Talk:When Flanders Failed: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
implementing ArticleHistory
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}
{{talkheader}}
{{ArticleHistory
{{GA|05:41, 6 August 2009 (UTC)|page=1|topic=Arts|status=pass}}
| action1 = GAN
{{SimpsonWikiProject|class=B|importance=mid}}
| action1date = 6 August 2009
| action1link = Talk:When Flanders Failed/GA1
| action1result = listed
| action1oldid = 305528263

| currentstatus = GA
| topic = Arts
}}
{{SimpsonWikiProject|class=GA|importance=mid}}


==In Flanders Fields==
==In Flanders Fields==

Revision as of 16:52, 6 August 2009

Good articleWhen Flanders Failed has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 6, 2009Good article nomineeListed
WikiProject iconThe Simpsons GA‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject The Simpsons, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to The Simpsons on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Tasks you can do:

edit

In Flanders Fields

What evidence is there that the title is based upon "In Flanders Fields"? The phrases aren't so similar. - House of Scandal (talk)!

That's what they claim in the DVD commentary for the episode. -- Scorpion0422 18:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Added that. Thanks. - House of Scandal (talk) 18:56, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And thanks for changing my in text citation to a more proper one. Best wishes. - House of Scandal (talk) 16:01, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:When Flanders Failed/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hello, I have reviewed this article for GAN and I find that this article already passes the GA criteria.

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers major areas b (focused): Remains focused
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Neutral
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.: Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass

Congrats and keep up the awesome work on Homerpedia. —Terrence and Phillip 05:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking a look. Theleftorium 19:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]