User talk:Aurora2698

Navigation Navigation

Main Enjoy the deluxe place of here About ME Stuff Little treasures of the briny deep Tools The free beach Edit counter Sister project accounts Commons talk page Hello!--RoryReloaded 09:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC) Archives: 1 Every 40 sections I archive, so don't be suprised if you see 40 sections in my archives. Please get used to the small text - I ain't changing this. Talkback! Hello, Aurora2698. You have new messages at Ioeth's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 21:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Re: Block this guy-so annoying Hey, sorry I didn't respond to your message sooner. I'm not an admin so I can't block anyone, so next time the IP vandalizes anything, warned 'em. After 4 warnings, report 'em. The IP seems to be from a school so childish vandalism is the norm. Pinkadelica (talk) 22:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Question Would you have any objections if I carried out a G7 speedy (author requests deletion or blanks page) on your War On Redirects page? If you want the information in it back at a later date, I would be happy to undelete it for you at that time if you wished as well. -Jéské (v^_^v Kacheek!) 23:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Smiggle ...is now unprotected. Next time you make a request such as that, do please try to be a little more polite? You've been here long enough you should know why we protect titles, and that it's not just to spite editors such as yourself. Hersfold (t/a/c) 00:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC) October 2008 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RoryReloaded is an I.Q guy (talk) 00:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC) Congratulations, you've made your point. Now I believe you said you had an article to write... Hersfold (t/a/c) 01:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC) Image tagging for Image:Protomegabaria.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Protomegabaria.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages: Wikipedia:Image use policy Wikipedia:Image copyright tags This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image (Image:Smiggle.jpeg) ⚠ Thanks for uploading Image:Smiggle.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hersfold (t/a/c) 18:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC) Talkback! Hello, Aurora2698. You have new messages at SoWhy's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Proposed deletion of Maria Antonia Koháry de Csábrág A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Maria Antonia Koháry de Csábrág, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rory (talk) 23:29, 5 October 2008 (UTC) I must confess, I was a little confused because it looks like you both created it and nominated it for deletion within a span of minutes! - Nunh-huh 00:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Yes... how confusing. Rory (talk) 00:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Project? :-D I am not a project. And I said most edits have to be rv'd. That doesn't mean all of them. Each one has to be scrutinised as to whether it follows policy or not. Some do, some don't. But always remember, when an edit is reverted it must be based on policy and that policy must be quoted as the reason so that the editor understands what was wrong with the edit in the first place. Stick to reverting clear cut vandalism if you have a struggle with some of the deeper or more vague policy problems. And ask me for help anytime if you need a translation of any policy page. The Real Libs-speak politely 10:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC) CSD of 1956 1000 km Buenos Aires Hi. I've removed the DB-Attack tag you places on 1956 1000 km Buenos Aires. As far as I can see, there is nothing on there that qualifies as an attack of any kind. If you did mean to mark it for deletion, I would recommend going through the PROD/AFD route. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. StephenBuxton (talk) 11:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC) Sockpuppeter Well, I do not believe your checkuser reports as far as I can throw your servers. And also, Wikipedia is also unable to provide 3rd party, non-trivial proof supporting the checkuser report, so therefore I believe I am not a sockpuppeter, and I am in fact not. Sorry to burst your bubble. And by the way, you spelled sockpuppeter wrong on my talk page. Just thought I'd let you know for when you have to post that notice on other talk pages. Thanks for your time. --Quixotic92 (talk) 23:47, 9 October 2008 (UTC)