Jump to content

Talk:When Flanders Failed

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWhen Flanders Failed has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starWhen Flanders Failed is part of the The Simpsons (season 3) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 6, 2009Good article nomineeListed
May 5, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

In Flanders Fields

[edit]

What evidence is there that the title is based upon "In Flanders Fields"? The phrases aren't so similar. - House of Scandal (talk)!

That's what they claim in the DVD commentary for the episode. -- Scorpion0422 18:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Added that. Thanks. - House of Scandal (talk) 18:56, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And thanks for changing my in text citation to a more proper one. Best wishes. - House of Scandal (talk) 16:01, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:When Flanders Failed/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hello, I have reviewed this article for GAN and I find that this article already passes the GA criteria.

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers major areas b (focused): Remains focused
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Neutral
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.: Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass

Congrats and keep up the awesome work on Homerpedia. —Terrence and Phillip 05:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking a look. Theleftorium 19:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on When Flanders Failed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]