Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NickBush24

NickBush24

Vote here (37/1/0) ending 03:54 October 19, 2005 (UTC)

NickBush24 (talk · contribs) – NickBush24 came to Wikipedia as one of the most prolific people from GameFAQ's. Since then, he has left GameFAQ's for Wikipedia. He has enough edits where I don't think Editcountitus will be a problem, and he got his welcome on July 1st. The first time I saw him was when he reverted vandalism to my user page circa July 10th. The troll then made the name NickBush24isgay and a few other names. He practices RC Patrol and I've seen him helping people out. His user page has suffered about 50 times due to his RC Patrolling and trollslaying. He deserves the tools I believe. Redwolf24 (talk) 03:54, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: OMG I ACCEPT LOLE >_> NickBush24 04:26, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Support

1. Definitely. Redwolf24 (talk)
2. I support him fully. -GregNorc (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
3. I definitely would support this decision. foxdude333 (talk)
4. I believe NickBush24 has the potential to become an excellent administrator! Thatdog 08:57, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
5. Extreme Hula Hoop Support! Acetic'^Acid 10:17, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
6. Heh. If your userpage gets vandalised 50 times, you're doing something right. David Gerard 11:25, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
7. Support--Exir Kamalabadi^Esperanza 11:42, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
8. Support: the response to the antics of User:NickBush24isgay seals it for me. Graham/pianoman87 talk 11:55, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
9. Support Seems good to me. Dlyons493 Talk 13:18, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
10. My support too. --MissingLinks 14:54, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
11. Support I beleieve NickBush24 would make a good admin. Alf ^melmac 15:11, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
12. Support. →Journalist >>talk<< 15:20, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
13. Support, a bold fighter of vandals. Christopher Parham (talk) 15:32, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
14. Merovingian (t) (c) 15:45, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
15. FireFox 16:40, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
16. Support A good RC patroler --JAranda | yeah 17:24, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
17. Support - most certainly....en passant! 17:28, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
18. Support CambridgeBayWeather 17:52, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
19. Support Yes, definitely. A great RC patroller. Banes 17:58, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
20. Support He isn't already? Private Butcher 19:01, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
21. Support. Good vandal hunter. Rje 20:39, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
22. Extreme RickK support! Nothing more appropriate than giving a hard-working floorscrubber a mop. -DDerby-(talk) 20:50, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
23. Definitely, seen him, liked him, protected his pages. - RoyBoy ⁸⁰⁰ 00:06, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
24. Without reservation. -- Essjay · Talk 00:31, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
25. Support. I've seen his edits and he also reverted vandalism on my own user page. -x42bn6 Talk 01:53, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
26. Strong Support was helpful at GF, still helpful now. freestylefrappe 02:12, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
27. Support this guy needs the tools! --Bjarki 02:24, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
28. Support. No wonder your name sounds familiar.. I've seen you all over the GameFAQs boards. :p Coffee 03:20, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
29. -- (drini's page|☎) 03:25, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
30. Support. El_C 03:26, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
31. Extreme Mop and Flamethrower Support! Vandals are dreading the day Nick gets those two tools. Titoxd^(?!?) 03:37, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
32. Support Go get the vandals! --Rogerd 05:43, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
33. We are power incarnate! — JIP | Talk 09:14, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
34. Support. the wub "?!" 11:44, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
35. Support. utcursch | talk 13:14, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
36. Support. --NormanEinstein 13:50, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
37. Support. Excellent contributor. Hall Monitor 21:17, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose I know this RfA will pass even with this oppose vote. I'm making it because of a diff that I find clearly unacceptable for an admin to make. I don't really care what the provocation is, how immature a user is or what the situation is, mocking a user is never an appropriate reaction for an admin to take. This is completely unacceptable. Nick, you'll pass this RfA as it is 36-1 currently. But, please promise you'll never engage in activity like that again. --Durin 21:33, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

• Wow he's such a good vandal fighter that Im reverting vandalism in this page from annons that don't want this to happen. --JAranda | yeah 19:20, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)

A. Basically blocking vandals, keeping an eye on the speedy deletion candidates, and other stuff. Those are the two things I intend to do at the start of my adminship, with more chores coming in the future.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A. I'd have to say starting the articles for each of the six divisions in Major League Baseball. There's others I'm happy about but can't think of at the moment.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A. Nope, not really. Right now... I'm not quite sure how to deal with it, but I should find a way sometime in the very near future. Currently I just listen to music to help take my mind off it >_>