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

What, no Elvis sightings?

You guys might be amused by a surprisingly animated debate in an unlikely place, the talk page of the NPOV policy page. The bottom line is that the absence of the Elvis sightings concept from this page is incompatible with the WP:NPOV policy. Emmanuelm (talk) 01:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

If you want to add information regarding the phenomenon of Elvis sightings, by all means, draft something up here and we'll discuss. But we're not stating a possibility that he's still alive. The coroner's report proves death. Lara❤Love 15:39, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

_____________________________________________

Ancestry

It should be worth mentioning that the American Presleys, a very rare family name, stem from a Southern Palatinate vintner named Valentin Pressler who emigrated to the U.S. around 1700. Thus the anglicized version "Presley" of the German family name. Compare to the German Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.5.29.146 (talk) 14:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest. Presley's ancestry details have been mentioned in the article, though not in the main body of text - see footnote 4. Rikstar (talk) 23:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Two Things

Any one who saw the thing on elvis on cnn saw that they said elvis was related to oprah throw slavery and slave was pregnant by elvis's ancenstor which made them related and 2 there was something about no photo's were allowed at his funeral and somebody took a quick picture and the elvis in the coffin looked like the younger elvis so possible of what alot of ppl think faked death. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.254.160.170 (talk) 02:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Any extraordinary claims about Presley need equally extraordinary evidence to back them up. If there are several reliable sources that show he was related to Oprah, that's fine, but reliable, well cited sources do not guarantee the claim will be mentioned in the article, though it may qualify for a place in the footnotes. As for the picture of Presley in his coffin, it appeared on the front page of the National Enquirer. It's a pretty bad photo by all accounts and he doesn't look young, he just looks retouched - and very much dead. But if you can quote reliable sources that claim otherwise... Rikstar (talk) 07:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Elvis Presley discography — Chart Help Needed

I am wondering if anyone knows the charting history of which charts studio albums, live albums, compilations, soundtracks and singles were on, US Billboard, UK, Canada, Australia, and where this information can be founded. Thanks! Hpfan9374 (talk) 08:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

There are plenty of books listing Presley's charting history in various countries, but try googling "Elvis chart statistics", several times, each time adding the name of desired country and the word "album" or "singles", and you will find at least some of the info you require. The stats for his film soundtracks might be on separate sites. Rikstar (talk) 10:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Article Vandalised

The Article Vandalised today, January 29. Im trying to fix it. This Article needs to be protected. Gduwen

I only saw parts removed that had little to do with Elvis, text that OneFortyOne likes; sentances that wouldn't see the light of day in Encyclopaedia Britannica —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.208.183.44 (talk) 21:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

IP 130.208.183.44 is identical with my old opponent Lochdale who has been banned from editing Elvis-related topics by arbcom decision. See the last paragraphs of this discussion and [51], [52] and [53]. Onefortyone (talk) 00:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

The article has been indefinitely protected. Lara❤Love 23:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Fine, let's keep on trashing Elvis *sigh* —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.208.186.17 (talk) 11:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Not everyone who has been able to edit this article is interested in "trashing" Elvis. If you can, be more specific about your objections on these pages. That might lead to this article moving forward, something many of us want, in spite of continuing difficulties. You might also consider signing in, it looks better. Rikstar (talk) 11:07, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

IP 130.208.186.17 is already signed in as banned User:Lochdale since August 12, 2005. See above. Onefortyone (talk) 01:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Then let's talk about trashing Gladys. "Priscilla Presley recalls her as "a surreptitious drinker and alcoholic."[15]" This is in the Early Years section. Priscilla did not meet Elvis until he was in the military late in the 50s. I don't see what this quote has to do with the early years. Steve Pastor (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Her drink/health problems is mentioned later and it does not need to be metioned in the Early Years section. So that's two of us with the same opinion. If more people agree than disagree with this change, then the edit should go ahead. The minority who disagree will have to accept it. This is the only way this article is going to move forward. I still prefer the "2nd draft" of Dec 6:

I agree too, and ip 130.208.186.17 is not user Lochdale and is not banned —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.208.183.44 (talk) 11:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

You must be joking, IP 130.208... Your contributions to the Elvis talk page in December 2006 certainly show that you are identical with banned user Lochdale. See also this contribution by IP 130.208.183.44 [54] and these edits by Lochdale: [55], [56], [57]. Onefortyone (talk) 18:37, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

No, I'm not joking - do you like twisting the truth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.208.183.44 (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Trying again at WP:ECotW

Presley's father, Vernon (April 10, 1916–June 26, 1979), had several low-paying jobs, including sharecropper and truck driver. His mother, Gladys Love Smith (April 25, 1912–August 14, 1958) worked as a sewing machine operator. They met in Tupelo, Mississippi, and eloped to Pontotoc County where they married on June 17, 1933.

Presley was born in a two room house, built by his father, in East Tupelo. He was the second of identical twins (his brother was stillborn and given the name Jesse Garon). He grew up as an only child and "was, everyone agreed, unusually close to his mother." The family lived just above the poverty line and attended the Assembly of God church.Template:Fn In 1938, Vernon Presley was jailed for an eight dollar check forgery. During his absence, his wife lost the family home.

At age ten, Presley made his first public performance in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show. Dressed as a cowboy, he had to stand on a chair to reach the microphone and sang Red Foley's "Old Shep." He won second prize.

In 1946, Presley got his first guitar. In November 1948, the family moved to Memphis, Tennessee, allegedly because Vernon—in addition to needing work—had to escape the law for transporting bootleg liquor. In 1949, they lived at Lauderdale Courts, a public housing development in one of Memphis' poorer sections. Presley practiced playing guitar in the laundry room and also played in a five-piece band with other tenants. He occasionally worked evenings to boost the family income, and began to grow his sideburns and dress in the wild, flashy clothes of Lansky Brothers on Beale Street. He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and was mocked and bullied for it. Despite any unpopularity, Presley was a contestant in his school's 1952 "Annual Minstrel Show" and won by receiving the most applause and thus an encore (he sang "Cold Cold Icy Fingers" and "Till I Waltz Again With You").

After graduation, Presley was still rather shy, and had spent little time away from home . His third job was driving a truck for the Crown Electric Company. He began wearing his hair longer with a "ducktail"—the style of truck drivers at that time.

Rikstar (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree. This is my preferred version as well. Lara❤Love 17:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I do not agree, as important information about the character of Elvis’s parents is missing. In my opinion, the revised fourth draft is the best. See [58]. Priscilla's statement about Gladys is very important, as she heard a lot about the character of Elvis’s mother from Vernon, when she lived together with Elvis's father and his new wife at Graceland. It should not only be mentioned that Elvis "was, everyone agreed, unusually close to his mother" (Guralnick), but also that the absence of his father "had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development" and that at school, Elvis was bullied "because he was different... he stuttered and he was a mama's boy." Furthermore, it must be mentioned that fellow students viewed the young singer as "a sad, shy, not especially attractive boy" and that some made fun of him for playing "trashy" hillbilly music. This well-sourced information clearly shows that Elvis was not seen as an infant prodigy from the beginning. By way of compromise and in order to shorten the text, the rifle story may perhaps be removed. And what about the following sentence, which is much shorter: "At age ten, Presley won second prize in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show for his rendition of Red Foley's 'Old Shep.' " Concerning the content disagreements, outside views would be helpful (possibly backed by uninvolved adminstrators), as arbitrator FT2 has suggested. There is also this statement by Egghead06 that should make you think: "There appears to be a drive here to only have one view point - put them all as long as they are referenced and let the reader decide. There also appears to be a drive to keep the article short so as to achieve some internal star or pat-on-the back." Onefortyone (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

The last sentence there from Egghead06 is an ignorant one. We're trying to improve the article, and bring it down to a readable length. Months have passed with no progress on this article. It's time to stop with the pointless back and forth and start making consensus-based changes. Right now, consensus is against you, but let's see how it goes after others weigh in. Lara❤Love 21:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

To my mind, Egghead06 is right. There is still a tendency to remove well-referenced material from the Elvis article in order to get rid of more critical information. Interestingly, all users who now agree to remove critical content, were involved in a rejected arbcom case against me. Is this really consensus against me from a neutral point of view? I don't think so. Wikipedia says:

• The Wikipedia policy of editing from a neutral point of view, a central and non-negotiable principle of Wikipedia, applies to situations where there are conflicting viewpoints and contemplates that significant viewpoints regarding such situations all be included in as fair a manner as possible.
• According to Wikipedia policy, it is highly desirable that editors cite the sources of the information in their edits, especially on controversial articles. Removal of references from articles is generally considered inappropriate.
• Neutral point of view as defined on Wikipedia contemplates inclusion of all significant perspectives regarding a subject. While majority perspectives may be favored by more detailed coverage, minority perspectives should also receive sufficient coverage. No perspective is to be presented as the "truth"; all perspectives are to be attributed to their advocates.
• When you find a passage in an article biased or inaccurate, improve it if you can. If that is not possible, and you disagree completely with a point of view expressed in an article, think twice before simply deleting it. Rather, balance it with your side of the story. Make sure that you provide reliable sources.
• For the purpose of dispute resolution when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets.

This means that brief information on the character of Elvis's parents or Elvis's guitar playing at school etc. should not be removed from the first section of the article because some editors do not like the information, especially in view of the fact that the material is well sourced. Onefortyone (talk) 22:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Arbcom did not rule that you were right. They rejected the case and, if I recall correctly, directed us to Enforcement because there was previously a case against you. I'm not reading all this over and over again. You made your point. Now we're waiting for others to join in. Lara❤Love 05:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

You know you are getting somewhere near the truth when people refer to your comments as 'ignorant'!! Just who decides what is 'readable length'? This endless quest for Wiki awards/stars and brevity sometimes blinds people to what these articles are all about - accuracy, completeness and notability. For an article on someone like Elvis this is never going to allow the Wiki mantra of 'keep it short and readable' to work to everyone's satisfaction. Unless you allow all possible, notable information, with good references, to stand you are debasing Wiki to suit personal and arbitrary goals--Egghead06 (talk) 09:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

"Unless you allow all possible, notable information, with good references, to stand..." Really? All possible, notable information?? Well we can combine everything from both Guralnick books - and add Albert Goldman's tome for 'balance'. There's a 1500+ page Elvis article that won't debase wiki.

The FA submission (c.1936?) was criticised because it was too long; it contained trivia and was badly laid out. There are now whole link articles (Sun recordings, Cultural Impact, Films, Memphis Mafia, etc.) in which readers can look for more of this notable information. Therefore the main article could be shortened. 141 states that a reference to Gladys' drinking must appear at the start. I did not insist it should be removed; I merely observed that reference to her death from drink-related hepatitis occurs in a later section. We need notable information - we don't need repetition. 141 conveniently failed to acknowledge or discuss this point, preferring as usual to simply shore up his unilateral position for the umpteemth time. If there is a 'drive to have only one viewpoint' in this article, that view point is 141's.

141 states: "This means that brief information on the character of Elvis's parents or Elvis's guitar playing at school etc. should not be removed from the first section of the article because some editors do not like the information". I already stated why the Priscilla quote does not need to be in the Early Years section. It is not because I "do not like the information". I am growing tired of these personal "Elvis Fan" claims of bias from 141. We desperately need more viewpoints on moving this all forward, but who in there right mind would bother? Rikstar (talk) 12:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Enough of the hyperbole! 1500+ pages !! You've conveniently overlooked my use of the word 'notable'. This is the crux of the whole problem. Who decides notable and who decides readable length. Answer - we all do. Wiki is open to everyone.

I think people need to take a step back and ask themselves, 'If I knew nothing about Elvis Presley, just what would I hope to learn from reading this article'. This should be the key question when deciding what is relevant. --Egghead06 (talk) 12:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Great. Wiki is open to everyone. Including people who refuse to agree to a consensus of opinion on length and notable content. I have been trying to edit this article as if it is being read by those who know nothing about Presley. It's a key question alright, one I don't think certain other editors are addressing themselves. The point I was at pains to make above was we don't need repetition regarding Gladys and drinking. No one who wants that mentioned in the Early Years has addressed that either. 141 has as much right to have his "well-sourced" content considered for inclusion, but his history shows an alarming preoccupation with negative content, ranging from Elvis singing numerous homo-erotic lyrics to having sex with his mother. So much for his ideas about what is relevant in an encyclopedic article. You'd think there was no negative content at all in the article. It's OK for those not involved in spending hours keeping out such trashy content, not fearing the emergence of more of the same, and not still unhappy with some of 141's edits that he refuses to have changed or removed despite consensus. May be all this is mildly amusing to those not involved, but some of us want limits on content that are not unreasonable. Rikstar (talk) 13:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

What are you talking about, Rikstar? There is nothing on "homo-erotic lyrics" or Elvis "having sex with his mother" in the current version of the article, although several sources, among them Elvis experts Greil Marcus and Albert Goldman, deal with such topics. On the other hand, there is a clear tendency to remove information Elvis fans do not like from the article. These are the facts. As the first section briefly deals with the singer's father and mother, short statements about their character are necessary, including Gladys's alcoholism, which deeply affected Elvis's life. Later in the article, we read that "his mother continued to drink excessively." So her alcohol problems should be mentioned earlier. Significantly, the versions you, Steve Pastor and LaraLove prefer do not mention that the absence of Presley's father "had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development," that at school, young Elvis was bullied "because he was different... he stuttered and he was a mama's boy," or that fellow students viewed the young singer as "a sad, shy, not especially attractive boy" and that some made fun of him for playing "trashy" hillbilly music. Sorry, if you compare the second and fourth drafts, only this kind of well-sourced information has been removed in order to "improve" (or should it be whitewash) the first section. The problem is that, apart from my more critical view (and some vandals), only Elvis fans seem to be interested in the article. Therefore, unbiased third-party opinions would be helpful. Onefortyone (talk) 18:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Okay, here's a question, for the the absence of Presley's father "had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development," is that backed by a psychologist or some other mental health professional? Lara❤Love 06:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Patrick Humphrey’s writes in his book on Elvis (p.117): "There is a widely held believe among psychologists that the disappearance of Vernon from Elvis’ life when the King was three (Vernon was jailed for passing bad cheques) had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development. At that age a child naturally goes through a separation anxiety from its mother, which fathers can often help with. Elvis only had Gladys. They slept in the same bed up until Elvis was a young teen. Elvis loved his father, of course. But a big part of this love was probably based upon his mother’s love for the elder Presley. After the death of Gladys, Elvis kept Vernon close and welcomed his father’s second family into his own home (Vernon’s second wife Dee had three young sons, all of whom moved into Graceland). Vernon loved his son but hated his Mafia."

In addition, Elaine Dundy says about Elvis’s mother (p.71): "it was agony for her to leave her child even for a moment with anyone else, to let anyone else touch Elvis. Maternal love was not for Gladys a prettily sentimental attachment. Rather it was a passionate concentration which deepened into a painful intensity when her son was not there, directly in her sight. She imagined all sorts of horrors. She imagined he was being tortured and she was not there to stop it. It was physical torment for her to be separated from him. Maternal devotion is constantly misrepresented as either grasping, clinging, stifling or pathetic. It is none of these things. Every mother of a very young child has the primordial conviction, deeper than reason, that as long as her child is within her eyesight she will be able to protect him from all harm. Generally the mother outgrows this as the child grows up but Gladys all her life remained anxious over each one of Elvis' separations from her."

Freudian and other sexual psychologists say that Presley is a "classic example of the mother/Madonna/whore split." He "adored his mother and never recovered from her early death." He met Priscilla "when she was 14. She became a mother at 22. It is said that Elvis never made love to her again after the birth of his daughter, and would never have sex with a woman who had had a baby. He did not remarry after his divorce from Priscilla and did not have any more children." See Carol Martin-Sperry, Couples and Sex: An Introduction to Relationship Dynamics and Psychosexual Concepts (2004), p.24. Onefortyone (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes. Perhaps those wishing to comment on the situation should first do some research on it. The past two years of history on this talk page would be a good start. Then there's the ArbCom case. Maybe reading the article would help too. Of course, cancel your appointments for the day, as it's not a light read. Consider, also, as you read, that there are somewhere around 15 articles that stem off of this one. So if there's something you wanted to know more about, that's where it's at. Absolutely everything Elvis should not be included in this article. It's redundant and makes for poor reading. Egghead, have you read the article in its entirety? Let's start there. Lara❤Love 17:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Here is a shorter version of the fourth draft

Presley's father, Vernon (April 10, 1916–June 26, 1979) has been described as a malingerer, averse to work and responsibility. He had several low-paying jobs, including sharecropper and truck driver. Gladys Love Smith (April 25, 1912–August 14, 1958), who became an alcoholic, was "voluble, lively, full of spunk," and worked as a sewing machine operator. They met in Tupelo, Mississippi, and eloped to Pontotoc County where they married on June 17, 1933.

Presley was born in East Tupelo, the second of identical twins (his brother was stillborn). As an only child he "was, everyone agreed, unusually close to his mother." The family lived in a two room house just above the poverty line and attended the Assembly of God church.Template:Fn In 1938, Vernon Presley was jailed for a check forgery. The absence of his father "had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development".

At age ten, Presley won second prize in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show for his rendition of Red Foley's "Old Shep".

In 1946, Presley got his first guitar. In November 1948, the family moved to Memphis, Tennessee, allegedly because Vernon had to escape the law for transporting bootleg liquor. At school, Presley was bullied "because he was different... he stuttered and he was a mama's boy." At L. C. Humes High School, fellow students viewed the young singer as "a sad, shy, not especially attractive boy"; some made fun of him for playing "trashy" hillbilly music.

In 1949, the family lived at a public housing development in one of Memphis' poorer sections. Presley practiced playing guitar in a five-piece band with other tenants. He occasionally worked evenings to boost the family income, and began to grow his sideburns and dress in the wild, flashy clothes of Lansky Brothers on Beale Street. He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and he was mocked for it. Despite any unpopularity, Presley won as a contestant in his school's 1952 "Annual Minstrel Show" singing "Cold Cold Icy Fingers" and "Till I Waltz Again With You".

After graduation, Presley was still rather shy and “more comfortable just sitting there with a guitar than trying to talk to you." His third job was driving a truck for the Crown Electric Company. Like his fellow drivers, he began wearing his hair longer with a "ducktail".

Perhaps this may be the best version. However, I am not happy that there is nothing on Elvis's ancestry in the main text. Onefortyone (talk) 20:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps. And perhaps 141 does know exactly what Rikstar is talking about when he bothers to leave comments on this page. If 141 continues to question what and why I made the above point about his talk history/contributions, I'll gladly hammer it home; I'm sure some neutral/armchair observers who haven't got their hands dirty from this article would find it interesting. But we don't really want to go there... we've got this damn fine article to write!!!!!

The Gladys stuff about her health/death could easily be slightly rewritten to meet 141's needs, but we haven't got to that section yet because we're so mired in the crap of rewriting the first section (see above). People really need to think about existing content in the rest of the article before stubbornly insistng on edits in isolation. LaraLove is of course correct: everyone should read this article and talk page in full (oh, what joy...) and know enough about other Presley articles to judge if certain contentious edits that persist should be in this main article.

I again vehemently oppose 141's insinuations that "only Elvis fans" seem to be interested in this article. I have personally contributed enough negative content - and opposed enough fan-biased content - to prove my position. The fact that 141 has previously admitted as much, but then reverts back to his tedious fan bias claims, is a real smear on my character as a responsible editor, and it could deliberately mislead and prejudice new editors. It's a disgrace. Rikstar (talk) 03:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I have read all four drafts and the secound draft sits well with me to be included in the main article,as it flows freely and is easy to read. Also, I believe that if the article is to long it will bore the general public to tears and they will click off and go somewhere else,have you heard the expression to much information! We could also add,that elvis chose not to wear jeans after he became famous,as it reminded him of being poor. I mean, where does end?

User: Lara Love response to User: Onefortyone comments dated 11 February 2008. Okay,here's a question for the "the absence of presley's father had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development." Is that backed by a psychologist or some other mental health professional.

Great point Lara I don't believe there is,and it is my opinion that if a psychologist or some other mental health professional was to give his or her opinion,based on biographies and the like,would be very unprofessional to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaye9 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 11 February 2008

For different opinions, see the sources cited here. Onefortyone (talk) 21:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, Lara

1/ Of course I have read it. Why would anyone comment on something they hadn't read?

2/ Rikstar - like it or not comment on this and any other Wiki page is open to all - even those who haven't dirtied their hands.

3/ I hate censorship and cutting notable stuff out to make and article short or because people will get bored (good grief!) is a very dangerous road to take.

4/ I have no views, one way or the other on 141 but wasn't an attempt made to ban him and an attempt which failed? --Egghead06 (talk) 16:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I completely disagree. This is why we have articles branch off of this one. Rikstar is only slightly exaggerating about how many pages this article would be if we included everything. The article is also redundant. We don't have to mention the same thing in two different sections. We also don't need to back everything with multiple examples. But, we've already been over this ad nauseam. Which can be found in the sections above. As far as this latest suggestion, for example, it is not necessary to note that Gladys later becomes a drunk. This is the Early life section. Her alcoholism is mentioned later when it is relevant. Lara❤Love 16:16, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I reiterate - notable stuff. Notable being the operative word. Funny how you and Rikstar seem to keep on ignoring my use of this word. I do not wish 1500+ on anyone but could you really fill that many with NOTABLE info - no thought not. Oh yes - please answer my item 4/!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Egghead06 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I acknowledged and specifically used the word "notable" in my response to Egghead06 and in relation to 141's contributions. So much for my ignoring the use (and I mean use) of the word. Egghead06 has already referred to the complexity and depth of the Elvis phenomenon, much of it, absolutely reams of it, negative and positive, being "notable" And it's been duly noted - by the best biographers (I think I made a "hyperbolic" reference to this).

Oh, item 4... So the attempt to ban 141 failed; speaks volumes about something, but NOT about my attempts to move this article forward, nor to encourage other editors from getting positively involved, nor to get this article to achieve GA/FA status. I am already on record as stating 141 has the capacity and resources to move this article on to FA status, but his continuing comment and editing history indicates a desire to skew this article in a decidely unencyclopedic direction (that's anti-wiki, isn't it?).

If Egghead06 wants the Presley article to include the majority of 141's "well-sourced" input in the name of open, "anything goes" wiki philosophy, I'm on the verge of being quite sickened enough to let that happen, as I have been for... let's see now, hundreds of hours churning out words over about a year?? I wonder how Egghead06 would have taken the scars of battle if he himself had had to personally endure battling with 141. Maybe he would have thrown in the towel like other useful editors have done. We'll probably never know. I will probably jack all this in soon as I am losing the will to live... I can always console myself by watching Presley's shit movies and listening to his sublime voice on a couple dozen tracks. Lord help this article if any real "ELVIS FANS" with 141's tenacity get involved... World War III beckons... Rikstar (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Rikstar, sweetheart, it's okay. Haha. Yes, Egghead, I already acknowledged your 4/ earlier when you mentioned it. The original ArbCom resulted in no ban, the second request was rejected and referred to enforcement. But considering the days of our lives we've already wasted on this article over 141, no one had the will or energy to fill for enforcement. And notable or not, that doesn't justify including information more than once in the article, or backing it with multiple examples and quotes. It also doesn't make it necessary for this article, as there are more focused articles on various topics which allow for some information on the lower side of notable to be mentioned merely in passing. As a little note, Egghead, I believe, is a female. Lara❤Love 20:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Believe it or not, this new version of the fourth draft is shorter than the second draft:

Presley's father, Vernon (April 10, 1916–June 26, 1979) was a malingerer, averse to work and responsibility. He had several low-paying jobs, including sharecropper and truck driver. His mother, Gladys Love Smith (April 25, 1912–August 14, 1958), was "voluble, lively, full of spunk," and had alcohol problems. She worked as a sewing machine operator. They met in Tupelo, Mississippi, and were married in Pontotoc County on June 17, 1933.

Presley was born in East Tupelo, the second of identical twins (his brother was stillborn). As an only child he was "unusually close to his mother." The family lived in a two room house just above the poverty line.Template:Fn In 1938, Vernon Presley was jailed for a check forgery. The absence of his father "had a profound effect upon Elvis' emotional development".

At age ten, Presley won second prize in a singing contest at the Mississippi-Alabama Fair and Dairy Show for his rendition of Red Foley's "Old Shep".

In 1946, Presley got his first guitar. In November 1948, the family moved to Memphis, Tennessee, allegedly because Vernon had to escape the law for transporting bootleg liquor. At school, Presley was bullied for being different, a stutterer and "a mama's boy." At L. C. Humes High School, he was viewed as "a sad, shy, not especially attractive boy"; some students made fun of him for playing "trashy" hillbilly music.

In 1949, the family lived at a public housing development in one of Memphis' poorer sections. Presley practiced playing guitar in a five-piece band with other tenants. He occasionally worked evenings to boost the family income, and began to grow his sideburns and dress in the wild, flashy clothes of Lansky Brothers on Beale Street. He stood out, especially in the conservative Deep South of the 1950s, and he was mocked for it. Despite any unpopularity, Presley won as a contestant in his school's 1952 "Annual Minstrel Show" singing "Cold Cold Icy Fingers" and "Till I Waltz Again With You".

After graduation, Presley was still rather shy and “more comfortable just sitting there with a guitar than trying to talk to you." His third job was driving a truck for the Crown Electric Company. Like his fellow drivers, he began wearing his hair longer with a "ducktail".

Any comments? Onefortyone (talk) 20:46, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

This is not a competition to produce THE shortest version of the said section: anyone thinking this has not understood the reasons for rewriting this and the other sections. It's of interest to mention that the Presley parents eloped, for example. This says something about their relationship and perhaps their respective families, without laboring the point with quotes and sources. The reader can be left to conclude what they like about them needing/wanting to elope, without spelling it out, and especially if no further information is available. This probably applies to other parts of this article. Did Gladys have "alcohol problems" before or around the time she worked as a sewing machine operator? I don't know, or I can't remember. Rikstar (talk) 22:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Some months ago you were very busy shortening all sections of the article. So it's not necessary to produce the shortest version of each section. This is also my opinion. If you think that it is of some interest to mention that the Presley parents eloped, you may add, "they eloped to, and were married in..." I have no problem with the inclusion of this detail. If other users are of the opinion that Gladys's drinking problems are equally important, they should be allowed to include this fact. This is how Wikipedia works. Onefortyone (talk) 01:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I thought 141 would twist my words on this shortening issue - and he has. I hate this. Rikstar (talk) 07:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Is there a reference for when her alcohol issues began? Lara❤Love 22:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, there are several references. I did some further research. Here are some sources:

• Kathleen Tracy, Elvis Presley: A Biography (2006) says, "While Vernon was serving his time in prison, Gladys found solace in Elvis and, increasingly, in drinking. Even though she drank in private, her bloodshot eyes and the lingering aroma of stale liquor gave her away. She also began missing work..." (p. 17). The author adds (p.23) that those who were like Gladys "owed their extra weight to drinking or avoiding field work. Alcohol was cheap; food might be hard to come by, but one could always find a drink."
• According to Jane Ellen Wayne's chapter on Elvis Presley in her book, The Leading Men of MGM (2006), in younger years "she also enjoyed an occasional night out drinking and dancing" (p.368). The author also mentions that "Gladys and Vernon were both heavy drinkers" (p.373) and that "Gladys took Benzedrine and consumed vodka to excess to ease the pain of loneliness" (p.377).
• Rex Mansfield, Elisabeth Mansfield and Zoe Terrill write in their book, Sergeant Presley: Our Untold Story of Elvis' Missing Years (2002): "she had a weight problem (Gladys had been taking diet pills on and off for some time) and a drinking problem." (p.54)
• J. G. Ballard says that "despite her own well-developed taste for drugs and alcohol, Gladys seems to have offered Presley rock-like support throughout her short life." See J. G. Ballard, A User's Guide to the Millennium: Essays and Reviews (1997), p.39.

There are many more references of this kind. Other sources deal with her liver problems caused by drinking heavily for many years. See, for instance, Elaine Dundy's chapter on "The Death of Gladys" in Elvis and Gladys. Onefortyone (talk) 00:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I support this version with the first reference provided above to back the statement of her drinking and Rikstar's additional of their elopement. Lara❤Love 01:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

So do I - let's have some clear preferences noted on here!--Egghead06 (talk) 08:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I concur, absolutely, unequivocally. Except for the omission of the Johnny Burnette quote, but I'm not gonna let that get in the way of this article's progress. Rikstar (talk) 09:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

It was very pleasing for me to read these recent few edits from everyone,which all sounded so positive,good stuff,hope it continues. 141,as part of your last edits you mentioned Elaine Dundy's chapter on "The Death of Gladys" in "Elvis and Gladys",would you mind showing this in more detail please.(I'm curious) I read her book many years ago,and I thought she was such a brilliant writer,which it had to find in alot of Elvis related books unfortunately.--Jaye9 (talk) 12:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

The said chapter of Elaine Dundy's book deals with Gladys's hepatitis and its pathology in more detail from medical and psychological points of view. On p.318, the author writes, "one vital clue she and her family kept secret: her alcoholic intake." Dundy also talks about Gladys’s "increasing nausea" later at Graceland and that "she had to be helped more and more in her cooking chores," that she forgot to take her medicines when she drank, etc. etc. In another chapter, the author says, "She was drinking a lot. At the end she was drinking all the time. Vodka. Where'd she get it from? Vernon — he give it to her. Just to keep her quiet." (p.294) In addition, here is Dundy's statement about Elvis's father: Vernon "didn't work very hard or very steadily. ... He had been known all his young life as a 'jellybean' – by definition weak, spineless, and work-shy." (p.10) Onefortyone (talk) 00:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

The only listed material that talks about Gladys drinking -specifically - when Elvis was young is the one published in 2006. That book also seems to be saying that the Presley's lost their house because of Gladys' drinking, and her missing work, citing details such as the alcohol could be smelled on her breath, she had blood shot eyes, etc. Who were her sources for these statements? Remember, she is writing about the 1940s. I think this reveals the author's predjudice "The author adds (p.23) that those who were like Gladys "owed their extra weight to drinking or avoiding field work. Alcohol was cheap; food might be hard to come by, but one could always find a drink." Was Gladys working or not? Elvis was ~ 3 years old at this time. Personally, I do not accept the penned in 2006 account about Gladys drinking, and it being a problem, at that time. If she lists who her sources were, I could change my opinion. "Those who were like Gladys", indeed. Is it verifiable at this point. Yeah, but I prefer "the highest standards", and hope you all start thinking that way.) Steve Pastor (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Could it be that you simply do not like sources telling the truth about Gladys's alcoholism? There can be no doubt that Gladys was working. In his book, Double Trouble: Bill Clinton and Elvis Presley in a Land of No Alternatives (2001), Greil Marcus cites another woman who "had worked at a local garment factory with Gladys Presley, who had married Vernon Presley in June 1933; now Gladys was expecting twins..." (p.100). Some further sources. When Gladys's friends and co-workers collected some money for her shortly after the birth of Elvis, Elaine Dundy says, they were warned: "Don't give it to her in money." " He'll only drink it up." (p.10) Bobbie Ann Mason, Elvis Presley (2002), writes about the young couple (p.9): "I think of Elvis's parents, Vernon and Gladys, as a pair of cutups — teasing, playing cards, drinking beer, dancing." Connie Kirchberg and Marc Hendrickx add in their book, Elvis Presley, Richard Nixon, and the American Dream (p.62): "Like Gladys, Grandma Presley was known to enjoy a drink or two..." Interestingly, the Presleys did not talk about their drinking habits. According to Larry Geller and Joel Spector, If I Can Dream: Elvis' Own Story (1989), p.46, "Some people ... suggested that Gladys drank then, but if Elvis knew, it was his secret. He occasionally remarked about 'the drinkers' in his extended family, and he detested drunks. Elvis did say that Gladys would have an occasional beer, but that was all." Onefortyone (talk) 00:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Elvis and drugs

This is totally unproven- that he died from drugs. Please, let's change this wild assertion. There is absolutely no proof. None whatsoever.

Matthew Laffert (talk) 10:08, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

The reliable sources say otherwise. And I wouldn't consider it a "wild assertion". His excessive drug use is/was no secret. The drugs he took are known, as well as a good idea of the quantities. It's not a stretch to put the pieces together and determine that chronic drug use contributed to his death. And that is a widespread belief. Lara❤Love 21:06, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

No man, you got it wrong. Check out the Ilchi Lee article, and you will understand that your wild assertions re: Elvis's drug use are bogus. We are establishing outstanding criteria there that prove your sources aren't worth a penny. You need real, valid, quantifiable sources. Those that stand the test of scrutiny.

Matthew Laffert (talk) 10:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

No man... I've just checked out the Ilchi Lee website. You seem to be arguing against the observations of medical doctors, medical examiners, etc. using beliefs based on Eastern mysticism. I don't see much in the way of compatibility between these. You mention "real, valid, quantifiable sources. Those that stand the test of scrutiny". That is exactly what we have in a plethora of documentation on Presley. It is extraordinary to claim all this is bogus: the onus is on you to provide meaningful, accessible and extraordinary evidence to support your somewhat sweeping and perplexing claims. Nothing on the websites you refer to contains this kind of evidence. It is extremely unlikely that your assertions will find credence amongst Presley article editors. Rikstar (talk) 12:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Elvis' Jewish Roots

Not sure why the page keeps getting reverted back to an anti-Semtic and untrue claim that Elvis' Jewish lineage is only valid in Nazi Germany. It's a well known fact that Elvis' maternal Grandmother was Jewish. In the Jewish religion a person's religious lineage is passed down via the mother. See http://www.elvispresleynews.com/JewishElvis.html or type into any search engine the terms "Elvis Presley" and "Jewish roots" and you'll see numerous articles and research stating with 100% surety that as far as Jewish law, theologians, The Wall Street Journal (in a 1998 article), and the Jewish faithful are concerned, Elvis is Jewish. However I think we can also agree that despite this he certainly wasn't a practicing Jew. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SUNY Boy (talk • contribs) 03:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Some months ago we had a lot of trouble trying to list Presley's ancestry in the main article. It was changed continually, with people arguing about which bits of his lineage should be listed. As a compromise, mention of whether he was of Jewish, German, Venusian, or any other ancestry were left out, but links were kept and interested readers could click on those. Now the opening paragragh has explicit mention of his ancestry again, and it's causing problems again. Why not just have the links, as it was previously? Please, let us all be aware of LaraLove's wikiproject (top of page) and make contributions accordingly. This article has been a nightmare to edit, and new editors need to be aware this. Rikstar (talk) 10:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Although I think we can all agree that until that time, the anti-Semitic reference to Nazis needs to be removed.SUNY Boy (talk) 16:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Presley was not a practicing Jew and did not consider himself Jewish. He was Protestant. It is not anti-semetic to of me to disagree with you and say no, he is not Jewish and that he should not be listed under the Jewish singers category. Also, it is ridiculous to include Jewish with German, Scottish, French, and Cherokee as it is a religion, not a nationality.
NewYork1956 (talk) 23:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

My, my a little testy aren't we? I wasn't referring to you as being anti-semitic. That would be silly. I was referring to the suggestion made by someone else that tracing one's Jewish roots through the mother's side of the family was something the Nazis did.SUNY Boy (talk) 22:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

"Cherokee" is not a nationality, either. And I'd think it's obvious that Elvis was not of German, Scottish, or French nationality either. He had ethnic French, German, and Scottish ancestry, as well as ethnic Jewish and Cherokee ancestry. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 06:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism?

Is this vandalism, or not? I'm not sure if it is or not, needs someone who knows more about the subject to cast an eye over it. Mjroots (talk) 22:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I have reverted all of it. It removed criticisms and other info that reflected Elvis in a negative light. It also changed to an informal tone; referring to him as Elvis in the article is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Lara❤Love 23:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

This article is going nowhere

It's all very sad, but I baulk at the possibility of engaging in any further attempts to improve this article unless we get more editors involved with an eye on producing a good, encyclopedic entry. The vandals have been rampant, necessitating the lock. I will only peruse these and my talk pages occasionally. As things stand, I'm outta here! Rikstar (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Consensus seems to be the way other articles on here get done. Raise an issue, get consensus, make changes, move on. If anyone disagrees with consensus their changes get zapped - easy! Wiki is no place for approval seekers--Egghead06 (talk) 08:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Living person?

Why is there a {{blp}} near the top of this page? Isn't Elvis Presley dead? —Helland (talk) 21:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Removed the header in question (WP:BOLD). —Helland (talk) 14:02, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

He is alive and well in space...on an alien vessel...being probed. Haven't you heard?--Veritas (talk) 15:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Fat Elvis Picture

Does anybody have a picture of Fat Elvis? All the pictures are of him still thin. Klosterdev (talk) 05:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

There are not many photographs of the fat Las Vegas Elvis, because Elvis Presley Enterprises is a "well-run marketing machine" that runs on tight regulation of Elvis's images and lawsuits, when necessary. EPE, for instance, "absolutely refuses to license a product picturing an overweight Elvis." Therefore, the Wikipedia article should include a photograph of fat Elvis. For such images, see, for instance, [59] or [60]. Onefortyone (talk) 20:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Elvis's Jewish Ancestry

I am not biased in saying this, but Elvis Jewish ancestry has never been properly substatiated, much of it is a result of massive speculation and therories. The wiki article dosnt even have a proper citation which substataiantes his jewish ancestry. I do not suggest that the aspect where is states he has jewish ancestry be removed, however I do suggest next to where it states he has jewish ancestry, there should me a phrase that reads "Topic of debate" in parenthisies "(---)" next to it.

why

Isnt there anytalk of People who Belive that Elvis Faked his death?Joe ferst (talk) 17:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)