Talk:Docklands Light Railway: Difference between revisions
Simply south (talk | contribs) done archival |
→Developments: new section |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
I think we need the bulk of this page archived. Could someone who knows how to do it please do so. Some of us would be very grateful--[[User:Pedantic of Purley|Pedantic of Purley]] ([[User talk:Pedantic of Purley|talk]]) 18:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC) |
I think we need the bulk of this page archived. Could someone who knows how to do it please do so. Some of us would be very grateful--[[User:Pedantic of Purley|Pedantic of Purley]] ([[User talk:Pedantic of Purley|talk]]) 18:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Done. [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] ([[User talk:Simply south|talk]]) 18:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC) |
:Done. [[User:Simply south|Simply south]] ([[User talk:Simply south|talk]]) 18:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Developments == |
|||
Maybe these should be split per earler discussions and they make up half the article. [[Special:Contributions/147.197.173.29|147.197.173.29]] ([[User talk:147.197.173.29|talk]]) 14:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:32, 21 April 2008
Docklands Light Railway has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Spoken Wikipedia | ||||
|
Poplar Station - rebuilt when Beckton Branch constructed?
I do not remember Poplar ever being rebuilt "to provide cross-platform interchange between the Stratford and Beckton lines", so I think a citation is needed here. 164.36.38.240 (talk) 12:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- The original station was just a two-platform thing; nothing major. It was completely rebuilt into a four-platform station when the new branch was mooted. The primary difference / reason being the direct link across the tunnel entrance being added instead of the sole route coming down from the high-level triangular junction. --AlisonW (talk) 15:57, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Logo
There're 2 logos:
-
PNG roundel with text and without transparency
-
SVG roundel without text
I think that SVG roundel without text is better, but what do you think? --<Flrntalk> 15:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Number of Platforms Planned at Tower Gateway
I am a little unhappy about the definitive statement concerning the platforms at Tower Gateway. I deliberately made this vague because I was aware of a later planning application for a change of design. However a planning application is not the same as planning consent and presumably the original application is still valid. The fact that this has not been confirmed elsewhere leaves me unconvinced that this will happen - though I think it more likely than not and it does seem eminently sensible.
Has anyone got any evidence that there will be two platforms ?--Pedantic of Purley (talk) 17:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Archival
I think we need the bulk of this page archived. Could someone who knows how to do it please do so. Some of us would be very grateful--Pedantic of Purley (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Developments
Maybe these should be split per earler discussions and they make up half the article. 147.197.173.29 (talk) 14:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class rail transport articles
- Mid-importance rail transport articles
- GA-Class Rapid transit articles
- Mid-importance Rapid transit articles
- WikiProject Rapid transit articles
- GA-Class UK Railways articles
- Mid-importance UK Railways articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages