User talk:Jc37/Top quotes: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:15, 28 July 2008

Memorable comments from discussions I've been in:

I flipped a three-sided coin, it came up "no consensus". --Kbdank71 20:32, 13 November 2006 (From User talk:Kbdank71)
While the essay WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may be useful for other XfD discussions, it isn't as useful for CfD, due to a commonality of consistancy due to prior consensus. The guideline WP:OCAT is an excellent example of this. And the same seems true for WP:ALLORNOTHING. - jc37 17:12, 9 April 2007
Due to a what of what due to what? Please rephrase for us simple folk. Picaroon 01:23, 12 April 2007 (From a WP:DRV discussion.)
But in my experience, every talk page of XfD closers seems to be filled with vehemence about disagreement of a closure. Nice to know that you've managed to (mostly) somehow avoid that. ("somehow" - you'll have to loan me your special medallion sometime : ) - jc37 00:11, 6 March 2008
It's a medallion of troll-protection +4. I looted it from a [contentious] AfD along with a masterwork ban-hammer +1, a mop of template sweeping, and 103 gold pieces. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:39, 7 March 2008

Pages worth reading:

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color: #C7BEFA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #8779DD;">{{Deletiondebates}}
+<div style="background-color: #C7BEFA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #8779DD;">{{Deletiondebates}}
 '''''Memorable comments from discussions I've been in:'''''<small><small>
 * I flipped a three-sided coin, it came up "no consensus".  --[[User:Kbdank71|Kbdank71]] 20:32, 13 November 2006 (From [[User_talk:Kbdank71/Archive4#Skeptics|User talk:Kbdank71]])