Talk:When Flanders Failed: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
FV alternate (talk | contribs) implementing ArticleHistory |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{talkheader}} |
{{talkheader}} |
||
{{ArticleHistory |
|||
{{GA|05:41, 6 August 2009 (UTC)|page=1|topic=Arts|status=pass}} |
|||
| action1 = GAN |
|||
⚫ | |||
| action1date = 6 August 2009 |
|||
| action1link = Talk:When Flanders Failed/GA1 |
|||
| action1result = listed |
|||
| action1oldid = 305528263 |
|||
| currentstatus = GA |
|||
| topic = Arts |
|||
}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
==In Flanders Fields== |
==In Flanders Fields== |
Revision as of 16:52, 6 August 2009
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the When Flanders Failed article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
When Flanders Failed has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
The Simpsons GA‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
In Flanders Fields
What evidence is there that the title is based upon "In Flanders Fields"? The phrases aren't so similar. - House of Scandal (talk)!
- That's what they claim in the DVD commentary for the episode. -- Scorpion0422 18:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Added that. Thanks. - House of Scandal (talk) 18:56, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- And thanks for changing my in text citation to a more proper one. Best wishes. - House of Scandal (talk) 16:01, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
- Added that. Thanks. - House of Scandal (talk) 18:56, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:When Flanders Failed/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hello, I have reviewed this article for GAN and I find that this article already passes the GA criteria.
GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS
- a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
- a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Covers major areas b (focused): Remains focused
- a (major aspects): Covers major areas b (focused): Remains focused
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: Neutral
- Fair representation without bias: Neutral
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.: Stable
- No edit wars etc.: Stable
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass
Congrats and keep up the awesome work on Homerpedia. —Terrence and Phillip 05:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)