Jump to content

User talk:MBisanz: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 5 thread(s) (older than 10d) to User talk:MBisanz/Archive 3.
Macdaddy (talk | contribs)
→‎Unblock.: new section
Line 177: Line 177:


This is from a rangeblock from a couple of days ago. Details at [[User talk:87.113.73.89]].--[[User:Chaser|chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|t]] 23:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
This is from a rangeblock from a couple of days ago. Details at [[User talk:87.113.73.89]].--[[User:Chaser|chaser]] - [[User_talk:Chaser|t]] 23:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

== Unblock. ==

What the hell do you think you're doing applying a block to me?!

Kindly read my profile page, and sort your attitude out.

I am a long-serving wikipedian, and I know the rules back to front.

I do not engage in vandalism, and I absolutely object to you applying a block to my IP address - especially without even bothering to contact me.

This is a clear abuse of powers; and not in the spirit of Wikipedia (go to my page to learn more).

Unblock now; I don't want to have to make something of this.

Revision as of 17:47, 2 August 2008

Hi, This is just my talk page, feel free to leave any advice on my edits or ask for help on anything. If you feel I've abused my administrative or BAG powers, please see User:MBisanz/Recall for further instructions to request their removal.

Rfa thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA. The Rfa was successful with 64 Support and 1 Neutral. None of this would have happened without your support. I would also like to thank my nominator Wizardman and my sensei/co-nom bibliomaniac15--Lenticel (talk) 09:12, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YOU!

TUSC token fa25b957c9efa54ee67b217d20c2934e

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Nice job

here. Neat. Enigma message 04:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also nice job on the RfB nom. Number-counting here, but it's the third-most supported RfB in history. Not going to get near #2, but that's pretty good. Enigma message 17:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading

I need some help if you can. I wanted to upload an image of this videogame character (Devil (Tekken)) but i can't find the right sources, if you could, write me on my talk page and give me some tips. Thanks, Ultron5000 (talk) 16:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

So may I ask, if I could: you would still feel comfortable with a nomination, or have actions in the meantime caused you to question whether you would support me as a candidate? I will not feel at all hurt if you say the latter - I would prefer that than to drag you into an RFA that you don't wish to push. The Evil Spartan (talk) 06:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You rang?

I got a message letting me know that you wanted to speak to me, and that it should sound ominous, so I'm just dropping this note. How can I help? Gazimoff(mentor/review) 12:38, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SSP & RFCU > SSP2 going slow

Dear MBisanz...Since you agreed that the sock puppet process needed an overhaul, I was wondering if you would be somewhat active in making sure that it gets done. Currently, the merging of Suspected sock puppets and Requests for checkuser is going rather slow. I would like to get the templating done soon. To do that the merging needs to be completed first, or at least the proposed process finalized. I ask you to take part in getting this done. You can start by reading SSP2 and then the talk page. I have already written two of the templates, but the rest will take a finalized process to write. Hopefully, you have the time to take part in this. Have a nice day! - LA @ 05:46, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got off a plane a little while ago, will try to get to this in the next couple of days. MBisanz talk 05:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could you do me a little favor the next time you answer on your talk page instead of mine, please place a {{Talkback}} on my talk page to alert me to the fact that you answered. Thanks! :) - LA (T) 10:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for running the check to verify that I am not, in fact, Lar. (Lar gave me a heads-up that you had done so.) I'm not sure why anyone would even think that. As others have pointed out, Lar is much more clueful. ;-) Kelly hi! 14:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, it was fun to check up on a checkuser, finally I HAZ DA POWER! I was actually checkusered at the simple english wikipedia due to their belief I was grawp, lulz :) MBisanz talk 05:16, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
HAGGER? (I always wanted to say that!) I'm sure I just tripped an anti-vandal filter somewhere. :) Kelly hi! 12:37, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grrrr ...

MBisanz, I saw your name in the edit history at User:Redirect fixer, so I'm hoping you know how one communicates with that page. It's messing up WP:GO. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:53, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that info; I left him a message. Very strange how a Wiki page that's not a user can change something basic that messes up basic pages, but I'm supposed to figure out how to communicate with the person or file a bug report. The default should be checked off; most strange situation. Thanks again, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 29 14 July 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: Transparency 
WikiWorld: "Goregrind" Dispatches: Interview with botmaster Rick Block 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 30 21 July 2008 About the Signpost

WikiWorld: "Cartoon physics" News and notes: New Board Chair, compromised accounts 
Dispatches: History of the featured article process Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:51, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thankspam

Thanks for your support in my RFA, which passed with 140 supporting, 11 opposing, and 4 neutral. I will do my best to live up to the trust that you have given to me. If I can ever assist you with anything, just ask.

Cheers!

J.delanoygabsadds 20:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thank-you

Thank-you for your support of me at my recent RFA, which was successful. I have appreciated everyone's comments and encouragement there. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:43, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfB Thank You spam

Thank you for participating in my RfB! I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at my RfB, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please let me know. Again, Thanks! RlevseTalk 08:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hard block

FYI - That range doesn't hardblock me (not telling you this to take the piss but as far as I can see, all you've done is block the range for a large number of possible good faith editors). --87.114.36.65 (talk) 18:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Belated thanks

Thank you for mediating our discussion of the Peter Yarrow article. Who knows when resolution would have occurred had we not undertaken that process. So thank you very much, Aleta Sing 19:51, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rockfangbot

Nichalp asked me to set this flag. Why does it need the flag when the bot has a flag? The bot is the same and yet needs a flag for each task though the bot name is the same? I don't get this. Pls explain. RlevseTalk 12:31, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It only gets 1 flag (there is only 1), ST47 must not have noticed that. MBisanz talk 12:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for your recent anti-vandalism efforts :-)   «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l»  (talk) 14:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked?

Why have you blocked my IP address from editing? Mr A (talk) 22:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I blocked your IP from editing, how you posting here? MBisanz talk 22:43, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have to log in to post these messages because my login is not blocked, just my IP when I am not logged in. But I would still like to know why you blocked me.Mr A (talk) 20:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well before I can figure out what is going on, I'd need to know your IP address or the Block ID. MBisanz talk 20:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Range block collateral damage

This is from a rangeblock from a couple of days ago. Details at User talk:87.113.73.89.--chaser - t 23:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock.

What the hell do you think you're doing applying a block to me?!

Kindly read my profile page, and sort your attitude out.

I am a long-serving wikipedian, and I know the rules back to front.

I do not engage in vandalism, and I absolutely object to you applying a block to my IP address - especially without even bothering to contact me.

This is a clear abuse of powers; and not in the spirit of Wikipedia (go to my page to learn more).

Unblock now; I don't want to have to make something of this.