Talk:Homo floresiensis: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:51, 12 June 2009

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Homo floresiensis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 30 days

Homo floresiensis is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 24, 2004.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 23, 2004	Featured article candidate	Promoted
October 23, 2006	Featured article review	Kept
March 22, 2009	Featured article review	Kept

Current status: Featured article

Indonesia FA‑class Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Primates FA‑class Low‑importance

	Primates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology FA‑class Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals FA‑class Mid‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:V0.5

In its current state...

...this article can't be featured. --62.216.120.76 (talk) 18:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? The article just went through a Featured Article Review three months ago, and the decision was to let it keep its little gold star WP:Featured_article_review/Homo_floresiensis/archive2. Do you have specific comments about why it is not Feature Article worthy? Edhubbard (talk) 23:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are some problems in the end of the "Discovery" part and there's a lack of images. --62.216.120.76 (talk) 15:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is very good job, though :) --62.216.120.76 (talk) 15:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, great. Specific comments, we can work with. Let's work on the problems at the end of the Discovery part. What, specifically, would you like to see added, removed, or clarified? Or, just be bold, and we can come to a consensus together. The lack of images is probably going to be harder to deal with, since of course, to appear here in wikipedia, the images have to be in the public domain, or we have to justify the use of non-free content. When we were doing the FAR, we checked places like Flickr for any available free images. There just aren't that many out there. Edhubbard (talk) 20:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I was in hurry when writing that but whatever. After all, it's your problem. You, sir, are just like anyone in the finnish Wikipedia and there they lack manners bad. I declare this conversation over. --62.216.120.76 (talk) 23:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 ::This is very good job, though :) --[[Special:Contributions/62.216.120.76|62.216.120.76]] ([[User talk:62.216.120.76|talk]]) 15:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 ::: Ok, great.  Specific comments, we can work with.  Let's work on the problems at the end of the Discovery part.  What, specifically, would you like to see added, removed, or clarified? Or, just [[WP:BOLD|be bold]], and we can come to a consensus together.  The lack of images is probably going to be harder to deal with, since of course, to appear here in wikipedia, the images have to be in the [[WP:Public domain|public domain]], or we have to justify the use of [[WP:NON-FREE|non-free]] content. When we were doing the FAR, we checked places like Flickr for any available free images.  There just aren't that many out there. [[User:Edhubbard|Edhubbard]] ([[User talk:Edhubbard|talk]]) 20:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
+::::Look, I was in hurry when writing that but whatever. After all, it's your problem. You, sir, are just like anyone in the finnish Wikipedia and there they lack manners bad. I declare this conversation over. --[[Special:Contributions/62.216.120.76|62.216.120.76]] ([[User talk:62.216.120.76|talk]]) 23:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)